Elastic silicone matrices as a tool for load relief in overdenture implants

• Autorzy: Żmudzki J. , Chladek W.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this study was to analyze how the elasticity of matrices attaching to an overdenture affects implants and how the location of implants affects their loading. The attachments proposed made from elastic matrix increase the denture stability and simultaneously preserve the mechanisms of occlusion load transfer in compliance with principles usually applied in the denture used in the case of edentulous maxilla or mandible. It was revealed that denture dislodgement caused by occlusion forces did not result in the force being greater than the attachment retention force determined empirically. Our analysis also demonstrates that in the case where the implants are inserted in such a way that they are shifted too much to the back area of the tooth arc, an increase in the implant bending occurs, with the supporting capacities of alveolar processes not being fully utilized. This fact suggests the necessity to increase the susceptibility of attachments in a posterior location.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

implant; denture; attachment; FEM; mechanics; force; load

PL

implant; proteza; przywiązanie; mechanika; obciążenia

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: Vol. 10, nr 4
• Strony: 7--14
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 61 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Żmudzki J.

autor

Chladek W.

• Department of Process Modelling and Medical Engineering, Silesian Polytechnic University, Katowice,

Bibliografia

• [1] ROSSEN I.P., Dental implant loading, Flexible vs. Rigid, Rotterdam, 1991.
• [2] SCHROEDER A., SUTTER F., BUSER D., KREKEREL G. et al., Oral Implantology, Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, 1996.
• [3] LIN C.L., WANG J.C., KUO Y.C., Numerical simulation on the biomechanical interactions of tooth/implant-supported system under various occlusal forces with rigid/non-rigid connections, J. Biomech., 2006, 39, 453–463.
• [4] SPIEKERMANN H., DONATH K., HASSELL T., JOVANOVIC S., RICHTER J., Implantology, Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, 1995.
• [5] SADOWSKY S.J., CAPUTO A.A., Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2000, 84, 327–334.
• [6] MISCH C.E., Dental implant prosthetics, Mosby, 2005.
• [7] QUIRYNEN M., NAERT I., VAN STEENBERGHE D., Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark® system, Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 1992, 3, 104–111.
• [8] MACENTEE M.I., WALTON J.N., GLICK N., A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: Three-year results, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2005, 93, 28–37.
• [9] KIRSCH A., Overdentures on IMZ implants: Modalities and long-term results, [in:] Schepers E., Naert I., Theuniers G. (Eds.), Overdentures on oral implants, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 1991, 15–17.
• [10] ENQUIST B., Six years experience of splinted and nonsplinted implants supporting overdentures in upper and lower jaws, [in:] Schepers E., Naert I., Theuniers G. (Eds.), Overdentures on oral implants, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 1991, 27–41.
• [11] MERICSKE-STERN R., Overdentures with roots or implants for elderly patients: a comparison, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1994, 72, 543–550.
• [12] WALTON J.N., HUIZINGA S.C., PECK C.C., Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience, Int. J. Prosthodont., 2001, 14, 523–30.
• [13] NAERT E., HOOGHE M., QUIRYNEN M., VAN STEENBERGHE D., The reliability of implant-retained hinging overdentures for the fully edentulous mandible. An up to 9-year longitudinal study, Clin. Oral Invest., 1997, 1, 119–124.
• [14] JEMT T., BOOK K., LINDÉN B., URDE G., Failures and complications in 92 consecutively inserted overdentures supported by Brånemark implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae, a study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1992, 7, 162–7.
• [15] PALMQVIST S., SONDELL K., SWARTZ B., Implant-supported maxillary overdentures: outcome in planned and emergency cases, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1994, 9, 184–90.
• [16] HUTTON J.E., HEATH M.R., CHAI J.Y., HARNETT J., JEMT T., JOHNS R.B. et al., Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1995, 10, 33–42.
• [17] WATSON G.K., PAYNE A.G., PURTON D.G., THOMSON W.M., Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service, Int. J. Prosthodont., 2002, 15, 259–66.
• [18] BEHR M., LANG R., LEIBROOK A., ROSENTRITT M., HANDEL G., Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and IMZ dental implants, Clin. Oral. Impl. Res., 1998, 9, 51–8.
• [19] DAVIDOFF S.R., STEINBERG M.A., HALPERIN A., The implant supported overdenture: a practical implant–prosthetic approach, Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent., 1993, 14, 722–730.
• [20] FEDERICK D.R, CAPUTO A.A., Effects of overdenture retention designs and implant orientations on load transfer characteristics, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1996, 76, 624–232.
• [21] DAAS M., DUBOIS G., BONNET A.S., LIPINSKI P., RIGNONBRET C., A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: Comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations, Med. Eng. Phys., 2008, 30, 218–225.
• [22] DAVIDOFF S.R., DAVIS R.P., The ERA implant-supported overdenture, Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent., 1995, 16(5), 512, 514, 516.
• [23] WIEMEYER A.S., AGAR J.R., KAZEMI R.B., Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelism, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2001, 86, 434–437.
• [24] SVETLIZE C.A., BODEREAU E.F., Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures, Quint. Int., 2004, 35(6), 443–438.
• [25] DAHER T., A simple, predictable intraoral technique for retentive mechanism attachment of implant overdenture attachments, J. Prosthodont., 2003, 12(3), 202–205.
• [26] MENICUCCI G., CERUTI P., BARABINO E., SCRETI A., BIGNARDI C., PRETI G., A preliminary in vivo trial of load transfer in mandibular implant-retained overdentures anchored in 2 different ways: allowing and counteracting free rotation, Int. J. Prosthodont., 2006, 19(6), 574–576.
• [27] PASCIUTA M., GROSSMANN Y., FINGER I.M., A prosthetic solution to restoring the edentulous mandible with limited interarch space using an implant–tissue-supported overdenture: A clinical report, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2005, 93, 116–120.
• [28] NAERT I., ALSAADI G., QUIRYNEN M., Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 10-year randomized clinical study, Int. J. Prosthodont., 2004, 17, 401–410.
• [29] ADRIAN E.D., KRANTZ W.A., IVANHOE J.R., The use of processed silicone to retain the implant-supported tissue-borne overdenture, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1992, 67, 219–22.
• [30] TANINO F., HAYAKAWA I., HIRANO S., MINAKUCHI S., Finie element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures, Int. J. Prosthodont., 2007, 20(2), 193–198.
• [31] KIAT-AMNUAY S., MEKAYARAJJANANONTH T., CRON C.C., KHAN Z., GENTLEMAN L., Simplified methods for fabricating tissue-supported implant-retained overdentures with retention from a resilient liner, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1999, 82, 242–245.
• [32] TADDEI C., METZ M., WALTMAN E., ETIENNE O., Direct procedure for connecting a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with ball attachments, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2004, 92, 403–404.
• [33] BATENBURG R.H.K., MEIJER H.J.A., RAGHOEBAR G.M., VISSINK A., Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1998, 13, 539–545.
• [34] NAERT I., DE CLERCQ M., THEUNIERS G., SCHEPERS E., Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for the edentulous mandible: a 2.5 year report, Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 1988, 3, 191–196.
• [35] MENICUCCI G., LORENZETTI M., PERA P., PRETI G., Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a clinical trial of two anchorage systems, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1998, 13(6), 851–856.
• [36] DUYCK J., Van OOSTERWYCK H., VANDER SLOTEN J., De COOMAN M., PUERS R., NAERT I., In vivo forces on oral implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: the influence of attachment system, Clin. Oral Invest., 1999, 3, 201–207.
• [37] PETROPOULOS V.C., SMITH W., Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stub attachments, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2002, 17(4), 526–535.
• [38] ATWOOD D.A., COY W.A., Clinical, cephalometric, and densitometric study of reduction of residual ridges, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1971, 26, 280–295.
• [39] TALLGREN A., The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixedlongitudinal study covering 25 years, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1972, 27, 120–132.
• [40] BERESIN V.E., SCHIESSER F.J., The neutral zone in complete dentures, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Co., 1973.
• [41] KENNEY R., RICHARDS M.W., Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1998, 80, 559–564.
• [42] TANGERUD T., GRONNINGSATER A.G., TAYLOR A., Fixe partial dentures supported by natural teeth and Branemark system implants: a 3-year report, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2002, 17, 212–219.
• [43] FERNANDES C.P., GLANTZ P.O., NILNER K., On the accuracy of some in vitro models for mechanical studies of maxillary removable partial dentures, Dent. Mater., 2003, 19(2), 127–136.
• [44] FONTIJN-TEKAMP F.A., SLAGTER A.P., Van’t HOF M.A., KALK W., JANSEN J.A., Pain and instability during biting with mandibular implant-retained overdentures, Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2001, 12(1), 46–51.
• [45] OCHIAI K.T., WILLIAMS B.H., HOJO S., NISHIMURA R., CAPUTO A.A., Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2004, 91, 421–427.
• [46] PORTER J.A., PETROPOULOS V.C., BRUNSKI J.B., Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2002, 17(5), 651–662.
• [47] MERICSKE-STERN R., PIOTTI M., SIRTES G., 3-D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study, Clin. Oral Implant. Res., 1996, 7, 387–396.
• [48] MERICSKE-STERN R., VENETZ E., FAHRLÄNDER F., Bragin W., In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: A pilot study, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2000, 84, 535–547.
• [49] MERICSKE-STERN R., Three-dimensional force measurements with mandibular overdentures connected to implants by ballshaped retentive anchors. A clinical study, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1998, 13(1), 36–43.
• [50] HECKMANN S.M., WICHMANN M.G., WINTER W., MEYER M., WEBER H.-P., Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 2: A methodical study using five types of attachment, Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2001, 12(6), 640–647.
• [51] FANUSCU M.I., CAPUTO A.A., Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture, J. Prosthodont., 2004, 13(4), 214–220.
• [52] Van KAMPEN F.M.C., Van Der BILT A., CUNE M.S., BOSMAN F., The influence of various attachment types in mandibular implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG, J. Dent. Res., 2002, 81(3), 170–173.
• [53] WISMEIJER D., Van WAAS M.A.J., VERMEEREN Z.L.Z.F., MULDER J., KALK W., Patient satisfaction with implantsupported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 1997, 26, 263–267.
• [54] ESPOSITO M., HIRSCH J.-M., LEKHOLM U., THOMSEN P., Failure patterns of four osseointegrated oral implant systems, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 1997, 8, 843–847.
• [55] ISIDOR F., Histological evaluation of peri-implants bone At implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation, Clin. Oral Implant Res., 1997, 8, 1–9.
• [56] CHLADEK W., MAJEWSKI S., ŻMUDZKI J., KRUKOWSKA J., The mechanical conditions of the functionality of implant– dentures constructions chosen – model investigations (in Polish), Implantoprotetyka, 2003, 2, 3–10.
• [57] WINKLER S., PIERMATTI J., ROTHMAN A., SIAMOS G., An overview of the O-ring implant overdenture attachment: clinical reports, J. Oral Implantol., 2002, 28(2), 82–86.
• [58] RUTKUNAS V., MIZUTANI H., TAKAHASHI H., Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture, J. Oral Rehabil., 2007, 34(1), 41–51.
• [59] WALTON J.N., A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol, Int. J. Prosthodont., 2003, 16, 255–260.
• [60] BABBUSH C.A., Provisional implants: surgical and prosthetic aspects, Implant. Dent., 2001, 10, 113–120.
• [61] OHKUBO C., SATO J., HOSOI T., KURTZ K.S., O-ring attachments for transitional implant-retained overdentures, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2004, 91, 195–197.