Rationale for mu-synthesis control of flexible rotor-magnetic bearing systems

• Autorzy: Sawicki J. T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The emergence of sophisticated formal control synthesis tools provokes important questions for any prospective user: why learn to use these new tools, what will they offer me? In synthesis of magnetic bearing controllers, it turns out that the range of stabilizing controllers is often quite narrow so that the difference between a poor controller and an “optimal” one may be small. Hence, the product of formal control synthesis tools often looks and performs much like what a reasonably clever control engineer would produce by hand. This paper demonstrates that the real value of these tools lies in a) generation of a performance benchmark which can be used to firmly establish the best performance relative to a specification and b) change of design parameter space to one which is relatively easy to maintain and represents a durable investment from an engineering process view.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

robust control; flexible rotor; mu-synthesis; uncertainties

PL

sterowanie odporne; niepewność pomiaru

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Acta Mechanica et Automatica
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: Vol. 2, no. 2
• Strony: 67--74
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 13 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Sawicki J. T.

• Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cleveland State University, 2121 Euclid Avenue, SH-245, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA,

Bibliografia

• 1. Zhou, K., Doyle, J. C., and Glover, K. (1996), Robust and Optimal Control. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• 2. Goodwin, G. C. (2001), Control System Design. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• 3. Green, M., and Limebeer, D. J. N. (1995), Linear Robust Control. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• 4. Sawicki, J.T. and Maslen, E.H., Bischof, K.R. (2007), “Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Machining Spindle with Active Magnetic Bearings,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21(6), pp. 847-850.
• 5. Fittro, R., and Knospe, C. (1999), “μ control of a high speed spindle thrust magnetic bearing”, In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 570–575.
• 6. Sawicki, J.T. and Maslen, E.H. (2007),“Rotordynamic Response and Identification of AMB Machining Spindle,” Paper GT2007-28018, Turbo ASME Turbo Expo Conference, May 14 17, Montreal, Canada.
• 7. Sawicki, J.T. and Maslen, E.H. (2006), “AMB Controller Design for a Machning Spindle using μ-Synthesis,” The Tenth International Symposium on Magnetic Bearings (ISMB-10), Martigny, Switzerland, August 21-23.
• 8. Namarikawa, T., and Fujita, M. (1999), “Uncertain model and μ-synthesis of a magnetic bearing”, In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 558–563.
• 9. Tsiotras, P., Wilson, B., and Bartlett, R. (2000), “Control of zero-bias magnetic bearings using control Lyapunov functions”, In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2000, Vol. 4, pp. 4048–4053.
• 10. de Queiroz, M. S., and Dawson, D. M. (1996), “Nonlinear control of active magnetic bearings: a backstepping approach”. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 4(5), September, pp. 545–552.
• 11. Lindlau, J. D., and Knospe, C. R. (2002), “Feedback linearization of an active magnetic bearing with voltage control” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 10(1), January, pp. 21–31.
• 12. Cole, M. O. T., Keogh, P. S., and Burrows, C. R. (2000), “Fault-tolerant control of rotor/magnetic bearing systems using reconfigurable control with builtin fault detection”. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 214(12), pp. 1445–1465.
• 13. The MathWorks (2004), Robust Control Toolbox User’s Manual, 3rd ed. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Natick, MA.