Does the behaviour of spruce caterpillars improve the effect of their crypticity?

• Autorzy: Dvorackova K. , Kulfan J. , Zach P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Cryptic green caterpillars of Thera variata and Pungeleria capreolaria and brown caterpillars of Peribatodes secundarius, Eupithecia tantillaria and Hylaea fasciaria (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) were studied. The question was if these caterpillars could improve the effect of their crypticity by selecting for their diurnal roosting a specific place on their host plant - Norway spruce (Picea abies). We observed the preference for background type, preference for upper or undersurface, and preference for illuminated or shaded part of background. We found that the caterpillars chose special sites on their host plants. Very similar green caterpillars of T. variata and P. capreolaria roosted most frequently on the undersurface of fresh green spruce twigs (twigs with living needles). Brown caterpillars also roosted mostly on fresh twigs. P. secundarius preferred ; twig undersurface, while E. tantillaria roosted most often on the upper surface of twigs. Larvae of H. fasciaria did not prefer either the upper surface or undersurface of twigs. Comparing with the other studied species, they roosted more frequently on brown sprigs of fresh green twigs. We conclude that caterpillars could improve their mimicking of the particular parts of their host plant by the selection of their roosting position: larvae of T. variata and P. capreolaria imitate green needles, P. secundarius thin twigs, E. tantillaria dry needles captured among green needles on a living twig, and H. fasciaria thicker sprigs.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

antipredatory strategy; behaviour; caterpillars; crypticism; Geometridae; Norway spruce

PL

drapieżnik; gąsienica; miernikowcowate; ochrona; świerk pospolity; zachowanie

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 58, nr 1
• Strony: 145--152
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Dvorackova K.

autor

Kulfan J.

autor

Zach P.

• Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Sturova 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovak Republic,

Bibliografia

• 1. Akino T. 2005 – Chemical and behavioral study on the phytomimetic giant geometer Biston robustum (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) – Appl. Entomol. Zool. 40: 497–505.
• 2. Baker R.R. 1970 – Bird predation as a selective pressure on the immature stages of the Cabbage butterflies, Pieris rapae and P. brassicae – J. Zool. 162: 43–59.
• 3. Bennett A.T., Cuthill I.C. 1994 – Ultraviolet vision in birds: what is its function? – Vision Res. 34: 1471–1478.
• 4. Bergelson J.M., Lawton J.H. 1988 – Does foliage damage influence predation on the insect herbivores of birch? – Ecology, 69: 434–445.
• 5. Bernays E.A. 1997 – Feeding by lepidopteran larvae is dangerous – Ecol. Ent. 22: 131–123.
• 6. Bernays E.A., Singer M. 2002 – Contrasted foraging tactics in two species of polyphagous caterpillars – Acta zool. Acad. Sci. hung. 48: 117–135.
• 7. Betts M.M. 1955 – The food of titmice in oak woodland – J. Anim. Ecol. 24: 283–323.
• 8. Church S.C., Bennett A.T.D., Cuthill I.C., Hunt S., Hart N.S., Partridge J.C. 1998 – Does Lepidopteran larval crypsis extend into ultraviolet? – Naturwissenschaften, 85: 189–192.
• 9. Dyer L.A. 1995 (1997) – Effectiveness of caterpillar defences against three species of invertebrate predators – J. Res. Lep. 34: 48–68.
• 10. Gendron R.P., Staddon J.E.R.1983 – Searching for cryptic prey: The effect of search rate – Amer. Natur. 121: 172–186.
• 11. Greene E. 1989 – A diet-induced developmental polymorphism in a caterpillar – Science, 243: 643–646.
• 12. Hassell M.P., Southwood T.R.E. 1978 – Foraging strategies of insects – Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 75–98.
• 13. Heinrich B. 1979 – Foraging strategies of caterpillars – Oecologia (Berlin), 42: 325–337.
• 14. Heinrich B. 1993 – How avian predators constrain caterpillar foraging. (In: Caterpillars. Ecological and evolutionary constrains on foraging. Eds: N.E. Stamp, T.M. Casey) – Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 224–247.
• 15. Heinrich B., Collins S.L. 1983 – Caterpillar leaf damage and the game of hide-and-seek with birds – Ecology, 64: 592–602.
• 16. Herrebout W.M., Kuyten P.J., De Ruiter L. 1963 – Observations on colour patterns and behaviour of caterpillars feeding on Scots pine – Arch. néerl. Zool. 15: 315–357.
• 17. Hitchcock C.B. 2004 – Survival of caterpillars in the face of predation by birds: Predator-free space, caterpillar mimicry and protective colouration – Dissertation thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 137 pp.
• 18. Hogstad O. 2005 – Numerical and functional responses of breeding passerine species to mass occurrence of geometrid caterpillars in a subalpine birch forest: a 30-year study – Ibis, 147: 77–91.
• 19. Hunt D.M., Wilkie S.E., Bowmaker J.K., Poopalasundaram S. 2001 – Vision in the ultraviolet – Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58: 1583–1598.
• 20. Hunt S., Bennett A.T.D., Cuthill I.C., Griffiths R. 1998 – Blue tits are ultraviolet tits – Proc. Biol. Sci. 265: 451–455.
• 21. Jones M.T., Castellanos I., Weiss M.R. 2002 – Do leaf shelters always protect caterpillars from invertebrate predators? – Ecol. Ent. 27: 753–757.
• 22. Kenis M., Herz K., West R.J., Shaw M.R. 2005 – Parasitoid assemblages reared from geometrid defoliators (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of larch and fir in the Alps – Agric. Forest Ent. 7: 307–318.
• 23. Krištín A., Patočka J. 1997 – Birds as predators of Lepidoptera: Selected examples – Biologia, 52: 319–326.
• 24. Kudler J. 1978 – Familienreihe Geometroidea (In: Die Forstschädlinge Europas, 3. Band, Schmetterlinge. Ed. W. Schwenke) – Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg-Berlin, pp. 467.
• 25. Kulfan J. 1998 – Zur Struktur der Zönosen der Raupen an Fichten und Tannen (Lepidoptera) – Folia Oecol. 24: 181–187.
• 26. Montlor C.B., Bernays C.B. 1993 – Invertebrate predators and caterpillar foraging. (In: Caterpillars. Ecological and evolutionary constrains on foraging. Eds: N.E. Stamp, T.M. Casey) – Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 170–202.
• 27. Patočka J., Burgan J., Čapek M., Stolina M. 1960 – Die Tannenschmetterlinge der Slowakei mit Berücksichtigung der Fauna Mitteleuropas – Verlag SAW, Bratislava, 214 pp.
• 28. Pro Natura – Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz (ed.) 2000 – Schmetterlinge und ihre Lebensräume. Band 3 – Fotorotar AG, Egg, 914 pp.
• 29. Saunders D.S. 1982 – Insect clocks – Pergamon Press, Oxford, 409 pp.
• 30. Vargová K., Kulfan J. 2008 – Úskalia štúdia celodennej aktivity vybraných druhov húseníc na smreku [Problems in study circadian activity in selected caterpillar species feeding on spruce] (In: Zoologické dny, Sborník abstraktů z konference 14.–15. února 2008. Eds: J. Bryja, O. Nedvěd, F. Sedláček, J. Zukal) – AVČR, Brno, p. 210 (in Slovak).
• 31. Vaughan N. 1997 – The diets of British bats (Chiroptera) – Mammal Rev. 27: 77–94.
• 32. Whitman D., Vincent S. 2008 – Large size as an antipredator defence in an insect – J. Orthoptera Res. 17: 353–371.
• 33. Zar J.H. 1984 – Biostatistical analysis – Prentice- Hall, New Jersey, 736 pp.