A multicriteria approach to support the design of comlex systems

• Autorzy: Norese M. F. , Montagna F. , Riva S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Numerous design problems exist when the product is so complex that it has to be decomposed and given to specialists from different disciplines. Multidisciplinary interaction is difficult and therefore specific methodologies are proposed for the design of systems and for the coordination of the involved organizational groups. The concept of interaction between disciplines is related to the original work context, the design coordination, but can be extended to all situations in which different sectors are involved, tin technical, administrative or management contexts. A collaboration between the Thales Alenia Space Italia enterprise and the university made it possible to define the problem of supporting the design of complex systems, in relation to the firm's design processes, and to test some innovative approaches. I One of these approaches integrates methods of Problem structuring and Multicriteria analysis. The results, in relation to a specific space-mission case study, are presented and analysed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

design coordination; collaborative optimisation; multi-criteria decision analysis

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej
• Czasopismo: Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: Vol. 33, No. 1
• Strony: 53--70
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Norese M. F.

autor

Montagna F.

autor

Riva S.

• Dipartimento di Sistemi di Produzione de Economia dell'Azienda, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, Italy

Bibliografia

• [1]Coates G., Duffy A.H.B., Whitfield I., Hills W., Engineering management: operational design coordination, Journal of Engineering Design, 15, 5, 2004, 433-446.
• [2]Brown J.S., Duguid P., Knowledge and Organization: a Social Practices Perspective, Organization Science, 12, 2, 2001, 198-213.
• [3]Carlile P.R., Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries, Organization Science, 15, 5, 2004, 555-568.
• [4]Venkataraman S. and Haftka R. T., Structural Optimization: What has Moore's Law Done for Us?, Structural andMultidisciplinary Optimization, 28, 6, 2004, 375-387.
• [5]Braun R.D., Moore, A.A. and Kroo, I.M., Use of the Collaborative Optimization Architecture for Launch Vehicle Design, Sixth AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, Washington, 1996, 1-13.
• [6]Choi S., Alonso J.J., Kim S., Kroo, I.M., Two-level multi-fidelity design optimization studies for supersonic jets, 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exibit, January 10-13, Reno (NV), 2005, 1-31.
• [7]Amata G.B., Fasano G., Arcaro L., Delia Croce F., Norese M.F., Palamara S., Tadei R., Fragnelli F., Multisciplinary Optimization in Mission Analysis and Design Process, Executive Summary, ESTEC, Nov. 2004.
• [8]Alenia Spazio, Multidisciplinary Optimisation (MDO) - Problem Architecture Definition, Technical note SD-TN-AI-0854, 2004.
• [9]Dias L., Tsoukiàs A., On Constructive and other approaches in Decision Aiding, in C.A. Hengeller Antunes, J. Figueira and J.N. Climaco (eds.), Proceedings of the 56th meeting of the EURO MCDA working group, CCDRC, Coimbra, 2004, 13 -28.
• [10]Belton V., Stewart T.J., Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach,Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002.
• [11]Roy B., Multicriteria methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996.
• [12]Hari A., Weiss M.P., Zonnenshain A., “ICDM - An Integrated Methodology for the Conceptual Design of New Systems”, Proceeding of System Engineering/Test and Evaluation Conference, SETE 2004, Adelaide, Australia, 2004.
• [13]Presley A., Sarkis J., Liles D.H., A Soft-Systems Methodology Approach for Product and Process Innovation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47, 3, 2000, 379-391.
• [14]Friend J., The strategic choice approach, in Rosenhead J., (ed.), Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, Wiley, Chichester, 1989, 121-157.
• [15]Friend J., Hickling A., Planning under pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005
• [16]Vincke P., 1992, Multicriteria decision-aid, Wiley, Chichester.
• [17]Norese M.F., Montagna F., Vinardi F.M., Multicriteria modelling and rational use of waste, in Meredith et al. (eds.), Decision support in an Uncertain and Complex World (Proceedings of the 2004 IFIP International Conference on Decision Support Systems), Prato, 2004, 598-607.
• [18]Roy B., Electre III: Un algorithme de classements fondé sur une représentation floue en présence de critères multiples. Cahier du CERO, 20, 1978, 3-24.
• [19]Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. In: Bana CA, eds. Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1990,115-184
• [20]Cavallo A., Norese M.F., Slope instability and erosion: hazard evaluation through the integration of GIS and Multicriteria Analysis, Informatica, 12, 1, 2001, 25-44.
• [21]Balestra G., Norese M.F., Knaflitz M., Model structuring to assess the progression of muscular dystrophy, in A.Colorni, M.Paruccini, B.Roy, (eds)., A-MCD-A Aide Multi Critère à la Décision /Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, European Commission Joint Research Centre, 2001, 31-46.
• [22]Norese M.F., Multicriteria modeling and result analysis, Newsletter of the European Working Group “Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding”, Series 3, 14, Fall 2006, 10-14.
• [23]Norese M.F., Montagna F., A Hybrid Approach to Model Design and Development Processes and Evaluate Innovation Opportunities, International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 13, 1/2, 2008 (to appear).