Dobór platformy e-learningowej za pomocą metody Promethee GDSS

• Autorzy: Ziemba P. , Piwowarski M.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

In the article four most popular e-learning platforms spread on OpenSource principles were characterised. These systems were subjected to the evaluation of the experts group using the Promethee GDSS method. Assumptions of this method were presented in contents of the article besides guidelines of Promethee procedures II and GAlA, which procedures are using GDSS method. In the end conducted examinations were get ranking of e-learning platforms. This ranking was formed by the group of experts. In the obtained solution appearing of conflicts be twe en experts was examined. Next it stayed modified with using sensitivity analyses.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Promethee GDSS; Promethee II; GAIA; grupowe wspomaganie decyzji; analiza wrażliwości; e-nauczanie

EN

Promethee GDSS; PROMETHEE II; GAIA; group decision support; sensitivity analysis; e-learning

• Wydawca: Komisja Informatyki Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział w Gdańsku
• Czasopismo: Metody Informatyki Stosowanej
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: nr 4 (24)
• Strony: 109--124
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Ziemba P.

autor

Piwowarski M.

• Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie, Wydział Informatyki

Bibliografia

• [I] Elektroniczna gospodarka w Polsce RAPORT 2009. Kraska M. (red.), Instytut Logistyki i Magazynowania, Poznań, 2010, s. 305.
• [2] Wolski W. Dobór platformy e-learningowej dla działalności kursowej. Studia i Materiały PSZW, Nr. 28, 2010, s.301-3lO.
• [3] Piwowarski M. Wspomaganie podejmowania decyzji w procesie doboru platformy e-learningowej. Studia i Materiały PSZW, Nr. 21, 2009, s.79-88.
• [4] Mejssner B. Nauczanie na platformie. CIO, 812007.
• [5] [online]. http://moodle.org [dostęp: grudzień 2010]
• [6] [online]. http://www.dokeos.com [dostęp: grudzień 2010]
• [7] [online). http://www.ilias.de [dostęp: grudzień 2010]
• [8] [online]. http://dotlrn.org [dostęp: grudzień 2010]
• [9] Peng Y. Wang G. Wang H. User preferences based software defect detection algorithms selection using MCDM. Information Sciences, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.in .2010.04.019
• [1O] Behzadian M. Kazemzadeh R.B. Albadvi A. Aghda iM. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature rel'iew on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, No. 200, 2010, s.198-215.
• [11] Brans J-P. Mareschal B. Promethee Methods. W: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Figueira J. Greco S. Ehrgott M. (red.), Springer, Boston 2005, s. 163-195.
• [12] Ghafghazi S. Sowlati T. Sokhansanj S. Melin S. A multicriteria approach to evaluate district heating system options. Applied Energy, No. 87, 2010, s.1134-1140.
• [13] Brans J.P. Macharis C. Kunsch P.L. Chevalier A. Schwaninger M. Combining multicriteria decision. aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic process. An iterative real-time procedure. European Joumal of Operational Research, No. 109, 1998, s.4 28-44 l.
• [14] Escobar-Toledo C.E. Lopez-Garcia B. The Use oj Multicriteria Decision Aid System in the Information Technology (lt) Allocation Problem. Operational Research: An International Journal, Vot. 5, No. 2,2005, .223-240.
• [15] Morais D.C. de Almeida A.T. Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, No. 52, 2007, s.441-459.
• [16] Leyva-Lopez J.e. Pernandez-Gonzalez E. A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, No. 148,2003, s.14-27.
• [17] Brans J.P. Mareschal B. How to Decide with PROMETHEE. [online]. http://www.visualdecision.com [dostęp: grudzień 2010]
• [18] Kodikara P.N. Multi-Objective Optima Operation of Urban Water Supply Systems. Victoria University, 2008.