Bezpieczeństwo energetyki jądrowej

• Autorzy: Strupczewski A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Security of Nuclear Power

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Polska ponownie stanęła wobec perspektywy budowy energetyki jądrowej, tym razem z reaktorami najwyższej generacji. W ciągu ubiegłego pół wieku postawiono wiele pytań i zarzutów pod adresem energetyki jądrowej, na które trzeba odpowiedzieć, zanim się uzyska jego zgodę na budowę elektrowni jądrowych. Zajęto się zagadnieniami dotyczącymi: redukcji dawek wokół instalacji jądrowych, szkodliwości małych dawek promieniowania dla zdrowia ludzi, badań mieszkańców rejonów o podwyższonym tle promieniowania, osiągnięć w badaniach procesów biologicznych po napromieniowaniu ludzi, redukcji zagrożenia w razie awarii elektrowni jądrowej.

EN

Poland confronts again with the perspective of construction of the nuclear power station, with reactors of the newest generation. In half of previous century many questions were asked and many objections were presented against nuclear power; they must be answered before the construction of the nuclear power station is agreed. In the paper discussed are following problems: the dose reduction around the nuclear objects, harmfulness of small dose radiation for health of the people, exploration of the people in regions with higher radiation background, achievements in investigation of biological processes of the people after radiation, reduction of the menace in the case of the failure in the nuclear power station.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

energetyka jądrowa; reaktory najwyższej generacji; awaria elektrowni jądrowej

EN

nuclear power station; reactors of the newest generation; discussed are following problems:; achievements in investigation

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Energia [Stowarzyszenie Elektryków Polskich - COSiW]
• Czasopismo: Energetyka
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: nr 10
• Strony: 719--725
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Strupczewski A.

• Instytut Energii Atomowej, Świerk

Bibliografia

• [1] UNSCEAR Report 2000: Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation
• [2] European Utility Requirements for LWR Nuclear Power Plants, Revision C, 2001
• [3] STUK- Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority: Safety Assessment of the Olkiluoto 3 NPP Unit for the Issuance of Construction License, 21.1.2005 Annex 1 to Statement Issued by STUK concerning the construction of the Olkiluoto NPP Unit 3
• [4] ICRP Committee 1 Task Group Report: Low-dose Extrapolation of Radiation-Related Cancer Risk, Draft report of December 2004, 12/421/04
• [5] Mifune M., et al. Cancer mortality survey in a Spa area (Misasa, Japan) with a high radon background. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. (1992); 83: 1–5
• [6] Wei L.: „Health effects on populations exposed to low level radiation in China in: Radiation and Public Perception, Benefits and Risks”, in: Advances in Chemistry Series 243, American Chemical Society, Washington DC (1995).
• [7] Wei L., Sugahara T. High background radiation area in China. J. Rad. Research (Tokyo) 41, Suppl. 1–76, 2000)
• [8] Nair M.K., et al., Population study in the high natural background radiation area of Kerala, India. Radiat Res. 152, 145–148S, 1999
• [9] Frigerio N.A., Stowe R.S.: “Carcinogenic and genetic hazards from background radiation”, in: Proc. of a Symp. on Biological Effects of Low-Level Radiation Pertinent to Protection of Man and His Environment, (Chicago 3–7 Nov. 1975), IAEA, Vienna (1976)
• [10] Hickey R.J. et al. Low level ionizing radiation and human mortality: multi-regional epidemiological studies, Health Physics, Vol. 40, (May 1981) 625–641
• [11] Cohen B.L.: (1995) Test of the linear-no threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis for inhaled radon decay products. Health Phys. 68, 157–174
• [12] Cohen B.L.: (1997b) Problems in the radon vs. lung cancer test of the linear no-threshold theory and a procedure for resolving them,. Health Phys. 72
• [13] Cohen B.L.: ‘The cancer risk from low level radiation’, Radiation Research, vol. 149, 1998
• [14] Sandquist G.M. et al., Assessing Latent Health Effects from U.S. Background Radiation, Proc. of ANS Meeting, Nov. 1997
• [15] Greenland S., Robins J.: Ecologic studies – biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples, Am. J. of Epidemiology, Vol. 139, No 8. (1994) 747–760
• [16] Greenland S., Robins J.: Accepting the limits of ecologic studies, Am. J. of Epidemiology, Vol. 139, No 8. (April 15, 1994) 769–771
• [17] Stidley C.A., Samet J.M.: A review of ecologic studies of lung cancer and indoor radon, Health Physics, Vol. 65 No 3, (Sept. 1993) 234–251
• [18] Lubin J. H.: The potential for bias in Cohen’s ecological analysis of lung cancer and residential radon J . Radiol. Prot. 22 141–8, 2002
• [19] Cohen B.L.: (1994) Invited commentary: in defense of ecologic studies for testing a linear-no threshold theory. American Journal of Epidemiology 139, 765–71
• [20] Cohen B.L., Answer to Drs Greenland and Robins, Am. J. of Epidemiology, Vol. 139, No. 8, 761 (April 15, 1994)
• [21] Cohen B. L.: Response to ‘The potential for bias in Cohen’s ecological analysis of lung cancer and residential radon’ J. Radiol. Prot. 22 (2002) 305–307
• [22] Quanfu Sun, et al.: Excess Relative Risk of Solid Cancer Mortality after Prolonged Exposure to Naturally Occurring High–Background Radiation in Yangjiang, China, Radiation Res. (Tokyo) 41, (2000) Suppl 433–52
• [23] ACADÉMIE DES SCIENCES – Académie Nationale de Médecine: Dose–effect relationships and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation, March 30, 2005
• [24] Cardis E. et al., “Combined analysis of cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in Canada, UK and the USA”, IARC Techn. Report No. 25, Lyon, (1995)
• [25] Calabrese E.: Hormetic Dose–Response Relationship in Immunology: Occurence, Qantitative Features of the Dose and Response, Mechanistic Foundations, and Clinical Implications. In: Special edition of Critical Reviews in Toxicology 35, 2–3, February–March 2005, 89–293
• [26] Hosoda Y. et al., First analysis of mortality of nuclear industry workers in Japan, 1986–1992, J. of Health Physics, Vol. 32 No. 2, (1997) 173–184
• [27] Matanoski G.M.: “Health effects of low–level radiation in shipyard workers– finalreport”,DOEDE–AC02–79 EV 10095, US Dept. of Energy, (1991)
• [28] NRPB, NATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION BOARD, “Cancer in the offspring of radiation workers: a record linkage study”, NRPB–R298, Nov. 1997
• [29] COMARE, Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment, “Fourth Report, The incidence of cancer and leukaemia in young people in the vicinity of Sellafieldsite”(1994)
• [30] COMARE, Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment, “Tenth Report, The incidence of child-hood cancer around nuclear installations in Great Britain (2005) www.comareorg.uk
• [31] Pollycove M., Feinendegen L.E. Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: possible effects of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage. Human Exp Toxicol 2003, 22, 290–306
• [32] Feinendegen L.E.: Low Doses of ionising Radiation: Relationship between Biological Benefit and Damage Induction. World J Nucl Med 2005, 4, 21–34
• [33] Clarke R.: Control of low–level radiation exposure: time for a change? J. Radiol. Prot. 1999 Vol. 19 No. 2, 107–115
• [34] UNDP, UNICEF, UN–OCHA, WHO: The Human Consequences of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident, A Strategy for Recovery, 25 January 2002
• [35] Jaworowski Z.: (1998) All Chernobyl’s Victims: A Realistic Assessment of Chernobyl’s Health Effects, 21st Century Science & Technology, 11.1:14–25
• [36] Jaworowski Z.: (2004) Lessons of Chernobyl: Nuclear power is Safe, Science and Technology, EIR, May 7, 2004
• [37] Cardis E. et al.: Risk of Thyroid Cancer After Exposure to I–131 in Childhood, J. of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 97, No. 10, May 18, 2005 pp. 724–732
• [38] Boice J.D.: Radiation–induced Thyroid Cancer – What’s New? J. of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 97, No. 10, May 18, 2005 p. 703
• [39] Study of Chernobyl+Affected Areas Supports Benefits of Extra lodine. Nucleonics Week June 16, 2005
• [40] Hirschberg S., Strupczewski A.: How Acceptable? – Comparison of Accident Risks in Different Energy Systems, IAEA Bull. 41/1/1999, s. 25–30, 1999
• [41] Hirschberg S., et al.: “Severe Accidents in the Energy Sector”. PSI Report Nr. 98–16, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland, (November 1998)
• [42] Jablon S., et al.: “Cancer in populations living near nuclear facilities”, National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 90–874, US Dept. of Health and Human Services, (July 1990)
• [43] GROUPE RADIOECOLOGIE NORD CONTENTIN “Estimation des niveaux d’exposition aux rayonnements ionisants et des risques de leucemies associes de populations du Nord–Contentin, Synthese”, (July 1999)
• [44] Shihab–Eldin A., et al., Is there a large risk of Radiation? A critical review of pessimistic claims, Environment Intern. Vol. 18, (1992) 117–151
• [45] Polskie Towarzystwo Fizyki Medycznej. Oświadczenie Zarządu Głównego PTFM z 24 kwietnia 1990
• [46] Wyższa Szkoła Ekologii i Zarządzania w Warszawie, Wydział Ekologii, Kierunek Ochrona Środowiska (2004) Postawy ekologów i ekologii jako nauki wobec energetyki jądrowej, http://www.nuclear.pl