Motives of underlying entrepreneurship: macroergonomic factors in technical design

• Autorzy: Jasiak A. E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article comprises four complementary strands. One serves as an introduction and signals some of the key issues relating to the human aspects of present-day technical design with a focus on production systems. Part two describes key macroergonomic concepts, scientifically defines the term "human factor criteria" and discusses the nature of sociotechnical system design and the methodological legacy in the field. Part three centres on incentives that motivate people to develop socio-technical systems as well as some complex economic, social, technical, legal and cultural factors that more or less directly trigger action. This section also describes studies on entrepreneurial behaviour. The article ends with a debate that attempts to summarize its central points. In addition to methodological dilemmas and controversies, the author outlines opportunities and benefits offered by today's macroergonomics in support of modern humanistic technical design and a higher standard of living.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

macroergonomics; technical desirgn; entrepreneurship

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej
• Czasopismo: Foundations of Control and Management Sciences
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: No. 11
• Strony: 75--90
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Jasiak A. E.

• Poznan University of Technology, Institute of Management Engineering

Bibliografia

• [1]Bańka A., (1984). Psychological determinants of methodology of system analysis and designing, (in Polish), in: Papers No 152, (pp. 1-152), Poznan University of Technology.
• [2]Chapanis A., (1991). To communicate the human factors message, you have to know what the message is and how to communicate it. Human Factors Society Bulletin. Santa Monica, USA, 34(11), (pp. 1-4).
• [3]Crozier M. and Friedberg E., (1982). Man but system. Limitations of collective operation (in Polish). PWN. Warsaw (pp. 1-459).
• [4]Hendrick, H. (1987). Macroergonomics: A concept whose time has come. Human Factors Society Bulletin. Santa Monica, USA, 30(2), (pp. 1-3).
• [5]Jahns, D.W. (1991). The education and certification of ergonomists:a practicioner's perspective. Human Factors Society Bulletin. Santa Monica, USA, 34(8), (pp. 4-6).
• [6]Jasiak, A. and Pacholski L., (1991). Question of assessment and values in ergonomics. (in Polish). 14(1), Polish Academy of Sciences, Ossolineum. Krakow (pp. 109-121).
• [7]Jasiak, A. (1993). Human factor criterion but production systems designing (in Polish), in: Papers, No 283, (pp. 1-145). Poznan University of Technology, Poznan.
• [8]Jasiak A., (2002). Latour market analysis In reference to graduates of universities management specializations as economic trend in years Analiza rynku pracy dla absolwentów kierunków 1998-2002 in Greater Poland, (in Polish), in: Scientific Papers of Poznan University of Technology, series: Organization and Management, No 35, Poznan University of Technology (pp. 59-72). Marshall, Ch. (1991). Ergonomics is dead: long live ergonomics, p.l, Human Factors Society Bulletin, 34 (3) (pp. 3-4).
• [9]Meister D., (1989). Conceptual aspect of human factors. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, USA, (pp. 1-263).
• [10]Montmollin M., and Bainbridge L., (1985). Ergonomics or Human Factors? Human Factors Society Bulletin, 28(6), (pp. 1-3).
• [11]Muckler F., (1987). Trends in ergonomics/human factors. Human Factors Society Bulletin, 30(2), (pp. 8-9).
• [12]Pacholski L., (1977). Methodology of ergonomie diagnosis In an industrial enterprise. (in Polish), in: Papers, No 81, (pp. 1-148), Poznan University of Technology, Poznan.
• [13]Pacholski L., (1979). Ergonomie assessment of technological processes – methodological aspects. Methodology of ergonomie assessment of machines and technological processes (in Polish), in: Research and study materials, No 46, (pp. 15-21),published by CIOP, Warsaw.
• [14]Pacholski L., (1980). Electonic processing of diagnosis data for further complex ergonomie assessment of work conditions in production enterprise (in Polish), in: Scientific Papers of Poznan University of Technology, series: Economics and Industry Organization, No 9, (pp. 95-100), Poznan University of Technology
• [15]Pacholski L., (1982), An ergonomie method of the complex production systems diagnosing (pp. 568-569), Ergonomics, 25(6), Taylor and Francis, London.
• [16]Pacholski L., (1985). An indication of priorities and sequence of activities concerning ergonomie aspects of modernization of manufacturing process. In the Proceedings of the 9th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, (pp. 271-273), Taylor and Francis, London.
• [17]Pacholski L., and Mateja B., (1988). Application of maintenance methodology for ergonomie advance of manufacturing systems. In the Proceedings of the Xth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Assciation (pp. 203-205), Ergonomie Society of Australia, Sydney.
• [18]Pacholski L., Jasiak A., (1992). Application of system methodologies to macroergonomic diagnosing. In: Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety IV, ed. by S. Kumar, (pp. 27-33), Taylor and Francis.
• [19]Pacholski L., and Wejman M., (1995). Soft modelling of the ergonomicity of the multiagent manufacturing systems. In: Contemporary Ergonomics, ed. by Robertson S.A., (pp. 160-163), Taylor and Francis, London.
• [20]Pacholski L., (1996). Methodological question in the present day ergonomics science. In: Ergonomics-Safety-Productivity-Quality, ed. by Ergonomie Society of Taiwan (pp. 684-687). Taipei.
• [21]Pacholski L. and Jasiak A., (1998). Macroergonomic effect of rapid economic reneval. In: Globar Ergonomics. Scott P. (pp. 855-859), Elsevier, Amsterdam-Cape Town.
• [22]Pacholski L., (2000). Macroergonomic paradox of enterpreneurship and economic reneval. In: Ergonomics for the New Millennium, HFES, (pp. 185-188), Santa Monica-San Diego.
• [23]Pacholski L., (2003). Macroergonomic circumstances of the manufacturing company development. In the Proceedings of the XVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, (pp. 556-559) Seoul.
• [24]Rogaliński K., (1977). Ergonomiczny system przemysłowy. (In Polish), in: Rozprawy, No 82, (pp. 1-162), Poznan University of Technology.
• [25]Schitag Ernst and Young (1998). Die Erfolgsfaktoren neugegriindeter Unternehmen (Entrepreneurial Growth Companies).
• [26]Smith, K.U., (1987). Origins of human factors science. Human Factors Society Bulletin,30(4), (pp. 1-3).