Three-dimensional analysis of the pelvic and hip mobility during gait on a treadmill and on the ground

• Autorzy: Staszkiewicz R. , Chwała W. , Forczek W. , Laska J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Pelvic girdle combines two units: passenger and locomotor. That is why the importance of this part of the body is emphasized by all researchers in terms of gait economy. The purpose of our research was to determine the changes of pelvic girdle mobility and hip joint in men in three planes of movement (sagittal, frontal and horizontal) during gait at a speed of 5 km/h. The methodology used here aimed at assessing the impact of the surface (ground or treadmill) on the mobility in those planes. To register overground and treadmill locomotion we applied: Vicon 250, Cardionics Treadmill 3113. The sample of the study was the group of 30 men aged between 21 and 23. The analysis of the results revealed the biggest impact of the type of surface on both pelvis and hip joint in the transverse plane. When the subjects moved on the natural ground, the pelvic range of motion (ROM) in this plane was more than twice wider than that in treadmill walking. Whereas in the case of hip joint, significantly higher ROM values occurred in the transverse plane during walking on the treadmill.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pelvic girdle; range of motion (ROM); Vicon system; walking

PL

miednica; zakres ruchu (ROM); system Vicon; pieszy

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 14, no. 2
• Strony: 83--89
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Staszkiewicz R.

autor

Chwała W.

autor

Forczek W.

autor

Laska J.

• Department of Biomechanics, University School of Physical Education in Kraków,

Bibliografia

• [1] STASZKIEWICZ R., CHWAŁA W., FORCZEK W., LASKA J., Influence of surface on kinematic gait parameters and lower extremity joints mobility, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2012, 14(1), 75–82.
• [2] RILEY P., PAOLINI G., DELLA CROCE U., PAYLO K., KERRIGAN D.C., A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects, Gait Posture, 2007, 26, 17–24.
• [3] PARVATANENI K., PLOEG L., OLNEY S., BROUWER B., Kinematic, kinetic and metabolic parameters of treadmill versus overground walking in healthy older adults, Clin. Biomech., 2009, 24, 95–100.
• [4] MURRAY M.P., SPURR G.B., SEPIC S.B., GARDNER G.M., MOLLINGER L.A., Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate, J. Appl. Physiol., 1985, 59, 87–91.
• [5] GREIG C., BUTLER F., SKELTON D., MAHMUD S., YOUNG A., Treadmill walking in old age may not reproduce the real life situation, J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 1993, 41, 15–18.
• [6] RAHIMI A., MAJIDIRAD F., MOVAHED M., VALI F., A comparative study on electromyographic and kinematic parameters of the knee joint during walking on level ground and level treadmill, Abstracts of the 17th Annual Meeting of ESMAC, Gait Posture, 2008, 28S, S49–S118.
• [7] NYMARK J., BALMER S. MELIS E., LEMAIRE E., MILLAR S., Electromyographic and kinematic nondisabled gait differences at extremely slow overground and treadmill walking speeds, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 2005, 42(4), 523–534.
• [8] WARABI T., KATO M., KIRIYAMA K., YOSHIDA T., KOBAYASHI N., Treadmill walking and overground walking of human subjects compared by recording sole–floor reaction force, Neurosci. Res., 2005, 53, 343–348.
• [9] PEARCE M.E., CUNNINGHAM D.A., DONNER A.P., RECHNITZER P.A., FULLERTON G.M., HOWARD J.H., Energy cost of treadmill and floor walking at self-selected paces, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 1983, 52, 115–119.
• [10] DAL U., ERDOGAN T., RESITOGLU B., BEYDAGI H., Determination of preferred walking speed on treadmill may lead to high oxygen cost on treadmill walking, Gait Posture, 2010, 31, 366–369.
• [11] PERRY J., Gait analysis: normal and pathological function, Thorofare (NJ): Slack Inc., 1992.
• [12] STASZKIEWICZ R., RUCHLEWICZ T., FORCZEK W., LASKA J., The impact of changes in gait speed and step frequency on the extent of the center of mass displacements, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2010, 12, 3, 13–20.
• [13] THOMAS S.S., SUPAN T.J., A comparison of current biomechanical terms, J. Prosthet. Orthot., 1990, 2(2), 107–114.
• [14] OWINGS T., GRABINER M., Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion, J. Biomech., 2004, 37, 935–938.
• [15] SHIAVI R., BUGLE H.J., LIMBIRD T., Electromyographic gait assessment. Part 1: Adult EMG profiles and walking speed, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 1987, 24, 13–23.
• [16] ARSENAULT A.B., WINTER D.A., MARTENIUK R.G., Treadmill versus walkway locomotion in humans: an EMG study, Ergonomics, 1986, 29, 665–76.
• [17] WATELAIN E., DUJARDIN F., BABIER F., DUBOIS D., ALLARD P., Pelvic and lower limb compensatory actions of subjects in an early stage of hip osteoarthritis, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2001, 82, 1705–1711.
• [18] DUJARDIN F.H., ROUSSIGNOL X., MEJAD O., WEBER J., THOMINE J.M., Individual variations of the hip joint motion in normal gait, Gait Posture, 1997, 5, 246–250.
• [19] JOHNSTON R.C., SMIDT G.L., Measurement of hip joint motion during walking evaluation of an electrogoniometric method, J. Bone Joint Surg., 1969, 51-A, 6, 1083–1094.