Applicability of Indicators of Trabecular Bone Structure for Evaluation of its Mechanical Properties

• Autorzy: Cichański A. , Nowicki K. , Mazurkiewicz A. , Topoliński T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents the results of examination of relations between indicators describing trabecular bone structure and its static and cyclic compressive strength. Samples of human trabecular bone were subject to microtomographic tests in order to specify indicators describing its structure. Part of the samples was subject to static compression tests, part to cyclic compressing loads with stepwise increasing amplitude. Evaluation of a degree of applicability level of estimation of bone compressive strength properties was conducted based upon values of structure indicators. Evaluation was performed based upon values of obtained determination coefficients R2 for linear regression. Obtained R2 values were within the range of 0.30-0.51 for relations between examined indicators and static compressive strength within the range of 0.47-0.69 for relations with the results of cyclic test with stepwise increasing amplitude.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

trabecular bone; testing method; bone structure indicators

PL

kość beleczkowa; metody testowe; wskaźniki struktury kości

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Acta Mechanica et Automatica
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 6, no. 3
• Strony: 27--30
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 9 poz., Rys.

Twórcy

autor

Cichański A.

autor

Nowicki K.

autor

Mazurkiewicz A.

autor

Topoliński T.

• Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Technology and Life Sciences, ul. Kaliskiego 7, 85-789 Bydgoszcz, Poland,

Bibliografia

• 1. Biewener A.A. (1993), Safety factors in bone strength, Calcified Tissue International, Vol. 53, Suppl. 1, 68-74.
• 2. Taylor M., Tanner K.E. (1997), Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: a possible cause of implant migration and loosening, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 79-B, 181-182.
• 3. Warden S.J., Burr D.B., Brukner P.D. (2006), Stress fractures: pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors, Current Osteoporosis Reports, Vol. 4, No. 3, 103-109.
• 4. Rapillard L., Charlebois M., Zysset P.K. (2006), Compressive fatigue behavior of human vertebral trabecular bone, Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2133-2139.
• 5. Keaveny T.M., Borchers R.E., Gibson L.J., Hayes W.C. (1993), Technical Note: Theoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in trabecular bone compressive modulus, Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 26, 599-607.
• 6. Martin, R.B. (2003), Fatigue Microdamage as an Essential Element of Bone Mechanics and Biology, Calcified Tissue International, Vol. 73, 101-107.
• 7. Parfitt A.M., Drezner M.K., Glorieux F.H., et. al. (1987), Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee, Journal of Bone Mineral Research, Vol. 2, 595-610.
• 8. Haddock S.M., Yeh O.C., Mummaneni P.V., Rosenberg W.S., Keaveny T.M. (2004), Similarity in the fatigue behavior of trabecular bone across site and species, Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 37, No. 2, 181-187.
• 9. Zioupos P., Gresle M., Winwood K. (2008), Fatigue strength of human cortical bone: Age, physical, and material heterogeneity effects, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 86A, No. 3, 627-636.