Parametric studies and simulation of PSA process for oxygen production from air

• Autorzy: Beeyani A. , Singh K. , Vyas R. , Kumar S. , Kumar S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A numerical simulation and parametric studies for the separation of air using 5A zeolite for the production of oxygen are presented for a basic two bed pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process. The simulation is based on an in-house program 'PSASOL' developed in MATLABŽ. The transient process of PSA has been described by a set of partial differential equations, which were solved using a finite difference method. Simulation results have been validated with the experimental data from literature. Based on the simulation results, an optimal set of operational parameter values has been obtained for the PSA bed. The values of the optimal parameters, viz. adsorption pressure, cycle time, feed rate, and product rate have been found to be 2.5 atm, 150 s, 15 cm3/s, and 2.55 cm3/s, respectively. For the optimal conditions, purity of 95.45% and recovery of 77.3% have been achieved. It has also been found that a longer tubular unit with the length to diameter (L/D) ratio of 10.5 is advantageous. The estimated pressure drop across the bed has been found to be negligible. Power consumption and productivity have also been computed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pressure swing adsorption; mathematical model; simulation; oxygen production; MATLAB; Zeolite 5A

PL

amplituda ciśnienia adsorpcji; model matematyczny; symulacja; produkcji tlenu; MATLAB; Zeolit5A

• Wydawca: West Pomeranian University of Technology. Publishing House
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Chemical Technology
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 12, nr 2
• Strony: 18--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Beeyani A.

autor

Singh K.

autor

Vyas R.

autor

Kumar S.

autor

Kumar S.

• Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Jaipur-302 017, India,

Bibliografia

• 1. Shuai, X., Cheng, S. & Meisen, A. (1996). Simulation of pressure swing adsorption modules having laminated structure. Microporous Materials 5(6), 347 – 355. DOI: 10.1016/0927-6513(95)00070-4.
• 2. Santos, J. C., Cruz, P., Regala, T., Magalhaes, F. D. & Mendes, A. (2007). High-purity oxygen production by pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 46(2), 591 – 599. DOI: 10.1021/ie060400g.
• 3. Lee, S. J., Jung, J. H., Moon, J. H., Jee, J. G. & Lee, C. H. (2007). Parametric Study of the Three-Bed Pressure-Vacuum Swing Adsorption Process for High Purity O2 Generation from Ambient Air. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 46(11), 3720 – 3728. DOI: 10.1021/ie061087l.
• 4. Yang, R. T. (1999). Gas separation by adsorption processes. London: Imperial College Press.
• 5. Jee, J. G., Lee, S. J., Kim, M. B. & Lee, C. H. (2005). Three-bed PVSA process for high-purity O2 generation from ambient air. AIChE Journal 51(11), 2988-2999. DOI: 10.1002/aic.10548
• 6. Sircar, S. (2002). Pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 41(6), 1389 – 1392. DOI: 10.1021/ie0109758.
• 7. Ruthven, D. M. & Farooq, S. (1990). Air separation by pressure swing adsorption. Gas Separation & Purification 4, 141 – 148. DOI: 10.1016/0950-4214(90)80016-E.
• 8. Arvind, R., Farooq, S. & Ruthven, D. M. (2002). Analysis of a piston PSA process for air separation. Chemical Engineering Science 57(3), 419 – 433. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00374-8.
• 9. Jee, J. G., Lee, S. J. & Lee, C. H. (2004). Comparison of the adsorption dynamics of air on zeolite 5A and carbon molecular sieve beds. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 21(6), 1183 – 1192. DOI: 10.1007/BF02719492.
• 10. Todd, R. S. & Webley, P. A. (2006). Mass-transfer models for rapid pressure swing adsorption simulation. AIChE Journal 52(9), 3126 – 3145. DOI: 10.1002/aic.10948.
• 11. Ahari, J. S., Pakseresht, S., Mahdyarfar, M., Shokri, S., Zamani, Y., pour, A. N. & Naderi, F. (2006). Predictive Dynamic Model of Air Separation by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Chemical Engineering & Technology 29(1), 50 – 58. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200500226.
• 12. Farooq, S., Ruthven, D. M. & Boniface, H. A. (1989). Numerical simulation of a pressure swing adsorption oxygen unit. Chemical Engineering Science 44(12), 2809 – 2816. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85090-0.
• 13. Hassan, M. M., Ruthven, D. M. & Raghavan, N. S. (1986). Air separation by pressure swing adsorption on a carbon molecular sieve. Chemical Engineering Science 41(5), 1333 – 1343. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(86)87106-8.
• 14. Cruz, P., Magalhaes, F. D. & Mendes, A. (2005). On the optimization of cyclic adsorption separation processes. AIChE Journal 51(5), 1377 – 1395. DOI: 10.1002/aic.10400.
• 15. Nilchan, S. & Pantelides, C. C. (1998). On the optimisation of periodic adsorption processes. Adsorption 4(2), 113 – 147. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008823102106.
• 16. Biegler, L. T., Jiang, L. & Fox, V. G. (2005). Recent advances in simulation and optimal design of pressure swing adsorption systems. Separation & Purification Reviews 33(1), 1-39. DOI: 10.1081/SPM-120039562.
• 17. Huang, Q., Malekian, A. & Ei, M. (2008). Optimization of PSA process for producing enriched hydrogen from plasma reactor gas. Separation and Purification Technology 62(1), 22 – 31. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.12.017.
• 18. Nikolic, D., Kikkinides, E. S. & Georgiadis, M. C. (2009). Optimization of Multibed Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 48(11), 5388 – 5398. DOI: 10.1021/ie801357a.
• 19. Shampine, L.F. & Reichelt, M.W. (1997). The MATLAB ODE suite. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 18 (1), 1 – 22. DOI: 10.1.1.138.8933.
• 20. Shampine, L.F., Gladwell, I. & Thompson, S. (2003). Solving ODEs with MATLAB, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
• 21. Ruthven, D. M., Farooq, S. & Knaebel, K. S. (1994). Pressure swing adsorption. New York, USA: VCH publishers.
• 22. Tien, C. (1994). Adsorption calculations and modeling. Newton, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• 23. Gomes, V. G. & Yee, K. W. K. (2002). Pressure swing adsorption for carbon dioxide sequestration from exhaust gases. Separation and purification technology 28(2), 161 – 171. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5866(02)00064-3.
• 24. Agarwal, A., Biegler, L. T. & Zitney, S. E. (2009). Simulation and Optimization of Pressure Swing Adsorption Systems Using Reduced-Order Modeling. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 48(5), 2327 – 2343. DOI: 10.1021/ie071416p.
• 25. Jiang, L., Biegler, L. T. & Fox, V. G. (2005). Design and optimization of pressure swing adsorption systems with parallel implementation. Computers and Chemical Engineering 29(2), 393 – 399. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.08.014.
• 26. Jain, S., Moharir, A.S., Li, P. & Wozny, G. (2003). Heuristic design of pressure swing adsorption: a preliminary study. Separation and Purification Technology 33 (1), 25 – 43. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5866(02)00208-3.
• 27. Rota, R. & Wankat, P.C. (1990). Intensification of pressure swing adsorption processes. AIChE Journal 36 (9), 1299-1312. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690360903.
• 28. Takamura, Y., Narita, S., Aoki, J., Hironaka, S. & Uchida, S. (2001). Evaluation of dual-bed pressure swing adsorption for CO2 recovery from boiler exhaust gas. Separation and purification Technology 24 (3), 519 – 528. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00151-4.
• 29. Mendes, A.M.M., Costa, C.A.V. & Rodrigues, A.E. (2001). PSA simulation using particle complex models. Separation and Purification Technology 24 (1-2), 1 – 11. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00191-X.
• 30. Kearns, D.T. & Webley, P.A. (2006). Modelling and evaluation of dual reflux pressure swing adsorption cycles: Part II. Productivity and energy consumption. Chemical Engineering Science 61 (22), 7234 – 7239. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.043.