Early-season defoliation of Sorbus aucuparia L. and Acer platanoides L. can induce defense mechanisms against the spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Koch)

• Autorzy: Giertych M. , Karolewski P. , Oleksyn J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Artificial defoliation is often used in studies of induced defense reactions of plants to damage by arthropods. However, little is known about the role of various external factors that may determine the nature of inducible defenses. Here we tested whether light level under which plants grow could affect the natural invasion of two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) with a broad range of host plants. For this study we used two host species that differ widely in shade tolerance: shade-adapted Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and sun-adapted European mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia L.). The purpose of this study was to explore mite invasion and to test whether prior simulated defoliation, light conditions and host species differences in secondary defense metabolites (soluble phenolics) play a role in the pattern of invasion. One-year-old maple and ash seedlings growing in pots were placed into two shade houses that produced a treatment with 5% light transmittance, and the second group of seedlings was placed in full sunlight. The experiment was carried out in a location chronically affected by spider mite presence. The defoliation was performed in mid-May by manual removal of 0 (control), 25, 50, 75 and 100% of leaves. Natural two-spotted spider mite invasion took place in mid-July and was observed only on seedlings growing in the shade. Mites were found on leaves of almost all seedlings. However, the intensity of feeding damage to leaves was related to the level of earlier defoliation. Control and slightly to moderately (25.50%) defoliated seedlings of both species were most affected by spider mites. Mite feeding behavior was directly linked to changes in concentration of leaf carbon and phenolic compounds. Carbon content was positively correlated with the percent of seedlings damaged by spider mites in both tree species (R[^2]> 0.80; P <0.05). The highest concentration of phenolic compounds was observed in leaves of seedlings subjected to 50 and 75% defoliation. Our results indicated that two-spotted spider mites preferred plants grown in a shade environment and within these plants favored leaves which are high in carbon and low in phenolic compounds. Both plant species were able to survive early season leaf damage inflicted by spider mites. Inducible phenolic compounds were among defensive secondary metabolites contributing to low spider mite success in plants recovering from artificial spring defoliation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Acari; Arachnida; chemical composition; herbivore mite; Tetranychidae

PL

Acari; Arachnida; pajęczaki; Przędziorkowate; roztocza; skład chemiczny; Tetranychidae

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: Vol. 56, nr 3
• Strony: 443--452
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 55 poz.,tab., wykr.,

Twórcy

autor

Giertych M.

autor

Karolewski P.

autor

Oleksyn J.

• Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, 62-035 Kórnik, Poland,

Bibliografia

• Agrawal A.A. 2005 – Future directions in the study of induced plant responses to herbivory - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 115: 97–105.
• Agrell J., Oleszek W., Stochmal A., Olsen M., Anderson P. 2003 – Herbivoreinduced responses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) - J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 303–320.
• Awmack C.S., Leather S.R. 2002 – Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 817–844.
• Baraza E., Gomez J., Hodar J., Zamora R. 2004 – Herbivory has a greater impact in shade than in sun: response of Quercus pyrenaica seedlings to multifactorial environmental variation – Can. J. Bot. 82: 357–364.
• Baur R., Binder S., Benz G. 1991 – Nonglandular leaf trichomes as short-term inducible defense of the grey alder, Alnus incana (L.), against the chrysomelid beetle, Agalastica alni L. – Oecologia, 87: 219–226.
• Bazzaz F.A., Chiariello N.R., Coley P.D., Pitelka L.F. 1987 – Allocating resources to reproduction and defense – BioScience, 37: 58–67.
• Bennett R.N., Wallsgrove R.M. 1994 - Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms – New Phytol. 127: 617–633.
• Brody A.K., Karban R. 1992 – Lack of a tradeoff between constitutive and induced defenses among varieties of cotton – Oikos, 65: 301–306.
• Chacón P., Armesto J.J. 2006 – Do carbonbased defences reduce foliar damage? Habitatrelated effects on tree seedling performance in a temperate rainforest of Chiloe Island, Chile - Oecologia, 146: 555–565.
• Coley P.D. 1987 – Interspecific variation in plant anti-herbivore properties: The role of habitat quality and rate of disturbance – New Phytol. 106: 251–263.
• Cornelissen T.G., Fernandes G.W. 2001 - Induced defences in the neotropical tree Bauhinia brevipes (Vog.) to herbivory: effects of damage-induced changes on leaf quality and insect attack – Trees-Struct. Funct. 15: 236–241.
• Cronin G., Lodge D.M. 2003 – Effects of light and nutrient availability on the growth, allocation, carbon/nitrogen balance, phenolic chemistry, and resistance to herbivory of two freshwater macrophytes – Oecologia, 137: 32–41.
• Dolch R., Tscharntke T. 2000 – Defoliation of alders (Alnus glutinosa) affects herbivory by leaf beetles on undamaged neighbours - Oecologia, 125: 504–511.
• Duso C., Chiarini F., Conte L., Bonora V., Dalla Monta L., Otto S. 2004 – Fogging can control Tetranychus urticae on greenhouse cucumbers – J. Pest Sci. 77: 105–111.
• Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W., Paulissen D. 1991 – Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa - Scripta Geobotanica, 18: 1–248.
• Freitas S., Berti-Filho E. 1994 – Effect of defoliation on Eucalyptus grandis growth - Instituto de Pasquisas e Estudos Florestais, 47:36–43.
• Giertych M.J. 2001 – The influence of shade on phenolic compounds in Scots pine –Dendrobiology, 46: 21–26.
• Giertych M.J., Karolewski P., De Temmerman L.O. 1999 – Foliage age and pollution alter content of phenolic compounds and chemical elements in Pinus nigra needles - Water Air Soil Pollut. 110: 363–377.
• Gowda J.H., Palo R.T. 2003 – Age-related changes in defensive traits of Acacia tortilis Hayne – Afr. J. Ecol. 41: 218–223.
• Haissig B.E., Dickson R.E. 1979 – Starch measurement in plant tissue using enzymatic hydrolysis – Physiol. Plantarum 47: 151–157.
• Hanna R., Wilson L.T., Zalom F.G., Flaherty D.L., Leavitt G.M. 1996 – Spatial and temporal dynamics of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) in ‘Thompson Seedless’ vineyards - Environ. Entomol. 25: 370–382.
• Hansen J., Moller I. 1975 – Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone - Anal. Biochem. 68: 87–94.
• Haukioja E. 1990 – Induction of defenses in trees – Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 25–42.
• Hawkes C.V., Sullivan J.J. 2001 – The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: A meta-analysis – Ecology, 82: 2045–2058.
• Henriksson J., Haukioja E., Ossipov V., Ossipova S., Sillanpaa S., Kapari L., Pihlaja K. 2003 – Effects of host shading on consumption and growth of the geometrid Epirrita autumnata: interactive roles of water, primary and secondary compounds – Oikos, 103: 3–16.
• Hoogesteger J., Karlsson P.S. 1992 – Effects of defoliation on radial stem growth and photosynthesis in the mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa) – Functional Ecology, 6: 317–323.
• Hunter M.D., Schultz J.C. 1995 – Fertilization mitigates chemical induction and herbivore responses within damaged oak trees - Ecology, 76:1226–1232.
• Johnson G., Schaal L.A. 1957 – Accumulation of phenolic substances and ascorbic acids in potato tuber tissue upon injury and their possible role in disease and resistance – Amer. Potato J. 34: 200–208.
• Kaitaniemi P., Ruohomaki K., Ossipov V., Haukioja E., Pihlaja K. 1998 – Delayed induced changes in the biochemical composition of host plant leaves during an insect outbreak – Oecologia, 116: 182–190.
• Karban R., Baldwin I.T. 1997 – Induced Responses to Herbivory – University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
• Karban R., Thaler J.S. 1999 – Plant phase change and resistance to herbivore – Ecology, 80: 510–517.
• Kause A., Ossipov V., Haukioja E., Lempa K., Hanhimaki S., Ossipova S. 1999 – Multiplicity of biochemical factors determining quality of growing birch leaves - Oecologia, 120: 102–112.
• Koricheva J. 2002 – Meta-analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant antiherbivore defenses – Ecology, 83: 176–190.
• Koricheva J., Nykänen H., Gianoli E. 2004 – Meta-analysis of trade-offs among plant antiherbivore defenses: Are plants jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all? – Amer. Naturalist, 163: E64–E75.
• Kuhajek J. M., Payton I.J., Monks A. 2006 – The impact of defoliation on the foliar chemistry of southern rata (Metrosideros umbellata) - N. Z. J. Ecol. 30: 237–249.
• Lokvam J., Kursar T.A. 2005 – Divergence in structure and activity of phenolic defenses in young leaves of two co-occurring Inga species – J. Chem. Ecol. 31: 2563–2580.
• Louda S.M., Dixon P.M., Huntly N.J. 1987 – Herbivory in sun versus shade at a natural meadow-woodland ecotone in the Rocky Mountains – Vegetatio, 72: 141–149.
• Luczynski A., Ismsn M.B., Raworth D.A. 1990 – Strawberry foliar phenolics and their relationship to development of the two-spotted spider mite – J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 557–563.
• Maiorana V.C., 1981 – Herbivory in sun and shade – Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 15: 151–156
• Migeon A. Dorkeld F. 2006 – Spider Mites Web – http://www.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb.
• Mutikainen P., Walls M., Ovaska J., Keinänen M., Julkunen-Tiitto R., Vapaavuori E. 2000 – Herbivore resistance in Betula pendula: Effect of fertilization, defoliation, and plant genotype – Ecology, 81: 49–65.
• Nykänen H., Koricheva J. 2004 – Damageinduced changes in woody plants and their effects on insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis – Oikos, 104: 247–268.
• Oleksyn J., Karolewski P., Giertych M.J., Zytkowiak R., Reich P.B., and Tjoelker M.G. 1998 – Primary and secondary host plants differ in leaf-level photosynthetic response to herbivory: evidence from Alnus and Betula grazed by the alder beetle, Agelastica alni – New Phytol. 140: 239–249.
• Poorter L., Bongers F. 2006 – Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species – Ecology, 87: 1733–1743.
• Raubenheimer D., Simpson S.J. 2004 - Organismal stoichiometry: Quantifying non-independence among food components - Ecology, 85: 1203–1216.
• Reich P.B., Ellsworth D.S., Walters M.B., Vose J.M., Gresham C., Volin J.C., Bowman W.D. 1999 – Generality of leaf trait relationships: A test across six biomes - Ecology, 80: 1955–1969.
• Reich P.B., Kloeppel B.D., Ellsworth D.S., Waiters M.B. 1995 – Different photosynthesis-nitrogen relations in deciduous hardwood and evergreen coniferous tree species Oecologia, 104: 24–30.
• Ruohomäki K., Chapin F.S., Haukioja E., Neuvonen S., Suomela J. 1996 – Delayed inducible resistance in mountain birch in response to fertilization and shade – Ecology, 77: 2302–2311.
• Singleton V.I., Rossi J.A. 1965 – Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdicphosphotungstic acid reagent – Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 16: 144–158.
• Stevens M.T., Lindroth R.L. 2005 – Induced resistance in the indeterminate growth of aspen (Populus tremuloides) – Oecologia, 145: 298–306.
• Trewhella K.E., Leather S.R., Day K.R. 1997 – Insect induced resistance in Lodgepole pine: Effects on two pine feeding insects – J. Appl. Entomol. 121: 129–136.
• Tscharntke T., Thiessen S., Dolch R., Boland W., 2001 – Herbivory, induced resistance, and interplant signal transfer in Alnus glutinosa – Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 29: 1025–1047.
• Valkama E., Koricheva J., Ossipov V., Ossipova S., Haukioja E., Pihlaja K. 2005 – Delayed induced responses of birch glandular trichomes and leaf surface lipophilic compounds to mechanical defoliation and simulated winter browsing – Oecologia, 146: 385–393.
• van de Vrie M., McMurtry J.A., Huffaker C.B. 1972 – Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies. A review. III Biology, ecology, and pest status and host plant relations of Tetranychids – Hilgardia, 41: 354–432.
• van den Boom C.E.M., van Beek T.A., Dicke M. 2003 – Differences among plant species in acceptance by the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. – J. Appl. Entomol. 127: 177–183.