Three-dimensional human gait pattern - reference data for normal men

• Autorzy: Pietraszewski B. , Winiarski S. , Jaroszczuk S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this research was to establish a kinematic pattern of adult gait for motion analysis system BTS Smart-E used in the research conducted in the Laboratory of Biomechanical Analysis, University School of Physical Education, Wrocław. This research presents the results of gait patterns for a group of 17 adult males for three speed levels: high (1), preferred (2), and low (3). Subject's sex, age and speed of gait are to be considered in the kinematic normal gait pattern. No statistically significant differences were observed between the right and the left limb. However, differences between the high, preferred and low gait speed were noticeable. An increase in gait speed was related to the change in the angular range of motion in the hip, knee and ankle joints sagittal plane. The range of motion in joints mostly increased with the subjects' speed. No significant differences between the range of motion and speed were observed in the ankle joint.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

motion analysis; gait; normal pattern; kinematics; variability

PL

analiza ruchu; chód; wzór normalności; kinematyka; zmienność

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 14, no. 3
• Strony: 9--16
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Pietraszewski B.

autor

Winiarski S.

autor

Jaroszczuk S.

• Department of Biomechanics, University School of Physical Education, Wrocław,

Bibliografia

• [1] BOBER T., Biomechanika chodu i biegu, Studia i materiały AWF we Wrocławiu, Wrocław, 1985.
• [2] WINTER D.A., Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, J. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2005.
• [3] KADABA M., RAMAKRISHNAN H., WOOTTEN M., GAINEY J., GORTON G., COCHRAN G., Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait, J. Orthop. Res., 1989, 7(6), 849–860.
• [4] GROWNEY E., MEGLAN D., JOHNSON M., CAHALAN T., AN K., Repeated measures of adult normal walking using a video tracking system, Gait Posture, 1997, 6(2), 147–162.
• [5] ÖBERG T., KARSZNIA A., ÖBERG K., Basic gait parameters: Reference data for normal subjects 10–79 years of age, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 1993, 30, 210–233.
• [6] ÖBERG T., KARSZNIA A., ÖBERG K., Joint angle parameters in gait. Reference data for normal subjects 10-79 years of age, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 1994, 31, 199–213.
• [7] AL-OBAIDI S., WALL J.C., AL-YAQOUB A., AL-GHANIM M., Basic gait parameters: a comparison of reference data for normal subjects 20 to 29 years of age from Kuwait and Scandinavia, J. Rehab. Res. & Develop., 2004, 40(4), 361–366.
• [8] CHESTER V.L., TINGLEY M., BIDEN E.N., A comparison of kinetic gait parameters for 3–13 year olds, Clin. Biomech., (Bristol, Avon), 2006, 21(7), 726–32. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech. 2006.02.007.
• [9] CHESTER V.L, WRIGLEY A.T., The identification of agerelated differences in kinetic gait parameters using principal component analysis, Clin. Biomech., (Bristol, Avon), 2008, 23(2), 212–220. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.007
• [10] STANSFIELD B.W., HILLMAN S.J., HAZLEWOOD M.E., LAWSON A.A., MANN A.M., LOUDON I.R., ROBB J.E., Sagittal Joint Kinematics, Moments, and Powers Are Predominantly Characterized by Speed of Progression not age, in normal children, J. Pediatr. Orthop., 2001, 21(3), 403–411.
• [11] WU G., MILLON D., Joint kinetics during Tai Chi gait and normal walking gait in young and elderly Tai Chi Chuan practitioners, Clin. Biomech., (Bristol, Avon), 2008, 23(6), 787–795. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.02.001
• [12] MACWILLIAMS B., COWLEY M., NICHOLSON D., Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait, Gait Posture, 2003, 17(3), 214–224.
• [13] OSTROSKY K.M., VANSWEARINGEN J.M., BURDETT R.G., GEE Z., A comparison of gait characteristics in young and old subjects, 1994, 74(7), 637–644.
• [14] CHEN H.C., ASHTON-MILLER J.A., ALEXANDER N.B., SCHULTZ A.B., Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults, J. Gerontol., 1991, 46(6), M196–203.
• [15] GORTON G., HEBERT D., GOODE B., Assessment of the kinematic variability between 12 Shriner’s motion analysis laboratories. Part 1. Gait Posture, 2001, 13(3), 247, doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.10.060
• [16] GORTON G., HEBERT D., GOODE B., Assessment of the kinematic variability between 12 Shriner’s motion analysis laboratories. Part 2. Short term follow-up, Gait Posture, 2002, 16(S1), 65–66.
• [17] CHESTER V.L., TINGLEY M., BIDEN E.N., Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases, Dyn. Med., 2007, 6, 8. doi:10.1186/1476-5918-6-8
• [18] KADABA M., RAMAKRISHNAN H., WOOTTEN M., GAINEY J., GORTON G., COCHRAN G., Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1989, 7(6), 849–860.
• [19] DAVIS R.B., OUNPUU S., TYBURSKI D., GAGE J.R., A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique, Human Movement Science, 1991, 10, 575–587.
• [20] TABAKIN D., VAUGHAN C.L., A comparison of 3D gait models based on the Helen Hayes marker set, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on the 3D Analysis of Human Movement Cape Town, South Africa, 2000, 98–101.
• [21] WHITTLE M.W., Clinical gait analysis: A review, 1996, 15(3), 369–387.
• [22] KETTELKAMP D.B., JOHNSON R.J., SMIDT G.L., CHAO E.Y., WALKER M., An electrogoniometric study of knee motion in normal gait, J. Bone Joint Surg., 1970, 52-A, 775–790.
• [23] WHITTLE M.W., Gait analysis: An introduction (4th Edition), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2002.