Morfologia strumieni w projektowaniu drogowych przejść przez rzeki

• Autorzy: Kosicki A. J.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Artykuł jest trzecim w serii dotyczącej metod projektowania drogowych przejść przez rzeki w USA, omówionych na podstawie doświadczeń stanu Maryland. Omawia elementy morfologii rzek mające wpływ na projektowanie drogowych przejść przez rzeki oraz metody analizy morfologicznej stosowane w projektach stanowej administracji drogowej Marylandu.

EN

The article is devoted to the system of water resources management in Austria. Reportedly, the Austrians asked what they are the most proud of in their country, respond that of beautiful landscapes and crystalline waters. The article focuses mainly on legislation and structure of water management on the country level.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

morfologia strumieni; drogowe przejścia rzeczne

EN

morphology of streams; transition by river road

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Gospodarka Wodna
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Nr 4
• Strony: 152--158
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kosicki A. J.

• Maryland State Highway Administration, Maryland Department of Transportation

Bibliografia

• 1. E. D. ANDREWS, 1994. Marginal bed load transport in a gravel bed stream, Sagehen Creek, California. Water Resource Research 30(7): 2241-2250.
• 2. S. BOGGS, Jr. 2001. Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, NJ, 726 pp.
• 3. K. BUNTE, and S.R. ABT. 2001. Sampling surface and subsurface particle-size distributions in wadable gravel- and cobble-bed streams for analyses in sediment transport, hydraulics, and streambed monitoring. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-74. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, CO, 428 pp. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_atr74.html. accessed May 2007.
• 4. E.M.V. COOK, 1990. A history of early water mills in Montgomery County, Maryland. Eleanor M.V. Cook, Silver Spring, MD, 147 pp.
• 5. J.E. COSTA, 1975. Effects of agriculture on erosion and sedimentation in the Piedmont Province of Maryland. Geologic Society of America Bulletin 86:1281-1286.
• 6. A.O. CRAVENS, 1925. Soil exhaustion as a factor in the agricultural history of Virginia.
• 7. C.C. HARRELSON, C.L. RAWLINS, and J.P. POTYONDY. 1994. Stream channel reference sites: an illustrated guide to field technique. General Technical Report RM-245, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, 61pp.
• 8. F. M. HENDERSON, 1966. Open channel flow. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
• 9. R.D. HEY, 1975. Design discharge for natural channels. In: Science, technology and environmental management, R.D. Hey and T.D. Davies (eds.), Saxon House, Farnborough, UK, pp. 73-88.
• 10. G.M. HOPKINS, 1975 [1879], Atlas of Montgomery County, Maryland, 1879. Montgomery County Historical Society, Rockville, MD.
• 11. R.B. JACOBSON, and D.J. COLEMAN. 1986. Stratigraphy and recent evolution of recent Maryland floodplains, American Journal of Science 286: 617-63.7.
• 12. PF. LAGASSE, L.W. ZEVENBERGEN, W.J. SPITZ, and C.R. THORNE. 2004. NCHRP 24-16: Methodology for Predicting Channel Migration Prepared for the National Cooperative Highway Reseach Program, Washington, DC, p. 214.
• 13. J.T LIMERINOS, 1970. Determination of the Manning coefficient from measured bed roughness in natural channels. Water-Supply Paper 1898-B, U.S. Geological http:// www.gishdro.umd.edu/sha_soft.htmSurvey. 47 pp.
• 14. MDSHA (Maryland State Highway Administration), Office of Bridge Development, Bridge Design Division. 2009. Manual for hydrologic and hydraulic design. MDSHA, Baltimore, MD. Available at http://www.gishydro.umd.edu/ sha_soft, htm
• 15. MDSHA (Maryland State Highway Administration), Office of Bridge Development, Bridge Design Division. 2004. Hydrologic analysis report for the intercounty connector over Paint Branch.
• 16. MGS (Maryland Geological Survey). 2007. Maryland Geological Survey. Available at http://www.mgs.md.gov/. accessed April 2007.
• 17. G. PARKER, and D. ANDRES. 1976. Detrimental effects of river channelization. In Rivers 76 Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.: 1248-66.
• 18. A.C. PAROLA, W.L. OBERHOLTZER, and D.A. ALTLAND. 2004. Preliminary geomorphologic study for the assessment of the potential ICC bridge crossings in the Paint Branch watershed.
• 19. A.C. PAROLA, W.S. VESELY, and C. HANSEN. 2006a. Final stream geomorphic report for intercounty connector proposed crossing BR-21 at the Brooke Manor Country Club Tributary of North Branch of Rock Creek. Riverine Systems, LLC, Louisville, KY.
• 20. A.C. PAROLA, W.S. VESELY, and C. HANSEN. 2006b. Final stream geomorphic report for intercounty connector proposed crossing BR-34 at the Gum Spring tributary of Paint Branch. Riverine Systems, LLC, Louisville, KY.
• 21. C.F. RAPP, and T.B. ABBE. 2003. A framework for delineating channel migration zones. Ecology Publication #03-06-027, Washington Department of Ecology and Washington Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA. Available at http://www.ecv.wa.gov/pubs/0306027.pdf. accessed April 2007, 139 pp.
• 22. D. ROSGEN, 2006. Watershed assessment of river stability and sediment supply. Wildland Hydrology, Ft. Collins, CO.
• 23. D.L. ROSGEN,. 1996. Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, CO.
• 24. S.A. SCHUMM, 1999. Causes and controls of channel incision. In: Incised River Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering and Management, S.E. Darby and A. Simon (eds.), John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, pp. 19-33.
• 25. J. SCOTT, 1807. A geographical description of the states of Maryland and Delaware also of the counties, towns, rivers, bays, and islands: with a list of the hundreds in each county. Kimber and Conrad, Philadelphia, PA, 191 pp.
• 26. USFWS (US Fish & Wildlife Service). 2007. Stream Restoration: Technical Assistance, Maryland Stream Survey. Available at http:// www.fws.gov/chesapeakebay/stream.htm. accessed May 2007.
• 27. J. ŻELAZO, Z. POPEK, 2002. Podstawy renaturyzacji rzek, Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa.