Intra-versus inter-population variation of cone and seed morphological traits of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. in northern China : impact of climate-related conditions

• Autorzy: Ji M. , Zhang Q. , Deng J. , Zhang X. , Wang Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Morphological traits of conifer species are known to vary adaptively with the geographic and climatic variables, but little is known about intra- and inter-population variation and impact of associated climate factors on the morphological variation. Chinese hard pine (Pinus tabulaeformis Carr) is a major and widespread component of coniferous forests in the temperate and semi-humid zone in northern China. Here we investigated 12 life history traits involving cone length (CL), width (CW) and dry weight (CDW), cone length to width ratio (CLW), seed length (SL), width (CW) and total weight (STW), seed length to width ratio (SLW), seed wing length (SWL), width (SWW) and total weight (SWTW), seed wing length to width ration (SWLW) at 12 sites between longitudes (102[degrees]E to 122[degrees]E) and latitudes (32[degrees]N to 43[degrees]N) covering an altitude range of 125.2581 m. Our results showed that each morphological character presented a large variation both within and among populations. Moreover, we found that proportion of phenotypic variation (i.e. V[st], %) of the all cone traits except for the cone width was over 50% among populations, indicating that the variation of these traits was mainly controlled by the environmental variables. Although the mean proportion of phenotypic variation of all measured traits was only about 28% among populations of this species, it was much higher than those of other conifers, which further suggested that this species held the higher adaptive phenotypic variation or stress-tolerance ability under varying environmental conditions. Furthermore, the phenotypic variation presented a general pattern that almost all measured traits were negatively correlated with the potential evapotranspiration which reflected the synthetic effects of multiple factors such as the temperature and rainfall, rather than a single environmental or climatic factor. In conclusion, according to the relationship between phenotypic variation and climate factors, it will undoubtedly provide important information for the reforestation and genetic conservation for this species in the changing climate.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Chinese hard pine; environmental heterogeneity; morphological traits; phenotypic variation; Pinus tabulaeformis; potential evapotranspiration; precipitation; temperature

PL

cechy morfologiczne; ewapotranspiracja potencjalna; opady; sosna; środowisko heterogeniczne; temperatura; zmienność fenotypowa

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 59, nr 4
• Strony: 717--727
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 54 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Ji M.

autor

Zhang Q.

autor

Deng J.

autor

Zhang X.

autor

Wang Z.

• Key Laboratory of Arid and Grassland Ecology, School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Anderson E. 1965 – Cone and seed studies in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) Karst – Stud. For. Suecica, 23: 5–214.
• 2. Beaulieu J., Simon J.P. 1994 – Genetic structure and variability in Pinus strobus L. in Quebec – Can. J .For. Res. 24: 1726–1733.
• 3. Biere A. 1991 – Parental effects in Lychnis floscuculi. II: Selection on time of emergence and seedling performance in the field – J. Evol. Bio. 3: 467–486.
• 4. Borghetti M., Giannini R., Menozzo P. 1988 – Geographic variation in cones of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) Karst – Silvae Genet. 37: 178–184.
• 5. Boulli A., Baaziz M., M’Hirit O. 2001 – Polymorphism of natural populations of Pinus halepensis Mill. in Morocco as revealed by morphological characters – Euphytica, 119: 309–316.
• 6. Carlson C.E., Theroux L.J. 1993 – Cone and seed morphology of western larch (Larix occidentials), alpine larch (Larix lyallii), and their hybrids – Can. J. Forest Res. 23: 1264–1269.
• 7. Caruso C.M., Maherali H., Mikulyuk A., Carlson K., Jackson R.B. 2005 – Genetic variance and covariance for physiological traits in Lobelia: are there constraints on adaptive evolution – Evolution, 59: 826–837.
• 8. Chen K.M., Abbott R.J., Milne R.I., Tian X.M., Liu J.Q. 2008 – Phylogeography of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. (Pinaceae), a dominant species of coniferous forest in northern China – Mol. Ecol. 17: 4276–4288
• 9. Dangasuk O.G., Panetsos K.P. 2004 – Altitudinal and longitudinal variation in Pinus brutia (Ten.) of Crete Island, Greece: some needle, cone and seed traits under natural habitats – New Forest. 27: 26.
• 10. Donahue J.K., Upton J.L. 1996 – Geographical variation in leaves, cone and seeds of Pinus gregii in native forests – Forest Ecol. Manage. 82: 145–157.
• 11. El-kassaby Y.A., Sziklaio O. 1982 – Genetic variation of allozyme and quantitative traits in a selected douglas-fir population – Forest Ecol. Manage. 4: 115–126.
• 12. Gil L., Climent J, Nanons N., Mutke S., Ortiz I., Schiller G. 2002 – Cone Morphologic Variation in Pinus canariensis SM – Plant Syst. Evol. 235: 35–5l.
• 13. Jenkins S.H. 1997 – Perspectives on individual variation in mammals – J. Mammal. 78: 271–273.
• 14. Khalil M.A.K. 1974 – Genetics of cone morphology in white spruce (Picea glauca) – Can. J. Bot. 52: 15–21.
• 15. Khalil M.A.K. 1984 – Genetics of cone morphology of black spruce (Picea mariana Mill, B.S.P) in Newfoundland, Canada – Silvae Genet. 33: 101–109.
• 16. Langdon O.G. 1958 – Cone and seed size of south Florida slash pine and their effect on seedling size and survival – J. For. Res. 56: 122–127.
• 17. Li P., Beaulieu J., Daoust G., Plourde A. 1997 – Patterns of adaptive genetic variation in eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) from Quebec – Can. J. For. Res. 27: 199–206.
• 18. Li C., Chai B.F., Wang M.B. 2008 – Population genetic structure of Pinus tabulaeformis in Shanxi Plateau, China – Russ. J. Ecol. 39: 36–42.
• 19. Liang E.Y., Eckstein D., Liu H.Y. 2008 – Climate-growth relationships of relict Pinus tabulaeformis at the northern limit of its natural distribution in northern China – J. Veg. Sci. 19: 393–406.
• 20. Linhart Y.B., Grant M.C. 1996 – Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants – Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 237–277.
• 21. Maddox G.D., Root R.B. 1987 – Resistance to 16 diverse species of herbivorous insects within a population of goldenrod, Solidago altissima: genetic variation and heritability – Oecologia, 72: 8–14.
• 22. Marc ysiak K. 2004 – Interpopulational variability of Pinus uncinata Ramond ex DC. in Lam. & DC. (Pinaceae) cone characters – Dendrobiology, 51:43–51.
• 23. Misenti T.L., DeHayes D.H. 1989 – Genetic diversity of marginal vs. central populations of pitch pine and jack pine (In: Proceedings of the thirty-first northeastern forest tree improvement conference and the sixth north central tree improvement association, Ed: M.E. Jr. Demeritt) – Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA, 63–67.
• 24. Mitchell-Olds T., Willis J.H., Goldstein D.B. 2007 – Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits – Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 845–856.
• 25. Nienstaedt H., Riemenschneider D.E. 1985 – Changes in heritability estimates with age and site in white spruce Picea glauca (Moench) Voss – Silvae Genet. 34: 21–30.
• 26. Pendry C.A., Proctor, J., 1997 – Altitudinal zonation of rain forest on Bukit Belalong, Brunei: soils, forest structure and floristics – J. Trop. Ecol. 13: 221–241.
• 27. Piedra T.E. 1984 – Geographic variation in needles, cones and seeds of Pinus tecunumanii in Guatemala – Silvae Genet. 33: 63–71.
• 28. Platenkamp G.A.J., Shaw R.G. 1993 – Environmental and genetic maternal effects on seed characters in Nemophila menziesii – Evolution, 47: 540–555.
• 29. Rehfeldt J. 1991 – A model of genetic variation for applications in gene resource management – Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1491–1500.
• 30. Reich P.B., Oleksyn J., Modrzynski J., Tjoelker M.G. 1996 – Evidence that longer needle retention of spruce and pine populations at high elevations and high latitudes is largely a phenotypic response – Tree Physiol. 16: 643–647.
• 31. Rieseberg L.H., Widmer A., Arntz M.A., Burke J. M. 2002 – Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification – Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA . 99: 12242 – 12245.
• 32. Roach D.A. 1986 – Variation in seed and seedling size in Anthoxanthum odoratum – Amer. Midland. Naturalist. 117: 258–264.
• 33. Roche L. 1969 – A genecological study of the genus Picea in British Columbia – New Phytol. 68: 505–554.
• 34. Royer D.L., Meyerson L.A., Robertson K.M., Adams J.M. 2009 – Phenotypic Plasticity of Leaf Shape along a Temperature Gradient in Acer rubrum – PLoS ONE, 4(10): e7653.
• 35. Salazar R. 1983 – Genetic variation in needles of Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis Barr. et Golf. from natural stands – Silvae Genet. 32: 49–52.
• 36. Salazar R. 1986 – Genetic variation in seeds and seedling of ten provenances of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud – Forest Ecol. Manage. 16: 391–401.
• 37. Sanou H., Picard N., Lovett P.N., Dembélé M., Korbol A., Diarisso D., Bouvet J.M. 2009 – Phenotypic variation of agromorphological traits of the shea tree, Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn., in Mali – Genetic Resour. Crop. Evolution, 53: 145–161.
• 38. Schaal B.A. 1980 – Reproductive capacity and seed size in Lupinus texensis – Amer. J. Bot. 67: 703–709.
• 39. Schoenike R.E. 1962 – Natural variation in Jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) – Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 233 pp.
• 40. Segura G., Balvanera P., Durán E., Pérez A. 2003 – Tree community structure and stem mortality along a water availability gradient in a Mexican tropical dry forest – Plant Ecol. 169: 259–271.
• 41. Singh V., Sah V.K., Bana O.P.S., Singh V. 1996 – The effect of cone diameter on seed yield, moisture content and germination in Himalayan blue pine (P. wallichiana B. B. Jacks) – Ind. For. 122: 150–154.
• 42. Sorensen F.C., Miles R.S. 1978 – Cone and seed weight relationship in Douglas-fir from western and central region – Ecology, 59: 641–644.
• 43. Specht A., Specht R.L. 1994 – Biodiversity of overstory trees in relation to canopy productivity and stand density in the climatic gradient from warm-temperature to tropical Australia – Biodiversity Lett. 2: 39–45.
• 44. Thapliyal R.C., Dhiman R.C. 1997 – Geographic variation in seed and seedling characteristics in Pinus roxburghii sarg. From Himachal Pradesh – Ann. For. Sci. 5: 140–145.
• 45. Thornthwaite C.W. 1948 – An approach toward a rational classification of climate – Geogr. Review. 38: 55–94.
• 46. Wahid N., González-Martínez S.C., Hadrami I.E., Boulli A. 2006 – Variation of morphological traits in natural populations of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Morocco – Ann. For. Sci. 63: 83–92.
• 47. Wang M.B., Hao Z.Z. 2010 – Rangewide Genetic Diversity in Natural Populations of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) – Biochem. Genet. 48: 590–602.
• 48. Weaver P.L., Murphy P.G. 1990 – Forest structure and productivity in Puerto Rico’s Luquillo Mountains – Biotropica, 22: 69–82.
• 49. Willmore K.E., Young M.N., Richtsmeier J.T. 2007 – Phenotypic variability: Its component, measurement and underlying developmental processes – Evol. Biol. 34: 99–120.
• 50. Winn A.A. 1988 – Ecological and evolutionary consequences of seed size in Prunella vulgaris – Ecology, 69: 1537–1544.
• 51. Wu C.Y. 1995 – Vegetation of China, 2nd ed. – Science Press, Beijing, 7, 251 pp. (in Chinese).
• 52. Xiao Y. 2003 – Variation in needle longevity of Pinus tabulaeformis forests at different geographic scales – Tree Physiol. 23: 463–471.
• 53. Yeh F.C., EI-kassaby Y.A. 1980 – Enzyme variation in natural populations of Sitka spruce – Can. J. For .Res. 10: 415–422.
• 54. Zhou Y.F, Abbott R.J, Jiang Z.Y., Du F.K., Milne R.I., Liu J.Q. 2010 – Gene flow and species delimitation: a case study of two pine species with overlapping distributions in southeast China – Evolution, 64: 2342–2352.