Future comes when the present turns into the past: from gravitational to network spatial structures

• Autorzy: Baranets G. G.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Budusee prihodit, kogda nastoasee stanovitsa prošlym

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Success of spatial planning and urban growth management depends on our knowledge about cities and systems of settlements. Dominating in the relevant domestic theory views are continue to be almost unchanged since eighties of the 20th Century and can be described with the gravitational model. General overview of spatial development processes provides opportunity to identify at least two patterns of spatial organisation associated with the subsequent stages of settlement systems’ structural development. Structural organisation at the earliest stage can be described with linear-nodal model. Lately this pattern of spatial organisation had been substituted by gravitational structures. Establishment of such structures were predefined by establishment of centralised mechanisms of territorial management. Within every stage of structural development three phases are identified: origin and development (1), sustainability (2) and destruction (3). The first phase of origin and development overlaps the last phase of the previous stage. The contemporary period is characterised as the last phase of gravitational structural organisation and transition to the new pattern of spatial organisation on the basis of network model.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

spatial planning; system of settlement; spatial settlement structure

PL

zaludnienie; planowanie przestrzenne

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Architecturae et Artibus
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 3, no. 3
• Strony: 14--19
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 10 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Baranets G. G.

• Town Planning Department, Belarusian National Technical University, 65 Nezavisimosty Avenue, Minsk,

Bibliografia

• 1. Robinson I. (ed.) (1972), Decision-Making in Urban Planning, Sage, Newbury Park.
• 2. Баранец Г.Г. (2004), Градостроительная практи- ка и общая теория планирования.– Архитектурные тетради, современные проблемы архитек- туры и стратегия архитектурного образования, сб. науч. тр., вып.1. – Мн.: «Юнимедиа», Минck.
• 3. Баранец Г.Г. (2007), Архитектурное образование: «неархитектурный» взгляд. Архитектурное образование на перепутье: выбор траекторий, Материалы международной научной конференции, Вологда.
• 4. Benvenist G. (1990), Mastering the Politics of Planning: Creating Credible Plans and Policies That Make a Difference, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, Oxford.
• 5. Rydin Y. (1993), The British Planning System. An Introduction, Macmillan Press Ltd, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London.
• 6. Healey P. (1997), Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies,Macmillan Press Ltd., Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London.
• 7. Г.А. Потаев (отв. ред.), И.А. Иодо, К.К. Хачатрянч, А.И. Ничкасов (Редкол.) (1999), Градостроительство и территориальная планировка: понятийно-терминологический словарь, Мин-во архитектуры и стр-ва Респ. Беларусь, Мн.: Минсктиппроект.
• 8. Иодо И.А., Потаев Г.А. (2003), Основы градостроительства и территориально планировки, Учеб. для вузов., Мн.: «УниверсалПресс».
• 9. Бунин А.В., Саваренская Т.Ф.(1997), История градостроительного искусства: В 2-х т., 2-е изд., М.: Стройиздат.
• 10. Баранец Г.Г. (2003), Национальная экологическая сеть: проблемы управляемого развития, Вестник БНТУ, Минск.