PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Population decline of the Little Owl (Athene noctua)in the Czech Republic

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
A change of land use is often cited as a causal factor in the decline of many species of farmland birds. Populations of the Little Owl (Athene noctua Scop., 1769) have notably decreased throughout Europe in the last 60 years, including the Czech Republic. The aims of this study were to estimate the recent population trend of the Little Owl and to analyze the importance of altitude and grassland habitat within Little Owl territories. The population trend of the Little Owl in the Czech Republic has still decreasing tendency. The population density dropped from 0.33 breeding pairs (bps) 10 km[^-2] to 0.12 bps 10 km[^-2] in the first (1993-1995) and second (1998-1999) monitoring program, respectively. The decline is apparent also from results from last Little Owl monitoring program which were carried out in 2005.2006 on 35 study plots (4607 km[^2]). The average population density was estimated at 0.1 bps 10 km[^-2]. A distinct feature of these recent populations is that they occur in the places with relatively high local density (core areas) in comparison to the surroundings, which are unoccupied. At present, the Little Owl rarely breeds in natural tree cavities, but rather the majority of nesting sites are situated in human artifacts, especially within agricultural objects. Areas in which the Little Owl occurs have a significantly larger proportion of grasslands and are situated at lower altitudes. We suggest that the changes in agricultural landscape associated with disappearance of traditional farming management of grassland habitats, forceful pasturage and regular mowing were the main factors in this long-term population decline. The recent decrease of Little Owls could be also the consequence of the existence of small isolated populations in which mortality is not balanced by immigration from surrounding areas.
Rocznik
Strony
527--534
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 45 poz.,rys., tab.,
Twórcy
autor
autor
  • Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 31, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, martin.sali@post.cz
Bibliografia
  • Atkinson P.W, Buckingham D., Morris A.J. 2004 – What factors determine where invertebrate-feeding birds forage in dry agricultural grasslands? – Ibis, 146 (Suppl.2): 9–107.
  • Bauer H.G., Berthold P. 1996 – Die Brutvögel Mitteleuropas. Bestand und Gefährdung - AULA Verlag, Wiesbaden, 716 pp.
  • Boucníková E., Kučera T. 2005 – How natural and cultural aspects influence land cover changes in the Czech Republic? – Ekológia (Bratislava), 24 (Supp1/2005): 69–82.
  • Cramp S. 1985 – Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol. IV – Terns to Woodpeckers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 960 pp.
  • Dalbeck L., Bergerhausen W., Hachtel M. 1999 – Habitatpräferenzen des Steinkauzes Athene noctua SCOPOLI, 1769 im ortsnahen Grünland – Charadrius, 35: 100–115.
  • Donald P.F. 1998 – Changes in the abundance of invertebrates and plants on British farmland - Br. Wildlife, 9: 279–289.
  • Donald P.F., Green R.E., Heath M.F. 2001 - Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations – Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268: 25–29.
  • Devereux C.L., McKeever C.U., Benton T.G., Whittingham M.J. 2004 – The effect of sward height and drainage on Common Starlings Sturnus vulgaris and Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus foraging in grassland habitats – Ibis, 146 (Suppl. 2): 115–122.
  • Exo K.M. 1983 – Habitat, Siedlungsdichte und Brutbiologie einer niederrheinischen Steinkauzpopulation (Athene noctua) – Ökologie der Vögel, 5: 1–40.
  • Exo K.M. 1988 – Jahreszeitliche ökologische Anpassungen des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) - J. Ornit. 129: 393–415.
  • Exo K.M. 1989 – Tagesperiodische Aktivitätsmuster des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) – Vogelwarte, 35: 99–114.
  • Exo K.M. 1991 – Der Untere Niederrhein – ein Verbreitungsschwerpunkt des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in Mitteleuropa – Natur und Landschaft, 66: 156–159.
  • Evans K.L. 2004 – The potential for interactions between predation and habitat change to cause population declines of farmland birds - Ibis, 146: 1–13.
  • Finck P. 1990 – Seasonal variation of territory size with Little Owl (Athene noctua) – Oecologia, 83: 68–75.
  • Fuller R.J., Gregory R.D., Gibbons D.W., Marchant J.H.,Wilson J.D., Baillie S.R., Carter N. 1995 – Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain – Conserv. Biol. 9: 1425–1441.
  • Gassmann H., Bäumer B. 1993 – Zur Populationsökologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in der westlichen Jülicher Börde. Erste Ergebnisse einer 15jährigen Studie – Vogelwarte, 37: 130–143.
  • Génot J.C. 1995 – Données complémentaires sur la population de Chouettes Cheveches, Athene noctua, en déclin en bordure des vosges du nord – Ciconia, 19 (3): 145–157.
  • Génot J.C. 1996/97 – Monitoring Studies of the Little owl in France – The Raptor, 1996/97: 24–28.
  • Génot J.C., Wilhelm J.L. 1993 – Occupation et utilisation de L’éspace par la Chouette Cheveche Athene noctua, en bordure des vosges du nord – Alauda, 61: 181–194.
  • Hanski I., Ovaskainen O. 2000 – The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape - Nature, 404: 755–758.
  • Hudec K. (ed.) 1983 – Fauna ČSSR – Ptéci 3/I [Fauna of CSSR – Birds 3/I] – Academia, Praha, 704 pp. (in Czech).
  • Jirsík J. 1944 – Naše sovy [Our owls] – Praha, 192 pp. (in Czech)
  • Kasprzykowski Z., Golawski A. 2006 – Habitat use of the Barn Owl Tyto alba and the Little Owl Athene noctua in central-eastern Poland – Biological lett. 43 (1): 33–39.
  • Krebs J.R., Wilson J.D., Bradbury R.B., Siriwardena G.M. 1999 – The second silent spring? – Nature, 400: 611–612.
  • Kitowski I. 2003 – The monitoring of Little Owl Athene noctua in Chełm (SE Poland) in 1998–2000 – Ornis Hungarica, 12–13: 1–2.
  • Lipský Z. 2000 – Historical development of the Czech rural landscape: implications for present landscape planning. (in: Landscape Ecology: Theory and applications for practical purposes. The Problems of Landscape Ecology, Vol. VI, Eds. A. Richling et al.) – Warsaw, pp. 149–159.
  • Loske K.H. 1986 – Zum Habitat des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland – Vogelwelt, 107 (3): 91–101. (in German, English summary)
  • Mitchell-Jones G., Amori W., Bogdanowicz B., Kryštůfek P., Reijnders J.H., Spitzenberger F., Stubbe M., Thissen J.B.M., Vohralík V., Zima J. 1999 – The Atlas of European Mammals – Academic Press, London, 484 pp.
  • Newton I. 2004 – The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions – Ibis, 146: 579–600.
  • Salvati L., Manganaro A., Ranazzi L. 2002 – Little Owl Athene noctua density and habitat preferences in urban Rome, Italy – Vogelwelt, 123 (3): 155–160.
  • Schönn S., Scherzinger W., Exo K.M., Ille R. 1991: Der Steinkauz – Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei, 606. A. Ziemsen Verlag. Wittenberg Lutherstadt, 237 pp.
  • Schröpfer L. 1996 – Sýček obecný (Athene noctua) v České republice – početnost a rozšíření v letech 1993–1995 [The Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the Czech Republic – abudance and distribution in the years 1993–1995] – Buteo, 8: 23–38. (in Czech, English summary)
  • Schröpfer L. 2000 – Sýček obecný (Athene noctua) v České republice – početnost a rozšířrní v letech 1998–1999 [The Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the Czech Republic – abudance and distribution in the years 1998–1999] – Buteo, 11: 161–174. (in Czech, English summary)
  • Statsoft, Inc. 1996 – STATISTICA for Windows (Computer Program Manual) – Statsoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK.
  • Šálek M. 2004 – Ekologie sýčka obecného (Athene noctua) v zemědělské krajině [Ecology of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in agricultural landscape] – Master thesis AF JU, České Budějovice 2004, 82 pp. (in Czech).
  • Šálek M., Berec M. 2001 – Rozšíření a biotopové preference sýčka obecného (Athene noctua) ve vybraných oblastech jižních Čech [Distribution and biotope preferences of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in selected areas of the Southern Bohemia (Czech Repubic)] – Buteo, 12: 127–134. (in Czech, English summary)
  • Šťastný K., Randík A., Hudec, K. 1987 – Atlas hnízdního rozšíření ptáků v ČSSR 1973/77 [Atlas of the breeding birds in the CSSR, 1973/77] – Academia, Praha, 484 pp. (in Czech).
  • Šťastný K., Bejček V., Hudec K. 1997 – Atlas hnízdního rozšíření ptáků v České republice 1985–1989 [Atlas of the breeding birds in the Czech Republic, 1985–1989] – H & H, Jinočany, 460 pp. (in Czech).
  • Šťastný K., Bejček V., Hudec K. 2006 – Atlas hnízdního rozšíření ptáků v České Republice 2001–2003 [Atlas of the breeding birds in the Czech Republic, 2001–2003] – Aventinum 2006, Praha, 463 pp. (in Czech).
  • Tucker G.M., Heath M.F. 1994 – Birds in Europe: their conservation status – BirdLife International, Cambridge.
  • Van den Bring N.W., Groen N.M., De Jonge J., Boseld A.T.C. 2003 – Ecotoxicological suitability of floodplain habitats in The Netherlands for the little owl (Athene noctua vidalli) – Environmental-Pollution, 122 (1): 127–134.
  • Vickery J.A., Tallowin J.R., Feber R.E., Asteraki E.J., Atkinson P.W., Fuller R.J., Brown V.K. 2001 – The management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: effects of agricultural practices on birds and their food resources – J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 647–664.
  • Wuczynski A. 2005 – Habitat use and hunting behaviour of Common Buzzards Buteo buteo wintering in south-western Poland – Acta Ornithologica, 40 (2): 147–154.
  • Zaccaroni A, Amorena M., Naso B., Castellani G., Lucisano A., Stracciari G.L. 2003 – Cadmium, chromium and lead contamination of Athene noctua, the Little Owl, of Bologna and Parma, Italy – Chemosphere, 52 (7): 1251–1258.
  • Żmihorski M., Bacia D.A., Romanowski M., Kowalski M., Osojca G. 2006 – Long-term decline of the Little Owl (Athene noctua SCOP., 1769) in central Poland – Pol. J. Ecol. 54 (2): 321–324.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-2162-8398
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.