The winter bird community of rural areas in the proximity of cities : low density and rapid decrease in diversity

• Autorzy: Ciach M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The current problem in farmland ecology is the change in the character of rural development in areas neighbouring cities and towns. Progressive urbanization and the predominance of housing estates over agricultural aims led to a change in the bird community. During 2005-2010, a survey of birds wintering within densely populated built-up rural areas was conducted by the line transect method (a total length of 8 km). A total number of 33 species was recorded and the most numerous dominant was the House Sparrow Passer domesticus, which constituted 32.58% of the bird community. The group of dominants and subdominants (which constituted up to 20% of the bird community) included the Yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella and the Rook Corvus frugilegus, and a group of forest and synanthropic species - the Great Tit Parus major, the Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus, the Blackbird Turdus merula, and the Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto. The total density varied in subsequent study years from 57.4 to 87.5 ind. 10 ha[^-1] and was approximately twice lower than in other rural regions studied in Poland. A significant decrease in the wintering birds. diversity index was recorded through the study period. The explanations for this could be in the character of villages in the proximity of builtup city areas. This has rapidly changed in recent years, and nowadays agricultural management in the region is discarded. As a result, farmlands of the region almost entirely lost their agricultural character, notably becoming a residential and recreational backup for cities. The villages neighbouring cities and towns are developed into suburban-like areas, where housing estates predominate over agricultural aims. Future consequences of these changes are far-reaching for farmland biodiversity and ecology. The decrease in species diversity and evolution into urban-like bird communities is the most probable scenario.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

agriculture; bird community; farmland; rural habitat; urbanization; winter

PL

ptak; rola; rolnictwo; społeczność; urbanizacja; wiejskie siedlisko; zima

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 60, nr 1
• Strony: 193--199
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Ciach M.

• Department of Forest Zoology and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture, al. 29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Kraków, Poland,

Bibliografia

• 1. Atkinson P.W., Fuller R.J., Vickery J.A. 2002 – Large-scale patterns of summer and winter bird distribution in relation to farmland type in England and Wales – Ecography, 25: 466–480.
• 2. Bański J. 2006 – Geografia polskiej wsi [Geography of Polish countryside] – Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa, 220 pp. (in Polish).
• 3. Benton T.G., Vickery J.A., Wilson J.D 2003 – Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? – Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 182–188.
• 4. Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. 1992 - Bird census techniques – Academic Press, London, 257 pp.
• 5. Blair R.B. 1999 – Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? – Ecol. Appl. 9: 164–170.
• 6. Clergeau P., Savard J.-P.L., Mennechez G., Falardeau G. 1998 – Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents – Condor, 100: 413–425.
• 7. Dombrowski A. 2001 – Zimowanie ptaków w wybranych wsiach Wysoczyzny Siedleckiej [Wintering of birds in selected villages of the Siedlecka Plateau] – Kulon, 6: 92–94 (in Polish, English summary).
• 8. Donald P.F., Green R.E., Heath M.F. 2001 - Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations – Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 268: 25–29.
• 9. Donald P.F., Sanderson F.J., Burfield I.J., van Bommel F.P.J. 2006 – Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000 – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116: 189–196.
• 10. Evans K.L., Chamberlain D.E., Hatchwell B.J., Gregory R.D., Gaston K.J. 2011 – What makes an urban bird? – Global Change Biol. 17: 32–44.
• 11. Kleijn D., Baquero R.A., Clough Y., Díaz M., Esteban J., Fernández F., Gabriel D., Herzog F., Holzschuh A., Jöhl R., Knop E., Kruess A., Marshall E.J.P., Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T., Verhulst J., West T.M., Yela J.L. 2006 - Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries – Ecol. Lett. 9: 243–254.
• 12. Kluza D.A., Griffin C.R., Degraaf R.M. 2000 – Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birds – Anim. Conserv. 3: 15–26.
• 13. Kot H. 2004 – Zimowanie ptaków w osiedlach wiejskich Pojezierza Łęczyńsko-Włodawskiego [Wintering of birds in villages of the Łęczyńsko-Włodawskie Lakeland] - Kulon, 9: 220–227 (in Polish, English summary).
• 14. Maniarski R. 2004 – Zimowanie ptaków we wsi Umianowice (Dolina Nidy, woj. świętokrzyskie) [Wintering of birds at the village of Umianowice (the Nida river valley, Świętokrzyskie Province)] – Kulon, 9: 117–122 (in Polish, English summary).
• 15. McKinney M.L. 2006 – Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization – Biol. Conserv. 127: 247–260.
• 16. Melles S., Glenn S., Martin K. 2003 – Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species–environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient – Conserv. Ecol. 7: 5.
• 17. Mickiewicz A., Mickiewicz P. 2011 – Directions of agriculture and rural areas development after Polish accession to the European Union – J. Agribus. Rural Dev. 19: 93–104 (in Polish, English summary).
• 18. Sanderson F.J., Kloch A., Sachanowicz K., Donald P.F. 2009 – Predicting the effects of agricultural change on farmland bird populations in Poland – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 129: 37–42.
• 19. StatSoft Inc. 2008 – Statistica (data analysis software system). Version 8.0 – www.statsoft.com
• 20. Sutherland W.J. 2006 – Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental chan ge: a review of the methods – J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 599–616.
• 21. Tomiałojć L., Stawarczyk T. 2003 – Awifauna Polski. Rozmieszczenie, liczebność, zmiany [The avifauna of Poland. Distribution, numbers and trends] – PTPP pro Natura, Wrocław, 870 pp. (in Polish, English summary).
• 22. Tryjanowski P. 1999 – Effect of habitat diversity on breeding birds: comparison of farmland bird community in the region of Wielkopolska (W Poland) with relevant data from other European studies – Pol. J. Ecol. 47: 153–174.
• 23. Tryjanowski P., Kuźniak S., Kujawa K., Jerzak L. 2009 – Ekologia ptaków krajobrazu rolniczego [Farmland birds ecology] – Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 390 pp. (in Polish).
• 24. Voříšek P., Jiguet F., van Strien A., Škorpilová J., Klvaňová A., Gregory R.D. 2010 – Trends in abundance and biomass of widespread European farmland birds: how much have we lost? – BOU Proceedings, Lowland Farmland Birds III.
• 25. Zar J.H. 1999 – Biostatistical analysis. Fourth Edition – Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 664 pp.