Proste życie i zrównoważona konsumpcja

Kronenberg, J.; Iida, N.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Proste życie i zrównoważona konsumpcja

Autorzy

Kronenberg J. , Iida N.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Simple Living and Sustainable Consumption

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

After a brief reference to the philosophical background of simple living and its basic ideas, we explore how simple living can aid sustainable consumption. We look at general linkages between the two concepts and sug-gest how simple living can be used to support sustainable development (what elements to promote, what policy instruments to use, what barriers may be encountered). We conclude that philosophical reflection is the most important element of simple living that might enrich the current debate on sustainable consumption and suggest how to further strengthen the popularity of simple living movement.

Artykuł rozpoczyna omówienie filozoficznych uwarunkowań idei „prostego życia., które następnie umieszczono w kontekście zrównoważonej konsumpcji. Zwrócono uwagę na ogólne powiązania pomiędzy prostym życiem, zrównoważoną konsumpcją, a rozwojem zrównoważonym. Wskazano, jak proste życie może wspomóc wpro-wadzanie rozwoju zrównoważonego (jakie jego elementy należy promować, jakich instrumentów politycznych użyć i na jakie bariery można napotkać). Artykuł zamyka sugestia, że refleksja filozoficzna jest najważniejszym elementem prostego życia, który może wzbogacić prowadzoną obecnie debatę prowadzoną wokół zrównoważo-nej konsumpcji, a sama idea prostego życia warta jest popularyzacji.

Słowa kluczowe

simple living sustainable consumption voluntary simplicity rebound effect happiness

proste życie zrównoważona konsumpcja dobrowolna prostota efekt odbicia szczęśliwość

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2011

Tom

Vol. 6, nr 2

Strony

67--74

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 43 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kronenberg J.

autor

Iida N.

Department of International Economics, University of Lodz, POW 3/5, 90-255 Lodz, Poland, kronenbe@uni.lodz.pl

Bibliografia

1. BROWN K.W., KASSER T., 2005, Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 74 no 2, p. 349-368.
2. BRÜLDE B., 2007, Happiness and the good life, in: Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 8 no 1, p. 1-14.
3. CLARK A.E., FRIJTERS P., SHIELDS M.A., Income and happiness: Evidence, ex-planations and economic implications, Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques, Paris 2006.
4. CLAXTON G., 1994, Involuntary simplicity: Changing dysfunctional habits of consump-tion, in: Environmental Values, vol. 3 no 1, p. 71078.
5. DALY H.E., Toward a steady-state economy, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco 1973.
6. EEA, Household consumption and the envi-ronment, EEA, Copenhagen 2005.
7. EPOCH GROUP, Nine commentaries on the Communist Party, Broad Press, Flushing NY 2005.
8. ETZIONI A., 1998, Voluntary simplicity: Characterization, select psychological impli-cations, and societal consequences, in: Jour-nal of Economic Psychology, vol. 19 no 5, p. 619-643.
9. FABER M., MANSTETTEN R., PROOPS J.L.R., 1992, Humankind and the environment, in: Environmental Values, vol. 1 no 3, p. 217-241.
10. FIALA N., 2008, Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad econom-ics and bad environmental science, in: Eco-logical Economics, vol. 67 no 4, p. 519-525.
11. GREGG R., 1974, Voluntary simplicity, in: MANAS Reprint, vol. XXVII no. 36, p. 1-5.
12. HUNEKE M.E., 2005, The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States, in: Psychology and Marketing, vol. 22 no 7, p. 527-550.
13. HUNT BADINER A. (ed.), Mindfulness in the Marketplace: Compassionate Responses to Consumerism, Parallax Pr., Berkley 2002.
14. HUPPES G., ISHIKAWA M., 2010, Eco-efficiency for sustainability, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Devel-opment, vol. 5 no 2, p. 155-156.
15. JACKSON T., 2005a, Live better by consum-ing less?, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 9 no 1-2, p. 19-36.
16. JACKSON T., Motivating sustainable con-sumption, University of Surrey, Guildford 2005b.
17. JACKSON T., How to change consumer behaviour, Presentation at the Expert Confer-ence on the Marrakech Process, Wuppertal, 22 November 2006.
18. JENSEN R., The dream society, McGraw-Hill, New York 1999.
19. KASSER T., GROW KASSER V., 2001, The dreams of people high and low in material-ism, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 22 no 6, p. 693-719.
20. KRAS E., 2011, The Deep Roots of Sustai-nability, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6 no 1, p. 11-30.
21. KRONENBERG J., 2007, Making consumption “reasonable”, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 15 no 6, p. 557-566.
22. LASZLO C., 2008, Sustainable Value, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 3 no 2, p. 25-29.
23. LONGHURST M., 2003, Advertising and sustainability: a new paradigm, in: Admap July/August, p. 44-46.
24. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., PASCUAL U., VIVIEN F.-D., ZACCAI E., 2010, Sustain-able degrowth: Mapping the context, criti-cisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 69 no 9, p. 1741-1747.
25. MCDONALD S., OATES C., YOUNG W., HWANG K., 2006, Towards sustainable con-sumption: researching beginner voluntary simplifiers, in: Psychology and Marketing, vol. 23 no 6, p. 515-534.
26. MEADOWS D., Indicators and information systems for sustainable development, Sustainability Institute, Hartland VT, 1998.
27. MEADOWS D., Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system, Sustainability Institute, Hartland VT, 1999.
28. MILBRATH L.W., 1993, Redefining the good life in a sustainable society, in: Envi-ronmental Values, vol. 2 no 3, p. 261-269.
29. MILLS S., Epicurean simplicity, Island Press, Washington DC, 2002.
30. MYERS D., DIENER E., 1995, Who is happy?, in: Psychological Science, vol. 6 no 1, p. 10-19.
31. MYERS N., KENT J., The new consumers: The influence of affluence on the environ-ment, Island Press, Washington DC, 2004.
32. NEF, The Happy Planet Index, New Economics Foundation, London 2006.
33. PUGNO M., 2007, Ricchezza e ben-essere: l‟importanza delle relazioni sociali e personali, in: Studi e Note di Economia, vol. 12 no 1, p. 23-58.
34. REDCLIFT M.R., 2009, Sustainable Development – an Oxymoron Comes of Age, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustaina-ble Development, vol. 4 no 1, p. 33-50.
35. SANCHÈZ A., 2008, Perspectives and Problems in Sustainable Development, in: Prob-lemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 3 no 2, p. 21-23.
36. SCHNEIDER F., KALLIS G., MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 2010, Crisis or opportunity? Eco-nomic degrowth for social equity and eco-logical sustainability, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18 no 6, p. 511-518.
37. SCHUMACHER E.F., Small is Beautiful, Blond and Briggs, London 1973.
38. SHAW D., NEWHOLM T., 2002, Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption, in: Psychology & Marketing, vol. 19 no 2, p. 167-185.
39. TAINTER J.A., Complexity, problem solving, and sustainable societies, in: Getting down to Earth: Practical applications of eco-logical economics, eds. Costanza R., Segura O., Martinez-Alier J., Island Press, Washing-ton DC 1996, p. 61-76.
40. THOREAU H.D., Walden, Harper & Row, New York 1961 (originally 1854).
41. TURNBULL C.M., The forest people, Jonathan Cape, London 1961.
42. TUZIAK A., 2010, Socio-Economic Aspects of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Devel-opment, vol. 5 no 2, p. 39-49.
43. VAN DEN BERGH J., FERRER-I-CARBONELL A., Economic theories of sustainable consumption, Free University, Amsterdam 1999.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPL2-0028-0066