Morphological and genetical variability of Rubus hirtus (Waldst. & Kitt.) plants under partly open forest canopy

• Autorzy: Gazda Anna , Szwagrzyk Jerzy , Nybom Hilde , Werlemark Gun
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Blackberries growing in forests regenerate mainly in a vegetative way; however, detailed studies have shown substantial variability in performance of Rubus individuals. The main problem is if the differences among plants are genetically based, or are due to site heterogeneity? This study was aimed at determining 1) how large are the differences in performance of individual plants and how persistent they are during consecutive years, 2) how much of that variability can be explained by the local environmental conditions, especially the intensity of competition among plants, and whether the performance of individual plants is related to their genetic characteristics. In a partially cut mature beech forest in Western Carpathians 35 randomly chosen individuals of Rubus hirtus (Waldst. & Kitt.) were tagged and measured each year for 9 years. Ten largest and ten smallest individuals were selected for genetic analysis. Mean size of individual plants differed between consecutive growing seasons, but the overall size ranking was quite consistent throughout the entire period of study. Analysis of environmental variables: relative light intensity and local abundance of potential competitors explained about 24% of the differences in individual plant performance. In the genetic analysis the five primers were applied to analyse all 20 samples. The five primers produced 10 polymorphic bands, showing a high variability. Only a few samples displayed identical band patterns, indicating either vegetative propagation or apomictic origin. Distribution of the results of Spearman's rank correlation of plant size among genetically related individuals did not differ significantly from the distribution of rank correlation coefficients in the entire sample. In the analysed population genetical affinity did not seem to correlate withwith the performance of Rubus hirtus.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

clonal plants; population structure; vegetative reproduction

PL

jeżyna gruczołowata; morfologia roślin; rubus hirtus

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 55, nr 1
• Strony: 49--55
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz.,Rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Gazda Anna

• Department of Forest Botany and Nature Conservation, Agricultural University, al. 29-Listopada 46, 31-425 Kraków, Poland

autor

Szwagrzyk Jerzy

• Department of Forest Botany and Nature Conservation, Agricultural University, al. 29-Listopada 46, 31-425 Kraków, Poland

autor

Nybom Hilde

• Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Balsgard, Fjalkestadsv 123-1, 291 94 Kristianstad, Sweden

autor

Werlemark Gun

• Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Balsgard, Fjalkestadsv 123-1, 291 94 Kristianstad, Sweden

• Department of Forest Botany and Nature Conservation, Agricultural University al.29-Listopada 46, 31-425 Cracow, Poland,

Bibliografia

• 1. Alice L.A., Small C.S. 1999 – Phylogeny of Rubus (Rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences - Am. J. Bot. 86: 81–97.
• 2. Amsellem L., Noyer JL., Le Bourgeois T., Hossaert-McKey M. 2000 – Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers – Mol. Ecol. 9: 433–455.
• 3. Anderson R.C., Loucks O.L., Swain A.M. 1969 – Herbaceous response to canopy cover, light intensity and throughfall precipitation in coniferous forests – Ecology, 50: 255–263.
• 4. Crawley M.J. 1990 – The population dynamics of plants – Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 330: 125–140.
• 5. Eriksson O., Bremer B. 1993 – Genet dynamics of the clonal plant Rubus saxatilis – J. Ecol. 81: 533–542.
• 6. Friend D.T.C. 1961 – A Simple Method of Measuring Integrated Light Values in the Field – Ecology, 42: 577–580.
• 7. Gazda A. 1992 – Warunki występowania jeżyny gruczołowatej Rubus hirtus (W. K.) w rezerwacie ścisłym “Dolina Łopusznej” w Gorczańskim Parku Narodowym [Conditions of occurrence of the blackberry Rubus hirtus (W. K.) in the strict reserve “Dolina Łopusznej” in the Gorce National Park] – Par. Nar. Rez. Przyr. 11: 105–117 (in Polish).
• 8. Gazda A. 2000 – Response of Rubus hirtus to canopy gaps: results of long-term studies in Western Carpathians (In: Plant population Biology VI, Ed. P. Elias) – SEKOS, Bratislava-Nitra, pp. 120–125.
• 9. George L.O., Bazzaz F.A. 1999 – The fern understory as an ecological filter: Emergence and establishment of canopy-tree seedlings – Ecology, 80: 833–845.
• 10. Gustafsson A. 1943 – The Genesis of the European Blackberry Flora – Lunds Univ. Arsskrift 39 (6): 1–200.
• 11. Harper J.L. 1977 – The population biology of plants – Academic Press, London, UK.
• 12. Kraft T., Nybom H., Werlemark G. 1996 - DNA fingerprint variation in some blackberry species (Rubus subg. rubus, Rosaceae) - Plant Syst. Evol. 199: 93–108.
• 13. Lambrecht-McDowell S.C., Radosevich S.R. 2005 – Population demographics and trade-offs to reproduction of an invasive and non-invasive species of rubus – Biological Invasions, 7: 281 – 295
• 14. Nybom H., Bartish I.V. 2000 – Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants – Persp. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3/2: 93–114
• 15. Nybom H., Kraft T. 1995 – Application of DNA fingerprinting to the taxonomy of European blackberry species – Electrophoresis, 16: 1731–1735.
• 16. Nybom H., Schaal B.A. 1990 – DNA “fingerprints” reveal genotypic distributions in natural populations of blackberries and raspberries (Rubus, Rosaceae) – Am. J. Bot. 77: 883–888.
• 17. Pancer-Koteja E., Szwagrzyk J., Bodziarczyk J. 1998 – Small scale spatial pattern and size structure of Rubus hirtus in a canopy gap – J. Veg. Sci. 9: 755–762.
• 18. Pitelka L.F., Stanton D.S., Peckenham M.O. 1980 – Effects of light and density on resource allocation in a forest herb Aster acuminatus (Compositae) – Am. J. Bot. 67: 942–948.
• 19. Szwagrzyk J., Szewczyk J., Bodziarczyk J. 2001 – Dynamics of seedling banks in a beech forest: results of a 10-year study on germination, growth and survival – For. Ecol. Manage. 141: 237–250.
• 20. Taylor K. 2005 – Biological Flora of the British Isles: Rubus vestitus Weihe – J. Ecol. 93: 1249–1262.
• 21. Weber H. E. 1972 – Die Gattung Rubus (Rosaceae) im nordwestlichen Europa – Phanerogamarum Monogr. 7, 504 pp.