Nowy system ochrony środowiska przed promieniowaniem jonizującym. Propozycje Grupy Zadaniowej ICRP

• Autorzy: Krajewski P.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Słowa kluczowe

PL

system ochrony radiologicznej; bezpieczeństwo środowiska

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Nukleoniczne
• Czasopismo: Postępy Techniki Jądrowej
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: Vol. 46, z. 1
• Strony: 17--26
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Krajewski P.

• Centralne Laboratorium Ochrony Radiologicznej , Warszawa

Bibliografia

• [1] Bird G. A. et al., (2002) Ecological risk assessment approach for the regulatory assessment of the effects of radionuclides released from nuclear facilities. Third International Symposium on Protection of the Environment from lonizing Radlation. Darwin, Australia, 21-26 July. In press.
• [2] CEAA (1992) Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. An Act to establish a Federal Environmental Assessment Process. Bill C-13. Statutes of Canada 1992, Chapter 37.
• [3] CEPA (1999) Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999-Chapter C-15.31 (1999; C. 33).
• [4] Ciarke R. (1999) Control of low-level radiation exposure: time for a change? J. Radiol. Prot., 19, 107-115.
• [5] Copplestone D., et al., (2001) Impact assessment of ionising radiation on wildlife. Environment Agency (UK) R&D Publ. 128, 222pp.
• [6] De Shalit, A. D. (2000) The Environment: From Theory to Practice, Oxford (UK), Oxford University Press.
• [7] EU FP6 calls (2002) Protection of the environment from radiation, RAD PROT-2003-3.3.3.1-1, STREP, <http: //fp6.cordis.Iu/fp6/call_details.cfm? CALL_ID=40#>
• [8] FASSET (2001) Framework for Assessment of Environmental Impact. Progress Report 1 December 2001 covering the period 1 November 2000 to 31 October 2001; EU Contract N°: FIGE-CT-2000-00102, <http://www.arrakis.es/~fas-set/ftp/progress__report1_short. zip>
• [9] FASSET (2002) Framework for Assessment of Environmentai Impact. Progress Report 2 December 2002 covering the periodl November 2001 to 31 October 2002, EU Contract N°: FIGE-CT-2000-00102, <http: //www.arrakis.es/~fas-set/ftp/progress_report2_short. zip>
• [10] Higley, K. A., et al., (2002a) Derivation of a Screening Methodology for Evaluating Radiation Dose to Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota. J. Environ. Radioactivity, In press.
• [11] Higley, K. A., et al., (2002b) Akinetic -allometric approach to predicting tissue concentrations for biota. J. Environ. Radioactivity, In press.
• [12] Higley, K. A., et. al., (2002c) Aprobabilistic approach to obtaining limiting estimates of radionuclide concentrations in biota. J. Environ. Radioactivity, In press.
• [13] IAEA (1992) Effects of lonizing Radiation on Plants and Animals at Levels Implied by Current Radiation Protection Standards. Technical Reports Series No. 332, IAEA Vienna
• [14] IAEA (2002a) Ethical Considerations in Protecting the Environment from the effects of lonizing Radiation, IAEA-TECDOC-1270, IAEA, Vienna.
• [15] IAEA (2002b) Specialists Meeting on Protection of the Environment from the Effects of lonizing Radiation: International Perspectives, IAEA-723-J9-SP-114.3, IAEA, Vienna.
• [16] ICRP (1975) Reference Man: Anatomical, Physiological and Metabolic Characteristics. ICRP Publication 23.
• [17] ICRP (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Anna/sof the ICRP 21 (1-3).
• [18] ICRP (1994) Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66, Annals of the ICRP24 (1 -3).
• [19] ICRP (1999) Protection of the Public in Situations of Prolonged Radiation Exposure. ICRP Publication 82, Anna/s of the ICRP'29 (3-4).
• [20] ICRP (2001a) Doses to Embryo and Fetus from Intakes of Radionuclides by the Mother. Annals of the ICRP 31 (1-3).
• [21] ICRP (2001b) A report on progress towards new recommendations: a communication from the International Commission on Radiological Protection J. Radiol. Prot. 21; 113-123
• [22] ICRP (2002b); Protection of Non-Human Species From lonising Radiation Proposal for a Framework for the Assessment and Management of the Impact of lonising Radiation in the Environment, Draft 2002-08-26, www.icrp.org/Nonhum-prot-drafr.pdf <http: //www.icrp.org/Nonhum-prot-drafr.pdf>
• [23] IUR (2000) Doses and effects in non-human systems. International Union of Radioecology. Report.
• [24] IUR (2001) Statement from the Consensus Conference on Protection of the Environment. Radiation Protection in the 21 st Century: Ethical, Philosophical and Environmental Issues. Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo.
• [25] Jurkowski M. (2001), Harmonizacja polskiego prawa w zakresie bezpieczeństwa jądrowego i ochrony radiologicznej j przepisami Unii Europejswej i wpędzenie odpowiednich rozwiązań instytucjonalnych, bezpieczeństwo Jądrowe i Ochrona Radiologiczna, Biuletyn Informacyjny Państwowej Agencji Atomistyki, Nr3 (47) /2001, Warszawa
• [26] Krajewski P. (2000), Koncepcja nowego systemu ochrony środowiska przed promieniowaniem jonizującym, Postępy Techniki Jądrowe], PTJ v. 43 Z. 4.2000, str. 21-27
• [27] NCRP 1991 National Council on Radiation and Measurements. Effects of ionising radiation on aquatic organisms. Report 109, 115pp.
• [28] NRC (1996) National Research Council. Understanding Risk in a Democracy, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
• [29] Pentreath R. J. (1999) A system for radiological protection of the environment: some initial thoughts and ideas. J. Radiol. Prot. 19, 117-128.
• [30] Pentreath R. J. (2002 a) Radiation protection of people and the environment: developing a common approach. J. Radiol. Prot. 22, 1-12.
• [31] Pentreath R. J. (2002 b) Evaluating the effects of ionising radiation upon the environment In: 3rd International Symposium on the Protection of the Environment from lonising Radiation (In press).
• [32] PETA (2002) Między nauką a skandalem, Mission Human, BU-AV, Biblioteka praw Zwierząt i Ludzi, <http://www.wolfpunk.most.org.pl>.
• [33] Sazykina T. G., Krysshev I. I. (1999) Estimation of the control concentration of radionuclides in sea water considering health physics and radioecological criteria. Atomnaya Energiya, v. 87, No. 4, P. 302-307 (in Russian).
• [34] Strand P. & Larsson C. -M. (2001) Delivering a framework for the protection of the environment from ionising radiation. In Radioactive Pollutants. Impact on the Environment (F. Brechignac and B. J. Howard, eds.). EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France.
• [35] Strand P., et al., (2000). Delivering a system and framework for the protection of the environment from ionising radiation 10th Int. Congress IRPA 14-19 May 2000, Hiroshima Japan, 2000; P-2a-116, 5 pp.
• [36] Thompson P. A., et al, (2002) Recommended RBE weighting factor for the ecological risk assessment of alphp-emitting radionuclides. Third International Symposium on Protection of the Environment from lonizing Radiation. Darwin, Australia. 21-26 July. In press.
• [37] United Nations (1992) Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.
• [38] UNSCEAR (1996) Sources and Effects of lonizing Radiation. United Nations Scientitic Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 1996 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annex, United Nations, New York.
• [39] USDOE (1993) U. S. Department of Energy. Radiation protection of the public and the environment. DOE Order 5400.5, Washington, D. C.
• [40] USDOE (1996) Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment. U. S. Department of Energy, Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 36, 6799-6801.
• [41] USDOE (1998) Establishment of biota dose assessment committee and invitation for membership. U. S. Departmet of Energy: memorandum from A. Wallo III, August 3, Washington, D. C.
• [42] USDOE (2002) Agraded approach for evaluating radiation doses to aquatic and terrestrial biota. U. S. Department of Energy. Technical Standard DOE-STD-1153-2002. Washington, DC. USA.