PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Wing to tail length ratio in European Blackbirds (Turdus merula L.) of different age

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Urban European Blackbird (Turdus merula L.) population was studied in 1997-2004 in two city parks of Szczecin (NW Poland), based on observations of colour-ringed birds. Biometric studies involving numerous bird species showed that the wings of individuals in their second year of life are shorter than those of birds older than two years; the causes of the differences are, however, unclear. The wing length of the individuals observed the year following the ringing was similar to that of the individuals that were not observed that year (probably non-survivors) -127.2 vs. 127.5 mm for young birds, 129.9 vs. 128.3 mm for old birds, respectively. Therefore, the hypothesis assuming increased mortality of shorter-winged individuals has to be rejected. In opposition to the expected differences between the wing to tail length ratios in the young and older birds (1[st] year - 1.43, 2[nd] year - 1.40, older - 1.39) one has to reject the hypothesis that the young individuals benefit from higher maneuverability of shorter wings. On the other hand, the greater wing length of those individuals captured in their second year of life and recaptured one year later (127.2 vs. 129.7 mm respectively) allows to accept the hypothesis of better nutrition as the cause of longer wings in the older blackbirds.
Rocznik
Strony
121--125
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 22 poz.,
Twórcy
  • Department of Vertebrate Anatomy and Zoology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland
  • Department of Vertebrate Anatomy and Zoology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland
  • Department of Vertebrate Anatomy and Zoology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Alatalo R.V., Gustafsson L., Lundberg A. 1984 – Why do young passerine birds have shorter wings than older birds? – Ibis, 126: 410–415.
  • 2. Busse P. 1983 – Biometrical standards in the Operation Baltic work – Ring, 10: 125–137.
  • 3. Desrochers A. 1992 – Age and foraging success in European blackbirds: variation between and within individuals – Anim. Behav. 43: 885–894.
  • 4. Evans M.R., Rosen M., Park K.J., Hendenström A. 2002 – How do birds’ tails work? Delta-wing theory fails to predict tail shape during flight – Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 1053–1057.
  • 5. Figuerola J., Gutierrez R. 2000 – Why do juvenile Moustached Warblers have shorter wings? – Ornis Fennica, 77: 183–187.
  • 6. Gosler A.G., Greenwood J.J.D., Baker J.K., Davidson N.C. 1998 – The field determination of body size and condition in passerines: a report to the British Ringing Committee – Bird Study, 45: 92–103.
  • 7. Grant P.R. 1986 – Ecology and evolution of Darwin’s Finches. Princeton, University Press.
  • 8. Hall K.S.S., Ryttman H., Fransson T., Stol B-Ot. 2004 – Stabilising selection on wing length in reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus – J. Avian Biol. 35: 7–12.
  • 9. Hendenström A., Alerstam T. 1998 – How fast can birds migrate? – J. Avian Biol. 29: 424–432.
  • 10. Hedenström A., Rosen M. 2001 – Predator versus prey: on aerial hunting and escape strategies in birds – Behav Ecol. 12: 150–156.
  • 11. James F.C. 1982 – The ecological morphology of birds review – Ann. Zool. Fennici, 19:265–275
  • 12. Jenni L., Winkler R. 1994 – Moult and ageing of European passerines – Academic Press, London, UK.
  • 13. Norberg U.M. 1990 – Vertebrate flight: mechanics, physiology, morphology, ecology and evolution – Berlin, Springer.
  • 14. Norman S.C. 1997 – Juvenile wing shape, wing moult and weight in the family Sylviidae Ibis, 139: 617–630.
  • 15. Rising J.D., Somers K.M. 1989 – The measurement of overall body size in birds – Auk, 106: 666–674.
  • 16. Rosen M. 2003 – Birds in the Flow. Flight Mechanics, Wake Dynamics and Flight Performance - Lund University, Sweden.
  • 17. Slagsvold T. 1982 – Sex, size and natural selection in the Hooded Crow Corvus corone cornix - Ornis Scand. 13: 165–175.
  • 18. Stephan B. 1985 – Die Amsel – Neue Brehm–Bucherei 95, Ziensen, Wittenberg Lutherstadt.
  • 19. Svensson L. 1992 – Identification Guide to European Passerines – Stockholm.
  • 20. Van Balen J.H. 1967 – The significance of variation in body weight and wing length in the Great Tit, Parus major – Ardea, 55: 1–59.
  • 21. Wysocki D. 2002 – Biometrical analysis of an urban population of the Blackbird (Turdus merula) in Szczecin (NW Poland) – Ring, 24: 69–76.
  • 22. Wysocki D. 2004 – Age structure of urban population of blackbirds (Turdus merula) in Szczecin (NW Poland) – Zoologica Poloniae, 49: 219–227.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-1617-6313
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.