The compromise in multicriterial net optimization

• Autorzy: Piech H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We propose to utility the methodology consist in estimation of concessions for compromise (called here the losses of magnitude). This is practically valuation (estimation) in what degree the got solution for remaining criterions or weight components will correct the suitable value of characteristic for concrete criterion. The additional aspect of multicriteria optimization in nets is the problem of adaptation the methodology, and at the same time the algorithm of estimating losses of magnitude to specific and type of criteria configuration.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multicriteria net optimization; compromise

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Częstochowskiej
• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Instytutu Matematyki i Informatyki Politechniki Częstochowskiej
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 8, nr 2
• Strony: 119--130
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Piech H.

• Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] Eschenauer H., Kolski J., Osyczka A., Multicriteria Design Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1990.
• [2] Kalynmoy D., Lother T., Laumans M., Zitzler E., Scalable Multi-objective Opimization Test Problems, 2002, 199.
• [3] Piech H., Wnioskowanie na bazie strategii rozmytych, Monografia, Politechnika Częstochowska, 226.
• [4] Roy B., Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji, WNT, Warszawa 1990,
• [5] Baebera S., Jackson M.O., Choosing of Barbera Jackson model-Stable Majority Rules, V Conference SAET, Iscia 2001.
• [6] Sysło M., Deo N., Kowalik J., Discrete optimisation algorithms, PWN, Warsaw 1995 (in Polish).
• [7] Czogała E., Perdycz W., Elementy i metody teorii zbiorów rozmytych. PWN, Warszawa 1985.
• [8] Fuller R., Carlson C., Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1996, 78, 139-153.
• [9] Piech H., Ptak A., Fuzzy Models in Networks Algorithms, Electronic Modeling 2005, 27/2, 13-31.
• [10] Jaulin L., Kieffer M., Didrit O., Walter E., Applied Interval Analysiss, Springer Verlag, London 2001.
• [11] Kacprzyk J., Zbiory rozmyte w analizie systemowej, PWN, Warszawa 1986.
• [12] Łachwa A., Fuzzy world of files, numbers, relations, facts, rules and decisions, Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza Exit, Warsaw 2001 (in Polish).
• [13] Wetzeel A., Evaluation of the effectiveness of genetic algorithms in combinatorial optimization, University of Pittsburgh 1983.
• [14] Baas S.M., Kwakernaak H., Rating and Raking of Multiplae - Aspects Alternatives Using Fuzzy Sets, Automatica 1977, 1, 47-58.
• [15] Filar J., Vrieze K., Competitive Markov Decision Processes, Springer - Verlag, New York, Inc. 1997.
• [16] Hofbauer J., Stability for Best Response Dynamic, University of Viena, 1995
• [17] Kwaśnicka H., Ewolucyjna optymalizacja wielokryterialna 2000.
• [18] Loeve M., Probability Theory, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1978.
• [19] Nachbar J., Prediction, Optimization and Learning in Repeated Games, Econometrica 1995.
• [20] Piech H., Leks D., Fuzzy Model of Productivity Control, International Conference on Fuzzy Sets and Soft Computing, Petersburg 2004, 570-577.
• [21] Piech H., Ptak A., Machura M., Evaluation of Operation and State of an Object Using Artificial Intelligence tools, Springer Science + Business Media, New York 2005, 465-475.
• [22] Piech H., Ptak A., Machura M., Interchangeable Strategies (without Side Payments) on the base of Uncertain Information on Resources, Image Anal., Comp. Graph., and AI Applications, Białystok 2005, 145-157.
• [23] Vavock V., Aggregating Strategies, Conference on Computational Learning Theory 1990.