PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Contribution of Eocene sharks and rays from southern France to the history of deep-sea selachians

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Konferencja
Evolution and Diversity of Chondrichthyans (2008 ; Warszawa)
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Fossil deep-sea selachians are rare and their diversity underestimated as a consequence of the scarcity of available outcrops of sediments containing them. Here we report a new fossil locality from the Middle Eocene of southwestern France and give a first synthesis of the deep-sea deposits of this area which have yielded one of the richest fossil selachian faunas ever to have inhabited the continental slope. The fossil records of deep-sea sharks and rays are discussed in the context of these new fossil occurrences, a literature review and the recent phylogenetic hypothesis.
Rocznik
Strony
257--260
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 22 poz.,Tabl. 1,fot., rys.,
Twórcy
autor
autor
autor
  • Laboratoire de Paleontologie, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (CNRS-UMR 5554) Universite Montpellier II, c.c. 064, Place Eugene Bataillon, F-34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
Bibliografia
  • ADNET, S. 2006. Nouvelles faunes de Sélaciens (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) de l’Eocène moyen des Landes (Sud-Ouest, France). Implication dans la connaissance des communautés de sélaciens d’eaux profondes. Palaeo Ichthyologica, 10, 5-128.
  • ADNET, S. & CAPPETTA, H. 2001. A paleontological phylogenetical analysis of squaliform sharks (Chondrichthyes: Squaliformes) based on dental characters. Lethaia, 34, 234-248.
  • ADNET, S. & CAPPETTA, H. 2008 (in press). New fossil triakid sharks from the Early Eocene of Prémontré, France and comments on fossil record of the family. Acta Paleontologica Polonica, 53.
  • ADNET, S., CAPPETTA, H. & MERTINIENE, R. 2008 (in press). Re-evaluation of squaloid shark records from the Albian and Cenomanian of Lithuania. Cretaceous Research. 1-12
  • BENTON, M.J. & STORRS, G.W. 1994. Testing the quality of the fossil record: paleontological knowledge is improving. Geology, 22, 111–114.
  • CARVALHO, M.R. DE 1996. Higher-level Elasmobranch Phylogeny, Basal Squaleans, and Paraphyly. In: M.L.J. STASSNY, PARENTI, L.R. & JONHSON, G.D. (Ed.), Interrelationships of Fishes, pp. 35-62. Academic Press; San Diego, California.
  • CARVALHO, M.R. DE, MAISEY, J.G., GRANDE, L. 2004. Freshwater stingrays of the Green River Formation of Wyoming (Early Eocene), with description of a new genus and species and an analysis of its phylogenetic relationships (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 284, 1-136.
  • CAPPETTA, H. 2006. Elasmobranchii Post-Triadici (Index specierumet generum). 142 pp. Backhuys Publishers; Leiden.
  • COMPAGNO, L.J.V. 2005. Checklist of living Chondrichthyes. In: W.C. HAMLET (Ed.) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: Sharks, batoids and chimaeras. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA, 503-548.
  • DUNN,K. A., MCEACHRAN J.D. & HONEYCUTT, R.L. 2003.Molecular phylogenetics of Myliobatiform fishes (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes), with comments on the effects of missing data on parsimony and likelihood. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 24, 259-270.
  • GOTO, T. 2001. Comparative Anatomy, Phylogeny and Cladistic Classification of the order Orectolobiformes (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii). Memoirs of the Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences Hokkaido University, 48, 1-100.
  • IGLÉSIAS, S.P., LECOINTRE, G. & SELOS, D. 2005. Extensive paraphylies within sharks of the order Carcharhiniformes inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 34, 569-583.
  • KYNE, P.M. & SIMPFENDORFER, A.C. 2007. A Collation and summarization of available data on deepwater Chondrichthyans: Biodiversity, Life History and Fisheries. IUCN SSC Shark Specialist Group for the Marine Conservation Biology Institute, 1-137.
  • LÓPEZ, J.A., RYBURN, J.A., FEDRIGO, O. & NAYLOR, G.J.P. 2006. Phylogeny of sharks of the family Triakidae (Carcharhiniformes) and its implications for the evolution of carcharhiniform placental viviparity. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 40, 50-60
  • LOVEJOY, N.R. 1996. Systematics of myliobatoid elasmobranchs: with emphasis on the phylogeny and historical biogeography of neotropical freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygonidae: Rajiformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 117, 207-257.
  • MCEACHRAN, J.D. & ASCHLIMAN, N. 2004. Phylogeny of Batoidea. In: J.C. CARRIER, J.A. MUSICK & M.R. HEITHAUS (Eds), Biology of sharks and their relatives. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press, 79-113.
  • NAYLOR, G.J.P., RYBURN, J.A., FEDRIGO, O. & LOPEZ, J.A. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages of modern elasmobranchs. In: W.C. HAMLET (Ed.) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: Sharks, batoids and chimaeras. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA, 1-25.
  • PLEDGE, N.S. 1967. Fossil Elasmobranch teeth of South Australia and their stratigraphic distribution. Transaction of the Royal Society of South Australia, 91, 135-160.
  • SHIRAI, S. 1992. Squalean Phylogeny : a new framework of “Squaloid” sharks and related taxa. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo. 151 p.
  • SWEETMAN, S.C. & UNDERWOOD, C.J. 2006. A neoselachian shark from the non-marine Wessex Formation (Wealden Group: early Cretaceous, Barremian) of the Isle of Wight, southern England. Palaeontology, 49, 457-465.
  • UNDERWOOD, C.J. 2006. Diversification of the Neoselachii (Chondrichthyes) during the Jurassic and Cretaceous. Palaeobiology, 32, 215-235.
  • WINCHELL, C., MARTIN, A. P. & MALLAT, J. 2004. Phylogeny of elasmobranchs based on LSU and SSU ribosomal RNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31, 214-224.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-2214-8510
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.