Wybrane zastosowania przestrzeni sytuacji

• Autorzy: Bartoszek J. , Brzykcy G.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The use of situation spaces - some examples

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Przestrzenie sytuacji to rozproszone środowisko bazujące na teorii sytuacji i modelu obliczeniowym współdzielonych przestrzeni danych. Ze względu na możliwość jednorodnego wyrażania w nich różnych aspektów wiedzy, przestrzenie sytuacji są odpowiednim narzędziem do definiowania kontekstowo zorientowanych działań agentów. W pracy zilustrowano te możliwości na przykładach inteligentnego domu, systemu sterowania ruchem ulicznym i punktu obsługi klienta sieci telefonicznej.

EN

Situation Spaces is a distributed environment founded on situation theory and tuple space computation model. With its orientation on meaning and information content, situation theory accurately matches the basic principles of the Semantic Web. In this paper we demonstrate examples of Situation Spaces used to solve problems of semantic interoperability such as usercentric reasoning in smart home scenario or in a contact center. We also present metabased reasoning in a traffic control system.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

teoria sytuacji; Semantic Tuple Spaces; Semantic Web Spaces; centrum kontaktowe

EN

situation theory; Semantic Tuple Spaces; Semantic Web Spaces; contact center

• Wydawca: Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk
• Czasopismo: Studia z Automatyki i Informatyki
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: T. 31
• Strony: 17--30
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Bartoszek J.

autor

Brzykcy G.

• Politechnika Poznańska, Instytut Automatyki i Inżynierii Informatycznej, Zakład Technologii i Systemów Informatycznych, pl. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznań,

Bibliografia

• [1] Ait-Kaci H. et al., The Wild LIFE Hanbook, Paris Research Laboratory 1994.
• [2] Akman V., Surav M., The Use of Situation Theory in Context Modeling, Computational Intelligence, 1996, Vol. 12(4).
• [3] Baclawski K., Kokar M., Matheus C., Letkowski J., Malczewski M., Formalization of Situation Awareness, w: Behavioral Specifications of Businesses and Systems, red. H. Kilov, Boston/Dodrecht/Londyn, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
• [4] Bartoszek J., Brzykcy G., Situation Spaces in context-aware business solutions, w: Business Information Systems, Lecture Notes in Informatics – Proceedings, red. W. Abramowicz W., H. Mayr, Bonn, 2006, s. 114-122.
• [5] Bartoszek J., Brzykcy G., The Use of Situation Theory in Information Spaces, Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence Studies, 2006, Vol. 3(26), s. 139-146.
• [6] Bartoszek J., Brzykcy G., Wyrażanie kontekstu w przestrzeniach informacji, Studia z Automatyki i Informatyki, t. 30, s. 7-16.
• [7] Barwise J., Perry J., Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MIT Press 1983.
• [8] Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., Lassila O., The Semantic Web, Scientific American, Vol. 284(5), s. 34-43.
• [9] Bouquet P., Giunchiglia F., van Harmelen F., Serafini L., Struckenschmidt H., C-OWL: Contextualizing Ontologies, w: ISWC03.
• [10] Software Agents, red. J. Bradshaw J., The MIT Press 1997.
• [11] Ciancarini P., Tolksdorf R., Zambonelli F.: A Survey on Coordination Middleware for XML-Centric Applications, Proceedings of ACM SAC 2002,s. 335-343.
• [12] Devlin K., Logic and information, New York, Cambridge University Press 1991.
• [13] Eiter T., Ianni G., Polleres A., Schindlaner R., Tompits H., Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies, Proceedings of Reasoning Web. LNCS, Vol. 4126.
• [14] Estrin D., Culler D., Pister K., Sukjatme G., Connecting the Physical World with Pervasive Networks. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2002, Vol. 1(1), s. 59-69.
• [15] Gangemi A., Mika P., Understanding the Semantic Web through Descriptions and Situations, Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Web, http://www.loa-cnr.it/Papers/ODBASE-CONTEXT.pdf, 2003.
• [16] Garbers J., Niemann M., Mochol M., A Personalized Hotel Selection Engine, Demons and Posters of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2006), Budva 2006.
• [17] Gelernter D., Carriero N., Coordination Languages and their Significance, Communication of the ACM, 1992, Vol. 35(2), s. 97-107.
• [18] Giunchiglia F., Contextual Reasoning, Epistemologica, 1993, Vol. 16, s. 345-364.
• [19] JavaSpace Specification, Sun Microsystems, 1998.
• [20] Kalyan A., Gopalan S., Sridhar V., Hybrid Context Model based on Multilevel Situation Theory and Ontology for Contact Centers, Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Pervesive Computing and Communication Workshops, 2005.
• [21] Khushraj D., Lassila O., Finin T., sTuples: Semantic Tuple Spaces, Proceedings of the First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems (MobiQuitous’04), 2004.
• [22] Loke S., Representing and Reasoning with Situations for Context-Aware Pervasive Computing: a Logic Programming Perspective, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2005, Vol. 19(3), s. 213-233.
• [23] Manzalini A., Zambonelli F., Towards Autonomic and Situation-aware Communication Services: the CASCADAS Vision. IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems, Praga, 2006.
• [24] Mei J., Paslaru Bontas E., Reasoning Paradigms for SWRL-enabled Ontologies, International Workshop on Protégé with Rules, Madryd, 2005.
• [25] Pinheiro F., Preliminary Thoughts on Using Situation Theory for Scenario Modelling, V Workshop Iberoamericano de Ingenieria de Requisitos y Ambientes de Software, Hawana, 2002, s. 272-280.
• [26] Pinheiro F., Lopez I., Writing Use Cases Modelled with Situation Theory, Vth Workshop on Requirements Engineering (WER’2002), Walencja, 2002.
• [27] Sapkota B., Kilgariff E., Bussler C., Role of Triple Space Computing in Semantic Web Services, Proceedings of the 8th Asian Pacific Web Conference (APWEB 2006), Harbin, 2006.
• [28] Strang T., Linhoff-Popien C., A Context Modeling Survey, Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning and Management, UbiComp 2004 – The Sixth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Nottingham, 2004.
• [29] Tin E., Akman V., Situated Nonmonotonic Temporal Reasoning with BABY-SIT, AI Communications, Vol. 10, s. 93-109.
• [30] Tin E., Akman V., Situations and Computation: An Overview of Recent Research, Proceedings of the Topics in Constraint Grammar Formalism for Computational Linguistics, Kopenhaga, 1995, s. 77-104.
• [31] Tokarz M., Elementy pragmatyki logicznej, Warszawa, PWN 1993.
• [32] Tolksdorf R., Workspaces, A Web-Based Workflow Management System, IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 6(5), 2002, s. 18-26.
• [33] Tolksdorf R., Glaubitz D., Coordinating Web-based Systems with Documents in XMLSpaces, Proceedings of the Sixth IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CooplS 2001), LNCS 2172, 2001, s. 356-370.
• [34] Tolksdorf R., Liedsch F, Nguyen D. M., XMLSpaces.NET: An Extensible Tuplespace as XML Middleware, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on .NET Technologies, 2004.
• [35] Tolksdorf R., Nixon L., Liebsch F., Nguyen D., Paslaru Bontas E., Semantic Web Spaces Technical Report B-04-11, Freie Universität Berlin, 2004.
• [36] Tolksdorf R., Nixon L., Paslaru Bontas E., Nguyen D. M., Liebsch F., Enabling Real World Semantic Web Applications Through a Coordination Middleware, ESWC 2005, LNCS 3532, s. 679-693.
• [37] Tolksdorf R., Paslaru Bontas E., Nixon L., Towards a Tuplespace-based Middleware for the Semantic Web. Web Intelligence 2005, IEEE Computer Society, 2005, s. 338-344.
• [38] Tolksdorf R., Paslaru Bontas E., Nixon L., A Coordination Model for the Semantic Web, SAC’06, Dijon, 2006.
• [39] Zambonelli F., Van Dyke Parunak H., Towards a Paradigm Change in Computer Science and Software Engineering: A Synthesis, The Knowledge Engineering Review.