Biomechaniczne aspekty endoprotezoplastyk stawu biodrowego.

• Autorzy: Kusz D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Biomechanical aspects of the hip joint endoprosthesoplasty.

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W pracy omówiono wybrane czynniki biomechaniczne, określające relacje pomiędzy endoprotezą stawu biodrowego a tkanką kostną chorego oraz różnice w patogenezie obluzowania panewki i komponenty udowej sztucznego stawu. Przedstawiono uwarunkowania biofunkcjonalności implantów w zależności od budowy modeli i sposobu ich zamocowania. Podkreślono znaczenie właściwości materiałowych endoprotez, w tym zwłaszcza odpowiedniej sztywności, na odległe wyniki alloplastyk.

EN

In the paper selected, biomechanical factors which specify relations between the hip endoprosthesis and patient's bone tissue and also differences in pathogenesis of a cup and femoral component of artificial joint loosening were disscused. The conditions of implants biofunction depending on the structure of models and the way of fixing them were provided. The importance of the material attributes of the endoprosthesis and particulary their proper stiffness for long term alloplasty results was stressed.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

biomechanika; endoprotezoplastyka; staw biodrowy

EN

biomechanics; endoprosthesoplasty; hip joint

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Inżynieria Materiałowa
• Rocznik: 1998
• Tom: R. XIX, nr 2
• Strony: 39--44
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Kusz D.

• Katedra i Klinika Ortopedii Śląskiej Akademii Medycznej

Bibliografia

• [1] Black J:Metal on metal bearings. Clin. Orthop., 1996, t. 329S, str. 244–255
• [2] Bobyn J. D., Mortimer E. S., Glassman A. H., Engh C. A., Miller J. E 1 Brooks C. E.: Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Clin. Orthop., 1992, t. 274, str, 79–96
• [3] Cech O., Jirova J., Novotny R., Beznoska S.: Biomechanicka studie noveho typu izoelasticke cervikokapitalni endoprotezy Poldi. Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech., 1983, t. 50 (2), str. 138-146
• [4] Dujardin F. H., Mollard R., Toupin J. M., Coblentz A., Thomine J. M.: Micromotion, fit, and fill of custom made femoral stems designed with an automated process. Clin. Orthop., 1996, t. 325, str. 276–289
• [5] Engh C. A., Bobyn J. D.: The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop., 1988, t. 231, str. 7-28
• [6] Engh C. A., Glassman A. H., Suthers K. E.: The case for porous-coated hip implants. Clin. Orthop., 1990, t. 261, str. 63–81
• [7] Galante J. O., Jacobs J.: Clinical performances of ingrowth surfaces. Clin. Orthop., 1992, t. 276, str. 41–49
• [8] Harris W. H.: Hybrid total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop., 1996, t. 333, str. 155-164
• [9] Harris W. H.: Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement? Clin. Orthop. 1992, t. 274. str. 120-123
• [10] Head W. C., Bauk D. J., Emerson R. H. Jr.: Titanium as the material of choice for cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop., 1995, t. 311, str. 85-90
• [11] Heekin R. D., Callaghan J. J., Hopkinson W. J., Savory C. G., Xenos J. S.: The porous coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 1993, t. 75-A (1), str. 77—91
• [12] Herzwurm P. J., Simpson S. L., Duffin S., Oswald S. G., Ebert F. R.: Thigh and total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1997, t. 336, str. 156-161
• [13] Hozack W. J., Rothman R. H., Eng K., Mesa J.: Primary cementless hip arthroplasty with a titanium plasma sprayed prosthesis. Clin. Orthop.. 1996, t. 333, str. 217–225 1996, t. 333, str. 217-225
• [14] Hughes S. S., Furia J. P., Smith P., Pellegrini V. D. Jr.: Atrophy of the proximal part of the femur after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J 1 Bone Joint Surg. Am., 1995, t. 77-A (2), str. 231–239
• [15] Huiskes R.: The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin. Orthop., 1990, t. 261, str. 27-38
• [16] Huiskes R., Van Rietbergen B.: Preclinical testing of total hip stems. Clin. Orthop., 1995, t. 319, str. 64–76
• [17] Huiskes R., Weinans H., Van Rietbergen B.: The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin. Orthop., 1992, t. 274, str. 124-134
• [18] Jasty M., Maloney W. J., Bragdon C. R., Haire T., Harris W. H.: Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 1990, t- 72-A (8), str. 1220-1229
• [19] Lee A. J. C., Ling R. S. M.: Total hip replacement with a collarless femoral stem. W: Clinical biomechanics, red. Black J., Dumbleton J. H., Churchill Livingstone, New York, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne 1981, str. 156–172
• [20] Lewis J. L., Askew M. J., Wixson R. L., Kramer G. M., Tarr R. R.: The influence of prosthetic stem stiffness and of a calcar collar on stresses in the proximal end of the femur with a cemented femoral component. J. Joint Surg. Am., 1984, t. 66-A (2), str. 280–286
• [21] Lord G., Marotte J. H., Blanchard J. P., Guillamon J. L., Servant J.. Samuel P., Gentaz R.: Cementless madreporic and polarised total hip prostheses. French J. Orthop. Surg., 1988, t. 2 (1), str. 82-92 str. 82-92
• [22] McKellop H. A., Sarmiento A., Schwinn C. P., Ebramzadeh E.: In vivo of titanium – alloy hip prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 1990, t. –A (4), str. 512-517
• [23] Merritt K., Brown S. A.: Distribution of cobalt chromium wear and corrosion products and biologic reactions. Clin. Orthop., 1996, t. 329S, str. 233 243
• [24] Moreland J. R., Bernstein M. L.: Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous - coated stems. Clin. Orthop., 1995, t. 319, str. 141-150
• [25] Morscher E. W.: Current status of acetabular fixation in primary total arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1992, t. 274, str. 172–193
• [26] Noble P. C., Box G. G., Kamaric E., Fink M. J., Alexander J. W., Tullos H.S.: The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin. Orthop., 1995, t. 316, str. 31-44
• [27] Otani T., Whiteside L. A., White S. E.: The effect of axial and torsional loading on strain distribution in the proximal femur as related to cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1993, t. 292, str. 376-383
• [28] Parhofer R., Mönch W.: Experience with revision arthroplasties for failed cemented total hip replacements using uncemented. Lord and PM prostheses. W: The cementless fixation of hip endoprostheses, red. Morscher E., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio 1984, str. 275-278
• [29] Parhofer R., Weinhart R., Frehner W.: 15 years of personal experience with cement-free primary hip-joint endoprostheses. Chir. Narz. Ruchu Ortop. Pol., 1994, t. 59 (supl.3), str. 218-222
• [30] Perona P. G., Lawrence J., Paprosky W. G., Patwardhan A. G., Sartori M.: Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation. J. Arthroplasty, 1992, t. 7 (4), str. 537-547
• [31] Poss R.: Natural factors that affect the shape and strength of the aging human femur. Clin. Orthop., 1992, t. 274, str. 194–201
• [32] Pritchett J. W. Fernoral bone loss following hip replacement. Clin. Orthop., 1995, t. 314, str. 156–161
• [33] Reuben J. D., Eismont F. J., Burstein A. H., Wright T. M.: Comparative |mechanical properties of forty-five total hip stems. Clin. Orthop., 1979, 141, str. 55–65
• [34] Schmalzried T. P., Kwong L. M., Jasty M., Sedlacek R. C., Haire T. C., O’Connor D. O., Bragdon C. R., Kabo J. M., Malcolm A. J., Harris W. H.: The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1992, t. 274, str. 60-78
• [35] Schneider E., Eulenberger J., Steiner W., Wyder D., Friedman R. J., Perren S. M.: Experimental method for the in vitro testing of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. J. Biomech., 1989, t. 22 (6/7), str. 35-744
• [36] Sumner D. R., Galante J. O.: Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin. Orthop., 1992, t. 274, str. 202–212
• [37] Sumner D. R., Turner T. M., Urban R. M., Galante J. O.: Experimental studies of bone remodeling in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1992, t. 276, str. 83- 90
• [38] Walker P. S., Gold B. L.: The tribology (friction lubrication and wear of all metal artificial hip joints. Clin. Orthop ., 1996, t.329S, str.4-10
• [39] Walker P. S., Schneeweis D., Murphy S., Nelson P.: Strains and micromotions of– fit femoral stem prostheses. J. Biomech., 1987, t. 20(7), str. 693-702
• [40] Willert H. G., Bertram H., Buchhorn G. H.: Osteolysis in alloarthroplas of the hip. Clin. Orthop., 1990, t. 258, str. 95-107
• [41] Yoder S. A., Brand R. A., Pedersen D. R., O’Gorman T. W.: Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin. Orthop., 1988, t. 228, str. 79–87