Spojrzenie na wymiarowanie trwałościowe konstrukcji nośnych w aspekcie bezpieczeństwa

Jakubczyk, H.; Sobczykiewicz, W.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Spojrzenie na wymiarowanie trwałościowe konstrukcji nośnych w aspekcie bezpieczeństwa

Autorzy

Jakubczyk H. , Sobczykiewicz W.

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Słowa kluczowe

bezpieczeństwo konstrukcje nośne trwałość trwałość zmęczeniowa symulacja

safety load-bearing structure durability fatigue life simulation

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Instytut Mechanizacji Budownictwa i Górnictwa Skalnego

Czasopismo

Przegląd Mechaniczny

Rocznik

2003

Tom

nr 10

Strony

61--68

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 66 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Jakubczyk H.

Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Samochodów i Maszyn Roboczych

autor

Sobczykiewicz W.

Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Samochodów i Maszyn Roboczych

Bibliografia

1. Hudak S. J., Jr. at al.: A Comparison of Single-Cycle Versus Multiple Cycle Proof Testing Strategies. Report No. 4318, Washington CD, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1990.
2. Schutz W.: Fatigue Life Prediction - a Review of the State of the Art. Structural Failure, Liability and Technical Insurance. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1993, pp. 49-60.
3. Jakubczak H.: Wpływ jakości wykonania oraz warunków eksploatacji na bezpieczeństwo konstrukcji nośnych maszyn. Problemy Eksploatacji, Vol. 44, No 3, 2001, ss. 159 – 168.
4. Jakubczak H.: Niepewność danych zmęczeniowych w prognozowaniu trwałości zmęczeniowej konstrukcji nośnych maszyn. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej, Mechanika, No 194, Warszawa 2002.
5. Ang A. H-S., Munse W. H.: Practical Reliability Basis for Structural Fatigue. ASCE National Structural Engineering Conference, 1975.
6. Szala J., Zawiślak S.: Application of Computer Simulation Method for Determining a Distribution Type of Construction Parts Fatigue Life. Archiwum Budowy Maszyn, T. XXXVII, Z. 3, 1990, pp. 145-167.
7. Zhao Z., Haldar A.: Bridge Fatigue Damage Evaluation and Updating Using Non-Destructive Inspections. Engg. Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 53, No. 5, 1996, pp. 775-788.
8. Bolotin V. V.: Reliability Against Fatigue Fracture in the Presence of Sets of Cracks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 53, No. 5, 1996, pp. 753-759.
9. Gurney, T. R., Maddox S. J.: A Re-Analysis of Fatigue Data for Welded Joints in Steel. Welding Research International, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1973.
10. Kocańda S., Szala J.: Podstawy obliczeń zmęczeniowych. PWN, Warszawa 1985.
11. Spindel J. E., Haibach E.: Some Considerations in the Statistical Determination of the Shape of S-N Curves. Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data, ASTM STP 744, 1981, pp. 89-113.
12. El Maraghy H. A., Siddal, J. N.: Finite Fatigue Life Distributions of SAE 1008 Subjected to Various Load-Time Histories. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 102, 1980, pp. 135-140.
13. Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Reliability of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of the Structural Division: Fatigue Reliability: Development of Criteria for Design. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. ST1, 1982, pp. 71-89.
14. Zhao J. at al.: A Reliability Assessment Method in Strain-Based Fatigue Life Analysis. Transactions ASME, Journal of Pressure Vessels Technology, Vol. 120, No 1, 1998, 99-104.
15. Kliman V. at al.: Residual Operating Lifetime – Estimation of Distribution Function. Advances in Fatigue Lifetime Predictive Techniques: 3rd Volume, ASTM STP 1292, 1996, pp. 305-327.
16. Sinclair G. M., Dolan T. J.: Effects of Stress Amplitude on Statistical Variability in Fatigue Life of 758-T6 Aluminium Alloy. Transactions of ASME, Vol. 75, 1951.
17. N. N. Wyniki badań próbek stali A514 oraz 8620/8685M. Korespondencja prywatna z University of Waterloo, Canada, 1999.
18. Jakubczak H.: Metoda oceny trwałości zmęczeniowej węzłów spawanych konstrukcji stalowych z uwzględnieniem tolerancji wykonawczych. Rozprawa doktorska, Politechnika Warszawska 1982.
19. Zhao X. Z.: A Methodology for Strain-Based Fatigue Reliability Analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 70, 2000, 205-213.
20. Kandarpa S. at al.: Reliability Analysis of Structural Components Utilizing the Strain-Life Method. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 53, No 5, 1996, pp. 761-774.
21. Fatigue Design Handbook, AE-10, SAE Publication, 1988.
22. Maddox S. J.: Fatigue Crack Propagation Data Obtained from Parent Plate, Weld Metal and HAZ in Structural Steels. Research Report E/48/72, The Welding Institute, 1972.
23. Bruckner-Foit A. at al.: Prediction of the Lifetime Distribution of High-Strength Components Subjected to Fatigue Loading. Fatigue Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, Vol. 16, No 8, 1993, pp. 891-908.
24. Cohelo da Silva R. B., Bastian F. L. (1995), in Proceedings of the VTT Symposium on Fatigue Design, G. Marquis and J. Solin (Eds).
25. Tryon R. G. at al.: Development of a Reliability-Based Fatigue Life Model for Gas Turbine Engine Structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 53, No 5, 1996, pp. 807-828.
26. Weber M. A.: Risk Assessment Through Probabilistic Structural Analysis. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. Vol. 61, 1995, 527-540.
27. Ichikawa M.: Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Investigation of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate. [in:] Statistical Research on Fatigue and Fracture, (ed. T. Tanaka at al.), Elsevier Applied Science, 1987, pp. 71-89.
28. Virkler D. A. at al.: The Statistical Nature of Fatigue Crack Propagation. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 101, 1979, 148-153.
29. Doliński K.: Time and Crack Length Dependent Stochastic Models of Fatigue Crack Growth. State-of-the-Art Review. Engineering Transactions. Vol. 40, No 3, 1992, pp. 387-410.
30. Johnston G. O.: Statistical Scatter in Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Data. Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Methods, ASTM STP 798, 1983, pp. 42-66.
31. Ostergaard D. F., Hillbery B. M.: Characterization of the Variability in Fatigue Crack Propagation Data. Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Methods, ASTM STP 798, 1983, pp. 97-115.
32. Bertini L., Marmorini L.: On the Characterization of Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour From a Statistical Viewpoint Via the Paris Law Coefficients. 2nd Int. Conf. on „Fatigue and Stress”, Ed. H.P. Lieurade, Pub. IITT Int., Gourmay-sur- Marne, France 1989, pp. 48-58.
33. Hazanow I. I., Politow W. A.: Wierojatnostnaja model usta- Łostnoj doŁgowiecznosti w swietlie predstawlenij liniejnoj miechaniki razruszenija. Problemy Procznosti No. 2, 1977, ss. 10-15.
34. Akama M., Ishizuka H.: Reliability Analysis of Shinkansen Vehicle Axle Using Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics. JSME, series A, Vol. 38, No 3, 1995, pp. 378-383.
35. Mimura H. at al.: Scatter of Fracture Toughness in an Inhomogeneous Material. Fatigue Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, Vol. 18, No 4, 1993, pp. 455-462.
36. Wallin K.: Statistical Re-evaluation of the ASME KIc and KIR Fracture Toughness Reference Curves. Nuclear Engineering and Design, No 193, 1999, 317-326.
37. Zhou W.: Probabilistic Approach for Prevention of Structural Failure. Technology, Law and Insurance No 4, 1999, pp. 231-237.
38. Sobczykiewicz W. i in.: Wymiarowanie konstrukcji nośnych sprzętów roboczych mrc w zakresie trwałości zmęczeniowej z uwzględnieniem procesu technologicznego wytwarzania i warunków eksploatacji. CPBP 02.05, Wydawnictwa Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa 1990.
39. Jakubczak H., Glinka G.: Fatigue Analysis of Manufacturing Defects in Weldments. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1986, pp. 51-57.
40. Sobczykiewicz W., Rzeszot J.: Metoda szacowania wytężenia lokalnego w złączach spawanych dla potrzeb wymiarowania trwałościowego. VI Konf. Rozwój Podstaw Budowy, Eksploatacji i Badań MRC, Zakopane 1993.
41. Lopez Martinez L., Korsgren P.: Characterization of Initial Defect Distribution and Weld Geometry in Welded Test Specimens. Proc. of the Nordic Conference on Fatigue. Ed by A.F. Blom, EMAS Publishers, England, 1993.
42. Zhao Y-X. at al.: A Statistical Investigation of the Fatigue Lives of Q235 Steel Welded Joints. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, Vol. 21, No 7, 1998, pp. 781-790.
43. Zhao Y-X. at al.: An Approach for Determining an Appropriate Assumed Distribution of Fatigue Life Under Limited Data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety No. 67, 1-7, 2000.
44. Shijve J.: A Normal Distribution or a Weibull Distribution for Fatigue Lives. Fatigue Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, Vol. 16, No 8, 1993, pp. 851-859.
45. Soares C. G., Garbatov Y.: Fatigue Reliability of the Ship Hull Girder Accounting for Inspection and Repair. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 51, 1996.
46. Sobczyk K. at al.: Probabilistic Micromechanical Description of Fatigue Crack Initiation. Arch. Mech. Vol. 52, No 4-5. 2000, pp. 761-777.
47. Hasofer A. M., Lind N. C.: Exact and Invariant Second Moment Code Format. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 1985, No 100, pp. 111-121.
48. Der Kureghian A. at al.: Second-Order Reliability Approximations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 113. No 8, 1987.
49. Liu W.K. at al.: Three Reliability Methods for Fatigue Crack Growth. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 53, No 5, 1996, pp. 733-752.
50. Shinozuka M.: Basic Analysis of Structural Safety. Journal of Structural Engineering. Vol. 109. No 3, 1983.
51. Rakwitz R., Fiessler B.: Structural Reliability Under Combined Random Load Sequences. Computers and Structures, No 9, 1978.
52. Wu Y.-T, Wirshing P. H.: New Algorithm for Structural Reliability Estimation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics of ASCE. Vol. 113, No 9, 1987, 1319-1336.
53. Ditlevsen O.: Generalized Second Moment Reliability Index. Journal of Structural Mechanics, Vol. 7, 1979.
54. Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Reliability of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of the Structural Division: Fatigue Reliability: Quality Assurance and Maintainability. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol.108, No. ST1, 1982, pp. 25-45.
55. Rosenblatt M.: Remarks on a Multivariante Transformations. Annals of Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 23, 1952.
56. Guohua C., Shuo D.: Study of the Reliability Assessment Methodology for Pressure Vessels Containing Defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, No. 69, 1996, pp. 273-277.
57. Rahman S.: A Stochastic Model for Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis of Circumferential Through-Wall-Cracked Pipes Subject to Bending. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 52, No 2, 1999, pp. 265-288.
58. Herman Shen M.-H.: Reliability Assessment of High Cycle Fatigue Design of Gas Turbine Blades Using the Probabilistic Goodman Diagram. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 21, 1999, pp. 699-708.
59. Cremona C., Lukic M.: Probability-Based Assessment of Maintenance of Welded Joints Damaged by Fatigue. Nuclear Engineering and Design. No 182, 1998, pp. 253-266.
60. Wirshing P. H.: Probabilistic Fatigue Analysis [in:] Probabilistic Structural Mechanics Handbook. Theory and Industrial Applications. Chapman & Hall, New York, Bonn 1995.
61. Sutharshana S. at al.: A Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Approach for Structural Reliability Assessment of Space Flight Systems. ASTM STP 1122, 1992, 234-246.
62. Mahadevan S.: System Reliability Analysis [in:] Reliability - Based Mechanical Design. Ed. Cruse, T.A., New York, Basel, Hong Kong, 1997, pp. 123-146.
63. Jakubczak H.: Probabilistyczna metoda oceny trwałości zmęczeniowej według metody odkształceń lokalnych. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Opolskiej, Mechanika, z. 64, 2001, ss. 181-168.
64. Zhou J., Shen S.: A Study on the Reliability Assessment Methodology for Pressure Piping Containing Circumferential Defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. Vol. 75, 1998, pp. 679-697.
65. Oziemski S.: Efektywność eksploatacji maszyn. Wyd. ITE, Radom 1999.
66. Wirshing P. H.: Fatigue Reliability for Offshore Structures. Journal of Structural Division of ASCE. Vol. 110. 1984, 2340-2356.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPB3-0014-0025