Long-term variation in laying date and clutch size of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in Central Poland

• Autorzy: Skwarska J. , Kaliński A. , Wawrzyniak J. , Markowski M. , Mikus W. , Bańbura M. , Bańbura J. , Glądalski M. , Zieliński P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Long-term annual variation in the timing of egg laying, clutch size and relationship between clutch size and the progress of the season was analysed for the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca nesting in a mature deciduous woodland in central Poland in 2002-2010. The earliest mean egg laying date was 8 May (2005) and the latest 18 May (2008), resulting in the maximum difference of 10 days between averages for years. No long- term trend was found. The total average of annual mean laying dates was 12 May. For all nine years the average of annual mean clutch sizes was 6.54 [plus or minus] 0.28 (SE) eggs; for individual seasons mean clutch size ranged from 6.0 to 7.1 eggs but differences among years were not significant. Clutch size clearly tended to decline with the progress of the breeding season within years, with some variation between years; correlation for pooled standardized data was -0.49. This supports the idea that in long-distance single-brooded passerine birds clutch size should decrease with the course of the breeding season due to progressively deteriorating food conditions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

clutch size; deciduous forest; Ficedula hypoleuca; nest-box population; timing of breeding; year-to-year variation

PL

chów; las liściasty; Muchołówka żałobna; populacja

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 60, nr 1
• Strony: 187--192
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Skwarska J.

autor

Kaliński A.

autor

Wawrzyniak J.

autor

Markowski M.

autor

Mikus W.

autor

Bańbura M.

autor

Bańbura J.

autor

Glądalski M.

autor

Zieliński P.

• Department of Experimental Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland,

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahola M., Laaksonen T., Sippola K., Eeva T., Rainio K., Lehikoinen E. 2004 Variation in climate warming along the migration route uncouples arrival and breeding dates – Glob. Change Biol. 10: 1610–1617.
• 2. Ahola M., Laaksonen T., Eeva T., Lehikoinen E. 2007 – Climate change can alter competitive relationships between resident and migratory birds – J. Anim. Ecol. 76: 1045–1052.
• 3. Bańbura M., Sulikowska-Drozd A., Kaliński A., Skwarska J., Wawrzyniak J., Kruk A., Zieliński P., Bańbura J. 2010 – Egg size variation in blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus and great tits Parus major in relation to habitat differences in snail abundance Acta Ornithol. 45: 121–129.
• 4. Berndt R., Winkel W. 1967 – Die Gelegegrösse des Trauerschnäppers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in Beziehung zu Ort, Zeit, Biotop und Alter – Vogelwelt, 88: 97–136.
• 5. Blums P., Hepp G.R., Mednis A. 1997 – Age-specific reproduction in three species of European ducks – Auk, 114: 737–747.
• 6. Both C. 2002 – Nemen Bonte Vliegenvangers Ficedula hypoleuca af door klimaatsverandering? – Limosa, 75: 73–78.
• 7. Both C., Bijlsma R.G., Visser M.E. 2005 – Climatic effects on timing of spring migration and breeding in a long-distance migrant, the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca – J. Avian. Biol. 36: 368–373.
• 8. Both C., Artemyev A.V., Blaauw B., Cowie R.J., Dekhuijzen A.J., Eeva T., Enemar A., Gustafsson L., Ivankina E.V., Jarvinen A., Metcalfe N.B., Nyholm N.E.I., Potti J., Ravussin P.A., Sanz J.J., Silverin B., Slater F.M., Sokolov L.V., Torok J., Winkel W., Wright J., Zang H., Visser M.E. 2004 – Large-scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier – Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 1657–1662.
• 9. Both C., Visser M.E. 2001 – Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird – Nature, 411: 296–298.
• 10. Coppack T., Both C. 2002 – Predicting lifecycle adaptation of migratory birds to global climate change – Ardea, 90: 369–378.
• 11. Creutz G. 1955 – Der Trauerschnäpper (Muscicapa hypoleuca) (Pallas). Eine populationsstudie – J. Ornithol. 96: 241–326.
• 12. Crick H.Q.P., Gibbons D.W., Magrath R.D. 1993 – Seasonal changes in clutch size in British birds – J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 263–273.
• 13. Czeszczewik D. 2004 – Breeding success and timing of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca nesting in natural holes and nest-boxes in the Białowieża Forest, Poland – Acta Ornithol. 39: 15–20.
• 14. Daan S., Dijkstra C., Drent R.H., Meijer T. 1989 – Food supply and the annual timing of avian reproduction – Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. XIX, pp. 392–408.
• 15. Dolenec Z. 2009 – Impact of local air temperatures on the brood size in starling (Sturnus vulgaris L.) – Pol. J. Ecol. 57: 817–820.
• 16. Dolenec Z., Dolenec P., Kralj J., Kiš Novak D. 2009 – Long-term trends in timing of breeding of the barn swallow Hirundo rustica L. in Croatia – Pol. J. Ecol. 57: 611–614.
• 17. Drent R.H., Daan S. 1980 – The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea, 68: 225–252.
• 18. Goodenough A.E., Elliot S.L, Maitland D.P., Hart A.G. 2009 – Variation in the relationship between lay date and clutch size in three cavity-nesting woodland passerines – Acta Ornithol. 44: 27–36.
• 19. von Haartman L. 1967 – Clutch-size in the Pied Flycatcher – Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. XIV, pp. 155–164.
• 20. Hüppop O., Winkel W. 2006 – Climate change and timing of spring migration in the long-distance migrant Ficedula hypoleuca in central Europe: the role of spatially different temperature changes along migration routes – J. Ornithol. 147: 344–353.
• 21. Järvinen A. 1982 – Effect of exceptionally favorable weather on the breeding of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in Finnish – Ibis, 124: 196–198.
• 22. Järvinen A., Lindén H. 1980 – Timing of breeding and the clutch size in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in Finnish Lapland Ornis Fenn. 57: 112–116.
• 23. Järvinen A., Väisänen R.A. 1984 – Reproduction of Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in good and bad breeding seasons in a northern marginal area – Auk, 101: 439–450.
• 24. Kälander H. 1975 – Breeding data for the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in southernmost Sweden – Ornis Fenn. 52: 97–102.
• 25. Klomp H. 1970 – The determination of clutchsize in birds, a review – Ardea, 58: 1–124.
• 26. Kurowski J.K. ed. 2001 – Szata roślinna Lasu Łagiewnickiego w Łodzi [Plant Cover of the Łagiewniki Forest in Łódź] – OWR, Sagalara (in Polish, English summary).
• 27. Laaksonen T., Ahola M., Eeva T., Väisänen R.A., Lehikoinen E. 2006 – Climate change, migratory connectivity and changes in laying date and clutch size of the pied flycatcher – Oikos, 114: 277–290.
• 28. Lack D. 1954 – The natural regulation of animal numbers – Clarendon Press, Oxford.
• 29. Lack D. 1966 – Population studies of birds – University Press, Oxford.
• 30. Lundberg A., Alatalo R.V. 1992 – The Pied Flycatcher – T. and A.D. Poyser, London.
• 31. Lundberg A., Alatalo R.V., Carlson A., Ulfstrand S. 1981 – Biometry, habitat distribution and breeding success in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca – Ornis Scand. 12: 68–79.
• 32. Marciniak B., Nadolski J., Nowakowska M., Loga B., Bańbura J. 2007 – Habitat and year differences in arthropod abundance: potential food base affects blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus reproduction – Acta Ornithol. 42: 53–62.
• 33. Mitrus C. 2003 – Dependence of breeding phenology of the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in the Białowieża Forest (NE Poland) on ambient temperature – Acta Ornithol. 38: 67–70.
• 34. Murphy E.C., Haukioja, E. 1986 – Clutch size in nidicolous birds (In: Current Ornithology. Vol. 4. Ed. R.F. Johnston) – Plenum Press, New York, pp. 141–180.
• 35. Perrins C.M. 1970 – The timing of birds’ breeding seasons – Ibis, 112: 242–255.
• 36. Sanz J.J. 1995 – Environmental restriction on reproduction in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca – Ardea, 83: 421–430.
• 37. Sanz J.J. 1997 – Geographic variation in breeding parameters of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca – Ibis, 139: 107–114.
• 38. Sanz J.J. 2003 – Large-scale effect of climate change on breeding parameters of pied flycatchers in Western Europe – Ecography, 26: 45–50.
• 39. Schmitter L. 1980 – Biologie d’une population de Gobemouches Noirs (Ficedula hypoleuca Pallas) en forêt de Haguenau – Ciconia, 4: 91–102.
• 40. StatSoft Inc. 2003: STATISTICA version 6. – www.statsoft.com.
• 41. Verhulst S., van Balen J.H., Tinbergen J.M. 1995 – Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the great tit: variation in time or quality? – Ecology, 76: 2392–2403.
• 42. Veistola S., Lehikoinen E., Eeva T. 1997 – Weather and breeding success at high latitudes – the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and the Siberian tit Parus cinctus – Ornis Fenn. 74: 89–98.
• 43. Virolainen M. 1984 – Breeding biology of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in relation to population density – Ann. Zool. Fennici, 21: 187–197.
• 44. Winkel W., Hudde H. 1997 – Long-term trends in reproductive traits of tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) and Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca – J. Avian Biol. 28: 187–190.