Spatial distribution pattern of macroinvertebrates in relation to morphohydraulic habitat structure : perspectives for ecological stream assessment

Pastuchova, Z.; Greskova, A.; Lehotsky, M.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Spatial distribution pattern of macroinvertebrates in relation to morphohydraulic habitat structure : perspectives for ecological stream assessment

Autorzy

Pastuchova Z. , Greskova A. , Lehotsky M.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

http://www.miiz.waw.pl/index.php/pl/wydawnictwa/polish-journal-of-ecology

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The relationship between the river channel parameters - morphological, hydraulic and substrate - and the composition and distribution of macrozoobenthos communities was studied on the 75 m channel reach of the stream (Teplicka brook, Strazovske vrchy Mts., Slovakia) located at the altitude of 256 m; with average width 4 m, depth 0.25m, average current velocity 0.32 m s[^-1] and discharge in sampling season 0.2 m[^3]s[^-1]. Following the River Morphology Hierarchical Classification (RMHC), the fluvial geomorphological research was realised on the selected channel reach - taxon defined in accordance to RMHC. The plane bed and a riffle-pool channel types have been identified in the investigated channel reach. At the habitat level morphological and hydraulic features represent an alternative approach of habitat assessment in order to gain representative macroinvertebrate sample in stream assessment according to the Water Framework Directive (WFD). The morphological units defined in terms of Froude (Fr) and Reynolds (Re) numbers differed in the extent of the shear stress and turbulence of the water environment. Also Fr and Re values rose in the row of flow types: standing water (SW) - scarcely perceptible flow (SP), smooth flow (S) - rippled (R) - unbroken standing waves (USW) - broken standing waves (BSW) - chute (CH). Different taxa and feeding groups preferred different morphological units and flow types. In terms of morphological units, runs, bars, edgewaters and scours were generally inhabited by the lowest abundance of all invertebrate groups; only Gastropoda reached the higher abundance in these habitats. Glides, pools and backwaters were inhabited by somewhat higher numbers of invertebrates, Oligochaeta and Bivalvia dominated here. Units with organic substrate (moss on boulder clusters and roots) together with rapids and riffles were characterised by high abundance mainly of Gammaridae and Simuliidae. Regarding flow types, standing water separated from others by its low abundances of taxa group but Gastropoda and Bivalvia. SP, S and R types were preferred by Oligochaeta and Chironomidae, while Gammaridae and Simuliidae dominated in standing waves (USW, BSW) and chutes. Also distribution of feeding groups followed the gradient of local environmental conditions. Significant correlations of feeding groups and flow types, current velocity, Fr, Re and depth were observed. Organic substrates played an important role in distribution and abundance of the macrozoobenthos. Overall abundance and also abundance of Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Coleoptera and Diptera was significantly higher in the moss or roots compared to other habitats.. Benthos communities of these habitats showed similarities with habitats in the highly turbulent environment (riffles, rapids).

Słowa kluczowe

flow types habitat hydraulic characteristics macroinvertebrates morphological units multihabitat sampling riverbed morphology

hydrauliczna charakterystyka jednostka morfologiczna makrobezkręgowce morfologia koryta pobór prób siedliskowych siedlisko typy przepływów

Wydawca

Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences

Czasopismo

Polish Journal of Ecology

Rocznik

2010

Tom

Vol. 58, nr 2

Strony

347--360

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 52 poz.,Rys., tab., wykr.,

Twórcy

autor

Pastuchova Z.

autor

Greskova A.

autor

Lehotsky M.

Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia

Bibliografia

1. Allan J.D. 1995 – Stream Ecology. Structure and function of running waters – Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 388 pp.
2. Allen K.R. 1959 – The distribution of stream bottom faunas – Proc. New Zealand Ecol. Soc. 39: 547–580.
3. AQEM consortium 2002 – Manual for the application of the AQEM system. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.0, February 2002, 202 pp.
4. Beisel J.-N., Usseglio-Polatera P., Thomas S., Moreteau J.-C. 1998 – Effects of mesohabitat sampling strategy on the assessment of stream quality with benthic invertebrate assemblages – Arch. Hydrobiol. 142: 493–510.
5. Brierley G., Fryirs K., Outhet D., Massey C. 2002 – Application of the River Styles framework as a basis for river management in New South Wales, Australia – Appl. Geogr. 22: 91–222.
6. Brooks A.J., Haeusler T., Reinfelda I., Williams S. 2005 – Hydraulic microhabitats and the distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in riffles – Freshwater Biol. 50: 331–344.
7. Buffagni A., Crosa G.A., Harper D.M., Kemp J.L. 2000 – Using macroinvertebrate species assemblages to identify river channel habitat units: an application of the functional habitats concept to a large, unpolluted Italian river (River Ticino, northern Italy) – Hydrobiologia, 435: 213–225.
8. Chakona A., Phiri C., Magadza, Ch.H.D., Brendonck L. 2008 – The influence of habitat structure and flow permanence on macroinvertebrate assemblages in temporary rivers in northwestern Zimbabwe – Hydrobiologia, 607: 199–209.
9. Clifford N.J., Harmar O.P., Harvey G., Petts G.E. 2006 – Physical habitat, eco-hydraulics and river design: a review and re-evaluation of some popular concepts and methods - Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 16: 389–408.
10. Costa S.S., Melo A.S. 2008 – Beta diversity in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: among-site and among-microhabitat components - Hydrobiologia 598: 131–138.
11. Frissell C.A., Liss W.J., Warren C.E., Hurley M.D. 1986 – A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing stream in watershed context – Environ. Manage. 10: 199–124.
12. Gordon N.D., McMahon T.A., Finlayson B.L., Gippel Ch.J., Nathan R. 2004 – Stream hydrology. An Introduction for Ecologists. Second Edition – John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England, 429 pp.
13. Grešková A., Lehotský M. 2004 – Spatial structures of riverine landscape (In: Říční krajina [Riverine landscape], Eds: J. Měkotová, O. Štěrba) – Palackého univerzita, Olomouc, pp. 44–51 (in Slovak with English summary).
14. Grešková A., Lehotský M., Pastuchová Z. 2007 – Small stream channel bed morpho-hydraulic structure and macroinvertebrate communities - Geografický časopis, 59: 25–48 (in Slovak with English summary).
15. Habdija I., Radanović I., Primc-Habdija B., Špoljar M. 2002 – Vegetation cover and substrate type as factors influencing the spatial distribution of Trichopterans along karstic river – Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 87: 423–437.
16. Halwas K., Church M., Richardson J.S. 2005 – Benthic assemblage variation among channel units in high-gradient streams on Vancouver Island, British Columbia – J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 24: 478–494.
17. Harper D.M., Kemp J.L., Vogel B., Newson M.D. 2000 – Towards the assessment of ecological integrity in running waters of the United Kingdom – Hydrobiologia, 422/423: 133–142.
18. Hart D.D., Finelli Ch.M. 1999 – Physical – Biological Coupling in streams: The Pervasive Effects of Flow on Benthic Organisms – Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 363–395.
19. Harvey G.L., Clifford N.J., Gurnell A.M. 2008 – Towards an ecologically meaningful classification of the flow biotope for river inventory, rehabilitation, design and appraisal purposes – J. Environ. Manage. 88: 638–650.
20. Hering D., Moog O., Sandin L., Verdonschot P.F.M. 2004 – Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system – Hydrobiologia, 516: 1–20.
21. Hynes H.B.N. 1970 – The ecology of running waters - University of Toronto press, Toronto, 555 pp.
22. Jowett I.G. 1997 – Instream flow methods: a comparison of approaches – Regul. Rivers Res. Mgmt. 13: 115–127.
23. Kemp J.L., Harper D.M., Crosa G.A. 2000 – The habitat-scale ecohydraulics of rivers – Ecol. Eng. 16: 17–29.
24. Lehotský M. 2004 – River Morphology hierarchical Classification (RMHC) – Acta Univ. Carolinae, 39: 33–45.
25. Lehotský M. 2005 – Morphohydraulic unit as base of habitat (In: Geomorfologický zborník 4 – Stav geomorfologických výskumu v roce 2005 [Geomorphological text-book 4 – Stage of the geomorphological research in 2005], Ed: J. Rypl) – České Budějovice, pp. 67–70. (in Slovak with English summary).
26. Lehotský M., Grešková A. 2003 – Geomorphology, fluvial geosystems and riverine landscape (methodological aspects) – Geomorph. Slovaka, 2: 47–59.
27. Lehotský M., Grešková A. 2004 – Riverine landscape and geomorphology: ecological implications and river management strategy – Ekológia (Bratislava), 23: 179–190.
28. Lehotský M., Grešková A. 2005 – Basic classification systems and morphometric characteristics of the channel-floodplain geosystems - Geomorph. Slovaka, 5: 5–20.
29. Maddock I. 1999 – The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluation river health - Freshwater Biol. 41: 373–391.
30. Mérigoux S., Dolédec S. 2004 – Hydraulic requierements of stream communities: a case study in invertebrates – Freshwater Biol. 49: 600–613.
31. Minshall G.W. 1984 – Aquatic insects – substratum relationships (In: The ecology of aquatic insects, Eds: V.H. Resh, D.M. Rosenberg) - Preager Publishers, NY, pp. 358–400.
32. Newson M.D. 2002 – Geomorphological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystem management – Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 12: 365–379.
33. Newson M.D., Harper D.M., Padmore C.L., Kemp J.L., Vogel B. 1998 – A costeffective approach for linking habitats, flow types and species requirements – Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 8: 431–446.
34. Newson M.D., Newson C.L. 2000 – Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges - Progr. Phys. Geogr. 24: 195–217.
35. Pardo L., Armitage P.D. 1997 – Species assemblages as descriptors of mesohabitats – Hydrobiologia, 344: 111–128.
36. Pastuchová Z., Lehotský M., Grešková 2008 – Influence of morphohydraulic habitat structure on invertebrate communities (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) - Biologia, 63: 720–729.
37. Percival E., Whitehead H. 1929 – A quantitative study of the fauna of some types of stream bed – J. Ecol. 17: 282–314.
38. Percival E., Whitehead H. 1930 – Biological survey of the river Wharfe, II. Report on the invertebrate fauna – J. Ecol. 18: 286–302.
39. Pool G.C. 2002 – Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum - Freshwater Biol. 47: 641–660.
40. Quinn J.M., Hickey C.W., Linklater W. 1996 – Hydraulic influences on periphyton and benthic macroinvertebrates: simulating the effects of upstream bed roughness – Freshwater Biol. 35: 301–309.
41. Rabeni Ch.F., Doisy K.E., Galat D.L. 2002 - Testing the biological basis of a stream habitat classifiaction using benthic invertebrates – Ecol. Appl. 12: 782–796.
42. Reid M.A., Thoms M.C. 2008 – Surface flow type, near-bed hydraulics and the distribution of stream macroinvertebrates – Biogeosciences Discuss, 5: 1175–1204.
43. Rempel L., Richardson J., Healey M. 2000 - Macroinvertebrate community structure along gradients of hydraulic and sedimentary conditions in a large gravel-bed river – Freshwater Biol. 45: 57–73.
44. Rowntree K., Wadeson R. 1998 – A geomorhological framework for the assessment of instream flow requirements – Aquat. Ecosys. Health. Manage. 1: 125–141.
45. Scott D. 1958 – Ecological studies on the Trichoptera of the river Dean, Cheshire – Arch. Hydrobiol. 54: 340–392.
46. Ter Braak C.J.F., Šmilauer P. 1998 – CANOCO Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows – Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA, 352 pp.
47. Thomson J.R., Taylor M., Fryirs K.A., Brierley G.J. 2001 – A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment – Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 11: 373–389.
48. Urbanič G., Toman M.J., Krušnik C. 2005 - Microhabitat type selection of caddishfly larvae (Insect: Trichoptera) in a shallow lowland stream – Hydrobiologia, 541: 1–12.
49. Wadeson R.A., Rowntree K.E. 1998 – Application of the hydraulic biotope concept to the classification of instream habitats – Aquat. Ecosys. Health. Manage. 1: 143–157.
50. Wenthworth C.K. 1922 – A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments – J. Geol. 30: 377–392.
51. Wetzel R.G. 2001 – Limnology. Lake and River Ecosystems. Third edition – Academic press, an Elsevier Science Imprint, 1006 pp.
52. Wood P. 1998 – Reach-scale mesohabitat variations in a small chalk steam under low flow conditions (In: Advances in River Bottom Ecology, Eds: G. Bretschko, J. Helešic) – Blackhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 31–38

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-2913-1586