PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Late Cretaceous (Turonian - Coniacian) irregular echinoids of western Kazakhstan (Mangyshlak) and southern Poland (Opole)

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
During the Late Cretaceous, both Mangyshlak and the Opole area were part of the North European Province, and irregular echinoid faunas during the Turonian and Coniacian in both areas were dominated by holasteroids and spatangoids, in particular by Plesiocorys, Echinocorys and Micraster. Almost 1,000 specimens from both areas have been studied. Taxonomically more varied are the faunas species in 3 genera. One species, Micraster (Micraster) praerogalae, a transitional form between Micraster (Micraster) cortestudinarium(GOLDFUSS) and Micraster (Micraster) rogalae NOWAK, is described as new. Micraster (Micraster) rogalae is markedly diachronous within the North European Province, first appearing in the late Coniacian in Mangyshlak and reaching central and western Europe during the late Early Santonian. A similar pattern is revealed by a large morphotype of Echinocorys ex gr. scutata LESKE. Palaeoecological and actualistic data show the taxa studied to have been shallow infaunal (Catopygus), shallow epifaunal [Conulus (Conulus) subrotundus], deeper infaunal [Micraster (Micraster)], deeper semi-infaunal [Micraster (Gibbaster), Plesiocorys (Sternotaxis) plana], deeper epifaunal [Echinocorys, Plesiocorys (Plesiocorys) placenta], and deeper infaunal (Hemiaster). Echinoid bioevents described originally from the Salzgitter-Salder section (Lower Saxony, Germany) can also be recognised in the Opole area, but not further afield in Mangyshlak.
Rocznik
Strony
1--87
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 166 poz.,Tabl. 35,Rys., tab., w
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Geology, Warsaw University, al. Żwirki i Wigury 93, PL-02-089 Warszawa, Poland, don@uw.edu.pl
Bibliografia
  • AGASSIZ, L. 1836. Prodrome d’une monographie des radiares ou Echinodermes. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de Neufchâtel, 1, 168-199.
  • AGASSIZ, L & DESOR, E. 1846-1847. Catalogue raisonné des espèes, des genres, et familles d’échinides. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, (3), Zoologie, 7, 129-168; 8, 355-380.
  • ALEXANDROWICZ, S.W. 1974. Lithostratigraphical division of the Upper Cretaceous Deposits in the Opole Basin. Bulletin de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Série des Sciences de la Terre, 21 (3-4), 187-198. [misdated 1973]
  • ALEXANDROWICZ, S.W. & RADWAN, D. 1973. The Opole Cretaceous; stratigraphical problems and deposits. Przegląd Geologiczny, 4, 183-188.
  • ANDERT, H. 1934. Die Kreideablagerungen zwischen Elbe und Jeschken. Teil III: Die Fauna der obersten Kreide in Sachsen, Böhmen und Schlesien. Abhandlungen der Preubischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neue Folge, 159, 1-477.
  • BIERNAT, S. 1960. Geological structure of the Opole Cretaceous (Upper Silesia). Biuletyn Instytut Geologiczny, 152, 173-241.
  • BIESPALOV, V.F., BOROVIKOV, L.J., JEREMIN, V.K., JESIENOV, S.E. & JANSZIN, A.L. 1965. Geological map of Kazakh SSR and adjacent areas of Republic of Soviet Union, scale 1:1 500 000. Ministry (Department) of Geology USSR, Ministry (Department) of Geology of the Kazakh SSR. [In Russian]
  • BRONGNIART, A. 1822. Description géolgique des environs de Paris. In: G. CUVIER, Recherches sur les Ossemens Fossiles, 2, 239-648. Paris.
  • BUCAILLE, E. 1883. Étude sur des échinides fossiles du Départment de la Seine - Inférieure. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de Normandie, 8, 16-39.
  • CAYEUX, L. 1967. Note complémentaire sur la Répartition des Échinides du Turonien du Bec de Caux. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de Normandie, 57, 39-41.
  • CAYEUX, L. 1969. Les Échinides du Santonien du Bec de Caux. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de Normandie, 59, 30-44.
  • CAYEUX, L. & DE VILLOUTREYS, O. 1966. Répartition des Échinides du Turonien du Bec de Caux. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de Normandie, 56, 24-40.
  • CAYEUX, L. & DE VILLOUTREYS, O. 1967. Répartition des Échinides du Coniacien du Bec de Caux. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de Normandie, 57, 21-38.
  • CLARK, H.L. 1917. Hawaiian and other Pacific Echini. Memoirs Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard Coll., 46 (2), 85-283.
  • CLARK, H.L. 1925. A catalogue of the Recent sea-urchins (Echinoidea) in collections of the British Museum (Natural History). London, 1-250.
  • CLAUS, C.F. 1876. Grundzüge der Zoologie (3rd ed.), 1, Marburg & Leipzig.
  • CLAUS, C.F. 1880. Grundzüge der Zoologie (4th ed.), 2, 1-522. Marburg & Leipzig.
  • COTTEAU, G. 1857-1876. Études sur les Échinides fossiles du département de l’Yonne, II. Partie Terrain crétacé, pp. 1-511. J.-B. Baillière; Auxerre.
  • COTTEAU, G. & TRIGER, J. 1855-1869. Échinides du Département de la Sarthe considérés au point de vue zoologique et stratigraphique. pp. xv + 1-455. J.-B. Bailliére et Fils; Paris.
  • CROSS, N.E. & ROSE, E.P.F. 1994. Predation of the Upper Cretaceous spatangoid echinoid Micraster. In: B. DAVID, A. GUILLE, J.P. FÉRAL & M. ROUX (Eds), Echinoderms through Time. Proceedings of the Eighth International Echinoderm Conference, Dijon (France), 6-10 September 1993, pp. 607-612. Balkema; Rotterdam – Brookfield.
  • DAVID, B. & FOURAY, M. 1984. Variabilité et disjonction évolutive des caractères dans les populations de Micraster (Echinoidea, Spatangoida) du Crétace supérieur de Picardie. Geobios, 17, 447-476.
  • DES MOULINS, C. 1837. Troisième memoire sur les Échinides. Synonymie générale. Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, 9, 45-364.
  • DRUMMOND, P.V.O. 1985. The Micraster biostratigraphy of the Senonian White Chalk of Sussex, Southern England. Géologie Méditerranéenne, 10 (1983), 177-182.
  • DRUMMOND, P.V.O. & FOURAY, M. 1985. Micraster sénoniens du Bassin Anglo-Parisien. Géologie Méditerranéenne, 10 (1983), 426-429.
  • DUNCAN, P.M. 1889. A revision of the genera and great groups of the Echinoidea. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 23, 1-311.
  • DURHAM, J.W. 1966. Ecology and Paleoecology. In: R.C. MOORE (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part U, Echinodermata 3, vol. 1, U257-U265. Geological Society of America & The University of Kansas; Boulder, Colorado.
  • DURHAM, J.W. & MELVILLE, R.V. 1957. A classification of echinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 31 (1), 242-272.
  • DURHAM, J.W. & WAGNER, C.D. 1966. Glossary of morphological terms applied to Echinoids. In: R.C. MOORE (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part U, Echinodermata 3, vol. 1, U251-U256. Geological Society of America & The University of Kansas; Boulder, Colorado.
  • DZHABAROV, G.N. 1964. The Upper Cretaceous Echinoids of Central Kopet (Turkmenizdat)-Dag and their stratigraphic value, pp. 1-71. Turkmienskoye Izdatielstwo; Aschabad. [In Russian]
  • ELBERT, J. 1902. Das untere Angoumien in den Osningbergketten des Teutoburger Waldes. Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereins der preussischen Rheinlande, Westfalen und des Regierungs-Bezirks Osnabrück, 58 (1901), 77-167.
  • ENDELMAN, L.G. 1971. The stratigraphical distribution of the Upper Cretaceous echinoids in Mangyshlak. In: Geology and elaboration of the oil- and gas-resources., 73-78. Ministierstwo nieftianoj promyszlennosti, Akademia Nauk SSSR; Moskva. [In Russian]
  • ERNST, G. 1963. Stratigraphische und gesteinschemische Untersuchungen im Santon und Campan von Lägerdorf (SW-Holstein). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologischen Staatsinstitut in Hamburg, 32, 71-127.
  • ERNST, G. 1964. Ontogenie, Phylogenie und Stratigraphie der Belemnitengattung Gonioteuthis BAYLE aus dem nordwestdeutschen Santon/Campan. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen, 7, 113-174.
  • ERNST, G. 1966. Fauna, dkologie und Stratigraphie der mittelsantonen Schreibkreide von Lägerdorf (SW-Holstein). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologischen Staatsinstitut in Hamburg, 35, 115-150.
  • ERNST, G. 1967. Über Fossilnester in Pachydiscus-Gehäusen und das Lagenvorkommen von Echiniden in der Oberkreide NW-Deutschlands. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 41 (3/4), 211-229.
  • ERNST, G. 1970a. The stratigraphical value of the Echinoids in the Boreal Upper Cretaceous. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 1, 19-34.
  • ERNST, G. 1970b. Faziesgebundenheit und dkomorphologie bei irregulären Echiniden der nordwestdeutschen Oberkreide. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 44 (1/2), 41-62.
  • ERNST, G. 1970c. Zur Stammesgeschichte und stratigraphischen Bedeutung der Echiniden - Gattung Micraster in der nordwestdeutschen Oberkreide. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 39, 117-135.
  • ERNST, G. 1972. Grundfragen der Stammesgeschichte bei irregulären Echiniden der nordwesteuropäischen Oberkreide. Geologisches Jahrbuch, A 4, 63-175.
  • ERNST, G., HÄHNEL, W. & SEIBERTZ, E. 1973. Aktuopaläontologie und Merkmalsvariabilität bei mediterranen Echiniden und Rückschlüsse auf die dkologie und Artumgrenzung fossiler Formen. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 47 (3/4), 188-216.
  • ERNST, G. & SCHULZ, M.-G. 1974. Stratigraphie und Fauna des Coniac und Santon im Schreibkreide - Richtprofil von Lägerdorf (Holstein). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 43, 5-60.
  • ERNST, G. & SEIBERTZ, E. 1977. Concepts and methods of Echinoid Biostratigraphy. In: E.G. KAUFFMAN & J.E. HAZEL (Eds), Concepts and Methods of Biostratigraphy, 541-563. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc.; Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.
  • ERNST, G., SCHMID, F. & KLISCHIES, G. 1979. Multistratigraphische Untersuchungen in der Oberkreide des Raumes Braunschweig-Hannover. In: J. WIEDMANN (Ed.), Aspekte der Kreide Europas. IUGS A, 6, 11-46.
  • ERNST, G., SCHMID, F. & SEIBERTZ, E. 1983. Event-Stratigraphie im Cenoman und Turon von NW-Deutschland. Zitteliana, 10, 531-554.
  • FECHTER, H. 1970. Die Seeigel. In: Grzimeks Tierleben 3, pp. 326-356. Weichtiere und Stachelhäuter. Kindler-Verlagl; Zürich,.
  • FISCHER, A.G. 1966. Spatangoids. In: R.C. MOORE (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part U, Echinodermata 3, vol. 2, U543-U628. Geological Society of America & The University of Kansas; Boulder, Colorado.
  • FORBES, E. 1850. Notes on Cretaceous Echinodermata. In: F. DIXON (Ed.), The geology and fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous formations of Sussex. 325-343. Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans; London.
  • FOURAY, M. 1981. L’évolution des Micraster (Échinides, Spatangoïdes) dans le Turonien – Coniacien de Picardie Occidentale (Somme). Intérêts biostratigraphiques.
  • Annales de Paléontologie (Invertébrés), 67, 81-134.
  • FOURAY, M. & POMEROL, B. 1985. Les Micraster (Echinoidea, Spatangoida) de la limite Turonien - Sénonien dans la région stratotypique du Sénonien (Sens, Yonne). Implications stratigraphiques. Annales de Paléontologie, 71, 59-82.
  • FOURAY, M. & TARKOWSKI, R. 1991. Intéret biostratigraphique de Micraster leskei (Echinoidea, Spatangoida) dans le Turonien de l’Europe. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Earth Sciences, 39, 215-222.
  • FRIČ, A. 1889. Studien im Gebiete der Böhmischen Kreideformation. Palaeontologische Untersuchungen der einzelnen Schichten. IV. Die Teplitzer Schichten. Archiv der Naturwissenschaftliche Landesdurchforschung von Böhmen, 7 (2), 1-120.
  • GAUTHIER, V. 1887. Echinides. Description des espèces de la Craie de Reims et de quelques espèces nouvelles de l’Aube et de l’Yonne. In: A. PERON (Ed.), Notes pour servir . l’histoire du Terrain de Craie dans le Sud-est du bassin Anglo-Parisien. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Historiques et Naturelles de l’Yonne, 41, 223-255.
  • GEYS, J.F. 1995. Holectypoid echinoids from Cenomanian and Turonian strata in the Mons basin (Belgium). 2. Conulus. (with some taxonomic remarks on C. globolus and C. globulus), Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 65, 139-152.
  • GINDA, V.A. 1965. The stratigraphical distribution of echinoids in the Upper Cretaceous of Volhynian-Podolian Plate. Paleontologicheskiy Sbornik, 2 (2), 117-119. [In Russian]
  • GINDA, V.A. 1968. The paleoecology of the Late Turonian echinoids Volhynian-Podolian Plate. Paleontologicheskiy Sbornik, 5 (2), p. 50-53. [In Russian]
  • GOLDFUSS, A. 1826-33. Petrefacta Germaniae. Abbildungen und Beschreibungen der Petrefacten Deutschland und der angrenzenden Länder, 1, 1-252. Arnz & Co.; Düsseldorf.
  • GONGADZE, G.S. 1979. The Upper Cretaceous Echinoids of Georgia and their stratigraphic value, 1-151. Tbilissi Uniwersitet; Tbilisi. [In Russian]
  • HAWKINS, H.L. 1919. Morphological studies on the Echinoidea Holectypoidea their allies. IX. Pyrina, Conulus and Echinonëus. Geological Magazine, 6 (6), 442-452.
  • HAYWARD, J.F. 1940. Variations in a Chalk sea urchin (Echinocorys) in East Anglia. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists’ Society (for 1939), 15 (1), 68-100.
  • HYNDA, V.A. & MĄCZYŃSKA, S. 1979. Micraster (Micraster) maleckii sp. n. from the Santonian of the environs of Cracow, a new echinoid ex gr. Micraster (Micraster) rogalae NOWAK. Prace Muzeum Ziemi, 32, 21-27.
  • JAGT, J.W.M. 2000. Late Cretaceous-Early Palaeogene echinoderms and the K/T boundary in the southeast Netherlands and northeast Belgium – Part 4: Echinoids. Scripta Geologica, 121, 181-375.
  • JAGT, J.W.M. & MICHELS, G.P.H. 1994. The palaeobiology of a late Maastrichtian echinoid fauna from Haccourt (Liège, NE Belgium). In: B. DAVID, A. GUILLE, J.P. FÉRAL & M. ROUX (Eds), Echinoderms through Time. Proceedings of the Eighth International Echinoderm Conference, Dijon (France), 719-724. Balkema; Rotterdam – Brookfield.
  • JAGT, J.W.M., WALASZCZYK, I., YAZYKOVA, E.A. & ZATOŃ, M. 2004. Linking southern Poland and Northern Germany: Campanian cephalopods, inoceramid bivalves and echinoids. Acta Geologica Polonica, 54 (4), 573-586.
  • KACZOROWSKI, A. 1997. Ammonites of the Opole Cretaceous. Unpublished M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Geology, Warsaw University, pp. 1-84. [In Polish]
  • KAUFFMAN, E.G. 1973. Cretaceous Bivalvia. In: A.H. HALLAM (Ed.), Atlas of Palaeobiogeography, 353-386. Elsevier; Amsterdam - London - New York.
  • KENNEDY, W.J. & WALASZCZYK, I. 2004. Forresteria (Harleites) petrocoriensis (COQUAND, 1859) from the Upper Turonian Mytiloides scupini Zone of Slupia Nadbrzeżna, Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica, 54 (1), 55-59.
  • KĘDZIERSKI, M. & UCHMAN, A. 2001. Ichnofabrics of the Upper Cretaceous marlstones in the Opole region, southern Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica, 51 (1), 81-91.
  • KLEIN, J.TH. 1734. Naturalis dispositio Echinodermatum. Accessit Lucubratiunula de Aculeis Echinorum Marinorum, cum Spicilegio de Belemnitis, 1-79. T.J. Schreiber; Gedani.
  • KONGIEL, R. 1936. Sur quelques Échinides de la Craie supérieure de Krasne Sioło prés Wołkowysk. Travaux des Instituts de Géologie et de Géographie de l’Univérsité de Wilno, 10, 1-12.
  • KONGIEL, R. 1949. Les Echinocorys du Danien de Danemark de Suède de Pologne. Travaux du Service Géologique de Pologne, 5, 1-89.
  • KUDREWICZ, R. & OLSZEWSKA-NEJBERT, D. 1997. Upper Cretaceous ‘Echinoidlagerstätten’ in the Kraków area. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 67 (1), 1-12.
  • KUTYBA, J. 1977. Trace fossils in the Turonian sediments near Opole. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej, 3 (4), 61-66.
  • KÜCHLER, T. & ERNST, G. 1989. Intregrated biostratigraphy of the Turonian-Coniacian transition interval in northern Spain with comparisons to NW Germany. In: J. WIEDMANN (Ed.), Cretaceous of the Western Tethys. Proceedings 3rd International Cretaceous Symposium, Tübingen 1987, pp. 161-190.
  • LAMARCK, J.P. 1816. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres, ou tableau général des classes, des ordres, et des genres de ces animaux, 3. Les Échinides, pp. 1-59. Déterville & Verdière; Paris.
  • LAMBERT, J. 1893. Etudes morphologiques sur le plastron des Spatangides. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Historiques et Naturelles de l’Yonne, 46, 55-98.
  • LAMBERT, J. 1898. Note sur les échinides de la Craie de Ciply. Bulletin de la Société Belgie de Géologie, de Paléontologie et d’Hydrologie, 11, 141-190.
  • LAMBERT, J. 1903. Description des Échinides Crétacés de la Belgique. Étude monographique sur le Genre Echinocorys. Mémoires du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 2, 1-151.
  • LAMBERT, J. 1911. Description des Échinides Crétacés de la Belgique. II. Échinides de l’étage Sénonien. Mémoires du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 4, (1910), 1-81.
  • LAMBERT, J. 1920. Sur quelques genres nouveaux d’Eichinides. Mémoires de la Société Académique de l’Aube, 84, 145-174.
  • LAMBERT, J. & THIÉRY, P. 1909-25. Essai de nomenclature raisonne des Échinides. Fascicule I-V, pp. 1-607. L. Ferrière; Chaumont.
  • LEONHARD, R. 1897. Die Fauna der Kreideformation in Oberschlesien. Palaeontographica, 44, 1-70.
  • LESKE, N.G. 1778. Additamenta ad Jacobi Theodori Klein Naturalem Dispositionem Echinodermatum et Lucubratiunculam de Aculeis Echinorum Marinorum., pp. 1-214. G. E. Beer; Lipsiae.
  • MANTELL, G. 1822. Fossils of the south Downs; or illustrations of the geology of Sussex., pp. 1-320. Lupton Relfe; London.
  • MARCINOWSKI, R. 1974. The transgressive Cretaceous (Upper Albian through Turonian) deposits of the Polish Jura Chain. Acta Geologica Polonica, 24 (1), 117-217.
  • MARCINOWSKI, R. 1980. Cenomanian ammonites from German Democratic Republic, Poland and the Soviet Union. Acta Geologica Polonica, 30 (3), 215-325.
  • MARCINOWSKI, R. & WIEDMANN, J. 1985. The Albian ammonite fauna of Poland and its paleogeographical significance. Acta Geologica Polonica, 35 (3-4), 199-219.
  • MARCINOWSKI, R. & WIEDMANN, J. 1990. The Albian ammonites of Poland. Palaeontologia Polonica, 50, 1-94.
  • MARCINOWSKI, R., WALASZCZYK, I. & OLSZEWSKA-NEJBERT, D. 1996. Stratigraphy and regional development of the mid-Cretaceous (Upper Albian through Coniacian) of Mangyshlak Mountains, Western Kazakhstan. Acta Geologica Polonica, 46 (1-2), 1-60.
  • MĄCZYŃSKA, S.S. 1968. Echinoids of the genus Micraster L. AGASSIZ from the Upper Cretaceous of the Cracow - Miechów area. Prace Muzeum Ziemi, 12, 87-168.
  • MĄCZYŃSKA, S.S. 1972. On some representatives of genus Catopygus L. AGASSIZ (Echinoidea) from the Upper Cretaceous. Prace Muzeum Ziemi, 20, 173-185.
  • MĄCZYŃSKA, S.S. 1989. Class Echinoidea. In: L. MALINOWSKA (Ed.), Geology of Poland., III, Atlas of guide and characteristic fossils, part 2c, Mesozoic, Cretaceous, 300-315. Wydawnictwa Geologiczne; Warszawa.
  • MORTENSEN, TH. 1943. A monograph of the Echinoidea. III. 3. Camarodonta. II. Echinidae, Strongylocentrotidae, Parasaleniidae, Echinometridae. 446 pp. C.A. Reitzel; Copenhagen.
  • MORTENSEN, TH. 1951. A monograph of the Echinoidea. V. 2. Spatangoida. II. 593 pp. C.A. Reitzel; Copenhagen.
  • MORTIMORE, R.N. 1986. Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous White Chalk of Sussex. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 97 (2), 97-139.
  • MOSKVIN, M.M. (Ed.). 1959. Atlas of the Upper Cretaceous fauna of the northern Caucasus and the Crimea, 304 pp. Gostoptechizdat; Moskva. [In Russian]
  • MOSKVIN, M.M. & ENDELMAN, L.G. 1972. Upper Cretaceous echinoids of Mangyshlak and their stratigraphic signification. In: Mesozoic biostratigraphy of the oil-resources areas of SSSR, pp. 3-10. Ministerstwo nieftianoj promyszlennosti, Akademia Nauk SSSR; Moskva. [In Russian]
  • MOSKVIN, M.M. & SHIMANSKAYA, N.V. 1977. The echinoids of the genus Echinocorys as a example of the slow evolution group and about stratigraphic signification. In: O.A. SCARLATO (Ed.), Systematics, evolution, biology and distribution of recent and fossils echinoderms, 47-43. Zoologitscheskij Institut Akademi Nauk SSSR; Leningrad. [In Russian]
  • NAIDIN, D.P. 1959. On the paleogeography of Russian Platform during the Upper Cretaceous epoch. Stockholm Contributions in Geology, 3, 127-138.
  • NAIDIN, D.P, BENIAMOVSKIY, W.N. & KOPAEVICH, L.F. 1984. Methods of transgression and regression study (exemplified by Late Cretaceous basin of west Kazakhstan). 162 pp. Izdatielstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta; Moskva. [In Russian with English summary]
  • NASTAJ-SOBCZYK, W. & TARKOWSKI, R. 1989. The Turonian echinoid assemblages of Opole Trough and Cracow Upland. Sprawozdania z Posiedzeń Komisji Naukowych Polska Akademia Nauk, oddział w Krakowie, za styczeń-czerwiec 1988, 33 (1), 204-205. [In Polish]
  • NÉRAUDEAU, D. 1993. Sexual dimorphism in mid-Cretaceous hemiasterid echinoids. Palaeontology, 36 (2), 311-317.
  • NÉRAUDEAU, D. 1994. Hemiasterid echinoids (Echinodermata: Spatangoida) from the Cretaceous Tethys to the present-day Mediterranean. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 110 (3-4), 319-344.
  • NÉRAUDEAU, D., DAVID, B. & MADON, C. 1998. Tuberculation in spatangoid fascioles: Delineating plausible homologies. Lethaia, 31 (4), 323-334.
  • NICHOLS, D. 1959a. Changes in the Chalk heart-urchin Micraster interpreted in relation to living forms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 242 (693), 347-437.
  • NICHOLS, D. 1959b Mode of life and taxonomy in irregular seaurchins. In: A. J. CAIN (Ed.), Function and taxonomic importance. Systematics Association Publication, 3, 61-80.
  • NOWAK, J. 1909. Gliederung der oberen Kreide in der Umgebung von Halicz. Bulletin International de l’Académie des Sciences de Cracovie, 9, 871-887.
  • OLSZEWSKA, D. 1995. Westward migration of the echinoid species Micraster rogalae NOWAK in the North European Province during the Coniacian and Santonian. Second International Symposium on Cretaceous Stage Boundaries. Brussels, Abstract Volume, p. 91.
  • OLSZEWSKA-NEJBERT, D. 2005. Development of the Turonian Conulus Lagerstätte in the Wielkanoc Quarry (South Poland). Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 75 (3), 199-210.
  • D’ORBIGNY, A. 1853-1860. Description des Mollusques et Rayonnés Fossiles, 1. Terrains Crétacés, T. 6: Echinoides Irreguliers., pp. 1-596 + Tab. 801-1006. Victor Masson; Paris.
  • PARENT, H. 1892. Description de Quelques oursins nouveaux de la craie blanche. Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord, 20, 8-21.
  • PASTERNAK, S.I., GAVRILISHIN, V.I., GINDA, V.A., KOTSYUBINSKY, S.P. & SENKOVSKY, Y.M. 1968. Stratigraphy and fauna of the Cretaceous deposits of the west of the Ukraine (without the Carphathians), pp. 1-272. Naukovaya Dumka; Kiev. [In Ukrainian]
  • PEAKE, N.B. & MELVILLE, R.V. 1970. Proposed use of the plenary powers to vary the Neotype designated by WIND (1959) for Echinocorys scutata LESKE, 1778 (Class Echinoidea). Z. N. (S.) 1903. The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 27 (1), 55-59.
  • PICTET, F. 1857. Traité de Paleontologie, Tome 4 (3rd ed.), i-xvi, 1-768. Paris.
  • POMEL, A. 1883. Classification méthodique et generades échinides, vivants et fossiles, pp.1-131. A. Jourdan; Alger.
  • POMEROL, B. 1985. The Turonian-Senonian (Coniacian) Boundary in the Anglo-Paris Basin, its correlation with the Turonian-Coniacian Boundary defined in Southern France. Newsletter on Stratigraphy, 14, 81-95.
  • POPIEL-BARCZYK, E. 1958. The Echinoid genus Conulus from the Turonian in the vicinity of Kraków, Miechów and Wolbrom. Prace Muzeum Ziemi, 2, 41-79.
  • QUENSTEDT, F.A. 1872-1875. Petrefactenkunde Deutschlands. Abt., 3, Bd. Echinodermen (Echiniden), pp. 1-719. Fuess; Leipzig.
  • RAABE, H. 1966. Die irregulären Echiniden aus dem Cenoman und Turon der Baskischen Depression (Nordspanien). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, 127 (1), 82-126.
  • RADWAŃSKA, Z. 1969. Cretaceous in the borehole Sady IG-1. Kwartalnik Geologiczny, 13, 709-710.
  • RADWAŃSKI, A. & MARCINOWSKI, R. 1996. Elasmobranch teeth from the mid-Cretaceous sequence of the Mangyshlak Mountains, Western Kazakhstan. Acta Geologica Polonica, 46 (1-2), 165-169.
  • ROBASZYNSKI, F. 1978. Approche biostratigraphique du Cénomano-Turonien dans le Hainaut Franco-Belge et le Nord de la France. Annales du Museum d’Histoire Naturelle de Nice, 4 (1976), 1-23.
  • ROEMER, F. 1870. Geologie von Oberschlesien., pp. xxiv + 1-587. Breslau (Nischkowsky).
  • ROSE, E.P.F. & CROSS, N.E. 1993. The Chalk sea-urchin Micraster: microevolution, adaptation and predation. Geology Today, 9, 179-186.
  • ROWE, A.W. 1899. An analysis of the genus Micraster, as determined by rigid zonal collecting from the zones of Rhynchonella Cuvieri to that of Micraster Cor-Anguinum. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 55, 494-547.
  • SAVCHINSKAYA, O.V. 1967. The list and stratigraphic characteristic of the Upper Cretaceous echinoids of Donbass Basin. Paleontologicheskiy Sbornik, 4 (2), 47-55. [In Russian]
  • SAVCHINSKAYA, O.V. 1974. Echinodermata – Echinoidea. In: G.J. KRYMGOLTZ (Ed.), Atlas of the Upper Cretaceous Fauna of Donbass, pp. 303-333. Nedra; Moskva. [In Russian]
  • SAVCHINSKAYA, O.V. 1982. Echinodermata – Echinoidea. In: Atlas of the Late Cretaceous Marine Invertebrata of the Caspian Depression. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instytuta, 187, 229-240. Moskva. [In Russian]
  • SAVIN, L. 1903. Catalogue raisonnée des Échinides fossiles de la Savoie, Bulletin Soc. Hist. Nat. Savoie, 2 (8). 1-195.
  • SCHLÜTER, C. 1869. Fossile Echinodermen des nördlichen Deutschlands. Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereins der preussischen Rheinlande, Westfalen und des Regierungs- Bezirks Osnabrück, 26, 225-253.
  • SCHMIDT, O.I. 1962. The Late Cretaceous echinoids of Tadjic Depression. Trudy Vsesojuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instytuta, 169, 277-324.
  • SCHMIDT, O.I. & SIMAKOV, S.N. 1953. The Upper Cretaceous Echinoids of south-eastern Middle Asia. Trudy Vsesojuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instytuta, Novaya Seria, 66, 5-75.
  • SCHMIDT, O.I., TRIFONOV, N.K. & JASIUKIEVICH, L.P. 1973. The new data on the Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy of the Upper Mangyshlak (on the base of example of Aksyrtau mountain). In: V. S. MURONTZEV (Ed.), New data on geology and oil-resources of Mangyshlak, Trudy Vsesojuznogo Neftanogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta, 344, 5-18. [In Russian]
  • SEMENOV, V.P. 1899. Faune des depêts crétacés de Mangyshlak et quelques autres localités de la province Transcaspienne. Travaux Soc. Imp. Natur. St.-Petersbourg, 28 (5), 1-178.
  • SMISER, J.S. 1935. A monograph of the Belgian Cretaceous Echinoids. Mémoires du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 68, 1-98.
  • SMITH, A.B. 1980a. The structure and arrangement of echinoid tubercles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 289 (1033), 1-54.
  • SMITH, A.B. 1980b. The structure, function, and evolution of tube feet and ambulacral pores in irregular echinoids. Palaeontology, 23 (1), 39-89.
  • SMITH, A.B. 1984. Echinoid Palaeobiology, pp. x + 1-190. George Allen & Unwin; London.
  • SMITH, A.B. 1988. Echinoids. In: A.B. SMITH, C.R.C. PAUL, A.S. GALE & S.K. DONOVAN (Eds), Cenomanian and Lower Turonian echinoderms from Wilmington, south-east Devon, England. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, 42, 16-189.
  • SMITH , A.B. & JEFFERY, C.H. 2000. Maastrichtian and Palaeocene echinoids: a key to word faunas. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 63, 1-406.
  • SMITH, A.B., MONKS, N.E.A. & GALE, A.S. 2006. Echinoid distribution and sequence stratigraphy in the Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) of southern England. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 117, 207-217.
  • SMITH, A.B. & WRIGHT C.W. 1999. British Cretaceous echinoids. Part 5. Holectypoida, Echinoneoida. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London, 343-390, pls 115-129. (Publ. No. 612, part of Vol. 153 for 1999). London.
  • SMITH, A.B. & WRIGHT C.W. 2000. British Cretaceous echinoids. Part 6. Neognathostomata (Cassiduloids). Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London, 391-439, pls 130-138. (Publ. No. 615, part of Vol. 154 for 2000). London.
  • SMITH, A.B. & WRIGHT C.W. 2002. Echinoderms. In: A.B. SMITH & D.J. BATTEN (Eds), Fossils of the Chalk, Palaeontological Association Field Guides to Fossils: Number 2, Second edition, revised and enlarged, 251-295.
  • SMITH, A.B. & WRIGHT C.W. & 2003. British Cretaceous echinoids. Part 7. Atelostomata, Holasteroida. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London, 440-568, pls 139-182. (Publ. No. 619, part of Vol. 156 for 2002). London.
  • STOKES, R.B. 1975. Royaumes et provinces fauniques du Crétacé établis sur la base d’une étude systématique du genre Micraster. Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, C31, 1-94.
  • STOKES, R.B. 1977. The echinoids Micraster and Epiaster from the Turonian and Senonian chalk of England. Palaeontology, 20 (4), 805-821.
  • SUJKOWSKI, Z. 1926. Sur la Jurassique, le Crétacé et le Quaternaire des environs de Wolbrom. Sprawozdania Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, 3, 382-433.
  • TARKOWSKI, R. 1991. Stratigraphy, macrofossils and palaeogeography of the Upper Cretaceous from the Opole Through. Geology, Scientific Bulletins of Stanislaw Staszic Academy of Mining and Metallurgy, 51, 1-156.
  • TRIFONOV, N.K. & BURAGO, A.M. 1960. Upper Cretaceous deposits of Mangyshlak. Trudy VNIGRI, 157, 1-195. [In Russian]
  • TRIFONOV, N.K. & VASILENKO, V.P. 1963. The stratigraphy of Upper Cretaceous of Mangyshlak. Trudy VNIGRI, 218, 342-379. [In Russian]
  • TRÖGER, K.-A. 1974. Zur Biostratigraphie des Ober-Turon bis Unter-Santon aus dem Schachtaufschluss der Zeche Grimberg IV bei Bergkamen (BRD). Freiberger Forschungshefte, C298, 109-138.
  • TRÖGER, K.-A. 1989. Problems of Upper Cretaceous inoceramid biostratigraphy and paleobiogeography in Europe and western Asia. In: J. WIEDMANN (Ed.), Cretaceous of the Western Tethys. Proceedings 3rd International Cretaceous Symposium, Tübingen 1987, pp. 911-930.
  • WAGNER, C.D. & DURHAM, J.W. 1966. Holasteroids. In: R.C. MOORE (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part U, Echinodermata 3, vol. 1, U523-U543. Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas; Boulder, Colorado.
  • WALASZCZYK, I. 1988. Inoceramid stratigraphy of the Turonian and Coniacian strata in the environs of Opole (Southern Poland). Acta Geologica Polonica, 38 (1-4), 51-61.
  • WALASZCZYK, I. 1992. Turonian through Santonian deposits of the Central Polish Uplands; their facies development, inoceramid paleontology and stratigraphy. Acta Geologica Polonica, 42 (1-2), 1-122.
  • WALASZCZYK, I. 2000. Inoceramid bivalves at the Turonian/Coniacian boundary: biostratigraphy, events and diversity trends. Acta Geologica Polonica, 50 (4), 421-430.
  • WALASZCZYK, I. & COBBAN, W.A. 2000. Inoceramids fauna and biostratigraphy of the Upper Turonian – Lower Coniacian of the Western Interior of the United States. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 64, 1-118.
  • WALASZCZYK, I. & COBBAN, W.A. 2006. Palaeontology and biostratigraphy of the Middle-Upper Coniacian and Santonian inoceramids of the US Western Interior. Acta Geologica Polonica, 56 (3), 241-348.
  • WALASZCZYK, I. & WOOD, C.J. 1998. Inoceramid and biostratigraphy at the Turonian/Coniacian boundary; based on the Salzgitter-Salder Quarry, Lower Saxony, Germany, and the Słupia Nadbrzeżna section, Central Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica, 48 (4), 395-434.
  • WALASZCZYK, I. & WOOD, C.J. 1999. Inoceramid stratigraphy. In: B. NIEBUHR, R. BALDSCHUHN, G. ERNST, I. WALASZCZYK, W. WEISS & C.J. WOOD. The Upper Cretaceous succession (Cenomanian – Santonian) of the Staffhorst Shaft, Lower Saxony, northern Germany: intergrated biostratigraphic, lithostratigraphic and downhole geophysical log data. Acta Geologica Polonica, 49 (3), 184-191.
  • WILLCOX, N.R. 1953. Zonal variations in selected morphological features of Echinocorys scutata LESKE. Geological Magazine, 90 (2), 83-96.
  • WOOD, C.J., ERNST, G. & RASEMANN, G. 1984. The Turonian-Coniacian stage boundary in Lower Saxony (Germany) and adjacent areas: the Salzgitter-Salder Quarry as a proposed international standard section. Bulletin of Geological Society of Denmark, 33 (1-2), 225-238.
  • WRIGHT, TH. 1864-1882. Monograph on the British Fossil Echinodermata from the Cretaceous Formations. Volume I – The Echinoidea. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London, 371 pp.
  • ZIEGLER, P.A. 1990. Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe (2nd ed.). 293 pp. Shell Internationale Petroleum Maatschappij B.V.; Mijdrecht, The Hague, Amsterdam
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-1773-6578
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.