Effect of distance from forest edge on the distribution and diversity of spider webs in adjacent maize field

• Autorzy: Oleszczuk M. , Ulikowska M. , Kujawa K.
• Konferencja: All-Poland Scientific Conference "Interspecies Relationships at Levels of Organization" (2009 ; Krasnobród)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study was carried out on lowland agricultural lands in western Poland between July and August 2007. The influence of the proximity of forested areas on the occurrence of foliage-dwelling spiders was defined by measuring the abundance of spider webs on five transects situated at distances of 0, 20, 40, 60 and 80 metres from the forest edge. Generally, the greatest diversity and the highest total density were observed close to the forest edge, but an opposite relation was found for orb webs, built by spiders from the families Araneidae and Tetragnathidae, whose abundance was the lowest in close proximity to the forest. At a distance of 80 metres from the forest a slight increase in total abundance of webs was recorded, no doubt due to the presence of weeds, in which were recorded numerous occurrences of sheet and irregular webs. On all the transects studied, orb webs predominated on maize shoots, whereas only three-dimensional sheet and irregular webs occurred on weeds. Included in this discussion are some of the potential effects of the proximity of forest areas on foliage-dwelling spider populations in maize fields and on the possibilities for spiders limiting this crop's pests.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

abundance of spiders; agricultural landscape structure; cultivated fields; ecotonal zone; maize

PL

kukurydza; liczebność pająków; pola uprawne; strefa ekotonalna; struktura krajobrazu rolniczego

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 58, nr 4
• Strony: 759--768
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz.,

Twórcy

autor

Oleszczuk M.

autor

Ulikowska M.

autor

Kujawa K.

• Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Field Station, Szkolna 4, 64.000 Turew, Poland,

Bibliografia

• 1. Árpás K., Tóth F., Kiss J. 2005 – Foliagedwelling arthropods in Bt-transgenic and isogenic maize: a comparison through spider web analysis – Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 40: 347–353.
• 2. Balfour R.A., Rypstra A.L. 1998 – The influence of habitat structure on spider density in a no-till soybean agroecosystem – J. Arachnol. 26: 221–226.
• 3. Barthel J., Platcher H. 1995 – Distribution of foliage-dwelling spiders in uncultivated areas of agricultural landscapes (Southern Bavaria, Germany) (Arachnida, Araneae) (In: Proc. 15th Europ. Coll. Arachnol., Ed: V. Ružička) - Institute of Entomology, Česke Budejowice, pp: 11–21.
• 4. Barthel J., Platcher H. 1996 – Significance of field margins for foliage-dwelling spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) in an agricultural landscape of Germany – Revue Suisse de Zoologie. Hors série 2: 45–59.
• 5. Birkhofer K., Scheu S., Wise D. 2007 – Small-scale spatial pattern of web-building spiders (Araneae) in alfalfa: relationship to disturbance from cutting, prey availability and intraguild interactions – Environ. Entomol. 36: 801–810.
• 6. Flückiger R., S chmidt M.H. 2006 – Contribution of sown wildflower areas to cereal aphid control: from local to landscape scale – IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 29: 41–44.
• 7. Harwood J.D., Obrycki J.J. 2007 – Web-site selection strategies of linyphiid spiders in alfalfa: implications for biological control – BioControl, 52: 451–469.
• 8. Jeanneret Ph., Schüpbach B., Luka H. 2003 – Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 311–320.
• 9. Kajak A. 1990 – Spatial pattern of the intensity of area searching by predators – Acta Zool. Fenn. 190: 199 – 204.
• 10. Kajak A. 1998 – Nieleśne wyspy środowiskowe a bezkręgowce pól uprawnych [Non-forest habitat islands and invertebrates of crop fields] (In: Ekologia wysp leśnych [Ecology of Forest Islands ] Ed: J. Banaszak) – Bydgoszcz University Press, Bydgoszcz, 267–278 ( in Polish with English summary).
• 11. Kajak A., Oleszczuk M. 2004 – Effect of Shelterbelts on adjoining cultivated Fields: patrolling intensity of carabid beetles (Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52 : 155–172.
• 12. Karg J. 1999 – Rola zadrzewień śródpolnych w podnoszeniu bogactwa zespołów owadów w krajobrazie rolniczym [The role of midfield shelterbelts in the increasing of insect communities diversity in agricultural landscapes] (In: Ochrona owadów w Polsce u progu integracji z Unią Europejską [Conservation of insects in Poland at the threshold of integration into the European Union], Scientific Conference, 23–24 September 1999, Kraków, pp: 27.
• 13. Karg J. 2004 – Importance of midfield shelterbelts for over-wintering entomofauna (Turew area, West Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 421–431.
• 14. Karg J. 2007 – Urozmaicony krajobraz rolniczy okolic Turwi: ekologiczne podstawy funkcjonowania i zasady kształtowania [Mosaic agricultural landscape of the vicinity of Turew: ecological basis of landscape functioning and principles of landscape management] (In: Ochrona Środowiska Rolniczego w świetle programów rolno-środowiskowych Unii Europejskiej [Protection of agricultural environment in the view of agri-environmental measures] Eds: S. Bałazy, S. Gmiąt) – Brzesko – Poznań – Turew, pp: 40–73.
• 15. Karg J., Ryszkowski J. 1996 – Wpływ struktury krajobrazu rolniczego na bioróżnorodność i procesy regulacji biocenotycznej [Influence of agricultural landscape structure on biodiversity and biocenotic regulation processes] (In: Ekologiczne procesy na obszarach intensywnego rolnictwa [Ecological processes on the intensive agriculture areas] Eds: L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – ZBSR i L PAN, Poznań, pp: 21–31 (in Polish).
• 16. Ludy C. 2007 – Prey selection of orb-web spiders (Araneidae) on field margins – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 119: 368–372.
• 17. Ludy C., Lang A. 2004 – How to catch foliagedwelling spiders (Araneae) in maize fields and their margins: a comparison of two sampling methods – J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 501–509.
• 18. Ludy C., Lang A. 2006 – A 3-year field-scale monitoring of foliage-dwelling spiders (Araneae) in transgenic Bt maize fields and adjacent field margins – Biol. Control, 38: 314–324.
• 19. Łuczak J. 1975 – Spider communities of the crop-fields – Pol. Ecol. Stud. 1: 93–110.
• 20. Maloney D., Drummond F. A., Alford R. 2003 – Spider Predation in Agroecosystems: Can Spiders effectively Control Pest Populations? – The University of Main, MAFES Technical Bulletin 190, 32 pp.
• 21. Marc P., Canard A., Ysnel F. 1999 – Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 229–273.
• 22. Nentwig W., Hanggi A., Kropf Ch., Blick T. 2003 – Central European spiders -determination key. Version 8.12.2003 – http://www.araneae.unibe.ch
• 23. Nyffeler M. 1982 – Field studies on the ecological role of the spiders as insects predators in agroecosystems (abandoned grassland, meadows and cereal fields) – Ph.D thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 174 pp.
• 24. Nyffeler M. 1999 – Prey selection of spiders in the field – J. Arachnol. 27: 317–324.
• 25. Nyffeler M., Benz G. 1979 – Zur ökologischen Bedeutung der Spinnen der Vegetationsschicht von Getreide und Rapsfeldern bei Zürich (Schweiz) [Studies on the ecological importance of spider populations for the vegetation of cereal and rape fields] – Z. Angew. Entomol. 87: 348–376.
• 26. Öberg S., Ekbom B., Bommarco R. 2007 - Influence of habitat type and surrounding landscape on spider diversity in Swedish agroecosystems – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 122: 211–219.
• 27. Öberg S., Mayr S., Dauber J. 2008 – Landscape effect on recolonization patterns of spiders in arable fields – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 123: 211–218.
• 28. Pekár S. 2000 – Webs, diet, and fecundity of Theridion impressum (Araneae: Theridiidae) – Eur. J. Entomol. 97: 47–50.
• 29. Richardson M.L., Hanks L. 2009 – Partitioning of niches among four orb-weaving spiders in grassland habitat – Environ. Entomol. 38: 651–656.
• 30. Roberts M.J. 1995 – Spiders of Britain and Northern Europe – Collins Field Guide. Harper Collins Publishers, 383 pp.
• 31. Rypstra A.L. 1995 – Spider predators reduce herbivory; both by direct consumption and by altering the foraging behavior of insect pests – Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 76: 383.
• 32. Ryszkowski L., Karg J. 1997 – The influence of agricultural landscape diversity on biological diversity (In: Multifunctional land use, Eds:. Ü. Mander, H. Wiggiering, K. Helming) - Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York: pp: 125–141.
• 33. Schmidt M.H., Lauer A., Purtauf T., Thies C., Schaefer M., Tscharntke T. 2003 – Relative importance of predators and parasitoids for cereal aphid control – Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 1905–1909.
• 34. Schmidt M.H., Thies C., Tscharntke T. 2004 – The landscape context of arthropod biological control (In: Ecological Engineering for Pest Management: Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods, Eds: G.M. Gurr, S.D. Wratten, M.A. Altieri) – CSIRO, Collingwood VIC, pp. 55–63.
• 35. Schmidt M.H., Thies C., Nentwig W., Tscharntke T. 2008 – Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales – J. Biogeogr. 35: 157–166.
• 36. Sunderland K.D. 1999 – Mechanisms underlying the effects of spiders on pest populations - J. Arachnol. 27: 308–316.
• 37. Sunderland K.D., Fraser A.M., Dixon A.F.G. 1986 – Distribution of linyphiid spiders in relation to capture of prey in cereal fields – Pedobiologia, 29: 367–375.
• 38. Sunderland K.D., Samu F. 2000 – Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review – Entomol. Exp. Appl. 95: 1–13.
• 39. Symondson W.O.C., Sunderland K.D., Greenstone M.H. 2002 – Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? – Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 561–594.
• 40. Thies C., Roschewitz I., Tscharntke T. 2005 – The landscape context of cereal aphidparasitoid interactions – Proc. R. Soc. B, 272: 203–210.
• 41. Thomas M., Wratten S., Sotherton N. 1991 – Creation of „island” habitats in farmland to manipulate populations of beneficial arthropods: predator densities and emigration - J. Appl. Ecol. 28, 906–917.
• 42. Uetz G.W., Halaj J., Cady A.B. 1999 – Guild structure of spiders in major crops – J. Arachnol. 27: 270–280.
• 43. Wolak M. 2002 – The spider fauna of balks (In: European Arachnology 2000, Proc. 19th Europ. Coll. Arachnol., Eds: S. Toft, N. Scharff) – Århus University Press, Århus, pp. 229–326.
• 44. Wolak M. 2004 – The significance of unmanaged “island” habitats for epigeic spiders in a uniform agricultural landscape (In: European Arachnology 2002, Proc. 20th Europ. Coll. Arachnol., Eds: F. Samu, Cs. Szinetar) – Plant Protection Institute and Berzsenyi College, Budapest, pp: 327–336.