PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Habitat preferences of the Collared Flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis (Temm.) in mountains of continental Croatia

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Habitat selection of Collared Flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis (Temm.) was studied at three mountains of Continental Croatia covered with oak-hornbeam, beech and coniferous forests. Standard point count technique was used (n = 163). Collared Flycatcher territories were found at 59 points, 17 of them identified as the best territories, with two or more pairs present. Habitat at each counting point was described by the circular plot method. Each counting point was further characterized by the forest type. Differences between the proportions of available and used forest types were tested with [x^2] goodness-offit test. Standardized selection index (B) and 95% confidence limits with Bonferroni correction were calculated. PCA was used to identify the principal sources of variation in the habitat structure. In our study, both forest types and structural characteristics of habitat had effect on the habitat choice of the Collared Flycatcher. The Collared Flycatcher preferred oak and beech forests and strictly avoided pure coniferous stands. The best territories are mostly situated in the pure beech and mixed beech forests. PCA on habitat characteristics produced five components which accounted for 84.3% of the variation in the habitat structure. PC1 and PC3 indicated the presence of coniferous trees while PC2 and PC4 indicated the forest age. The PCA revealed significant relationship between Collared Flycatcher presence and several structural characteristics of habitat: total tree density, densities of small and large trees, shrub density and average tree basal area. The best territories were situated in the forest patches with low number of large trees. Tree density is an important factor for habitat selection in younger forests, but in stands older than 100 years, other factors play more important role in the habitat selection. The Collared Flycatcher avoided forests with dense shrub layer.
Rocznik
Strony
537--545
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 35 poz.,Rys., tab.,
Twórcy
autor
autor
autor
autor
autor
  • Institute of Ornithology, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Gunduliceva 24,10000 Zagreb, Croatia, zzo@hazu.hr
Bibliografia
  • 1. Adamik P., Bureš S. 2007 – Experimental evidence for species-specific habitat preferences in two flycatcher species in their hybrid zone - Naturwissenschaften, 94: 859–863.
  • 2. BirdLife International 2004 – Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status – BirdLife Cons. Series No.12.
  • 3. Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. 1992 - Bird Census Techniques – Academic Press, London.
  • 4. Blondel J., Ferry C., Frochot B. 1973 – Avifaune et vegetation essai d analyse de la diveriste - Alauda, 41: 63–84.
  • 5. Boncina A. 2000 – Comparison of structure and biodiversity in the Rajhenav virgin forest remnant and managed forest in the Dinaric region of Slovenia – Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 9: 201–211.
  • 6. Cody M.L. 1985 – Habitat selection in birds –Academic Press, Inc. London 558 pp.
  • 7. Cramp S., Perrins C.M. 1993 – The birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. VII – Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 577 pp.
  • 8. Cyr A., Oelke H. 1976 – Vorschlage zur Standardisierung von Biotopbeschreibungen bei Vogelbestandsaufnahmen im Waldland – Die Vogelwelt, 97: 161–175.
  • 9. Delahaye L., Vandevyvre X. 2008 – Le Pouillot siffleur (Phylloscopus sibilatrix) est-il une espece indicatrice de la qualite des forets feuillues ardennaises? – Aves, 45: 3–14.
  • 10. Gustafsson L. 1988 – Inter-and intraspecific competition for nest holes in a population of the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis – Ibis, 130: 11–16.
  • 11. Gustafsson L, Nilsson S.G. 1985 – Clutch size and breeding success of Pied and Collared Flycatchers Ficedula spp. in nest-boxes of different sizes – Ibis, 127: 380–385.
  • 12. Hagermeier W.J.M., Blair M.J. 1997 – The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance – T. & A.D. Poyser, London. 903 pp.
  • 13. James F.C., Shugart H.H. 1970 – A quantitative method of habitat description – Audubon Field Notes, 24: 727–736.
  • 14. Klepac D. 2003 – Management of beech selection forests. (In: Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Croatia. Ed. S. Matic) – Academy of Forestry Sciences, Zagreb, pp. 509–523.
  • 15. Krebs C.J. 1999–2003 – Ecological Methodology. 2nd ed. – Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, California, 620 pp.
  • 16. Krebs C.J. 2003 – Ecological Methodology software. ver.6.1.1.
  • 17. Lohrl H. 1976 – Studies of less familiar birds. Collared Flycatcher – British birds, 69: 20–26
  • 18. Lundberg A., Alatalo R.V. 1992 – The Pied Flycatcher – Poyser, London, 280 pp.
  • 19. MacArthur R.H., MacArthur J.W. 1961 – On bird species diversity – Ecology, 42: 594–598.
  • 20. Manly B.F.J., McDonald L.L., Thomas D.L. 1993 – Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies - Chapman and Hall, London, 177 pp.
  • 21. Maurizio R. 1987 – Beobachtungen am Halsbandschnapper Ficedula albicollis im Bergell, Sudostschweiz – Orn. Beob. 84: 207–217.
  • 22. Mitrus C. 2003 – A comparison of the breeding ecology of Collared Flycatchers nesting in boxes and natural cavities – J. Field Ornithol. 74: 293–299.
  • 23. Mitrus C., Kleszko N., Soćko B. 2006 – Habitat characteristics, age, and arrival date of male Red-breasted Flycatcher Ficedula parva – Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 18: 33–41.
  • 24. Mitrus C., Walankiewicz W., Czeszczewik D. 2007 – Frequency of nest-hole occupation and breeding success of Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis – Ibis, 149: 414–418
  • 25. Moskat C. 1988 – Breeding bird community and vegetation structure in a beech forest in the Pilis Mountains, N. Hungary – Aquila, 95: 105–112.
  • 26. Neu C.W., Byers C.R., Peek J.M., Boy V. 1974 – A technique for analysis of utilizationavailability data – J. Wild. Manage. 38: 541–545.
  • 27. Sachslehner L. M. 1995 – Reviermerkmale und Brutplatzwahl in einer Naturhohlen-Population des Halsbandschnapper Ficedula albicollis im Wienerwald, Osterreich – Vogelwelt, 116: 245–254.
  • 28. Sherr y T.W., Holmes R.T. 1985 – Dispersion patterns and habitat responses of birds in Northern hardwood forests (In: Habitat selection in birds, Ed. M.L. Cody) – Academic Press, Inc. London, pp. 283–309.
  • 29. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. 1987 – Introduction to biostatistics. Second edition – Freeman & co. New York, 363 pp.
  • 30. StatSoft, Inc. 1998 – STATISTICA for Windows - Tulsa, OK, USA.
  • 31. Tomiałojć L. 2000 – An East-West gradient in the breeding distribution and species richness of the European woodland fauna – Acta Ornit. 35: 3–17.
  • 32. Walankiewicz W., Czeszczewik D., Mitrus C. 2007 – Natural nest sites of the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis in limehornbeam- oak stands of a primeval forest - Ornis Fennica, 84: 155–162.
  • 33. Wesołowski T. 1989 – Nest-sites of hole-nesters in a primaeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland) – Acta Ornit. 25: 321–351.
  • 34. Wesołowski T. 2007 – Lessons from long-term hole-nester studies in a primeval temperate forest – J. Ornithol. 148 (Suppl 2): S395–S405.
  • 35. Wichmann G., Frank G. 2007 – Habitat choice of Red-breasted Flycatchers Ficedula parva is dependent on forestry management and game activity in a deciduous forest in Vienna (Austria) – Bird Study, 54: 289–295.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-2715-0330
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.