Powiadomienia systemowe
- Sesja wygasła!
- Sesja wygasła!
- Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Application of electricity market models
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Wdrożenie reform liberalizujących rynek energii elektrycznej istotnie wpłynęło na zakres problemów jakie muszą rozwiązywać w swojej bieżącej działalności zarówno producenci, operatorzy sieci i dystrybutorzy energii jak i organy kontrolujące ich funkcjonowanie. Wynika to przede wszystkim z możliwości niezależnego podejmowania decyzji jak i znacznego ryzyka funkcjonowania na rynku w nowej strukturze organizacyjno-prawnej. Narzędziem szeroko stosowanym w świecie do analiz tego typu są modele rynków energii elektrycznej, umożliwiające ilościową ocenę skutków podejmowania decyzji. W artykule przedstawione zostały najważniejsze światowe trendy w zakresie zastosowania modeli rynków energii elektrycznej. Do najistotniejszych z nich zaliczyć można: (1) analizę siły rynkowej przedsiębiorstw, (2) kształtowanie zasad funkcjonowania rynku, (3) zarządzanie ograniczeniami przesyłowymi oraz (4) wsparcie podejmowania decyzji w procesie sprzedaży energii elektrycznej. Ponadto w artykule przedstawiono i przeanalizowano przykłady najważniejszych modeli służących do rozwiązania problemów określonego typu.
Implementation of reforms, liberalizing the electric energy market, substantially influenced the scope of problems that must be solved by producers, transmission system operators and distributors as well as by their supervisory bodies during their everyday's activities. First of all, it results from possibility of taking independent decisions, but also from a substantial risk connected with functioning in the market having a new legal organizational structure. A tool, broadly applied in the world for this type of alanyses, are computable electric energy market models enabling quantitive assessment of results issuing from the decision-making process. Presented are the world's key trends in the scope of such models application, from which the most essential are: (1) market power analysis, (2) market design, (3) congestion management and (4) strategic bidding. Futhermore, examples of the most important models serving to solve some particular problems are presented and analysed.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
346--352
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 37 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią PAN, Zakład Polityki Energetycznej i Ekologicznej, kaminski@meeri.pl
Bibliografia
- 1. Aggarwal S. K., Saini L. M., Kumar A.: Electricity price forecasting in deregulated markets: A review and evaluation, Electrical Power and Energy Systems 31 (2009) 13-22, Elsevier Science
- 2. Badri A., Jadid S., Rashidinejad M., Moghaddam M.P.: 2008. Optimal bidding strategies in oligopoly markets considering bilateral contracts and transmission constraints. Electric Power Systems Research, Volume 78, Issue 6, June 2008, Pages 1089-1098
- 3. Baldick R., Grant R., Kahn E.: 2004. Theory and Application of Linear Supply Function Equilibrium in Electricity Markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 25(2):143-167, March 2004
- 4. Barth R., Söder L., Weber Ch., Brand H., Swider D. J.: 2006. Methodology of the Scenario Tree Tool, WILMAR Deliverable 6.2 (d), Riso National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, January 2006
- 5. Bolle F.: 1992. Supply function equilibria and the danger of tacit collusion. Energy Economics 14 (2), 94-102
- 6. Borenstein S., Bushnell J.: 1999. An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California's electricity industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 47 (3), 285-323
- 7. Borenstein S., Bushnell J., Kahn E., Stoft S.: 1995. Market power in California electricity markets, Utilities Policy, Vol. 5, No. 3/4, pp. 219-236. Elsevier Science
- 8. Borenstein S., Bushnell J., Knittel C.: 1999. Market power in electricity markets, beyond concentration measures, The Energy Journal 20 (4) (1999) 65-88, Elsevier Science
- 9. Bower J., Bunn D. W., Wattendrup C.: 2001. A model-based analysis of strategic consolidation in the German electricity industry, Energy Policy 29 (2001) 987-1005
- 10. Bower J., Bunn D.: 2000. Model-based comparisons of pool and bilateral markets for electricity. Energy Journal 21 (3), 1-29
- 11. Day Ch. J., Hobbs B. F., Pang J.: 2002. Oligopolistic Competition in Power Networks: A Conjectured Supply Function Approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 17, No. 3
- 12. Gao F., Sheble G.B.: 2010. Electricity market equilibrium model with resource constraint and transmission congestion. Electric Power Systems Research, Volume 80, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 9-18
- 13. Green R.: 1996. Increasing competition in the British electricity spot market. Journal of Industrial Economics (44), 205-216
- 14. Green R., Newbery D.: 1992. Competition in the British electricity spot market. Journal of Political Economy 100 (5), 929-953
- 15. Hobbs B. F.: 2001, Linear complementarity models of Nash- Cournot competition in bilateral and POOLCO power markets, IEEE Transactions on Power System, 2001, 16(2): 194-202
- 16. Hobbs B. F., Drayton G., Fisher E. B., Lise W.: 2008. Improved Transmission Representations in Oligopolistic Market Models: Quadratic Losses, Phase Shifters, and DC Lines. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3
- 17. Hobbs B. F., Rijkers F. A. M.: 2004. Strategic Generation With Conjectured Transmission Price Responses in a Mixed Transmission Pricing System - Part I: Formulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 19, No. 2
- 18. Hobbs B. F., Rijkers F. A. M., Wals A. F.: 2004. Strategic Generation With Conjectured Transmission Price Responses in a Mixed Transmission Pricing System - Part II: Application. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 19, No. 2
- 19. Holmberg P.: 2008, Numerical calculation of an asymmetric supply function equilibrium with capacity constraints, doi:10.1016/ j.ejor.2008.10.029, European Journal of Operational Research (2008), Elsevier Science
- 20. Kamiński J.: 2009a. The impact of liberalisation of the electricity market on the hard coal mining sector in Poland, Energy Policy, Volume 37, Issue 3, 2009, Elsevier Science
- 21. Kamiński J.: 2009b. Metody szacowania siły rynkowej w sektorze energetycznym, Polityka Energetyczna, Tom 12, Zeszyt 2/2, IGSMiE PAN, Kraków
- 22. Kian A. R., Cruz Jr. J. B.: 2005. Bidding strategies in dynamic electricity markets Decision Support Systems, Volume 40, Issues 3-4, October 2005, Pages 543-551
- 23. Kiviluoma J., Meibom P.: 2006. Documentation of databases in the Wilmar Planning tool, Wilmar Deliverable D6.2 (f), Riso- R-1554(EN), Risoe National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, January 2006
- 24. Klemperer P.D., Meyer M.A.: 1989, Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty, Econometrica 57 (6), 1243-12 77
- 25. Lise W., Hobbs B. F., Hers S.: 2008. Market power in the European electricity market - The impact of dry weather and additional transmission capacity. Energy Policy 36 (2008) 1331 - 1343. Elsevier Science
- 26. Lise W., Kruseman G.: 2008. Long-term price and environmental effects in a liberalized electricity market, Energy Economics 30 (2008) 230 - 248, Elsevier Science
- 27. Lise W., Linderhof V., Kuik O., Kemfert C., Ostling R., Heinzow T.: 2006, A game theoretic model of the Norhwestern European electricity market - market power and the environmental. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 2123-2136, Elsevier Science
- 28. Meibom P., Larsen H. V., Barth R., Brand H., Weber Ch., Voll O.: 2006. Wilmar Joint Market Model Documentation, Wilmar Deliverable D6.2 (b), Riso-R-1552(EN), Risř National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, January 2006
- 29. Morris J. R., Oska D.: 2008. The Likely Effect of the Proposed Exelon-PSEG Merger on Wholesale Electricity Prices. The Electricity Journal, Volume 21, Issue 1, January-February 2008, Pages 45-54
- 30. Song Y., Ni Y., Wen F., Wu F. F.: 2004. Conjectural variation based learning model of strategic bidding in spot market, Electrical Power and Energy Systems 26 (2004) 797-804, Elsevier Science
- 31. Stoft S., 2002, Power System Economics, Designing Markets for Electricity, IEEE Press, Wiley-Interscience
- 32. Tamaschke R., Docwra G., Stillman R.: 2005. Measuring market power in electricity generation: A long-term perspective using a programming model, Energy Economics 27 (2005) 317- 335
- 33. Tanaka M.: 2009. Transmission-constrained oligopoly in the Japanese electricity market, Energy Economics 31(2009) 690- 701, Elsevier Science
- 34. Ventosa M., Baíllo A., Ramos A., Rivier M.: 2005, Electricity market modelling trends, Energy Policy 33 (2005) 897-913, Elsevier Science
- 35. Wen F., David A.K.: 2001. Optimal bidding strategies and modeling of imperfect information among competitive generators, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 16 (1) (2001 Feb.) 15- 21
- 36. Willems B.: 2002. Modeling Cournot Competition in an Electricity Market with Transmission Constraints. The Energy Journal, Vol. 23, Nr 3, IAEE 2002
- 37. Willems B., Rumiantseva I., Weigt H.: 2009. Cournot versus Supply Functions: What does the data tell us?, Energy Economics 31 (2009) 38-47, Elsevier Science
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPS1-0040-0069