Inter and intra population variation of leaf morphological traits in natural stands of Buxus hyrcana (Pojark.) in Caspian Forests (Iran)

• Autorzy: Yosefzadeh H. , Tabari M. , Espahbodi K. , Jalali G. , Bussotti F. , Abdi E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The leaf morphology of Buxus hyrcana (Pojark.), shade-tolerant and evergreen species growing in understorey of Caspian Forest was studied in five natural Iranian populations in order to recognize the pattern of within- and among-population variation of selected leaf morphological traits. Fifteen traits were selected and measured or calculated - list in Appendix. Leaves were collected from different geographical (between 36[degree]13'N and 53[degree]15'E) populations of B. hyrcana growing in the Caspian Forests located in Mazandaran Province (northern Iran) in the similar vegetation and site conditions but on different altitudes. Ten mature trees from five relatively small areas (0.5-1 ha) were selected in June. Then ANOVA model was used with both crossed and nested effects. The results showed that variation among the populations was significant in 13 of 15 traits (P <0.05); variation among the trees in the population was significant in 14 of 15 traits (P <0.05). Among all characters measured, the greatest plasticity was found for weight, leaf area mass and specific leaf mass. Function 1 explained 30% of the total variance and Function 2 represented another 17% of the total variance. PCA analysis showed that the most important role in function 1 allocated to width of lamina and leaf figure ratio (length of lamina/width of lamina) and in function 2 to top of leaf figure (width of lamina in 0.1 its length/width of lamina). The results of the average linkage clustering method evidenced four distinct clusters. Generally, morphological traits of leaves of B. hyrcana showed low variation among the considered populations based on clustering analysis, although some trees inside the population showed significantly different values in comparison with other trees.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Buxus hyrcana; leaf morphology; plasticity; specific leaf area

PL

bukszpan; Buxus hyrcana; morfologia liścia; plastyczność; powierzchnia liści

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 57, nr 2
• Strony: 291--301
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 55 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Yosefzadeh H.

autor

Tabari M.

autor

Espahbodi K.

autor

Jalali G.

autor

Bussotti F.

autor

Abdi E.

• Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Mazandaran, Noor, Iran,

Bibliografia

• 1. Ashton P., Olander L.P., Berlyn G.P., Thadani R., Cameron I. 1998 – Changes in leaf structure in relation to crown position and tree size of Betula papyrifera within fire-origin stands of interior cedar-hemlock - Can. J. Bot. 76:1180–1187.
• 2. Baas P., Chenglee L., Xinying Z., Keming C., Yuefen D. 1984 – Some effects of dwarf growth on wood structure – IAWA Bull. 5: 45–63.
• 3. Baranski M. 1975 – An analysis of variation within white oak (Quercus alba L.) – Technical Bulletin, 236. North Carolina Agricultural Experimental Station.
• 4. Beadle N. 1966 – Soil phosphate and its role in molding segments of the Australian flora and vegetation, with special reference to xeromorphy and sclerophylly – Ecology, 47: 992–1007.
• 5. Bissing D. 1982 – Variation in qualitative anatomical features of selected dicotyledonous woods in relation to water availability – Bull. Torrey. Bot. Club. 109: 371–384.
• 6. Blue M.P., Jensen R. 1988 – Positional and seasonal variation in oak (Quercus: Fagaceae) leaf morphology – Am. J. Bot. 75: 939–947.
• 7. Bruschi P., Grossoni, P., Bussotti, F. 2003 - Within and among tree variation in leaf morphology of Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl. natural population – Trees, 17: 164–172.
• 8. Bussotti F., Grossoni P., Bottacci A. 1997 - Sclerophylly in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees: its relationship with crown transparency, nutritional status and summer drought - Forestry, 70: 267–271.
• 9. Bussotti F., Pancrazi M., Matteucci G., Gerosa G. 2005 – Leaf morphology and chemistry in Fagus sylvatica L. (beech) trees as affected by site factors and ozone: results from Level II permanent monitoring plots in Italy – Tree Physiol. 25: 211–219.
• 10. Castro-Diez P., Villar-Salvador P., Rontome D., Maestro-Martı´nez M., Montserrat-Martı M. 1997 – Leaf morphology and leaf chemical composition in three Quercus (Fagaceae) species along a rainfall gradient in NE Spain - Trees, 11: 127 –134.
• 11. Chabot B.F., Chabot J.F. 1977 – Effects of light and temperature on leaf anatomy and photosynthesis in Fragaria vesca – Oecologia, 26: 363–377.
• 12. Coelho G., Mariath J., Schenkel E. 2002 – Populational diversity on leaf morphology of mate – Brazil. Arch. Biol. Technol. 45: 47–51.
• 13. Crawley M.J. 1997 – Life history and environment (In: Plant Ecology, ed. M.J. Crawley) - Blackwell Science Ltd., Cambridge, UK, 2nd ed.
• 14. De Rivas C.S. 1972 – Biometria foliar de una poblacion de Quercus ilex L. en Montserrat (Barcelona) – Ana. Inst. Bot. AJ., Cavanilles, 29: 39–58.
• 15. Field C., Mooney H.A. 1986 – The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants (In: On the economy of plant form and function, Ed. T.J. Givnish) – Columbia University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25–55.
• 16. Floret C., Galan M.J., Lefloc’h E, Orshan E, Romane F. 1990 – Growth forms and phenomorphology traits along an environmental gradient: tools for studying vegetation - J. Veget. Sci. 1: 71–80.
• 17. Fretz, T.A. and Dunham C.W. 1972 – Influence of three levels of light-intensity on leaf structure, area and color difference in American holly (Ilex opaca) – Inter. J. Experim. Bot. 30: 135–139.
• 18. Garnier E., Laurent G. 1994 – Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial species – New Phytol. 128: 725–736.
• 19. Givnish T.J. 1979 – On the adaptive significance of leaf form (In: Topics in plant population biology, Eds. O.T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson, P.H. Raven) – Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 375–410.
• 20. Goble-Garratt E.M., Bell D.T., Loneragan W.A. 1981 – Floristic and leaf structure patterns along a shallow elevational gradient - Aust. J. Bot. 29: 329–347.
• 21. Groom P.K. Lamont, B.B. 1997 – Xerophytic implications of increased sclerophylly: Interactions with water and light in Hakea psilorrhyncha seedlings – New Phytol. 136: 231–237.
• 22. Hanson H.C. 1917 – Leaf structure as related to environment – Am. J. Bot. 4: 533–560.
• 23. Harris, P.J.C., Pasiecznik, N.M., Smith, S.J., Billington, J.M., Ramirez, L. 2003 - Differentiation of Prosopis juliflora and P. pallida using foliar characters and ploidy - For. Ecol. Manage. 180: 153–164.
• 24. Johnson R., Wichern D. 1982 – Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis – Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
• 25. Jurik T.W. 1986 – Temporal and spatial patterns of specific leaf weight in successional northern hardwood tree species – Am. J. Bot. 73: 1083–1092.
• 26. Karlsson P.S. 1992 – Leaf longevity in evergreen shrubs: variation within and among European species – Oecologia, 91: 346–349.
• 27. Kitajima K. 1994 – Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees – Oecologia, 98: 419–428.
• 28. Ko¨rner C., Neumayer M., Pelaez Menendez-Riedl S., Smeets-Scheel 1989 – A functional morphology of mountain plants – Flora, 182: 353–383.
• 29. Kozlowski T.T., Pallardy S.G. 1997 – Physiology of woody plants – San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2nd ed.
• 30. Lambers H., Poorter H. 1992 – Inherent variations in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences – Adv. Ecol. Res. 23: 187–261.
• 31. McDonald P.G., Fonseca C.R., Overton J.M., Westoby M. 2003 – Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: is the method of size reduction common among clades? – Funct. Ecol. 17: 50–57.
• 32. McGarigal K., Cushman S. A., Stafford S. 2000 – Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research – Springer-Verlag, New York.
• 33. Mclellan T., Endler J.A. 1998 – The relative success of some methods for measuring and describing the shape of complex objection - Syst. Biol. 47: 264–281.
• 34. Millar, C.I., Libby W.J. 1991 – Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic, and disjunct population diversity in widespread species – New York: Oxford University Press.
• 35. Mulkey S.S., Wright S.J., Smith A.P. 1993 - Comparative physiology and demography of three neotropical forest shrubs: alternative shade-adaptive character syndromes – Oecologia, 96: 526–536.
• 36. Muraoka H., Tang Y., Koizumi H, Washitani I. 1997 – Combined effects of light and water availability on photosynthesis and growth of Arisamea heterophylum in forest under story and an open site – Oecologia, 112: 26–34.
• 37. Niinemets U. 1997 – Role of foliar nitrogen in light harvesting and shade tolerance of four temperate deciduous woody species – Funct. Ecol. 11: 518–31.
• 38. Oleksyn J., Reich P.B., Tojoelker M.G., Chalupka W 2001 – Biogeographic differences in shoot elongation pattern among European Scot pine populations – For. Ecol. Manage. 148: 207–20.
• 39. Olsson U. 1975 – A morphological analysis of phenotypes in populations of Quercus (Fagaceae) in Sweden – Bot. Not. 128: 55–68.
• 40. Osunkoya, O.O., Ash J.E. 1991 – Acclimation to a change in light regime in seedlings of 6 Australian rain-forest tree species – Aust. J. Bot. 39: 591–605.
• 41. Rambal S., Leterme J. 1987 – Changes in aboveground structure and resistances to water uptake in Quercus coccifera along a rainfall gradient (In: Plant response to stress. Functional analysis in Mediterranean ecosystems, Eds. J.D. Tenhunen, F.M. Catarino, O.L. Lange, W.C. Oechel) – Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 191–200.
• 42. Reich P.B., Walters M.B., Ellsworth D.S. 1992 – Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems - Ecol. Monogr. 62: 365–392.
• 43. Roderick M.L., Berry S.L., Noble I.R. 2000 – A framework for understanding the relationship between environment and vegetation based on the surface area to volume ratio of leaves – Funct. Ecol. 14: 423–437.
• 44. Sabeti H., 1984 – Forests, trees and shrubs of Iran-Yazd, Iran – Yazd Univ. Publishers, 875 pp.
• 45. Sáenz-Romero, C., Guzmán-Reyna, R., Rehfeldt, G.E. 2006 – Altitudinal genetic variation among Pinus oocarpa populations in Michoacán, México; implications for seed zoning, conservation of forest genetic resources, tree breeding and global warming – Forest Ecology and Management, 229: 340–350.
• 46. Sokal R.R., Crovello T.J., Unnasch R.S. 1986 – Geographic variation of vegetative characters of Populus deltoides – Syst. Bot. 11: 141–155.
• 47. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J., 1995 – Biometry – Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 413–415.
• 48. Specht Rl., Specht A. 1989 – Canopy structure in Eucalyptus-dominated communities in Australia along climate gradients – Acta Oecol/Oecol Plant, 10: 191–213.
• 49. Steel R.G.D., Torrie J.H. 1980 – Analysis of covariance (In: Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biometrical Approach) – Mc-Graw-Hill, New York, pp. 401–437.
• 50. Tabari M., Yosef-Zadeh, H., Espahbodi K., Jalali, Gh.A. 2008 – The effect of seed source on the leaf morphology of Acer velutinum (Boiss.) seedlings – Taiw. J. For. Sci. 23: 1–7.
• 51. Turner I.M. 1994 – A quantitative analysis of leaf form in woody plants from the world’s major broadleaved forest types – J. Biol. 21: 413–419.
• 52. Van Arendonk J.M., Poorter H. 1994 - The chemical composition and anatomical structure of leaves of grass species differing in relative growth rate – Plant Cell Environ. 17: 963–970.
• 53. Waring R. H., 1991 – Responses of evergreen trees to multiple stresses (In: Response of plants to multiple stresses, Eds. H.A. Mooney, W.E. Winner, E.J. Pell) – Academic Press, San Diego.
• 54. Witowski E.T.F., Lamont B.B. 1994 – Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness – Oecologia, 88: 486–493.
• 55. Woodward F.I. 1983 – The significance of interspecific differences in specific leaf area to the growth of selected herbaceous species from different altitudes – New Phytol., 95: 313–323.