Environmental factors as determinants of multicriteria methods suitability for a decision situation

• Autorzy: Piotrowski Z. , Wątróbski J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Decision situations are related to various aspects of operations in an organisation. Hence the content of information included in a decision maker's expectations goes beyond defining criteria and setting a decision problematic. Finding a suitable approach is a task for an analyst who assists a decision maker in the decision process. The following paper sunthesises premises used in analysing decision situations, which result in a choice of a multicriteria method to perform calculations. The concluded guidelines can be used as a vocabulary of analytical knowledge, which allows to select a multicriteria method suitable for a given context of a decision situation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

decision support; MCDA; multicriteria analysis

PL

pomoc decyzyjna; analiza multikryterialna

• Wydawca: Komisja Informatyki Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział w Gdańsku
• Czasopismo: Metody Informatyki Stosowanej
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: nr 2 (Tom 15)
• Strony: 79--88
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Piotrowski Z.

autor

Wątróbski J.

• Szczecin University of Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology

Bibliografia

• [1] Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision, 31 (1991), pp. 49-73.
• [2] Escobar-Toledo C. E. The Use of Multicriteria Decision Aid System in the Information Technology (IT) Allocation Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 5/2(2005).
• [3] Araz C, Ozkarahan I. Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. International Journal of Production Economics, 106 (2007), pp. 585-606.
• [4] Brans J. P., Vincke P. A preference ranking organisation method. Management Science, 31 (1985), pp. 647-656.
• [5] Brans J. P.. Vincke P., Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24 (1986), pp. 228-238.
• [6] Wang J.-J., Yang D.-L. Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Computers &: Operations Research, 34 (2007), pp. 3691-3700.
• [7] Goumaa M., Lygerou V. An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 123 (2000), pp. 606-613.
• [8] Kangas A.. Kangas J., Pykaelaeinen J. Outranking Methods As Tools in Strategic Natural Resources Planning. Silva Fennica, 35 (2001), pp. 215-227.
• [9] Ozerol G., Karasakal E. A Parallel between Regret Theory and Outranking Methods for Multicriteria Decision Making Under Imprecise Information. Theory and Decision, 4 (2005).
• [10] Rao R., Davim J. A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35 (2008), pp. 751-700.
• [11] Li D.-F. Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multi-attribute group decision mating. Applied Soft Computing, 7 (2007), pp. 807-817.
• [12] Chu M.-T.,Shyu J., Tzeng G.-H., Khosla R., Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 33 (2007), pp. 1011-1024.
• [13] Wei C.-C., Chien C.-F., Wang M.-J.J. An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 96 (2005), pp. 47-62.
• [14] Cheng C.-H., Yang K.-L., Hwang C.-L. Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on Unguistic. variable weight. European Journal of Operational Research, 116 (1999), pp. 123-435.
• [15] Saaty T. L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1990). pp. 9-26.
• [16] Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes for the Measurement of Intangible Criteria and for Decision-Making. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. 2005.
• [17] Augusto M. R., Lisboa J. O., Yasin M., Figueira J. R. Benchmarking in a multiple criteria performance context: An application and a conceptual framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 184 (2008), pp. 244-254.
• [18] Hokkanen J., Salminen P. ELECTRE HI and IV Decision Aids in an Environmental Problem,. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6 (1997), pp. 215-226.