Field-sampling methods for investigating ground-bryophyte populations in forest vegetation

• Autorzy: Jiang Y. , Liu X. , Tian R. , Shao X.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

To determine the optimum plot size for bryophyte-biocoenosis investigations and identify the sampling methods that can provide sufficient and representative data for bryophyte diversity, we explored two sampling methods and investigated the species composition and their coverage in three sites located within the subtropical-temperate zone in China: mixed coniferous and deciduous broadleaved forest with species of Quercus, Betula, Pinus, Abies (Guanyinshan Nature Reserve), mixed evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest, broadleaved forest with species of Phoebe, Castanopsis, Lithocarpus, Acer, Tilia, Dacidia, Abies (Mabian Dafengding Nature Reserve) and temperate deciduous broadleaved forest with species of Quercus, Betula, Populus (Dongling Mountains). Two sampling methods are applied: the systematic-sampling method based on nested quadrates of five different sizes (10 x 10 cm, 25 x 25 cm, 50 x 50 cm, 1 x 1 m, and 2 x 2 m) in each 2 x 2 m grid within a 10 x 10 m plot (total 25 grids) and the microcoenose-sampling method (sampling with the minimum area quadrate at the center of the largest fragment in each of the 25 grids). The minimum area of sampling was determined based on the similarity-area curve, the coverage-area curve, and the importance-value-area curve through the systematicsampling. The appropriate sampling method and quadrate number were determined by analyzing the species diversity and evenness. We compared two sampling methods by assessing the species number at two different sites. Both the similarity-area curve and importance-value-area curve showed that the turnover point of sampling size occurred at 50 x 50 cm where the similarity and importance-value were closer to the actual. We concluded that a quadrate of 50 x 50 cm could be used as the minimum area of sampling. However, the systematic-sampling method was not suitable for analyzing the diversity of bryophytes. A viable alternative is the microcoenose-sampling method which allows to obtain sufficient information in terms of species richness and their distribution.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

bryophytes; microcoenose-sampling method; minimum area; species diversity; systematic-sampling method

PL

metoda systematycznego pobierania próbek; mszaki; powierzchnia minimalna; różnorodność gatunkowa

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 59, nr 2
• Strony: 317--327
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Jiang Y.

autor

Liu X.

autor

Tian R.

autor

Shao X.

• College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China,

Bibliografia

• 1. Ah-Peng C., Chuah-Petiot M., Descamps-Julien B., Bardat J., Stamenoff P., Strasberg D. 2007 – Bryophyte diversity and distribution along an altitudinal gradient on a lava flow in La Réunion – Divers. Distrib. 13: 654–662.
• 2. Anderson L.E. 1963 – Modern species concepts: Musci – The Bryologist, 66: 107–119.
• 3. Bai X.L., Zhao L.M., Sun W., Sun W.G. 1998 – A preliminary study on the species diversity, phytomass and ecological effect of bryophytes in Helan mountain, China – Acta Scient. Naturalium Univ. NeiMongol, 29: 118–124.
• 4. Barkman J.J. 1989 – A critical evaluation of minimum area concepts – Vegetatio, 85: 89–104.
• 5. Bates J.W. 1992 – Mineral nutrient acquisition and retention by bryophytes – J. Bryol. 17: 223–232.
• 6. Cain S.A., Castro G.M.O. 1959 – Manual of vegetation analysis – New York: Harper, 325 pp.
• 7. Cao T., Chen Y., Yu J., Song G.Y. 2004 – Distribution patterns of moss species in Shanghai city – Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 15: 1785–1791.
• 8. Dang K.L., Li D.W., Wang K.F. 2006 – Comprehensive scientific expedition and biodiversity in Guanyinshan Natural Reserve in Shannxi, China – China Forestry Press, Beijing, 519 pp.
• 9. Dietvorst P., van der Maarel E., van der Putten H. 1982 – A new approach to the minimal area of a plant community – Vegetatio, 50: 77–91.
• 10. Guo S.L., Cao T. 1999 – Distribution patterns of moss species on ground in main ecosystems in Changbai Mountains – Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 10: 270–274.
• 11. Heino J., Virtanen R. 2006 – Relationships between distribution and abundance vary with spatial scale and ecological group in stream bryophytes – Freshwater Biol. 51: 1879–1889.
• 12. Iwatsuki Z. 1960 – The epiphytic bryophytes communites in Japan – J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 22: 159–352.
• 13. Jāgerbrand A.K., Lindblad K.E.M., Bjork R.G., Alatalo J.M., Molau U. 2006 – Bryophyte and lichen diversity under simulated environmental change compared with observed variation in unmanipulated alpine tundra – Biodivers. Conserv. 15: 5543–4475.
• 14. Laaka-Lindberg S., Korpelainen H., Pohjamo M. 2003 – Dispersal of asexual propagules in bryophytes – J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 93: 319–330.
• 15. Li F.X., Wang Y.F., Liu L., Yang S.Z. 2006 – Species diversity of bryophytes in West Tianmu Mountain of Zhejiang province – Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 17: 192–196.
• 16. Longton R.E. 1976 – Reproductive biology and evolutionary potential in bryophytes – J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 41: 205–223.
• 17. Longton R.E. 1982 – Reproductive biology and variation patterns in relation to bryophyte taxonomy – Nova. Hedw. 71: 31–37.
• 18. Lou A.R. 2004 – A preliminary analysis of characteristic of plant communities and their floristic composition in Dongling mountain of Bejing – J. Beijing Norm. Univ. (Natural Science), 40: 507–512.
• 19. Luo L.Q. 2003 – Ma Bian Yi Autonomous County of sustainable tourism development planning Album – J. Leshan Norm. College, 18: 23–31.
• 20. Mills S.E., Macdonald S.E. 2005 – Factors influencing bryophyte assemblage at different scales in western Canadian boreal forest – The Bryologist, 108: 86–100.
• 21. Moravec J. 1973 – The determination of the minimal area of phytocenoses – Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 8: 23–47.
• 22. Mueller-Dombois D., Ellenberg H. 1974 – Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology – John Wiley and Sons, New York, 547 pp.
• 23. Økland T., Barkkestuen V., Økland R.H., Eilertsen O. 2004 – Changes in forest understorey vegetation in Norway related to long-term soil acidification and climatic change – J. Veg. Sci. 15: 437–448.
• 24. Peet R.K. 1974 – The measurement of species diversity – Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 285–307.
• 25. Pharo E.J., Beattie A.J., Pressey R.L. 2000 – Effectiveness of using plants to select reserves for bryophytes and lichens – Biol. Conserv. 96: 371–378.
• 26. Pielou E.C. 1975 – Ecological diversity – New York: John Wily & Sons, pp. 16–51.
• 27. Podani J., Czárán T., Bartha S. 1993 – Pattern, area and diversity: the importance of spatial scale in species assemblages – Abstr. Bot. 17: 37–51.
• 28. Rahbek C. 2005 – The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns – Ecol. Lett. 8: 224–239.
• 29. Raisa M., Juha H. 2003 – Large-scale changes in abundance of terricolous bryophytes and macrolichens in Finland – J. Veg. Sci. 14: 497–508.
• 30. Selkirk P.M. 1984 – Vegetative reproduction and dispersal of bryophytes on subantarctic Macquarie Island and in Antarctica – J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 55: 105–111.
• 31. Shmida A. 1984 – Whittaker’s plant diversity sampling method – Israel J. Bot. 33: 41–46.
• 32. Slack N.G. 1984 – A new look at bryophyte community analysis: field and statistical methods – J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 55: 113–132.
• 33. Sprensen T.A. 1948 – A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and it’s application to analysis of vegetation on Danish Commons – Biol. Skr. 5: 1–34.
• 34. Steel J.B., Wilson J.B., Anderson B.J., Lodge R.H.E., Tangney R.S. 2004 – Are bryophyte communities different from higher-plant communities? Abundance relations – Oikos, 104: 479–486.
• 35. Steere W. C. 1965 – Antarctic Bryophyta – BioScience, 15: 283–285.
• 36. Stohlgren T.J. 1994 – Planning long-term vegetation studies at landscape scales – Ecological Time Series, pp. 209–241.
• 37. Stohlgren T.J., Falker M.B., Schell L.D. 1995 – A modified-Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method – Vegetatio, 117: 113–121.
• 38. Sun Y., Shao X.M., Liu X.C., Jiang Y.B. 2007 – Bryophyte species diversity in main forest vegetations in Dongling Mountain of Beijing, China – Chin. J. Ecol. 26: 1725–1731.
• 39. van Tooren B.F., den Hertog J., Verhaar J. 1988 – Cover, biomass and nutrient content of bryophytes in Dutch chalk grasslands – Lindbergia, 14: 47–54.
• 40. Wang B.S., Yu S.X., Peng S.L. 1996 – Plant Community Experimental Handbook – Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press, 191 pp.
• 41. Whittaker R.H. 1972 – Evolution and measurement of species diversity – Taxon, 21: 213–251.
• 42. Xie X.W., Guo S.L., Huang H. 2003 – A study of the relationships between terrestrial bryophytes and their environment factors in Jinhua city, Zhejiang – J. Wuhan Bot. Res. 21: 129–136.
• 43. Ye J., Hao Z.Q., Dai G.H. 2004 – Bryophyte biomass in dark coniferous forest of Changbai Mountain – Chin J. Appl. Ecol. 15: 737–740.
• 44. Zhang J.T. 2004 – Quantitative ecology – Beijing, Science Press, pp. 83–107.