PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Multicriteria evaluation of animal welfare at farm level : an application of MCDA methodologies

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In this paper we present a contribution of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to the evaluation of Animal Welfare in European farms. We present the main features of the overall evaluation process designed to assess animal welfare on a farm from measures taken on the animals or their environment. We review the main steps of the construction of subcriteria and criteria. Then we discuss the aggregation problem and the design of a multicriteria sorting procedure to assess overall welfare from those criteria. This study is illustrated on cattle but is designed to be transposed to other animal species (e.g. pigs, poultry) so as to provide a general evaluation system for animal welfare on farms.
Rocznik
Strony
287--316
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 24 poz.
Twórcy
autor
autor
autor
  • INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Site de Theix, Saint-GenesChampanelle F-63122, France
Bibliografia
  • [1]Botreau R., Bracke M., Perny P., Butterworth A., Capdeville J., van Reenen D., Veissier I., Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare: Part 2 - Analysis of constraints, Animal, 1, 8, 2007, 1188-1197.
  • [2]Botreau R., Veissier I., Butterworth A., Bracke M., Keeling L., Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare, Animal Welfare, 16, 2007, 225-228.
  • [3]Bouyssou D., Marchant T., Perny P., Pirlot M., Tsoukis A., Vincke P., Evaluation and decision models: a critical perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
  • [4]Choquet G., Theory of capacities, Annales de ITnstitut Fourier, 5, 1953, 131-295.
  • [5]Dubois D., Fortemps P., Pirlot M., Prade H., Leximin Optimality and Fuzzy Set Theoretic Operations, European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 2001, 20-28.
  • [6]European Commission, Attitudes of EU citizens towards Animal Welfare – Special Eurobarometer 210/Wave 66.1 - TNS Opinion & Social, 2007.
  • [7]Farm Animal Welfare Council, FAWC updates the five freedoms, The Veterinary Record, 17, 1992, 357.
  • [8]Fraser D., Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the ‘inextricable connection’, Animal Welfare, 4, 1995, 103-117.
  • [9]Grabisch M., The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 1996, 445-456.
  • [10]Grabisch M., Duchne J., Lino F., Perny P., Subjective evaluation of discomfort in sitting position, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 1, 3, 2002, 287-312.
  • [11]Grabisch M., Kojadinovic I., Meyer M., A review of capacity identification methods for Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory, Applications of the Kappalab R package, European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 2, 2008, 766-785.
  • [12]Grabisch M., Murofushi T., Sugeno M., Kacprzyk J., Fuzzy Measures and Integrals. Theory and Applications, Physica Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
  • [13]Grabisch M., Roubens M., Application of the Choquet integral in multicriteria decision making, Physica Verlag, 2000, 348-374.
  • [14]Kojadinovic I., Marichal J., Meyer M., An axiomatic approach to the definition of the entropy of a discrete Choquet capacity, Information Sciences, 172, 1-2, 2005, 131-153.
  • [15]Main D., Webster F., Green L., Animal Welfare Assessment in Farm Assurance Schemes, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science, Supplementum 30, 2001, 108-113.
  • [16]Marichal J., An axiomatic approach of the discrete Choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interactive criteria, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8, 6, 2000, 800-807.
  • [17]Mason G., Mendl M., Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare?, Animal Welfare, 2, 1993, 301-319.
  • [18]Moscarola J., Roy B., Procdure automatique d'examen de dossiers fonde sur une segmentation trichotomique en prsence de critres multiples, RAIRO Recherche Oprationnelle, 11, 1977, 145-173.
  • [19]Mousseau V., Słowiński R., Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Model from Assignment Examples, Journal of Global Optimization, 12, 1998, 157-174.
  • [20]Perny P., Multicriteria Filtering Methods based on concordance and nondiscordance principle, Annals of Operations Research, 80, 1998, 137-165.
  • [21]Ramsay J., Monotone regression Splines in action, Statistical Science, 3, 4, 1988, 425-441.
  • [22]Roy B., The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, Theory and Decision, 31, 1991, 49-73.
  • [23]Roy B., Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
  • [24]Yager R., On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making, IEEE Trans. on SysMan and Cyb., 18, 1988, 183-190.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPP1-0092-0098
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.