Effects of post-cutting changes in site conditions on the morphology and phenology of naturally regenerated beech seedlings (Fagus sylvatica L.)

• Autorzy: Barna M. , Schieber B. , Cicak A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We studied the response in growth and phenology of naturally regenerated beech seedlings to changed ecological conditions over 14 and 19-years after cutting with different intensity. Five different types of stand densities were modelled: plot C - control plot - no cut, L - low intensity cut, M - medium intensity cut, H - high intensity cut and CC - clear cut, with 1, 8, 22, 53 and 100% of relative irradiation, and 66, 68, 78, 92 and 100% of through fall, respectively. We were focussing on tree height growth and leaf area. Our phenological observations were aimed at onset and course of two spring vegetative phenophases: bud-burst and leaf unfolding. Already in two-year-old beech seedlings we found significant differences in height growth; the differences in mean leaf area, however, were observed later. From the viewpoint of phenotypic plasticity, the height growth in beech seedlings represented more sensitive response to the environment than the leaf area. According to leaf area size and height growth in the beech seedlings on control plot, the stress conditions were indicated, primarily from the lacking light. With stand opening, the development of recruitment was getting better, and beginning with plot M the increase of seedlings height and leaf area became continuously related to the amount of radiation. The results of phenological observations showed that the spring phenophases in the seedlings start first on control plot. The start of spring phenophases on the clearcut was always observed the latest, even in comparison with the parent stand. Correlation analysis confirmed a significant correlation (P <0.05, r = -0.61) between the mean air temperature in March and April and start of the phenophase leafing in the individual years. Analysis of long-term research showed that the trend of leafing's onset observed in course of 18 years was significant (P <0.05), manifested a shift towards earlier dates.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

bud-burst; height; leaf area; leaf unfolding; phenotypic plasticity; seedling recruitment; shelterwood cutting

PL

drzewostan obsiewny; nabór sadzonek; pękanie peków; plastyczność fenotypowa; powierzchnia liścia; rozwijanie liścia; wyrąb; wzrost

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 57, nr 3
• Strony: 461--472
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz.,Tab., wykr.,

Twórcy

autor

Barna M.

autor

Schieber B.

autor

Cicak A.

• Institute of Forest Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Sturova 2, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia,

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahas R., Aasa A., Menzel A., Fedotova V.G., Scheifinger H. 2002 – Changes in European spring phenology – Int. J. Climatol. 22: 1727–1738.
• 2. Barna M. 2000 – Impact of shelterwood cutting on twig growth in predominant beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) – Ekológia (Bratislava), 19: 341–353.
• 3. Barna M. 2004 – Adaptation of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to different ecological conditions: leaf size variation – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 35–45.
• 4. Braslavská O., Borsányi P. 1996 – Quality control of long series of phenological data with sum of cumulated average monthly air temperatures – International Symposium on Applied Agrometeorology and Agroclimatology – Proceedings Volos, Greece, 24 to 26 April: 305–310.
• 5. Bussotti F., Gravano E., Grossoni P., Tani C. 1998 – Occurrence of tannins in leaves of beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) along an ecological gradient, detected by histochemical and ultrastructural analyses – New Phytol. 138: 469–479.
• 6. Chmura D.,J., Rożkowski R. 2002 – Variability of beech provenances in spring and autumn phenology – Silvae Genetica, 51: 123–127.
• 7. Cicák A. 1998 – Knowledge of leaf area distribution in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) spring shoots and possibility of its application in production ecology – Lesnictví-Forestry, 44: 250–255.
• 8. Cicák A., Štefančík I. 1993 – Phenology of bud breaking of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in relation to stocking of its tree component – Ekológia (Bratislava), 12: 441–448.
• 9. Curt T., Coll L., Prévosto B., Balandier P., Kunstler G. 2005 – Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition – Ann. For. Sci. 62: 51–60.
• 10. Dubová M. 2001 – Sulphates dynamic of surface water in beech ecosystem of the Kremnické vrchy Mts. – Folia oecol. 28: 101–109.
• 11. Engler A. 1911 – Untersuchungen über Blattausbruch und das sontige verhalten von Schatten- und Lichpflanzen der Buche – Mitt. Schweiz. Zent. Forst. Versuch. 10, 106 pp.
• 12. Geßler A., Keitel C., Kreuzwieser J., Matyssek R., Seiler W., Rennenberg H. 2007 – Potential risk for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in a changing climate – Trees, 21: 1–11.
• 13. Korpel’ Š., Peňáz J., Saniga M., Tesař V. 1991 – Pestovanie lesa [Silviculture] – Príroda, Bratislava, 472 pp.
• 14. Kożuchowski K., Degirmendžić J. 2005 – Contemporary changes of climate in Poland: Trends and variation in thermal and solar conditions related to plant vegetation – Pol. J. Ecol. 53: 283–297.
• 15. Kukla J., Kontriš J., Kontrišová O., Gregor J., Mihálik A. 1998 – Causes of floristical differen tiation of Dentario bulbiferae-Fagetum (Zlatník 1935) Hartmann 1953 and Carici pilosae-Fagetum Oberd.1957 associations – Ekológia (Bratislava), 17: 177–186.
• 16. Larcher W. 1995 – Physiological plant ecology, Third edition. Springer – Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 506 pp.
• 17. Lichtenthaler H.K., Kuhn G., Prenzel U., Buschmann C., Meier D. 1982 – Adaptation of chloroplast ultrastructure and of chlorophyll protein levels to high-light and lowlight growth conditions – Z Naturforsch 37c: 464–475.
• 18. Mátyás Cs. 2006 – Migratory, Genetic and Phenetic Response Potential of Forest Tree Populations Facing Climate Change – Acta Silv. Lign. Hung. 2: 33–46.
• 19. Mátyás Cs. 2007 – Genetic background of response of tree populations to aridification at the xeric forest limit; consequences for climatic modelling. (In: Bioclimatology and natural hazards, International Scientific Conference, Eds. K. Střelcová, J. Škvarenina, M. Blaženec) - ISBN 978-80-228-17-60-8, 19 p.
• 20. Masarovičová E. 1979 – Relationships between the CO2 compensation concentration, the slope of CO2 curves of net photosynthetic rate and the energy of irradiance – Biol. Plant. 21: 434–439.
• 21. Masarovičová E., Štefančík L. 1990 – Some ecophysiological features in sun and shade leaves of tall beech trees – Biol. Plant. 32: 374–387.
• 22. Nielsen CH.N., Jørgensen F.V. 2003 – Phenology and diameter increment in seedlings of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) as affected by different soil water contents: variation between and within provenances – For. Ecol. Manage. 174: 233–249.
• 23. Pichler V. 1998 – The changes of soil moisture and of soil moisture potential after the reduction of the stocking of beech stand – Dissertation, TU Zvolen, 83 pp. (in Slovak).
• 24. Roloff A. 1986 – Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft – Verlag Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart, 5–47 pp.
• 25. Rolloff A. 1999 – Tree vigor and branching pattern – J. For. Sci. 45: 206–216.
• 26. Schieber B. 2005 – Onset and course of selected phenological phases in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) over the last 10 years – Meteorol. J. 8: 9–12.
• 27. Schieber B. 2006 – Spring phenology of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in submountain beech forest stand with various stocking between 1995-2004 – J. For. Sci. 52: 208–216.
• 28. Sparks T.H., Jeffree E.P., Jefree C.E. 2000 – An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the international scale using long-term phenological records from the UK – Int. J. Biometeorol. 44: 82–87.
• 29. Střelec J. 1992 – Influence of cutting operation in a beech stand on changes in illumination – Lesn. čas. – Forestry Journal, 38: 551–558.
• 30. Šindelřá J. 1985 – Outline of the results of the phenological observation and some other elements of early diagnostics at provenances of beech Fagus sylvatica L. – Práce VÚLHM, 66: 9–43 (in Slovak with English abstract).
• 31. Tognetti R., Minotta G., Pinzauti S., Michelozzi M., Borghetti M. 1998 – Acclimation to changing light conditions of longterm shade-grown beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings of different geographic origins – Trees, 12: 326–333.
• 32. Uemura A., Ishida T., Nakano I., Terashima H., Tanabe H., Matsumoto Y. 2000 – Acclimation of leaf characteristics of Fagus species to previous-year and current-year solar irradiances – Tree Physiol. 20: 945–51.
• 33. Valladares F., Chico J.M., Aranda I., Balaguer L., Dizengremel P., Manrique E., Dreyer E. 2002 – The greater seedling high-light tolerance of Quercus robur over Fagus sylvatica is linked to a greater physiological plasticity – Trees, 16: 395–403.