The relationships between aboveground biomass and Voronoi area of coexisting species in an old-field community

• Autorzy: Du F. , Xu X. , Zhang X. , Sui Y. , Shao M. , Hu L. , Shan L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Voronoi area of coexisting species in a community has an important role in determining their performances as it is related with the available resources around individuals. Biomass formed within certain Voronoi area probably can be a mark of species that characterised resource competition ability of coexisting species in natural community. In this article, we tried to probe the subject in the following three aspects: 1) what is the apparent relationship between individuals' aboveground biomass and their available Voronoi area for species in natural community? 2) what is the possible theoretic relationship between them? 3) additionally, whether there are any possible indices that can be elicited from species' occupied Voronoi area to reflect species' competitive ability. Using individual-based investigation of aboveground biomass and their corresponding positions, Voronoi area of all individuals of coexisting species in an old field community were computed. The growth of an individual could be regard as a process to compete for resources that is limited by the available area or volume encompassed by the neighborhood individuals. We extended logistic growth model to describe the relationship between Voronoi area and aboveground biomass of coexisting species by relating limiting rhizospheral resource with the Voronoi area around an individual. Theoretically, the individuals aboveground biomass is also controlled by factor-ceiling effects of Voronoi area. So the extended model was fitted with boundary analysis method. And also, their linear relationship was fitted. Under the prediction that competive ability is one of the main driving factors of community succession, two parameters as the Voronoi area of coexisting species and the Voronoi area per unit of aboveground biomass were used to check whether they can designate species' competitive abilities and competitive hierarchies. This was presented by fitting the two parameters with the successional niche positions that was represented by the ordination values along abandonment ages of old field communities in the local area. The results showed that: 1) For most species, the linear regression demonstrated that Voronoi area of an individual that occupied larger Voronoi area tended to have greater aboveground biomass. The nonlinear regression of showed that the relationship might depend upon species' growth characteristics, like shade tolerance and root proliferation. Generally, the relationship could be better fitted by the extended logistic growth model using boundary analysis method than by the linear regression, except for some shade-preferring or clone species. If factor-ceiling effects were considered, at the highest, about 48% of the variation of aboveground biomass could be interpreted by Voronoi area. For some other species with light preference or clone proliferation, the determination coefficient was around zero. 2) Species. averaged Voronoi area had significant and positive Kendall's tau-b and Spearman correlations with successional niches, and species' per-unit aboveground biomass positions of Voronoi area has significantly negative rank correlation with successional niche positions. These indicate that both of them can reflect species' competitive ability and hierarchy to some extent.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

above-ground biomass; boundary analysis; competitive ability; competitive hierarchy; extended logistic model; plant performance; successional niche position; Voronoi area

PL

biomasa nadziemna; hierarchia; konkurencyjność

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 60, nr 3
• Strony: 479--489
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Du F.

autor

Xu X.

autor

Zhang X.

autor

Sui Y.

autor

Shao M.

autor

Hu L.

autor

Shan L.

• Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China ; State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Agriculture on the Loess Plateau, Yangling, Shaanxi 71,

Bibliografia

• 1. Aguilera M.O., Lauenroth W.K. 1993 – Neighborhood interactions in a natural population of the perennial bunchgrass Bouteloua gracilis – Oecologia, 94: 595–602.
• 2. Antonovics J., Levin D A. 1980 – The ecological and genetic consequences of density dependent regulation in plants – Annu. Rev. Eco. Syst. 11: 411–452.
• 3. Benjamin L.R., Hardwick R.C. 1986 – Sources of variation and measures of variability in even-aged stands of plants – Ann. Bot. 58: 757–778.
• 4. Berger U., Hildenbrandt H. 2000 – A new approach to spatially explicit modelling of forest dynamics: spacing, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees – Ecol. Modell. 132: 287–302.
• 5. Bergera U., Pioua C., Schiffersb K., Grimm V. 2008 – Competition among plants: Concepts, individual-based modelling approaches, and a proposal for a future research strategy– Perspect. Plant Ecol. 9: 121–135.
• 6. Du F., Shan L., Liang Z.S., Xu X.X. 2006 – Studies on the succession niche of abandoned arable land in a hilly Loess region of northern Shaanxi province – Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 15: 27–35
• 7. Du F., Xu X.X., Zhang X.C., Shao M.A., Liang Z.S., Shan L. 2008 – The ordination of abandoned old-field communities and secondary succession rate, successional divergence or convergence in the Loess Hilly Region of Northern Shaanxi Province – Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28: 5418–5427
• 8. Dugan N.R. 2005 – Using Dirichlet tessellation to help estimate microbial biomass concentrations – J. Microbiol Meth. 63: 205–210.
• 9. Firbank L.G. 1987 – On the analysis of competition at the level of the individual plant – Oecologia, 71: 308–317.
• 10. Fransen B., Boer M., Terlou M., During H. 1998 – Using image-analysis to quantify the horizontal vegetation pattern in two multispecies savanna grasslands – Plant Ecology, 138: 231–237.
• 11. Grime J. P. 1979 – Plant strategies and ve getation processes – New York, Wiley.
• 12. Hikosaka K., Hirose T. 2001 – Nitrogen upt ake and use by competing individuals in a Xanthium canadense stand – Oecologia, 126: 174–181.
• 13. Hutchings M.J. 1997 – The structure of plant populations (In: Plant Ecology, Ed. M.J. Crawley) – Blackwell Science Ltd, pp. 325–358.
• 14. Hutchings M.J., Discombe R.J. 1986 – The detection of spatial pattern in plant populations – J. Biogeogr. 13: 225–236.
• 15. John A., Silander J., Pacala S.W. 1985 – Neighborhood predictors of plant performance – Oecologia, 66: 256–263.
• 16. Keddy P.A., Shipley B. 1989 – Competitive Hierarchies in Herbaceous Plant Communities – Oikos, 54: 234–241.
• 17. Kenkel N.C., Hoskins J.A., Hoskins W.D. 1989 – Edge effects in the use of area polygons to study competition – Ecology, 70: 272–274.
• 18. Mackie-Dawson L.A., Pratt S.M., Buckland S .T., Duff E.L. 1995 – The effect of nitrogen on fine white root persistence in cherry (Prunus avium) – Plant and Soil, 173: 349–353.
• 19. Matlack G.R., Harper J.L. 1986 – Spatial distribution and the performance of individual plants in a natural population of Silene dioica – Oecologia, 70: 121–127.
• 20. Mercier F., Baujard O. 1997 – Voronoi diagrams to model forest dynamics in French Guiana – Proceedings of the 2rd International Conference on GeoComputation, pp. 161–171.
• 21. Miller T.E., Werner P.A. 1987 – Competitive effects and response between plant species in a first year old-field community – Ecology, 68: 1201–1210.
• 22. Mithen R., Harper J.L., Weiher J. 1984 – Growth and mortality of individual plants as a function of “available area” – Oecologia, 57: 57–60.
• 23. O’Brien E.E., Brown J.S., Moll J.D. 2007 – Roots in space: a spatially explicit model for below-ground competition in plants – Proc. R. Soc B, 274: 929–935.
• 24. Roush M.L. Radosevich S.R. 1985 – Relation ships between growth and competitiveness of four annual weeds – J. Appl. Ecol. 22: 895–905.
• 25. Pacala S.W., Rees M. 1998 – Models suggesting field experiments to test two hypotheses explaining successional diversity – Am. Nat. 152: 729–737
• 26. Scheiner S.M., Gurevitch J. eds. 2001 – De sign and Analysis of Ecological Experiments – Oxford New York, Oxford University Press.
• 27. Thomson J.D., Weiblen G., Thomson B.A., Alfaro S., Legendre P. 1996 – Untangling multiple factors in spatial distributions: lilies, gophers, and rocks – Ecology, 77: 1698–1715.
• 28. Tilman D. 1982 – Resource competition and community structure – Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
• 29. Weiner J., Wright D.B., Castro S. 1997 – Symmetry of below-ground competition between Kochia scoparia individuals – Oikos, 79: 85–91.
• 30. Wijesinghe D.K., Hutchings M.J. 1997 – The effects of spatial scale of environmental heterogeneity on the growth of a clonal herb: an experimental study with Glechoma hederacea – J. Ecol. 85: 17–28.