Water requirements of two landscape tree species Prosopis glandulosa (D.C.) and Conocarpus erectus (L.) grown in arid regions

• Autorzy: Moftah A. , Al-Ghanim W.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Six-month-old honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa DC) and buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus L.) tree seedlings were grown under different soil water potentials ([psi]soil) in order to determine the minimum soil water potential at which both species can survive and grow fairly well, and to study the soil-plant water relationship at different irrigation regimes. The results showed that growth of Prosopis was not affected significantly until soil water potential was lower than -0.12MPa, while growth of Conocarpus seedlings was affected at water potential of about -0.08MPa, below which, plant height, leaf area and shoot and root dry weights were severely reduced by soil water deficit. Water stress decreased osmotic potential ([psi][pi]) of leaves and roots of both species, however the decrease in [psi][pi] of Conocarpus leaves and roots were much more pronounced (10.15%, resp.) than that of Prosopis. Leaves tended to osmoregulate their cell sap through osmotic adjustment as their content of soluble sugars increased, which occurred in Prosopis at water stress higher than that needed for Conocarpus. The satisfying survival under low [psi]soil could be related to increased osmotic adjustment. [psi]soil values seem to be a more useful tool than the field capacity values to estimate plant water requirements and can be used over an extended period of time, for plant grown under different soil types and different environmental conditions. The study indicates that Conocarpus seedlings can withstand reasonable water stress and can survive at moderately low water potential, but can not be classified as a high drought tolerant or resistant species, while Prosopis can survive at an extremely low water potential and may be classified as a drought tolerant species.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Conocarpus; growth; osmotic adjustment; osmotic potential; Prosopis; water stress

PL

Conocarpus; osmotyczna regulacja; potencjał osmotyczny; Prosopis; stres wodny; wzrost

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: Vol. 56, nr 2
• Strony: 217--226
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz.,tab., wykr.,

Twórcy

autor

Moftah A.

autor

Al-Ghanim W.

• College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Qassim University, P.O. Box: 1482 Buridah, Saudi Arabia

Bibliografia

• Barathi P., Sunder D., Reddy A.R. 2001 - Changes in mulberry leaf metabolism in response to water stress. – Biol. Plant. 44: 83–87.
• Blum A. 1989 – Osmotic adjustment and growth of barley genotypes under drought stress. – Crop Sci. 29: 230–233.
• Branney P. 1989 – Propagation of tree species for afforestation in northern Sudan. – Northern Region Irrigation Project (NRIRP), Forestry Development Component. Overseas Development Administration, London, UK, 42 pp.
• Buysse J., Merckx R. 1993 – An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue. – J. Exp. Bot. 44: 1627–1629.
• Delperee C., Kinet J.M., Lutts S. 2003 - Low irradiance modifies the effect of water stress on survival and growth-related parameters during the early developmental stages of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum). – Physiol. Plant. 119: 211–220.
• Dubois M.K., Gille J., Smith F. 1956 - Colorimetric method for determination sugar and related substances. – Anal. Chem. 28: 350.
• Gliman E.F., Watson, D.G. 1993 – Conocarpus erectus: Buttonwood. Fact sheet ST–179. - U.S. Forest Service and Southern Group of State Foresters, Gainseville, FL, 3 p.
• Hsiao T.C., Xu L.K. 2000 – Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport. – J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1595–1616.
• Jones H.G., Lakso A.N., Syvertsen J.P. 1985 – Physiological control of water status in temperate and subtropical fruit trees. – Hort. Rev. 7: 301–344.
• Kramer P.J., Boyer J.S. 1995 – Water Relations of Plants and Soils. – Academic Press, New York.
• Leuschner C., Backes K., Hertel D., Schipka F., Schmitt U., Terborg O., Runge M. 2001 – Drought responses at leaf, stem and fine root levels of competitive Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) – Liebl. Trees in dry and wet years. Forest Ecol. Manage. 149: 33–46.
• Levitt D.G., Simpson J.R., Tipton J.L. 1995 – Water use of two landscape tree species in Tucson, Arizona. – J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120: 409–416.
• Li C. 2000 – Population differences in water-use efficiency of Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings under different watering regimes. – Physiologia Plant. 108: 134–139.
• Liogier H.A. 1990 – Plantas Medicinales de Puerto Rico y. del Caribe. – Iberoamericana de Ediciones, Inc., San Juan, PR 566p. (in Spanish)
• Loescher W.H., Marlow G.C., Kennedy R.A. 1982 – Sorbitol metabolism and sinksource interconversions in developing apple leaves. – Plant Physiol. 70: 335–339.
• Mielke M.S., Barros N.F., Penchel R.M., Martinez C.A., Fonseca S., Almedia A.C. 2000 – Leaf gas exchange in a clonal eucalyptus plantation as related to soil moisture, leaf water potential and microclimate variables. - Trees 14: 263–270.
• Nardini A., Salleo S. Gullo M.A., Pitt F. 2000 – Different responses to drought and freeze stress of Quercus ilex L. growing along a latitudial gradient – Plant. Ecol. 148: 139–147.
• Ni B.R., Pallardy S.G. 1991 – Response of gas exchange to water stress in seedlings of woody angiosperms. – Tree Physiol. 8: 1–9.
• Nilsen E.T, Orcutt D. 1996 – The Physiology of Plant under Stress. – John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
• Nobel P.S. 1999 – Physiochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology, 2nd ed. – Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
• Parker W.C., Pallardy S.G. 1985 – Genotypic variation in tissue water relations of leaves and roots of black walnut (Juglans nigra) seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 64: 105–110.
• Parker W.C., Pallardy S.G. 1988 – Leaf and root osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed Quercus alba, Q. macrocarpa, and Q. stellata. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 1–5.
• Polley H.W., Tischler C.R., Johnson H.B., Pennington R.E. 1999 – Growth, water relations, and survival of drought-exposed seedlings from six maternal families of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) responses to CO2 enrichment. – Tree Physiol. 19: 359–366.
• Popp M., Lüttge U., Cram W.J., Diaz M., Griffiths H., Lee H.J.S., Medina E., Schäfer C., Stimmel K.H., Thonke B. 1989 – Water relations and gas exchange of mangroves. – New Physiologist 111: 293–307.
• Ranney T.G., Bassuk N.L., Whitlow T.H. 1991 – Osmotic adjustment and solute constituents in leaves and roots of water-stressed cherry (Prunus) trees. – J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 116–688.
• Salisbury F.B., Ross C.W. 1992 – Environmental physiology (In: Plant Physiology, 4th ed.) – Wadsworth Pub. Company, Belmont, CA, USA, pp. 549–600.
• Scholander P.F., Hammer H.T., Bradsteel E., Henningsen E.A. 1965 – Sap pressure in vascular plants. – Science 148: 339–346.
• Shock C., Akin A., Unlenen L.U., Feibert E., Nelson K., Tschida A. 2002 – A comparison of soil water potential and soil water content sensors. (In: Proceedings of the International Irrigation Show) – Irrigation Association, Ontario, OR, pp. 139–146.
• Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G. 1980 – Statistical Methods, 18th ed. – The Iowa State College Press. Ames, Iowa, USA.
• Stevens W.D., Ulloa C., Pool A., Montiel O.H. 2001 – Flora de Nicaragua. –Monographs of Systematic Botany Vol. 85, No. 1. Missouri Botanical garden Press, 943 pp.
• Taiz L., Zeiger E. 2002 – Stress Physiology. In: Plant Physiology, 3rd ed. – Sinauer Associates, Inc., publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 591–620.
• Tambussi E.A., Bartoli C.G., Beltrano J., Guiamet J.J., Araus J.L. 2000 – Oxidative damage to thylakoid proteins in water stressed leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum). - Physiol. Plant. 108: 398–404.
• Tan W., Blake T.J., Boyle T.J.B. 1992 – Drought tolerance in faster-and slower-growing black sprusce (Picea mariana) progenies: II. Osmotic adjustment and changes of soluble carbohydrate and amino acids under osmotic stress. – Physiol. Plant. 85: 645–651.
• Tuomela K., Johansson S.G., Kuusipalo J., Luukkanen O. 1993 – Morphological and physiological comparison of three provenances of Eucalyptus microtheca grown in eastern Kenya. – E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 58: 35–41.
• Tyree M.T., Nardini A., Salleo S. 2001 - Hydraulic architecture of whole plants and single leaves. (In: L’arbre 2000 the Tree Ed. M. Labrecque) – Isabelle Quentin Publisher, Montreal, pp. 215–221.
• Vogt U.K., Löch R. 1999 – Stem water potential and leaf conductance: a comparison of Sorbus aucuparia and Sambucus nigra. – Phys. Chem. Earth 24: 121–123.
• Wang Z., Huang B., Xu Q. 2003 – Effect of abscisic acid on drought response of Kentucky bluegrass. – J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128: 36–41.
• Younis M.E., El-Shahaby O.A., Abo-Hamed S.A., Ibrahim A.H. 2000 – Effects of water stress on growth, pigments and 14CO2 assimilation in three sorghum cultivars. - J. Agron. Crop Sci. 185: 73–82.
• Zhang B., Archbold D.D. 1993 – Solute accumulation in leaves of a Fragaria chiloensis and a F. virginiana selection responds to water deficit stress. – J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 11: 280–285.