Density, distribution and nest-sites of woodpeckers (Picidae) in a managed forest of Western Polan

• Autorzy: Kosiński Z. , Kempa M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Abundance, distribution and nest-site characteristics of woodpecker species (family Picidae), i.e., Great Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major L.), Middle Spotted Woodpecker (D. medius L.), Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (D. minor L.), Black Woodpecker (Dryocopus martius L.), Grey-faced Woodpecker (Picus canus Gmel.) and Wryneck (Jynx torquilla L.), coexisting in managed forest are described. All species preferred old deciduous forest stands ([is greater than or equal to] 81 years old) as nest-sites, however, they differed in most aspects of nest site selection. Great- and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers excavated nest-holes most commonly in oaks (78 and 86% of nests, respectively), but Black- and Grey-faced Woodpeckers in beeches (71 and 100% of nests). However, placement of nest-holes within the same tree species differed among woodpecker species. Great Spotted- and Grey-faced Woodpeckers nested three meters lower (9 m) compared to Middle Spotted and Black Woodpeckers (12 m). Lesser Spotted- Woodpeckers excavated breeding holes relatively the highest in respect to tree height. With the exception of Lesser Spotted Woodpeckers, all specie used live trees as nest sites. Weaker excavators such as Middle Spotted- and Lesser Spotted Woodpeckers, nested more frequently in limbs and branches (31 and 25% of nests, respectively) compared to strong excavators, i.e., Great Spotted-, Black- and Greyfaced Woodpeckers (<8% of nests in limbs or branches). Weaker excavators more frequently selected dead tree fragments compared to strong excavators.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

breeding densities; hole-nesters; managed forests; nest-sites

PL

gniazdo; hodowla; umiejscowienie; zagnieżdżanie; zarządzanie lasem

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 55, nr 3
• Strony: 519--533
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 65 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Kosiński Z.

autor

Kempa M.

• Institute of Environmental Biology, Department of Avian Biology and Ecology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland,

Bibliografia

• Angelstam P., Roberge J.-M., Lõhmus A., Bergmanis M., Brazaitis G., Breuss M., Edenius L., Kosinski Z., Kurlavicius P., Lārmanis V., Lūkins M., Mikusinski G., Račinskis E., Strazds M., Tryjanowski P. 2004 – Habitat suitability index modelling as a conservation tool – a review of habitat parameters for forest birds in the Baltic Sea region (In: Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity, Eds. P. Angelstam, M. Dönz-Breuss, J-M. Roberge) – Ecol. Bull. 51: 427–453.
• Ar A., Barnea A., Yom-Tov Y., Mersten-Katz C. 2004 – Woodpecker cavity aeration: a predictive model – Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 144: 237–249.
• Bachmann S., Pasinelli G. 2002 – Raumnutzung syntop vorkommender Buntspechte Dendrocopos major und Mittelspechte D. medius und Bemerkungen zur Konkurrenzsituation – Ornithol. Beob. 99: 33–48.
• Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A., Mustoe S.H. 2000 – Bird census techniques – Academic Press, London, 302 pp.
• Bocca M., Rolando A. 2003 – The ecology of the Black Woodpecker in Mont Avic Natural Park (Italian Western Alps) (In: International Woodpecker Symposium. Proceedings, Eds. P. Pechacek, W. D’Oleire-Oltmanns) – Forschungsbericht 48, Nationalparkverwaltung Berchtesgaden, pp. 7–11.
• Fauvel B., Carré F., Lallement H. 2001 – Écologie du Pic mar Dendrocopos medius en Champagne (Est France) – Alauda, 69: 87–101.
• Fernadez C., Azkona P. 1996 – Influence of forest structure on the density and distribution of the White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos and Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius in Quinto Real (Spanish western Pyrenees) – Bird Study, 43: 305–313.
• Gaston K.J., Blackburn T.M., Gregory R.D. 1999 – Does variation in census area confound density comparisons? – J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 191–204.
• Glue D.E., Boswell T. 1994 – Comparative nesting ecology of the three British breeding woodpeckers – Brit. Birds, 87: 253–269.
• Günther E. 1993 – Zur Wahl des Höhlenstandortes von Bunt- und Mittelspecht (Dendrocopos major und D. medius) im nordöstlichen Harz (Sachsen-Anhalt) – Orn. Jber. Mus. Heineanum, 11: 67–73.
• Hågvar S., Hågvar G., Mønness E. 1990 – Nest site selection in Norvegian woodpeckers - Holarct. Ecol. 13: 156–165.
• Hertel F. 2003 – Habitatnutzung und Nahrungserwerb von Buntspecht Picoides major, Mittelspecht Picoides medius und Kleiber Sitta europaea in bewirtschafteten und unbewirtschafteten Buchenwäldern des nordostdeutschen Tieflandes – Vogelwelt, 124: 111–132.
• Hooge P.N., Stanback M.T., Koenig W.D. 1999 – Nest-site selection in the Acorn Woodpecker – Auk, 116: 45–54.
• Jenni L. 1981 – Das Skelettmuskelsystem des Halses von Buntspecht und Mittelspecht Dendrocopos major und medius – J. Orn. 122: 57–61.
• Kempa M., Kosiński Z. 2003 – Ekspansja i pierwsze przypadki gniazdowania dzięcioła zielonosiwego Picus canus w Wielkopolsce [Expansion and breeding records of the Greyfaced Woodpecker Picus canus in the region of Wielkopolska] – Not. Orn. 44: 131–135.
• Kosiński Z. 2006 – Factors affecting the occurrence of middle spotted and great spotted woodpeckers in deciduous forests – a case study from Poland – Ann. Zool. Fennici, 43: 198–210.
• Kosiński Z., Kempa M., Hybsz R. 2004 – The accuracy and efficiency of different techniques for censusing territorial Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius – Acta Ornithol. 39: 29–34.
• Kosiński Z., Ksit P. 2006 – Comparative reproductive biology of Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius and Great Spotted Woodpeckers D. major in a riverine forest – Bird Study, 53: 237–246.
• Kosiński Z., Ksit P. 2007 – Nest holes of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers D. medius: Do they really differ in size? – Acta Ornithol. 42: 45–52.
• Kosiński Z., Ksit P., Winiecki A. 2006 – Nest sites of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius in nearnatural and managed riverine forests – Acta Ornithol. 41: 21–32.
• Kosiński Z., Winiecki A. 2004 – Nest-site selection and niche partitioning among the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius in riverine forest of Central Europe – Ornis Fennica, 81: 145–156.
• Kosiński Z., Winiecki A. 2005 – Factors affecting the density of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius: a macrohabitat approach – J. Ornithol. 146: 263–270.
• Kosenko S. M., Kaygorodova E. Yu. 2001 – Vlijanie fragmentacii mestoobitanija na raspredelenie, plotnost’ naselenija i produktivnost’ razmnoženija srednego djatla Dendrocopos medius (Aves, Picidae) v Nerusso-Desnjanskom Poles’e – Zoolog. Žurnal, 80: 71–78 (in Russian).
• Kosenko S.M., Kaygorodova E. Yu. 2003 – Osobennosti ekologii srednego djatla v Desnjanskom Poles’e – Ornitologija, 30: 94–103.
• Lang E., Rost P. 1990 – Höhlenökologie und Schutz des Schwarzspechtes (Dryocopus martius) – Die Vogelwarte, 35: 177–185.
• Lange U. 1996 – Brutphänologie, Bruterfolg und Geschlechterverhältnis der Nestlinge beim Schwarzspecht Dryocopus martius im Ilm-Kreis (Thüringen) – Vogelwelt, 117: 47–56.
• Martin K., Aitken K.E.H., Wiebe K.L. 2004 – Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: nest characteristics and niche partitioning – Condor, 106: 5–19.
• Mazgajski T. D. 1997 – Zmiany liczebności i miejsca gniazdowania dzięcioła dużego Dendrocopos major i średniego D. medius w rezerwacie ”Las Bielański” w Warszawie. [Changes in the numbers and nest sites of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major and the Middle Spotted Woodpecker D. medius in the Las Bielański reserve in Warsaw – Och. Przyr. 54: 155–160.
• Mikusiński G., Angelstam P. 1997 – European woodpeckers and anthropogenic habitat change: a review – Vogelwelt, 118: 277–283.
• Mikusiński G., Gromadzki M., Chylarecki P. 2001 – Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity – Conserv. Biol. 15: 208–217.
• Miranda B., Pasinelli G. 2001 – Habitatansprüche des Kleinspechts (Dendrocopos minor) in Wäldern der Nordost-Schweiz – J. Ornithol. 142: 295–305.
• Newton I. 1994 – The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review – Biol. Conserv. 70: 265–276.
• Nilsson S.G. 1997 – Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius (In: The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance, Eds. W.J.M. Hagemeijer, M.J. Blair) – T&AD Poyser, London, pp. 446–447.
• Nilsson S.G., Johnsson K., Tjernberg M. 1991 – Is avoidance by black woodpeckers of old nest holes due to predators? – Anim. Behav. 41: 439–441.
• Noah T. 2000 – Siedlungsdichte, Habitat und Bestandsentwicklung der Spechte im NSG “Innerer Unterspreewald” Otis, 8: 75–98.
• Pasinelli G. 2000 – Oaks (Quercus sp.) and only oaks? Relations between habitat structure and home range size of the middle spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos medius) – Biol. Conserv. 93: 227–235.
• Pasinelli G., Hegelbach J., Reyer H.-U. 2001 – Spacing behavior of the Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Central Europe – J. Wildl. Manage. 65: 432–441.
• Pasinelli G. 2003 – Dendrocopos medius Middle Spotted Woodpecker – BWP Update. Vol. 5, N°. 1: 49–99.
• Remm J., Lõhmus A., Remm K. 2006 – Tree cavities in riverine forests: What determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines? – For. Ecol. Manage. 221: 267–277.
• Roberge J.-M., Angelstam P. 2006 – Indicator species among resident forest birds – A cross-regional evaluation in northern Europe – Biol. Conserv. 130: 134–147.
• Rolstad J., Rolstad E., Sæteren Ø. 2000 – Black Woodpecker nest sites: characteristics, selection, and reproductive success – J. Wildl. Manage. 64: 1053–1066.
• Saari L., Südbeck P. 1997 – Grey-faced Woodpecker Picus canus (In: The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance, Eds: W.J.M. Hagemeijer, M.J. Blair) – T&AD Poyser, London, pp. 442–443.
• Schepps J., Lohr S., Martin T. E. 1999 – Does tree hardness influence nest-tree selection by primary cavity nesters? – Auk, 116: 658–665.
• Scherzinger W. 1998 – Sind Spechte “gute” Indikatoren der ökologischen Situation von Wäldern? – Vogelwelt, 119: 1–6.
• Short L.L. 1979 – Burdens of the Picid hole-excavating habit – Wilson Bull. 91: 16–28.
• Short L.L., Horne J.F.M. 1990 – Woodpeckers – a world perspective and conservation concerns (In: Conservation and management of woodpecker populations, Eds. A. Carlson, G. Aulén) – Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Report 17. Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 5–12.
• Smith K.W. 1997 – Nest site selection of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in two oak woods in Southern England and its implications for woodland management – Biol. Conserv. 80: 283–288.
• Smith K.W. 2005 – Has the reduction in nest-site competition from Starlings Sturnus vulgaris been a factor in the recent increase of Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major numbers in Britain? – Bird Study, 52: 307–313.
• Spitznagel A. 1990 – The influence of forest management on woodpecker density and habitat use in floodplain forests of the Upper Rhine Valley (In: Conservation and management of woodpecker populations, Eds: A. Carlson, G. Aulén) – Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Report 17. Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 117–145.
• Stenberg I. 1996 – Nest site selection in six woodpecker species – Fauna norv. Ser. C, Cinclus, 19: 21–38.
• StatSoft, Inc. 2005 – STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.1. www.statsoft.com.
• Tjernberg M., Johnsson K., Nillson S.G. 1993 – Density variation and breeding success of the Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius in relation to forest fragmentation – Ornis Fennica, 70: 155–162.
• Tomiałojć L. 1980 – The combined version of the mapping method (In: Bird census work and nature conservation, Ed. H. Oelke) – Göttingen, pp. 92–106.
• Tomiałojć L., Stawarczyk T. 2003 – Awifauna Polski. Rozmieszczenie, liczebność i zmiany [Avifauna of Poland. Distribution abundance and variation] – PTPP “proNatura”, Wrocław, 870 pp.
• Tomiałojć L., Wesołowski T. 1994 – Die stabilität der Vogelgemeinschaft in einem Urwald der gemässigten Zone: Ergebnisse einer 15jährigen Studie aus dem Nationalpark von Białowieża (Polen) – Orn. Beob. 91: 73–110.
• Waite S. 2000 – Statistical ecology in practice: a guide to analysing environmental and ecology field data – Prentice Hall, 414 pp.
• Weggler M., Aschwanden B. 1999 – Angebot und Besetzung natürlicher Nisthöhlen in einem Buchenmischwald – Orn. Beob. 96: 83–94.
• Wesołowski T. 1995 – Value of Białowieża Forest for the conservation of white-backed woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) in Poland – Biol. Conserv. 71: 69–75.
• Wesołowski T., Tomiałojć L. 1986 – The breeding ecology of woodpeckers in a temperate primaeval forest – preliminary data – Acta Ornithol. 22: 1–21.
• Wesołowski T., Tomiałojć L. 1997 – Breeding bird dynamics in a primaeval temperate forest: long-term trends in Białowieża National Park (Poland) – Ecography, 20: 432–453.
• Wiebe K.L. 2001 – Microclimate of tree cavity nests: is it important for reproductive success in Northern Flickers? – Auk, 118: 412–421.
• Wiktander U., Olsson O., Nilsson S.G. 2001 – Seasonal variation in home-range size, and habitat area requirement of the lesser spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos minor) in southern Sweden – Biol. Conserv. 100: 387–395.
• Winter S., Flade M., Schumacher H., Kerstan E., Möller G. 2005 – The importance of near-natural stand structures for the biocoenosis of lowland beech forests – For. Snow Landsc. Res. 79: 127–144.
• Wübbenhorst J., Südbeck P. 2003 – Woodpeckers as indicators for sustainable forestry? First results of a study from Lower Saxony (In: International Woodpecker Symposium. Proceedings, Eds. P. Pechacek, W.D’Oleire-Oltmanns) – Forschungsbericht 48, Nationalparkverwaltung Berchtesgaden, pp. 173–192.
• Zar J.H. 1984 – Biostatistical analysis – Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.