Life history strategy influences biomass allocation in response to limiting nutrients and water in an arid system

• Autorzy: Mao W. , Allington G. , Li Y. , Zhang T. , Zhao X. , Wang S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The optimal partitioning theory (OPT) predicts that a plant should allocate relatively more biomass to the organs that acquire the most limiting resource. However, variation in biomass allocation among plant parts can also occur as a plant grows in size. As an alternative approach, allometric biomass partitioning theory (APT) asserts that plants should trade off their biomass between roots, stems and leaves, and this approach can minimize bias when comparing biomass allocation patterns by accounting for plant size in the analysis. We analyzed the biomass allocation strategy of the two species: annual Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv and perennial Pennisetum centrasiaticum Tzvel from the Horqin Sandy Land of northern China by treating them with different availabilities of soil nutrient and water (added in summer and winter), and hypothesized that the two species have different patterns of biomass allocation strategy in response to different soil water content and soil nitrogen content. After taking plant size into account, the biomass allocation strategy of S. viridis and P. centrasiaticum differed in response to nitrogen and water; leaves and root:shoot ratio (RTS) of S. viridis were "true" in response to various soil nitrogen contents. The plasticity of roots was also "true" in response to fluctuation in soil water content. However, P. centrasiaticum showed a different pattern with no shift of biomass allocation strategy in response to nitrogen and water. Adjustment in organs biomass allocation pattern of S. viridis in response to nitrogen and water limitation was dramatic, this suggested that S. viridis support optimal partitioning theory (OPT). P. centrasiaticum has better tolerance to varied environments and more likely support the allometric biomass partitioning theory (APT), this characteristic may allow P. centrasiaticum to keep dominance in fragile habitats.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

allometric scaling; arid system; biomass allocation; Pennisetum centrasiaticum; Setaria viridis

PL

allometria; alokacja biomasy; skalowanie; Włośnica zielona

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 60, nr 3
• Strony: 545--557
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Mao W.

autor

Allington G.

autor

Li Y.

autor

Zhang T.

autor

Zhao X.

autor

Wang S.

• Naiman Desertification Research Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 322 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou 730000, China,

Bibliografia

• 1. Bloom A.J., Chapin F.S., Mooney H.A. 1985 – Resource limitation in plants – an economic Analogy – Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 363–392.
• 2. Bonser S.P., Aarssen L.W. 2009 – Interpreting reproductive allometry: Individual strategies of allocation explain size–dependent reproduction in plant populations – Perspect. Pl. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 11: 31–40.
• 3. Chen S.P., Gao Y.B., Ren A.Z., Liang Y., Liu S., Liu N. 2002 – Ecological adaptability of Pennisetum centrasiaticum clones on farmlands and dune ecotone of Keerqin sandy land – Chin. J. Ecol. 13: 45–49 (in Chinese, English summary).
• 4. Enquist B.J., Niklas K.J. 2002 – Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants – Science, 295: 1517–1520.
• 5. Esmaeili M.M., Bonis A., Bouzillé J.-B., Mony C., Benot M.-L. 2009 – Consequence of ramet defoliation on plant clonal propagation and biomass allocation: Example of five rhizomatous grassland species – Flora, 204: 25–33.
• 6. Guo J.L., Li Q.F. 2008 – Effects of clonal integration on clonal growth in Pennisetum centrasiaticum – Chin. J. Grassland. 30: 43–48 (in Chinese, English summary).
• 7. He Y.H., Zhao H.L., Liu X.P., Zhang T.H., Yue G.Y. 2008 – Growth characteristics and biomass allocation of Setaria viridis on different types of sandy land – Chin. J. Ecol. 27: 504–508(in Chinese, English summary).
• 8. Hermans C., Hammond J.P., White P.J., Verbruggen N. 2006 – How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? – Trends Plant Sci. 11: 610–617.
• 9. Huang Y.X., Zhao X.Y., Zhang H.X., Huang G., Luo Y.Y., Japhet W. 2009a – A comparison of phenotypic plasticity between two species occupying different positions in a successional sequence – Ecol. Res. 24: 1335–1344.
• 10. Huang Y.X., Zhao X.Y., Zhang H.X., Japhet W., Zuo X.A., Luo Y.Y., Huang G. 2009b – Allometric effects of Agriophyllum squarrosum in response to soil nutrients, water, and population density in the Horqin Sandy Land of China – J. Plant Biol. 52: 210–219.
• 11. Kobe R.K., Iyer M., Walters M.B. 2010 – Optimal partitioning theory revisited: Nonstructural carbohydrates dominate root mass responses to nitrogen – Ecology, 91: 166–179.
• 12. Li F.R., Kang L.F., Zhang H., Zhao L.Y., Shirato Y., Taniyama I. 2005 – Changes in intensity of wind erosion at different stages of degradation development in grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China – J. Arid Environ. 62: 567–585.
• 13. Li Y.Q., Zhao H.L., Zhao X.Y., Zhang T.H., Liu X.P. 2009 – Desertification effects on calorific value, biomass and energy allocation in Horqin Sandy Land, Inner Mongolia, North China – International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology – Wuhan, China 2: 131–134.
• 14. Linkohr B.I., Williamson L.C., Fitter A.H., Leyser H.M.O. 2002 – Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis – Plant J. 29: 751–760.
• 15. Liu S., Gao Y.B., Chen S.P., Ren A.Z., Liang Y., Liu N. 1999 – A preliminary study on the clonal growth and adaptive strategy of Pennisetum centrasiaticum and Leymus secalinus – J. Desert. Res. 19: 75–78.
• 16. Müller I., Schmid B., Weiner J. 2000 – The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants – Perspect. Pl. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3: 115–127.
• 17. McCarthy M.C., Enquist B.J. 2007 – Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation – Func. Ecol. 21: 713–720.
• 18. McConnaughay K.D.M., Coleman J.S. 1999 – Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality?A test along three resource gradients – Ecology, 80: 2581–2593.
• 19. Mony C., Koschnick T.J., Haller W.T., Muller S. 2007 – Competition between two invasive Hydrocharitaceae (Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) (Royle) and Egeria densa (Planch) as influenced by sediment fertility and season – Aquat. Bot. 86: 236–242.
• 20. Poorter H., Nagel O. 2000 – The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review – Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 27: 595–607.
• 21. R Development Core Team. 2009 – R: a language and environment for statistical computing – Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
• 22. Shipley B., Meziane D. 2002 – The balancedgrowth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation – Func. Ecol. 16: 326–331.
• 23. Su Y.Z., Zhao H.L., Li Y.L., Cui J.Y. 2004 – Influencing mechanisms of several shrubs on soil chemical properties in semiarid Horqin Sandy Land, China – Arid Land Res. Manag. 18: 251–263.
• 24. Warton D.I., Wright I.J., Falster D.S., Westoby M. 2006 – Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry – Biol. Rev. 81: 259–291.
• 25. Weiner J. 2004 – Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants – Perspect. Pl. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6: 207–215.
• 26. Wright I.J., Reich P.B., Westoby M., Ackerly D.D., Baruch Z., Bongers F., Cavender–Bares J., Chapin T., Cornelissen J.H.C., Diemer M., Flexas J., Garnier E., Groom P.K., Gulias J., Hikosaka K., Lamont B.B., Lee T., Lee W., Lusk C., Midgley J.J., Navas M.L., Niinemets U., Oleksyn J., Osada N., Poorter H., Poot P., Prior L., Pyankov V.I., Roumet C., Thomas S.C. 2004 – The worldwide leaf economics spectrum – Nature, 428: 821–827.
• 27. Wright I.J., Westoby M., Reich P.B. 2002 – Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient-poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span – J. Ecol. 90: 534–543.
• 28. Yang Y.H., Luo Y.Q. 2011 – Isometric biomass partitioning pattern in forest ecosystems: evidence from temporal observations during stand development – J. Ecol. 99: 431–437.
• 29. Zhang D.Y., Jiang X.H. 2002 – Size-dependent resource allocation and sex allocation in herbaceous perennial plants – J. Evol. Biol. 15: 74–83.
• 30. Zhao H.L., Zhao X.Y., Zhang T.H., Zhou H.Y. 2004 – Plant strategies and vegetation stability in desertification process – China ocean press, Beijing pp. 1–26.
• 31. Zhao H.L., Zhou R.L., Su Y.Z., Zhang H., Zhao L.Y., Drake S. 2007 – Shrub facilitation of desert land restoration in the Horqin Sand Land of Inner Mongolia – Ecol. Eng. 31: 1–8.