Metody badania wpływu infranstuktury transportu na rozwój społeczno-ekonomiczny

Łatuszyńska, M.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Metody badania wpływu infranstuktury transportu na rozwój społeczno-ekonomiczny

Autorzy

Łatuszyńska M.

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Research Methods of Influence of the Transport Infrastructure on the Socio-Economical Development of Region

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Building and modernization of transport infrastructure causes many consequences, which influence socio - economical development of region. Traditional studies of regional development are based on the assumption, that a close relationship exists among a transport accessibility and socio - economical growth. Nevertheless, as the literature shows, there is a lack af a coherent methodology for analysis of relations between land use system and transport system in an economical frame. The article presents the synthetic review of methods of investigation the socio - economical effects of transport infrastructure investment: from early theories of industrial centers location to currently applied spatial interaction models.

Słowa kluczowe

infrastruktura transportu metody badania rozwój społeczo-ekonomiczny regionu transport metoda kwestionariuszowa metoda statystyczna model potencjału ekonomicznego analiza przepływów międzygałęziowych model interakcji przestrzennej dynamika systemowa

socio-economical development of region transport infrastructure research methods

Wydawca

Ośrodek Badawczy Ekonomiki Transportu

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekonomiki Transportu

Rocznik

2007

Tom

nr 1

Strony

7--24

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 99 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Łatuszyńska M.

Bibliografia

1. Abraham J. E., A review of the MEPLAN modelling framework from a perspective of urban economics. University of Calgary Research Report No CE98-2,Calgary 1998. http//:www.ucalgary.ca/~jabraham/papers/meplan_and_urban_economics.pdf grudzien 2002.
2. Alonso W., Location and Land Use: Towards a general theory of land rent.Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1964.
3. Anas A., Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transportation Research Part B Nr 17/1983.
4. Anas A., Duann L.S., Dynamic forecasting of travel demand, residence location,and land development, policy simulations with the Chicago Area Transportation/Land Use Analysis System, [w:] Advances in Urban Systems Modelling.Hutchinson B. and Batty M. (Red.) North-Holland, Amsterdam 1986.
5. Babcock M.W., Emerson M.J., Prater M., A Model-Procedure for Estimating conomic Impacts of Alternative Types of Highway Improvement. Transportation Journal, Vol. 36, Nr 4/1997, ss. 30-44.
6. Barker T.S., Ekins P., Johnstone N., Global Warming and Energy Demand. Routledge. London 1995.
7. Beaumont J.R., Clarke M. and Wilson A.G., Changing energy parameters and the evolution of urban spatial structure. Regional Science and Urban Economics 11/1981.
8. Bell M.G.H., Does traffic restraint concentrate or disperse activities? Traffic Engineering and Control Nr 38(12)/1997, s. 666-669.
9. Boarnet M.G., Sarmiento S., Can Land-Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link Between Non-Work Travel and Land-Use Characterstics. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, Nr 7/1998, s. 1155-1169.
10. Bolan M., The Mobility Experience and Neighborhood Attachment. Demography, Vol. 34, Nr 2/1997, s. 225-237.
11. Boyce D.E., Southworth F., Quasi-dynamic urban location models with endogenously determined travel costs. Environment and Planning 11 A/1979, s.575-584.
12. Buffington J. L., Wildenthal M.T., Estimated Impact of Widening U.S. Highway 80 (Marshall Avenue) in Longview, Texas. Transportation Research Record 1450/1993, s. 59-64.
13. Cervero R., Ashauer D., Economic Impact Analysis of Transit Investments. Guidebook for Practitioners. National Academy Press, Washinghton 1998.
14. Cervero R., Rail Transit and Joint Development: Land Market Impacts in Washington, D.C. and Atlanta. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 60, Nr 1/1994, s. 83-94.
15. Chisholm M., Accessibility and regional development in Britain: some questions arising from data on freight flows. Environment and Planning A 17(5)/1985.
16. Christaller W., Ośrodki centralne w południowych Niemczech. Przegląd zagranicznej literatury geograficznej, 1963 z. 1.
17. Chwesiuk K., Metodyka rozwiqzywania problemów strategicznego planowania rozwoju przedsiębiorstwa kolejowego. Wyd. Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin 1991.
18. Clark C, Wilson F., Bradley J., Industrial Location and Economic Potential in Western Europe. Regional Studies Vol. 3. Pergamon Press, 1969.
19. Commission of the European Communities: ASTRA: Assessment of Transport Strategies. Deliverable Dl. 4th Research Framework-DG VII 1998.
20. Damm D., Lerman S., Lerner-Lam E., Young J., Response of Urban Real Estate Values in Anticipation of the Washington Metro, [w:] Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 14/1980, s. 312-322.
21. De Solminihac H.E., Harrison R., Analyzing Effects of Highway Rehabilitation on Business. Transportation Research Record 1395/1993, s. 137-143.
22. Dervis K., De Melo J., Robinson S., General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. A World Bank Research Paper. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1982.
23. Diamandis P. F., Kouretas G. P., Tzanetos P., Modelling the Choice of Mode and Estimation of the Value of Travel Time Savings for the Case of the Rion-Antirion Suspension Bridge in Greece. Annals of Regional Science. Vol. 31, Nr 4/1997, s. 473-489.
24. Domariski R., Kształtowanie otwartych regionów ekonomicznych. PWE, Warszawa 1972.
25. Dziembowski Z., Infrastruktura jako kategoria ekonomiczna. Ekonomista, nr 4-5/1985.
26. Echenique M.H., Jin Y., Burgos J.L., Gil A., An integrated land use/transport strategy for the development of the Central Region of Chile. Traffic Engineering and Control 35(9)/1994, s. 491-497.
27. Echenique M.H., Flowerdew A.D., Hunt J.D., Mayo T.R., Skidmore I.J., Simmonds D.C, The MEPLAN models of Bilbao, Leeds and Dortmund. Transportation Reviews 10/1990, s. 309-322.
28. Erlander S., Accessibility, entropy and the distribution and assignment of traffic. Transportation Research 11:149B153/1977.
29. Erlander S., Stewart N.F., The Gravity Model in Transportational Analysis. III-VSPIII, Utrecht 1990.
30. Fajferek A., Region ekonomiczny i metody analizy regionalnej. PWE, Warszawa 1966.
31. Feo A., Herrera R., Riquerez J., Echenique M.H., A disaggregated model for Caracas, [w:] Urban Development Models. Baxter R.S., Echenique M.H., Owers J. (Red.). Construction Press, Lancaster 1975.
32. Ferguson B., Goldberg M., Mark J., The Pre-Service Impacts of the Vancouver Advanced Light Rail Transit System on Single-Family Property Values, [w.-] Real Estate Market Analysis: Methods and Applications, Clapp J., Messers S.(red.), Praeger, New York 1988.
33. Fisk C.S., Boyce D.E., A modified composite cost measure for probabilistic choice modelling. Environment and Planning 16A/1984, s. 241-248.
34. Forkenbrock D., Foster N., Economic Benefits of a Corridor Highway Investment. Transportation Research Part A 24/ 1990, ss. 301-312.
35. Forkenbrock D.J., Benshoff S., Weisbrod G.E., Assesing the Social and Economic Effects of Transportation Projects. NCHRP Web Document 31, luty 20D1, http//:trb.org/trb/publications/nchrp/nchrp-w31 .pdf grudzieri 2002.
36. Forrester J.W., Industrial Dynamics. The MIT Press and Wiley, New York 1961.
37. Gamble and Pearson, Growth allocation using the Delphi process. Materiały konferencyjne IV Krajowej Konferencji nt. ,,Zastosowania metod planowania transportu", 1993.
38. Giannopoulos G.A., Freight Transport Demand: some Approaches to Model Building. International Journal of Transport Economics Vol.VIII nr 1/1981.
39. Giannopoulos G.A., Modelling of International Freight Transport for Greece. International Journal of Transport Economics Vol XI nr 1/1984.
40. Grefe R., McDonald A., The Economic and Financial Impacts of BART: Fina Report. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Waszyngton 1977.
41. Grzywacz W., Infrastruktura transportu. WKiŁ, Warszawa 1982.
42. Harmatuck D.J., The influence of transportation infrastructure on economic development. Logistics and Transportation Review; Vancouver 1996.
43. Harris B., Wilson A.G., Equilibrium values and dynamics of attractiveness terms in production-constrained spatial-interaction models. Environment and Planning 10A/1978, s. 371-388.
44. Harris C, The Market as a factor in the localisation of industry in the United States. Annals of Association of American Geographers 44/1954.
45. Helmer O., Korzystanie z ocen ekspertów. [w:] Analiza systemowa - podstawy metodologia. Findeisen W. (red.). PWN, Warszawa 1985.
46. Hunt J.D., Simmonds D.C., Theory and application of an integrated land-use an transport modeling framework. Environment and Planning 20B/1993, s. 221-244.
47. Keeble D., Offord J., Walker S., Peripheral Regions in an Community of Twelve Member States. Office for Official Publications of the EC, Luxembourg 1986.
48. Keeble D., Owens P.L., Thompson C, Regional Accesibility and economic in the European Community. Regional Studies 16/1982.
49. Keeble D., Owens P.L., Thompson C, The Urban-Rural Manufacturing Shift in the European Community. Urban Studies 20/1983.
50. Keeble D., Wever E. (red.), New firms and regional development in Europe Croom Helm, London 1986.
51. Kisielnicki J., Metody systemowe. PWE, Warszawa 1986.
52. Klasik A., Litowski G., Wybrane metody analizy powiqzań ekonomiczno-przestrzennych. Warszawa 1973.
53. Kroes E., Daly A., Gunn H., Van Der Hoorn T., The Opening of the Amsterdam Ring Road: A Case Study on Short-Term Effects of Removing a Bottleneck.Transportation, Vol. 23, Nr 1/1996.
54. Krugman P., Venables A.J., Globalisation and the inequality of nations: international trade. Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper Series No 1015, London 1993.
55. Lange O., Wstęp do ekonometrii. PWN, Warszawa 1961.
56. Sulmicki P., Przepływy międzygałęziowe. Polgos, Warszawa 1959.
57. Leontief W., Input-Output Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1986.
58. Lissowski W., Metody rachunku ekonomicznego w perspektywicznym planowaniu regionalnym. Gospodarka Planowa 11/1958.
59. Losch A.,Gospodarka przestrzenna. Teoria lokalizacji. PWE, Warszawa 1961.
60. Losch A., The Economics of Location. Yale University Press, New Haven 1954.
61. Lowry I.S.A., Model of Metropolis. RM-4035-RC. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California 1964.
62. Macgill S.M., Wilson A.G., Equivalences and similarities between some alternative urban and regional models. Sistemi Urbani L9B40/1979.
63. Mackett R.L., LILT and MEPLAN: A comparative analysis of land-use and transport policies for Leeds. Transportation Reviews 11/1991.
64. Mackie P.J., Nellthorp J., Kiel J., Schade W., Nokkala M., IASON Project Assessment Baseline. IASON (Integrated Appraisal of Spatial economic and Network effects of transport investments and policies) Deliverable 1. Funded by 5 th Framework RTD Programme. TNO Inro, Delft, Netherlands 2001. http://www.inro.tno.nl/iason/documents/project/iason/deliverables/iason d 1 .pdf 5.12.2002.
65. Mannheim M.L., Fundamentals of Transportation Systems Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts 1984.
66. Mayeres I., The Distributional Impacts of Policies for the Control of Transport Externalities An Applied General Equilibrium Model. Center for Economic Studies-K. U. Leuven 1998. http://netec.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/wopec/data/papers/femfemupal999.8.htm listopad 2002
67. Myrdal G., Teoria ekonomii a kraje gospodarczo nierozwinięte. Państwowe Wydawnictwa Gospodarcze, Warszawa 1958.
68. Ortuzar J., Garrido R.A., A Practical Assessment of Stated Preference Methods Transportation, Vol. 21, Nr 3/1994.
69. Paelinck J.H.P., Klaassen L.H., Ekonometria przestrzenna. PWN, Warszawa 1983.
70. Peida A., Transport Costs in Peripheral Areas. Raport dla Komisji Europejskiej Projekt badawczy nr 9. Industry Department for Scotland i Department of Economic Development. Northern Ireland ESU 1984.
71. Picap4 G., Nguyen S., Estimation of International Freight Flows using Input-Output Analysis. Freight Transport Planning and Logistics 317/1987.
72. Ratajczak M, Infrastruktura a międzynarodowa współpraca gospodarcza w Europie, Ksiażka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1990.
73. Ray D., Market potential and economic shadow. Projekt Badawczy nr 101, Department of Geography, University of Chicago 1965.
74. Rich D., Population potential, potential transportation cost and industrial location. Area 10/1978.
75. Rietveld F., Bruinsma F., Is Transport Infrastructure Effective?, Springer 1998.
76. Rohr C, Williams I., Modelling the regional impacts of the Channel Tunnel.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 21/1994, s. 555-567;
77. Romp W.E., Oosterhaven J., Indirect Economic Effects of a Rail Link Along The Afsluitdijk. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam 2002, http://netec.mcc.ac.uk/wopec/data/dgrvuarem3.html listopad 2002.
78. Rostow W.W., The take-off into sustained growth. Economic Journal 1956.
79. Ruske W., Quantitative and Qualitative Investigations on the Application of an Intermodal Approach in the Scandinavian/Southern Europe Transport Corridor. Technical University of Aachen, Aachen 1987.
80. Serra-Puche J., A General Equilibrium Model for the Mexican Economy, [w:] Applied General Equilibrium Analysis. Scarf H., Shoven J.B. (red.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984.
81. Silski Z., Podstawy planowania przestrzennego. Wyd. Naukowe US, Szczecin 1991.
82. Simmonds D.C., Regional impact of the Channel Tunnel and associated links.The David Simmonds Consultancy, Cambridge 1992.
83. Simmonds D. C, Review Of Land-Use/Transport Interaction Models. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London 1999. http://www.roads.dft.gov.uk/roadnetwork/sactra/support99/landuse/pdf/landusel.pdf grudzień 2002.
84. Skala-Poźniak A., Koncepcja zrównoważonego wzrostu w transporcie. Problemy Ekonomiki Transportu 2/2001.
85. Southworth F., A Technical Review of Urban Land Use-Transportation Models as Tools for Evaluating Vehicle Travel Reduction Strategies. Center for Transportation Analysis 1995, http://ntl.bts.gov/docs/ornl.html listopad 2002.
86. Stachak S., Wstęp do metodologii nauk ekonomicznych. Ksiażka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1997.
87. Steer Davies Gleave, Guidance on the Economic Impact. Appendix A., Grudzień 2001. http://www.roads.dft.gov.uk/road_network/heta/resresult/pdf/eirphasel.pdf 4.01.2003.
88. Still B., The importance of transport impacts on land use in strategic planning,Traffic Engineering and Control 37/1996.
89. Strathman J., Dueker K., Regional Economic Impacts of Local Transit Financing Alternatives: Input-Output Results for Portland. Transportation Research Record 1116/1987, s. 40-48.
90. Thompson E., Berger M., Black D., Chandra A., Gintings K., Economic Impact Assessment of a Southern Kentucky Corridor (1-66). Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Center for Business and Economic Research 1997.
91. Thompson G.L., Identifying Gainers and Losers from Transit Service Change A Method Applied to Sacramento. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 18, Nr 2 /1998, s. 125-136.
92. Vickerman R., Measuring changes in regional competitiveness: the effects of international infrastructure investments. Annals of Regional Science 23/1989.
93. Vickerman R.W., European Research in Regional Science: Infrastructure and Regional Development. Pion, London 1991.
94. Weber A., The Location Theory of Industry. Chicago University Press, Chicago 1929.
95. Wegener M., Operational urban models: state of art. APA Journal 17/1994.
96. Widgery R.N., Satisfaction with the Quality of Urban Life: A Predictive Model. American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 10, Nr 1/1982.
97. Wildenthal M.T., Buffington J.L., Estimated Construction Period Impact of Widening State Highway 21 in Caldwell, Texas. Transportation Research Record 1559/1996, s. 76-83.
98. Williams I.N., A model of London and the South East. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 21/1994, s. 535-553.
99. Wojewódzka-Krol K. (red.), Rozwój infrastruktury transportu. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk 1999.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPS3-0004-0067