PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Corpse carrying in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) : behavioural side effect of aggressive arousual or competitive signaling?

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Some literature reports show that ants use bodies of their dead nestmates and other insect remains in conflict situations. The paper describes such phenomenon in a Formica rufa L. colony brought into conflict with a F. cinerea Mayr colony when the former tried to extend its own territory at the expense of the latter. A territorially stable F. rufa colony, neighbouring the same F. cinerea colony, served as control. Workers of the expansive F. rufa colony were repeatedly observed to carry numerous ant corpses, empty pupal cocoons and insect leftovers from their nest to the place of confrontation with F. cinerea, on a much bigger scale than workers of the stable F. rufa colony. Corpse-carrying intensity was not correlated with the general activity level of foragers which suggests that corpse carriers could be a separate task group. Workers of a small colony of F. cinerea were also observed to surround their nest entrance with corpses of their nestmates and prey remains, taken out from inside the nest, in response to intensified traffic of workers of F. rufa in the vicinity of their nest. These results are discussed in the context of a possible interrelation between ant aggressive behaviour and transport behaviour. Two hypotheses are proposed to explain the observed phenomenon: (1) explaining it as a by-product of the aggressive arousal of workers, and (2) ascribing to it a possible signalling function in conflict situations.
Rocznik
Strony
341--352
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 64 poz.,Fot., rys., tab.,
Twórcy
autor
  • Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Laboratory of Social and Myrmecophilous Insects, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland,, wcz@miiz.waw.pl
Bibliografia
  • 1. Aarab A., Lachaud J.P., Fresneau D. 1990 – Éthologie comparée et occupation de l’espace chez les majors de Pheidole pallidula en fonction de l’âge – Actes Coll. Insectes Soc. 6: 119–122.
  • 2. Champalbert A. 1986 – Individual ontogenesis of social behaviour in Ectatomma tuberculatum (Ponerinae) ants. (In: The individual and society, Eds L. Passera, J.-P. Lachaud) - Privat, I. E. C., Toulouse: 127–137.
  • 3. Champalbert A., Lachaud J.-P. 1990 – Existence of a sensitive period during the ontogenesis of social behaviour in a primitve ants – Anim. Behav. 39: 850–859.
  • 4. Chauvin R. 1968 – Données récentes sur la biologie et la physiologie des fourmis rousses – Année Biol. 7: 429–473.
  • 5. Chauvin R. 1969 – Le monde des fourmis. Un univers de science-fiction – Plon, Paris, 285 pp.
  • 6. Czechowski W. 1975 – Wyprawy rabunkowe Formica (Raptiformica) sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) [Raids of Formica (Raptiformica) sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)] – Przegl. Zool. 19: 33–43 (in Polish with English summary).
  • 7. Czechowski W. 1976 – Cmentarzyska mrówek [Ants’ cemeteries] – Przegl. Zool. 20: 417–427 (in Polish with English summary).
  • 8. Czechowski W. 1977 – Recruitment signals and raids in slave-maker ants – Ann. Zool. 34: 1–26.
  • 9. Czechowski W. 1985 – Competition between Myrmica laevinodis Nyl. and Lasius niger (L.) (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea) – Ann. Zool. 39: 153–173.
  • 10. Czechowski W. 1989 – Functioning of a mixed colony of Formica sanguinea Latr. + F. polyctena Foerst. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) with a surplus of slaves – Ann. Zool. 43: 103–126.
  • 11. Czechowski W. 1990 – Intraspecific conflict in Formica exsecta Nyl. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) – Memorabilia Zool. 44: 71–81.
  • 12. Czechowski W. 1999 – Lasius fuliginosus (Latr.) on a sandy dune – its living conditions and interference during raids of Formica sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) – Ann. Zool. 49: 117–123.
  • 13. Czechowski W. 2000 – Interference of territorial ant species in the course of raids of Formica sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) – Ann. Zool. 50: 35–38.
  • 14. Czechowski W. 2008 – Around-nest ‘cemeteries’ of Myrmica schencki Em. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): their origin and a possible significance – Pol. J. Ecol, 56: 359–363.
  • 15. Czechowski W., Markó B. 2005 – Competition between Formica cinerea Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and co-occurring ant species, with special reference to Formica rufa L.: direct and indirect interferences – Pol. J. Ecol. 53: 467–489.
  • 16. Czechowski W., Markó B. 2006 – Uncomfortable protection: Formica polyctena Först. shelters Formica fusca L. from Formica sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – Ann. Zool. 56: 539–548.
  • 17. Czechowski W., Vepsäläinen K. 2001 – Formica rufa L. protects indirectly F. fusca L. against raids of F. sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – Ann. Zool. 51: 267–273.
  • 18. de Biseau J.-C., Pasteels J.M. 2000 – Response thresholds to recruitment signals and the regulation of foraging intensity in the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) – Behavioural Processes, 48: 137–148.
  • 19. Déjean A. 1985 – Étude éco-éthologique de la predation chez les fourmis du genre Smithistruma (Formicidae, Myrmicinae, Dacetini). IV. Le polyéthisme chez S. truncatidens – Insect. Soc. 32: 389–402.
  • 20. Déjean A., Lachaud J.-P., Fresneau D. 1989 – Mise en place du comportement de predation au cours de fondation de la société chez Ectatomma tuberculatum (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae) – Actes Coll. Insectes Soc. 5: 215-223.
  • 21. Déjean A., Lachaud J.-P. 1991 – Polyethism in the ponerine ant Odontomachus troglodytes: interaction of age and interindividual variability – Sociobiology, 18: 177–196.
  • 22. Déjean A., Lachaud J.-P. 1992. – Growthrelated changes in predation behavior in incipient colonies of the ponerine ant Ectatomma tuberculatum (Olivier) – Insect. Soc. 39: 129–143.
  • 23. Déjean A., Lachaud J.-P. 1994 – Ecology and behavior of the seed-eating ponerine ant Brachyponera senaarensis (Mayr) – Insect. Soc. 41: 191–210.
  • 24. Delalande C., Lenoir A. 1987 – Exploitation de source de nourriture par Messor structor. Interaction avec deux autres espèces de fourmis (Hym. Formicidae) – Actes Coll. Insect. Soc. 1: 49–56.
  • 25. Detrain C. 1990 – Field study on foraging by the polymorphic ant species, Pheidole pallidula – Insect. Soc. 37: 315–332.
  • 26. Dlusskij G.M. 1965 – Okhranyaemaya territoriya u murav’ev [Protected territory in ants] – Zh. Obshch. Biol. 26: 479–489 (in Russian).
  • 27. Dobrzański J. 1971 – Manipulatory learning in ants – Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 31: 11–140.
  • 28. Dobrzański J., Dobrzańska J. 1975 – Ethological studies in the ant Tetramorium caespitum Mayr. I. Foraging and building behavior – Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 35: 299–309.
  • 29. Dorosheva E.A., Reznikova Zh.I. 2006 – An experimental study of behavioral mechanisms of relationships between red wood ants and ground beetles – Entomol. Rev. 86: 139–148.
  • 30. Godzińska E.J. 1986 – Ant predation on Colorado Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) – Z. Angew. Entomol. 102: 1–10.
  • 31. Godzińska E.J. 2004 – Novelty responses of harvesting ants: facts, hypotheses and open questions – Pol. Psychol. Bull. 35: 77–90.
  • 32. Hahn M., Maschwitz U. 1985 – Foraging strategies and recruitment behaviour in the European harvester ant Messor rufitarsis (F.) – Oecologia, 68: 45–51.
  • 33. Horvitz C., Beattie A.J. 1980 – Ant dispersal of Calathea (Marantaceae) seeds by carnivorous ponerines (Formicidae) in a tropical rain forest – Am. J. Bot. 67: 321–326.
  • 34. Hölldobler B., Wilson E.O. 1990 – The ants – Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 732 pp.
  • 35. Jaisson P., Fresneau D., Taylor R.W., Lenoir A. 1992 – Social organization in some primitive Australian ants. I. Nothomyrmecia macrops Clark – Insect. Soc. 39: 425–438.
  • 36. Jorgensen C.D., Porter S.D. 1982 – Foraging behavior of Pogonomyrmex owyheei in Southeast Idaho – Environ. Entomol. 11: 381–384.
  • 37. Lloyd J.E. 1983 – Bioluminiscence and communication in insects – Ann. Rev. Entomol. 28: 131–160.
  • 38. Lubicz Niezabitowski E. 1933 – Spostrzeżenia nad zbieraniem zabitych u Formica rufa L. [Observations on collecting killed individuals in Formica rufa L.] – Pol. Pismo Ent. 12: 139–142 (in Polish).
  • 39. López F., Serrano J.M., Acosta F.J. 1992 – Intense reactions of recruitment facing unusual stimuli in Messor barbarus – Dtsch. Ent. Z. Naturforsch. 39: 135–142.
  • 40. Mabelis A.A. 1979 – Wood ant wars. The relationship between aggression and predation in the red wood ant (Formica polyctena Först.) – Neth. J. Zool. 29: 451–620.
  • 41. Marikovsky P.I. 1965 – On one peculiar characteristic of behaviour of the red ants Formica rufa L. – Insect. Soc. 12: 145–150.
  • 42. Markó B., Czechowski W. 2004 – Lasius psammophilus Seifert and Formica cinerea Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on sand dunes: conflicts and coexistence – Ann. Zool. 54: 365–378.
  • 43. Markó B., Czechowski W. 2009 – Searching for optimality: plasticity, rigidity, and competitive effects in the foraging strategy of Formica cinerea Mayr, 1853 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) (in prep.).
  • 44. Michener C.D. 1974 – The social behavior of the bees – The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 404 pp.
  • 45. Oster G.F., Wilson E.O. 1978 – Caste and ecology in the social insects (Monographs in population biology, No.12) – Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J. XV + 352 pp.
  • 46. Owen J. 1980 – Feeding strategy – University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 160 pp.
  • 47. Pisarski B., Vepsäläinen K. 1989 – Competitive hierarchy in ant communities (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) – Ann. Zool. 42: 321–329.
  • 48. Portha S., Deneubourg J.-L., Detrain C. 2004 – How food type and brood influence foraging decisions of Lasius niger scouts. – Animal Behaviour, 68: 115–122.
  • 49. Punttila P., Haila Y., Pajunen T., Tukia H. 1991 – Colonisation of clearcut forests by ants in the southern Finnish taiga: a quantitative survey – Oikos, 61: 250–262.
  • 50. Punttila P., Haila Y., Tukia H. 1996 – Ant communities in taiga clearcuts: habitat effects and species interactions – Ecography, 19: 16–28.
  • 51. Rice W.R. 1989 – Analyzing tables of statistical tests – Evolution, 43: 223–225.
  • 52. Rosengren R., Sundström L. 1987 – The foraging system of a red wood ant colony (Formica s. str.) – collecting and defending food through an extended phenotype. (In: From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Les Treilles Workshop, Eds J.-M. Pasteels, J.-L. Deneubourg) – Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Experientia Suppl. 54: 117–137.
  • 53. Savolainen R. 1990 – Colony success of the submissive ant Formica fusca within territories of the dominant Formica polyctena – Ecol. Entomol. 15: 79–85.
  • 54. Savolainen R. 1991 – Interference by wood ant influences size selection and retrieval rate of prey by Formica fusca – Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 28: 1–7.
  • 55. Savolainen R., Vepsäläinen K. 1988 – A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure – Oikos, 51: 135–155.
  • 56. Savolainen R., Vepsäläinen K. 1989 – Niche differentiation of ant species within territories of the wood ant Formica polyctena – Oikos, 56: 3–16.
  • 57. Savolainen R., Vepsäläinen K., Wuorenrinne H. 1989 – Ant assemblages in the taiga biome: testing the role of territorial wood ants – Oecologia, 81: 481–486.
  • 58. Seeley T.D. 1989 – The honey bee colony as a superorganism – Am. Sci. 77: 546–553.
  • 59. Slater P.J.B. 1999 – Essentials of animal behaviour – Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 233 pp.
  • 60. Sundström L. 1993 – Foraging response of Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae); expoiting stable vs spatially and temporally variable resources – Insect. Soc. 40: 147–161.
  • 61. Tevis L. jr. 1958 – Interrelations between the harvester ant Veromessor pergandei (Mayr) and some desert ephemerals – Ecology, 39: 695–704.
  • 62. Vepsäläinen K., Savolainen R., Tiainen J., Vilén J. 2000 – Successional changes of ant assemblages: from virgin and ditched bogs to forests – Ann. Zool. Fenn. 37: 135–149.
  • 63. Zhigulskaya Z.A. 1971a – Osobennosti organizacii kormovykh territorij u Formica cinerea Mayr [Pecularities of the organisation of food territories in Formica cinerea Mayr] – Problemy Zashchity Taezhnykh Lesov [Problems of the Forest Protection in Taiga], Krasnoyarsk, pp. 49–50 (in Russian).
  • 64. Zhigulskaya Z.A. 1971b – Osobennosti organizacii kormovykh territorij u Formica cinerea Mayr v predgoryakh Altaya [Pecularities of the organisation of food territories in Formica cinerea Mayr in the Altai foreland] – Murav’i i Zashchita Lesa [Ants and the Forest Protection], Moskva, pp. 40–42 (in Russian).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-2578-9680
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.