Architectural view model for an integration platform

• Autorzy: Górski T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The most common architectural view model is "4+1" by Philipe Kruchten. This model presents the views required for a full description of computer system architecture. By contrast, this model seems to be insufficient to describe architecture of integration platform. Definitely lacks the view of integrated business processes. In the serviceoriented approach, one of the basic elements is a contract. It should also be included in the description of the architecture. Moreover, very important are integration mechanisms and mediation flows that should be presented in the description of architecture. Hence the need for integrated services view, and manner of their integration on the enterprise service bus. Use case view should also be extended by stereotypes required for presenting functionality exposed for other computer systems. It is therefore proposed architectural view model “1+5” for an integration platform. This model has following architectural views: Integrated processes, Use Cases, Logical, Integrated Services, Contracts, Deployment. Furthermore, in article was presented new UML profile "UML Profile for Integration Flows". In the profile were placed stereotypes corresponding to integration patterns and mediation mechanisms. It is important, that UML activity diagram was extended and its special form was obtained to model mediation flows on integration platform. Thus was proposed a new UML diagram: mediation flows diagram.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Information systems integration; architecture of information system; modeling

• Wydawca: Komisja Informatyki Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział w Gdańsku
• Czasopismo: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 6, nr 1
• Strony: 25--34
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 9 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Górski T.

• Military University of Technology, Faculty of Cybernetics, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] Arsanjani A. i in., SOMA: A method for developing service-oriented solutions, IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, VOL 47, NO 3, 2008, str. 377-396,
• [2] Casanave C., Service Oriented Architecture Using the OMG SoaML Standard, Model Driven Solution, 2009,
• [3] Fowler M., UML Distilled Third Edition, Addison-Wesley, 2005,
• [4] Górski T., Metoda modelowania architektury platformy integracyjnej „1+5”, Inżynieria Oprogramowania w Procesach Integracji Systemów Informatycznych, PWNT Gdańsk, 2011,
• [5] Górski T., Profil „UML Profile for Integration Platform” do modelowania architektury platformy integracyjnej, Inżynieria Oprogramowania w Procesach Integracji Systemów Informatycznych, PWNT Gdańsk, 2011,
• [6] Górski T., Badanie wydajności wybranych środowisk budowy platform integracyjnych, Biuletyn Wojskowej Akademii Technicznej, Vol. LXI, Nr 1, 2012,
• [7] Keen M., Achraya A., Implementing an SOA Using an Enterprise Service Bus, IBM, 2010,
• [8] Kroll P., Rational Unified Process Made Easy-A Practitioner's Guide to the RUP, Addison-Wesley, 2003,
• [9] Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0, W3C 2007 http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/