Determination of the Ecological-Economic Degree of Development in Countries of SE Europe – Weight Coefficients Technique

• Autorzy: Golušin M. , Ivanović O. M. , Jovanović L. , Domazet S.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Oszacowanie ekologiczno-ekonomicznego poziomu rozwoju w krajach południowo-wschodniej Europy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The practice has indicated that there is a particularly sensitive relationship that exists between ecological and economic subsystem of sustainable development. Therefore this research suggests to compare the states of these two subsystems as a new conceptual frame which is essential for strategic conceptualization of development of countries, by the use of weight (importance) coefficients method. The research pointed out at a rather visible gap between the achieved degree of economic and ecological development in the countries of South Eastern Europe in respect to Germany and France – which were taken into consideration as two of the most developed countries in the European Union and in the entire world. The usage of statistic method of weight (importance) coefficients requires assigning a certain degree (of individual value) to each and every indicator. In order to have a better overview and to get more precise results the weight coefficients in range from 0 to 100 were used. The results obtained by using the scale with lower values showed less qualitative final outcome. Used statistical technique for indicated research has shown excellent results and requires additional improvements

PL

Praktyka wskazuje na istnienie szczególnego powiązania pomiędzy ekologicznym i ekonomicznym subsytemem rozwoju zrównoważonego. Dlatego w prezentowanych badaniach dokonaliśmy porównania stanów tych dwóch subsystemów używając metody współczynników ważności – to nowa perspektywa niezbędna dla strategicznej konceptualizacji rozwoju poszczególnych krajów. Badania wskazały na istnienie poważnych rozbieżności pomiędzy osiągniętym poziomem ekonomicznego i ekologicznego rozwoju krajów Europy Południowo-Wschodniej a najbardziej rozwiniętymi krajami, tak w Unii Europejskiej, jak i z perspektywy ogólnoświatowej, którymi są Niemcy i Francja. Użycie metod statystycznych wymaga przypisania określonego stopnia (wartości indywidualnej) dla każdego wskaźnika. Aby uzyskać bardziej trafne wyniki użyto współczynników ważności z zakresu 1 – 100.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ecological indicators; economic indicators; weight coefficients; SE Europe

PL

wskaźniki ekologiczne; wskaźniki ekonomiczne; współczynniki ważności; Europa Południowo-Wschodnia

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 7, nr 1
• Strony: 87--93
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22, rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Golušin M.

autor

Ivanović O. M.

autor

Jovanović L.

autor

Domazet S.

• Educons University, Vojvode Putnika bb, Sremska Kamenica, 21208, Serbia,

Bibliografia

• 1. BORYS T., 2011,Sustainable Development – How to Recognize Integrated Order, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 2, p. 75-81.
• 2. European Environment Agency, The European Environment, State and Outlook 2005, Prepared for ’Environment for Europe’ Conference, Belgrade 2007.
• 3. UNDP, Evnironmental Policy in South-Eastern Europe, Prepared for ’Environment for Europe’ Conference, Belgrade 2007.
• 4. DODIĆ S., POPOV, S., DODIC J., RANKOVIC J., ZAVARGO Z., GOLUSIN M., 2010, An overview of biomass energy utilization in Vojvodina, in: Renewable and Sus-tainable Energy Review, vol. 14, issue 1, p. 550-553.
• 5. Dodić S, Popov S, Dodić J, Ranković J, Zavargo Z., 2009, Potential Contribution of Bioethanol Fuel to the Transport Sector of Vojvodina, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.01.005.
• 6. GOLUSIN M., MUNITLAK-IVANOVIC O., 2009, Definition, characteristics and state of indicators of sustainable development in countries of SE Europe, in: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 130, issue 1-2, p. 67-74.
• 7. GOLUSIN M., MUNITLAK-IVANOVIC O., BAGARIC I., VRANJES S., 2010, Exploitation of geothermal energy as a priority of sustainable energetic development in Serbia, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, vol. 14, issue 2, p. 868-871.
• 8. GOLUSIN M., TESIC Z., OSTOJIC A., 2010, The Analysis of the Renewable Energy Production Sector in Serbia, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, vol. 14, issue 5, p. 1477-1483.
• 9. GOLUSIN M., MUNITLAK-IVANOVIC O., TEODOROVIC N., 2010, The review of achieved degree of sustainable development in South Eastern Europe – The use of linear regression method, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, vol. 15, issue 1, p. 776-772.
• 10. GOLUSIN M., MIHIC S., MIHIC M., 2010, Policy and Promotion of Sustainable Inland Waterway Transport in Europe – Danube River, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, vol. 15, issue 4, p. 1801-1809.
• 11. KRISTINDOTTIR M. S., The Issis agreement – How sustainability can improve organizational performance and transform the world, in: Ecological Economics, in printing.
• 12. KRONENBERG J., IIDA N., 2011, Simple Living and Sustainable Consumption, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 2, p. 67-74.
• 13. MALER K., NORBRERG J., CREPIN A., Coupled economic-ecological systems with slow and fast dynamics – modelling analysis method, Ecological Economics, in printing.
• 14. MARUOTTI A., MARTINEZ-ZARZOSO I., 2010, The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 70, issue 7, p. 1344-1353.
• 15. MICHAŁOWSKI A., 2011, Spatial Environmental Services in the Approach of the Assumptions of Economics for SD, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 2, p. 117-126.
• 16. MUNITLAK-IVANOVIĆ O., GOLUSIN M., DODIĆ S., DODIĆ J., 2009, Perspectives of sustainable development in countries of South-eastern Europe, in: Renewable and sustainable energy review, vol. 13, issue 8, p. 2179-2200.
• 17. MUNITLAK-IVANOVIĆ O., GOLUSIN, M., Kyoto protocol implementation in Serbia as precognition of sustainable energetic and economic development, in: Energy Policy, in printing.
• 18. PASCHALIS-JAKUBOWICZ P., 2011, Theoretical Basis and Implementation of the Idea of Sustainable Development in Forestry, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 2, p. 101-106.
• 19. RANKOVIĆ J., DODIĆ J., DODIĆ S,, POPOV S., 2009, Bioethanol production from intermediate products of sugar beet processing with different types of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in: Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 15:1, p. 13-16.
• 20. SPETH J. G., American passage: Towards a new economy and new politics, in printing.
• 21. UDO V., PAWŁOWSKI A., 2011, Human Progress Towards Equitable Sustainable Development – part II: Empirical Exploration, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 2, p. 33-62.
• 22. ZACHER L.W., 2011, Dimensions of Ecological Discourse, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 2,p. 83-92.