Soil and litter macrofauna in shelterbelts and in adjacent croplands: changes in community structure after tree planting

• Autorzy: Olechowicz E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Studies were carried out in the vicinity of Turew near Poznań (Western Poland) in the years 2003 and 2004 in three midfield shelterbelts of different age (150, 11, 6 years old) and along two transects across shelterbelt (6 and 11 years old) >ecotone> field at distance 15 and 50 m from the shelterbelt. The field located in deforested area was treated as the control. The studies were aimed at estimating the changes in community structure (composition, density, biomass) of soil and litter macrofauna, (mainly dipteran larvae), related to shelterbelt age both within shelterbelts as in adjoining fields. The results were compared to previous studies carried out in 1999-2000 in the same agricultural landscape. The density and biomass of soil and litter macrofauna were many times higher in shelterbelts (2824-870 ind. m[^-2] and 3782-521 mg.d.wt. m[^-2]) than in fields (483-53 ind. m[^-2] and 101-12 mg.d.wt. m[^-2]) and increased with the age of planted trees. The same was true for taxonomic richness. Ecotone zone of both transects was characterised by the greatest density and biomass of animals, mainly those of mobile epigeic animals, particularly the ants. The density and biomass values were declining in the field with the increasing distance from the shelterbelt. Across the transect of an older (10-11 years old) shelterbelt and adjacent field the density and biomass of studied animals were higher in all plots than across the younger (5-6 years old) one. It can be concluded, that the effect of the shelterbelt increases with age of planted trees. The results confirm the previous suggestions of the enhancement of the field macrofauna by forested strips. The highest similarity in taxonomic and dominance structure was found between the shelterbelts and their ecotones and they differed significantly from those in the field.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biomass; density; dipteran larvae communities; dominance structure; individual body mass; macrofauna; midfield shelterbelts; trophic structure

PL

biomasa; dominacja; gęstość; makrofauna; masa ciała; pas wiatrochronny; struktura; struktury troficzne

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 55, nr 4
• Strony: 647--664
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz.,Tab., wykr.,

Twórcy

autor

Olechowicz E.

• Centre for Ecological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Dziekanów Leśny, 05-092 Łomianki, Poland,

Bibliografia

• Bartoszewicz A., Ryszkowski L. 1996 – Influence of the shelterbelts and meadows on the chemistry of ground water. (In: Dynamics of Agricultural Landscape. Eds: L. Ryszkowski, N.R. French, A. Kędziora) – PWRiL, Poznań: 98–109.
• Bernacki Z. 2004 – Secondary succesion of the vegetation in the young shelterbelt (Turew area, Western Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol., 52, 4: 391–404.
• Borowski J. 1995 – Antropogeniczne przeobrażenia zgrupowań larw muchówek (Diptera) borów sosnowych Polski. [Anthropogenic transformations in communities of Diptera larvae of pine forests] (In: Antropogeniczne przeobrażenia epigeicznej i glebowej entomofauny borów sosnowych. [Anthropogenic transformations of epigeic and soil fauna of pine forests]) – Warszawa, Fundacja „Rozwój SGGW”, 335–355. (in Polish)
• Dangerfield J.M. 1990 – Abudance, biomass and diversity of soil macrofauna in savanna woodland and associated managed habitats - Pedobiologia, 34: 141–150.
• Dąbrowska-Prot E. 1987 – The effect on Diptera of woodlots in an agricultural landscape - Pol. ecol. Stud., 13: 71–94.
• Dąbrowska-Prot E. 1991 – The role of forests islands in the shaping of the structure and functioning of entomofauna in an agricultural landscape – Ekol. pol., 39: 481–516.
• Dąbrowska-Prot E. 1999 – Influence of agricultural landscape on biodiversity of entomofauna communities. (In: Insect population growth and the environment. Ed: C.A.Barlow) - Publ. Research Sigupost, Trivandrum, India, 57–67.
• Dmowska E. 2007 – Nematode communities along the transect shelterbelt – ecotone – crop field – Pol. J. Ecol. 55: 665–680.
• Frouz J. 1994 – Changes in terrestrial chironomid community (Diptera: Chironomidae) during secondary succession in old fields - Pedobiologia, 32: 334–343.
• Frouz J. 2001 – Use of soil dwelling Diptera (Insecta, Diptera) as bioindicators: a review of ecological requirements and response to disturbance (In: Invertebrate biodiversity as bioindicators of sustainable landscapes. Practical use invertebrates to assess sustainable land use, Ed: M.G. Paoletti.) – Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74: 167–186.
• Górny M. 1968a – Synecological studies of the soil macrofauna in two different agricultural biotopes – Ekol. pol. A, 20: 411–443.
• Górny M. 1968b – Faunal and zoocenological analysis of the soil insect communities in the ecosystem of shelterbelt and field – Ekol. pol. A., 14: 297–324.
• Karg J. 1995 – Nowe zadrzewienia w krajobrazie rolniczym jako czynnik intensyfikujący procesy regulacji biocenotycznej. [New shelterbelts in agricultural landscape – factor enhancing processes of biocenotic density control] – Biuletyn Parków Krajobrazowych 2: 17–27. (in Polish)
• Karg J. 1998 – Wpływ nowowprowadzonych zadrzewień śródpolnych na wzbogacanie zespołów owadów krajobrazu rolniczego. [Influence of newly planted midfield shelterbelts on agricultural landscape insects communities enrichment] – (In: Dobre praktyki w produkcji rolniczej. [Good practices in agriculture], Mat. of scientific conference]) – IUNG Puławy: 211–218. (in Polish)
• Karg J. 1999 – Nowe zadrzewienie w Parku Krajobrazowym im. Gen. D. Chłapowskiego. Rozwój i funkcje. [New shelterbelt in the gen. D. Chłapowski Landscape Park: Their growth and functions.] – Biul. Parków Krajobr. Wielkop., 5(7): 102–120. (in Polish)
• Karg J. 2004 – Importance of midfield shelterbelts for over-wintering entomofauna (Turew area, West Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol., 52: 421–431.
• Karg J., Ryszkowski L. 1996a – Animals in arable land (In: Dynamics of an agricultural landscape, Eds: L. Ryszkowski, N. French, A. Kędziora) – PWRiL, Poznań, pp.138–172.
• Karg J., Ryszkowski L. 1996b – Wpływ struktury krajobrazu rolniczego na bioróżnorodność i procesy regulacji biocenotycznej. [Influence of agricultural landscape structure on biodiversity and biocenotic regulation processes] (In: Ekologiczne procesy na obszarach intensywnego rolnictwa. [Ecological processes on the intensive agriculture areas] Eds: L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – ZBSRiL PAN. Poznań: 21–31. (in Polish)
• Kempson O., Lloyd M., Gheraldi R. 1963 - A new extractor for woodland litter – Pedobiologia, 3: 1–21.
• Kujawa A., Karg J. 1998 – Wstępne wyniki inwentaryzacji zadrzewień na terenie Parku Krajobrazowego im. Gen. D. Chłapowskiego [Preliminary results of woodlot inventory in the gen. D. Chłapowski Landscape Park] – Biuletyn Parków Krajobrazowych Wielkopolski, 3 (5): 59–66. (in Polish)
• Lobry de Bruyn L.A. 1997 – The status of soil macrofauna as indicators of soil health to monitor the sustainability of Australian agricultural soils – Ecological Economics, 23: 167–178.
• Marczewski M., Steinhaus H. 1959 – O odległości systematycznej biotopów [On the taxonomic distance of biotopes] – Zastos. Matem., 4: 195–203. (in Polish)
• Marcinek J. 1996 – Soils of the Turew agricultural landscape – (In: Dynamics of an agricultural landscape, Eds: L. Ryszkowski, N.R. French, A. Kędziora) – PWRiL, Poznań, pp. 19–26.
• Nowak E. 2004 – Enchytraeids (Oligochaeta) in the agricultural landscape – Pol. J. Ecol., 52: 115–122.
• Olechowicz E. 1986 – Density and biomass of soil macrofauna from different forest ecosystems of the Kampinos Forest – Ekol. pol., 34, 4: 689–710.
• Olechowicz E. 1998 – Makrofauna glebowo-ściółkowa borów sosnowych w gradiencie zróżnicowań klimatycznych oraz zanieczyszczeń przemysłowych w Polsce. [The soil and litter macrofauna of pine forest along gradients of climate and industrial pollution in Poland] – In: Bory sosnowe w gradiencie kontynentalizmu i zanieczyszczeń w Europie Środkowej. [Pine forests along the climate and pollution gradient in Central Europe] Eds: A. Breymeyer, E. Roo-Zielińska) – Dokumentacja Geograficzna, 13: 145–160. (in Polish)
• Olechowicz E. 2004a – Communities structure of soil-litter macrofauna in shelterbelt and adjacent crop field – Pol. J. Ecol., 52: 135–153.
• Olechowicz E. 2004b – Soil-litter macrofauna in the mixed forest and midfield shelterbelts of different age (Turew area, West Poland) - Pol. J. Ecol., 52: 405–420.
• Olejniczak I. 2004 – Communities of soil microarthropods with special reference to Collembola in midfield shelterbelts – Pol. J. Ecol., 52 (2): 123–133.
• Olejniczak I. 2007 – Soil mesofauna (Acarina and Collembola) along transects crossed shelterbelts of different age and adjacent fields - Pol. J. Ecol. 55: 637–646.
• Paplinska E. 1980 – Preliminary analysis of communities of soil Diptera larvae in forest ecosystems from variously utilized areas - Pol. ecol. Stud., 6, 4: 625–643.
• Paplinska E. 1987 – Preliminary quantitative and qualitative estimation of soil associations of Diptera larvae occurring in forest ecosystems and in woodlots in the vicinity of Knurów (Silesia) – Pol. ecol. Stud., 13, 1: 95–111.
• Paoletti M.G. 2001 – Invertebrate biodiversity as bioindicators of sustainable landscapes - Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 74, 450 pp.
• Paquin P., Coderre D. 1997 – Changes in soil macroarthropod communities in relation to forest maturation through three successional stages in the Canadian boreal forest – Oecologia, 112: 104–111.
• Romaniszyn W. 1970 – Próba interpretacji tendencji skupiskowych zwierząt w oparciu o definicje podobieństwa i odległości [An attempt at interpreting agglomerative tendencies of animals based on definition of similarity and distance] – Wiad. ekol., 14: 306–327. (in Polish)
• Ryszkowski L. 1985 – Impoverishment of soil fauna due to agriculture. (In: Soil Ecology and Management. Ed. J.H. Cooley) – Intecol Bull., 12: 6–17.
• Ryszkowski L., Karg J. 1977 – Variability in biomass of epigeic insects in the agricultural landscape – Ekol. Pol., 25 (3): 501–517.
• Ryszkowski L., Kędziora H. 1987 – Impact of agricultural landscape structure on energy flow and water cycling – Landscape Ecology, 1: 85–94.
• Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Margarit G., Paoletti M.G., Zlotin R. 1993 – Aboveground insect biomass in agricultural landscapes of Europe. (In: Landscape Ecology and Agroecosystems, Eds: R.G.H. Bunce, L. Ryszkowski, M.G. Paoletti) – Lewis Publishers: 71–82.
• Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Kujawa K. 1999 – Ochrona i kształtowanie różnorodności biologicznej w krajobrazie rolniczym. [Protection and formation of biological diversity in agricultural landscape] (In: Uwarunkowania ochrony różnorodności biologicznej i krajobrazowej. [Determinants of the protection of biological and landscape diversity] Eds: L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy) – ZBSRiL, Poznań: 59–79. (in Polish)
• Ryszkowski L, Karg J., Kujawa K., Gołdyn H., Arczyńska-Chudy E. 2001 - Influence of landscape mosaic structure on diversity of wild plant and animal communities in agricultural landscape of Poland. (In: Landscape ecology in agroecosystems management. Ed. L. Ryszkowski) – CRS Press, Boca Raton, New York, Washington D. C.: 185–217.
• Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Bernacki Z. 2003 - Biocenotic function of the mid-field woodlots in west Poland: Study area and research assumptions – Pol. J. Ecol., 51: 269–281.
• Stork N.E., Eggleton P. 1992 – Invertebrates as determinants and indicators of soil quality - Am. J. Altern. Agric., 7: 38–47.
• Struve-Kusenberg R. 1981 – Sukzesion und trophische Structur der Bodenfauna von Brachflachen – Pedobiologia, 21: 132–141. (in German)
• Szujecki A. 1990 – Ekologiczne aspekty odtwarzania ekosystemów leśnych na gruntach porolnych [Ecological aspects of re-development of forest ecosystems on old farm land] – Sylwan, 3–12: 23–40. (in Polish)
• Szujecki A., Mazur S., Szyszko J., Perliński S. 1977 – Changes in the structure of macrofauna communities on afforested arable land – Ecol. Bull., 25: 580–584.
• Van der Drift J. 1951 – Analysis of the animal community in a beech forest floor – Tijdschr. Ent., 94: 1–168.
• Wallwork J.A. 1970 – Ecology of soil animals. - Mc Graw-Hill, London, New York, Sydney, Toronto, Johannesburg, Panama.