Formation and dynamics of the metapopulation of Senecio rivularis (Waldst. & Kit.) DC. (Asteraceae) at the limit of its geographical range : where, when, by what means?

• Autorzy: Czarnecka B.
• Konferencja: All-Poland Scientific Conference "Interspecies Relationships at Levels of Organization" (2009 ; Krasnobród)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the studies on the metapopulation system two aspects are important: cognitive and practical. The former indicates that a metapopulation is a demographic structure of a higher level than coenotic or local populations and aims at recognition of relations between particular populations of a given species. The practical aspect reflects the issues of the dynamics and/or the extinction rate in particular populations and indicates potential habitats which can be colonized. The study of the Senecio rivularis metapopulation is created by relatively abundant population of ragwort in the Roztocze Highlands, Roztocze National Park, south-eastern Poland, recognized as the source population and three other called marginal or sink populations as well as potentially suitable habitats which are distributed as islands in adjacent hydrogenic areas. The distances between particular populations range from 1.3 to 6.5 km. As a long-lived, iteroparous rhizomatous clonal plant, insect-pollinated and anemoc anemochoric one, so having adaptations both for 'escape in time' and 'escape in space', S. rivularis may be treated as the model object of the study on the metapopulation level. The following hypotheses were put forward: (1) the spatial pattern, size and life-stage structures of particular populations reflect the time of their origin in the meta-system; (2) hydrochory is a complementary or alternative way of migration of anemochoric diaspores; (3) local watercourses and hydro-technical activity affect the formation and dynamics of S. rivularis metapopulation. The multi-aspect studies of the source population were conducted in the years 1987.2007. They aimed to establish the density, spatial pattern and life-stage structure of the S. rivularis population, both at a large scale, i.e. in the whole population (three times) and at a small scale, i.e. on the level of three particular clumps (four times). The size structure of generative genets and ramets in the whole population was aleborated five times. In the greatest of the other populations in the meta-system, the size structure was elaborated twice (2002, 2007) while the study of spatial and life-stage structures was done only once, in the first period, because of the disturbance of a greater part of the population in the next years. In the two remaining localities all plants were counted thanks to small abundance of the populations. Considerable changes in the spatial organization and life-stage structure of genets in the source and sink populations exhibited that colonization in the meta-system of S. rivularis proceeds in accordance with an island model of the 'stepping stone' type, downstream the river. Renaturalization of water relations of river catchment areas and construction of the so-called small retention objects affect the formation and dynamics of S. rivularis metapopulation which reflects at least some dynamics phases observed at the level of the source population: progressive, stable, fluctuation and/or regressive, and extinction phases. Knowledge of the density, life-stage and size structures of plants in a population facilitates a highly reliable determination of the development phase of a given local population in the meta-system and prognosis of its future.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

life-stage structure; metapopulation system; population dynamics; Senecio rivularis; size structure; spatial structure

PL

dynamika populacji; etapy życia; starzec kędzierzawy; struktura przestrzenna; system metapopulacji; wielkość struktury

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 59, nr 2
• Strony: 263--278
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 64 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Czarnecka B.

• Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20.033 Lublin,

Bibliografia

• 1. Andersen M.C. 1992 – An analysis of variability in seed settling velocities of several wind-dispersed Asteraceae – Am. J. Bot. 79: 1087–1091.
• 2. Barrett S.C.H., Husband B.C. 1992 – The genetics of plant migration and colonisation (In: Plant Population Breedings and Genetic Resources, Eds: A.H.D. Brown, M.T. Cleg, A.L. Kahler) – Sunderland, MA, Sinauer, pp. 254–279.
• 3. Bartoszewski S., Siwek K., Lorens B. 2007 – Ocena funkcjonowania torfowiska „Międzyrzeki” (Roztoczański Park Narodowy) w aspekcie działań renaturalizacyjnych [Evaluation of the peatland „Międzyrzeki” /Roztocze National Park/ functioning in the aspect of restoration activities] (In: Obieg wody w środowisku naturalnym i przekształconym [Water Circulation in Natural and Disturbed Environment], Ed: M. Michalczyk) – Wyd. UMCS, Lublin, pp. 72–79 (in Polish with English summmary).
• 4. Bohrer G., Nathan R., Volis S. 2005 – Effects of long-distance dispersal for metapopulation survival and genetic structure at ecological time and spatial scales – J. Ecol. 93: 1029–1040.
• 5. Boorman S.A., Levitt P.R. 1973 – Group selection on the boundary of a stable population – Theoret. Pop. Biol. 4: 85–128.
• 6. Brown J.H., Kodric-Brown A. 1977 – Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction – Ecology, 58: 445–449.
• 7. Bullock J.M., Moy I.L. 2004 – Plants as seed traps: inter-specific interference with dispersal – Acta Oecol. 25: 35–41.
• 8. Cain M.L., Milligan B.G., Strand A.E. 2000 – Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations – Am. J. Bot. 87: 1217–1227.
• 9. Carter R.N., Prince S.D. 1981 – Epidemic models used to explain a biogeographical distribution limits – Nature, 293: 644–645.
• 10. Carter R.N., Prince S.D. 1988 – Distribution limits from a demographic viewpoint (In: Plant Population Ecology, Eds: A.J. Davy, M.J. Hutchings, A.R. Watkinson) – Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford, pp. 165–184.
• 11. Czarnecka B. 1995 – Biologia i ekologia izolowanych populacji Senecio rivularis (Waldst. et Kit.) DC. i Senecio umbrosus Waldst. et Kit. [Biology and Ecology of the Isolated Populations of Senecio rivularis (Waldst. et Kit.) DC. and Senecio umbrosus Waldst. et Kit.] – UMCS Publisher, Lublin, 363 pp. (in Polish with English summary).
• 12. Czarnecka B. 1997 – Demography of the isolated population of Senecio rivularis (Waldst. et Kit.) DC. at the north-eastern border of the areal – Botanica Lithuanica, Suppl. 1: 111–114.
• 13. Czarnecka B. 1998 – Island population: the concept of stability (In: Plant Population Biology and Vegetation Processes, Ed: K. Falińska) – W. Szafer Inst. Bot., PAS, Kraków, pp. 103–110.
• 14. Czarnecka B. 2003 – Siedliska hydrogeniczne doliny rzeki Szum jako ostoje rzadkich i chronionych roślin naczyniowych [Hydrogenic habitats in the Szum river valley as refuge of rare and protected vascular species] – Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 59: 42–57 (in Polish with English summary).
• 15. Czarnecka B. 2006 – The status of individuals within a changing plant population and community: the example of Senecio rivularis (Asteraceae) – Pol. Bot. Stud. 22: 155–164.
• 16. Czarnecka B. 2008 – Spatiotemporal patterns of genets and ramets in a population of clonal perennial Senecio rivularis: plant features and habitat effects – Ann. Bot. Fenn. 45: 19–32.
• 17. Czarnecka B. 2010 – Wpływ zmiany stosunków wodnych na walory przyrodnicze i rekreacyjne małej doliny rzecznej [The influence of changes of water conditions on nature and recreation values of a small-scale river valley] – Probl. Ekol. Krajobr. 27: 113–122 (in Polish with English summary).
• 18. Czarnecka B., Janiec B. 2002 – Przełomy rzeczne Roztocza jako modelowe obiekty w edukacji ekologicznej [River Breaks of Roztocze as Model Objects in Environmental Education] – UMCS Publisher, Lublin, 232 pp. (in Polish with English summary).
• 19. Ellner S., Fussmann G. 2003 – Effects of successional dynamics on metapopulation persistance – Ecology, 84: 882–889.
• 20. Ehrlén J., Eriksson O. 2003 – Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: a response to Freckleton & Watkinson – J. Ecol. 91: 316–320.
• 21. Fahring L., Merriam G. 1992 – Conservation of fragmented populations – Conserv. Biol. 8: 50–59.
• 22. Forman R.T.T., Godron M. 1986 – Landscape Ecology – J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 619 pp.
• 23. Freckleton R.P., Watkinson A.R. 2002 – Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations – J. Ecol. 90: 419–434.
• 24. Gatsuk L.E., Smirnova O.V., Vorontzova L.I., Z augolnova L.B., Zhukova L.A. 1980 – Age states of plant of various growth forms, a review – J. Ecol. 68: 675–696.
• 25. Gotelli N.J. 1991 – Metapopulation models: the rescue effect, the propagule rain, and the coresatellite hypothesis – Am. Nat. 138: 768–776.
• 26. Gotelli N.J., Kelly W.G. 1991 – A general model of metapopulation dynamics – Oikos, 68: 36–44.
• 27. Hanski I. 1982 – Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis – Oikos, 38: 210–221.
• 28. Harper J.L. 1977 – Population Biology of Plants – Acad. Press, London, 892 pp.
• 29. Harrison S. 1991 – Local extinction in metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation – Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 73–88.
• 30. Harrison S., Hastings A. 1996 – Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structure – Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 180–183.
• 31. Hastings A., Wolin C.L. 1989 – Withinpatch dynamics in a metapopulation – Ecology, 70: 1261–1266.
• 32. Higgins S.I., Clark J.S., Nathan R., Hovestadt T., Schurr F., Fragoso J.M.V., Aguiar M.R., Ribbens E., L avorel S. 2003 – Forecasting plant migration rates: managing uncertainty for risk assessment – J. Ecol. 91: 341–347.
• 33. Husband B.C., Barrett S.C.H. 1996 – A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology – J. Ecol. 84: 461–469.
• 34. Izdebski K. 1972 – Zbiorowiska roślinne projektowanego rezerwatu leśnego Zwierzyniec. [Plant communities of the future reserve ”Zwierzyniec”] – Ann. UMCS, s. C, 41: 208–231 (in Polish with English summary).
• 35. Levin S.A., Cohen D., Hastings A. 1984 – Dispersal strategies in patchy environments – Theor. Pop. Biol. 26: 165–191.
• 36. Levins R. 1970 – Extinction. Some mathematical questions in biology (In: Lectures on Mathematics in Life Sciences 2, Ed: M. Gerstenhaber) – American Math. Soc., Providence, pp. 77–107.
• 37. Levins R. 1971 – Evolution in Changing Environments – Princetown Univ. Press, Princeton, 132 pp.
• 38. Łomnicki A. 2003 – Teoria metapopulacji i jej różnorodne konsekwencje dla biologii ewolucyjnej, ekologii i ochrony przyrody [Metapopulation theory and its diverse relations to the processes of evolution, ecology and nature conservation] – Wiad. Ekol. 49: 3–26 (in Polish with English summary).
• 39. McCauley D.E. 1991 – Genetic consequences of local population extinction and recolonization – Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 5–8.
• 40. Murphy H.T., Lovett-Doust J. 2004 – Contex and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter? – Oikos, 105: 3–14.
• 41. Okubo A., Levin S.A., 1989 – A theoretical framework for data analysis of wind dispersal of seeds and pollen – Ecology, 70: 329–338.
• 42. Olivieri I., Berger A. 1985 – Seed dimorphism for dispersal: physiological, genetic and demographical aspects (In: Genetic Differentiation and Dispersal in Plants, Eds: P. Jacquard et al.) – NATO ASI serias, G5, SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 413–429.
• 43. Olivieri I., Couvet D., Gouyon P.-H. 1990 – The genetic of transient populations: research at the metapopulation level – Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 207–210.
• 44. Olivieri I., Gouyon P.-H. 1997 – Evolution of migration rate and other traits. The metapopulation effect (In: Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, Eds: I.A. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin) – Acad. Press, London, pp. 293–323.
• 45. Olivieri I., Michalakis Y., Gouyon P.-H. 1995 – Metapopulation and the evolution of dispersal – Am. Nat. 146: 202–228.
• 46. Olivieri I., Swan M., Gouyon P.-H. 1983 – Reproductive system and colonizing strategy of two species of Carduus (Compositae) – Oecologia, 60: 114–117.
• 47. Ouborg N.J. 1993 – Isolation, population size and extinction: the classical and metapopulation approaches applied to vascular plants along the Dutch Rhine-system – Oikos, 66: 298–308.
• 48. Pannel J.R., Obbard D.J. 2003 – Probing the primacy of the patch: what makes a metapopulation? – J. Ecol. 91: 485–488.
• 49. Perry J.N., Gonzalez-Andujar J.L. 1993 – Dispersal in a metapopulation neighborhood of an annual plant with a seedbank – J. Ecol. 81: 453–463.
• 50. Pulliam H.R. 1988 – Sources, sinks and population regulation – Am. Nat. 132: 652–661.
• 51. Schemske D.W., Husband B.C., Ruckelshaus M.H., Goodwillie C., Parker I.M., Bishop J.G. 1994 – Evaluating approaches to the conservation rare and endangered plants – Ecology, 75: 584–606.
• 52. Shaffer M.L. 1981 – Minimum population sizes for species conservation – BioScience, 31: 131–134.
• 53. Sheldon J.C., Burrows F.M. 1973 – The dispersal effectiveness of the achene-pappus units of selected Compositae in steady winds with convection – New Phytol. 72: 665–675.
• 54. Steinhaus H. 1947 – O wskaźniku zagęszczenia i rozproszenia [On density and dispersion index] – Przegląd Geograficzny, 21: 1–3 (in Polish).
• 55. Tackenberg O., Poschold P., Bonn S. 2003 – Assessment of wind dispersal potential in plant species – Ecol. Monogr. 73: 191–205.
• 56. Thomas C.D., Kunin W.E. 1999 – The spatial structure of populations – J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 647–657.
• 57. Thompson J.N. 1997 – Evaluating the dynamics of coevolution among geographically structured populations – Ecology, 78: 1619–1623.
• 58. Venable D.L., Lawlor, L. 1980 – Delayed germination and dispersal in desert annuals: escape in space and time – Oecologia (Berlin), 46: 272–282.
• 59. Ward J.V., Malard F., Tockner K. 2002 – Landscape ecology: a framework for integrating pattern and process in river corridors – Landscape Ecol. 17, Suppl. 1: 35–45.
• 60. Watkinson A.R ., Freckleton R.P., Forrester L. 2000 – Population dynamics of Vulpia ciliata: regional, metapopulation and local dynamics – J. Ecol. 88: 1012–1029.
• 61. White J. 1979 – The plant as a metapopulation – Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 109–145.
• 62. Zając M. 1996 – Mountain vascular plants in the Polish Lowlands – Pol. Bot. Stud. 11: 1– 92.
• 63. Zarzycki K. 1993 – Kryteria doboru zagrożonych gatunków roślin do specjalnego postępowania ochronnego [Criteria of selection of vascular plants for conservation management] (In: Utrzymanie i restytucja ginących gatunków roślin i zwierząt w parkach narodowych i rezerwatach przyrody [Preservation and Restitution of Declining Species in National Parks and Nature Reserves], Eds: A.W. Biderman, B. Wiśniewski) – Prądnik. Prace i Materiały Muzeum im. W. Szafera, Ojców, pp. 55–60 (in Polish with English summary).
• 64. Zarzycki K., Trzcińska-Tacik H., Różański W., Szeląg Z., Wołek J., Korzeniak U. 2002 – Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland – PAS, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Kraków, 183 pp.