Do trees make a difference? An evaluation of the impact of riparian vegetation on the ecology of nutrient poor headwater streams

• Autorzy: O'Driscoll John F. , Harrison Simon S.C. , Giller Paul S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The presence of riparian vegetation is shown to affect both physical and biological properties of headwater streams. Riparian vegetation mediates food resource availability for macroinvertebrates and fish within streams through addition of allochthonous material such as leaves, woody debris and terrestrial invertebrates. Riparian shade can also reduce biomass and production of autochthonous algae. The potential role of riparian vegetation in enhancing biodiversity and productivity of headwater streams is discussed, with reference to improving salmonid fish stocks in the headwater streams of Ireland and Great Britain.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

allochthonous; macroinvertebrates; periphyton; riparian vegetation; shading

PL

bezkręgowce; gatunki alochtoniczne; peryfiton; środowisko wodne

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: Vol. 54, nr 4
• Strony: 695--700

Twórcy

autor

O'Driscoll John F.

• Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

autor

Harrison Simon S.C.

• Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

autor

Giller Paul S.

• Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

• Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland,

Bibliografia

• Allan J.D., Wipfli M.S., Caouette J.P., Prussian A., Rodgers J. 2003 – Influence of streamside vegetation on inputs of terrestrial invertebrates to salmonid food webs – Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60: 309–320.
• Boston H.L., Hill W.R. 1991 – Photosynthesis-light relations of stream periphyton communities – Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 644–656.
• Cummins K.W., Minshall G.W., Sedell J.R., Cushing C.E., Petersen R.C. 1984 – Stream ecosystem theory – Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 22: 1818–1827.
• Dineen G. 2005 – Terrestrial energy subsidies for salmonids. Ph.D., University College Cork.
• Dobson M., Hildrew A.G. 1992 – A test of resource limitation among shredding detritivores in low order streams in southern England – J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 69–77.
• Edwards E.D., Huryn A.D. 1996 – Effect of riparian land use on contributions of terrestrial invertebrates in streams – Hydrobiologia, 337: 151–159.
• Eggert S.L., Wallace J.B. 2003 – Reduced detrital; resources limit Pycnopsyche gentilis (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) production and growth – J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 22: 388–400.
• Franken R.J.M., Waluto B., Peeters E.T.H.M., Gradeniers J.J.P. 2005 – Growth of shredders on leaf litter biofilms: the effect of light intensity – Freshwat. Biol. 50: 459–466.
• Friberg N. 1997 – Benthic invertebrate communities in six Danish forest streams: Impact of forest type on structure and function – Ecography, 20: 19–28.
• Friberg N., Winterbourn M.J., Shearer K.A., Larsen S.E. 1997 – Benthic communities of forest streams in the South Island, New Zealand: effects of forest type and location – Arch. Hydrobiol. 138: 289–306.
• Fuller R.L., Kennedy B.P., Nielsen C. 2004 – Macroinvertebrate responses to algae and bacterial manipulations in streams – Hydrobiologia, 523: 113–126.
• Gullefors B., Petersson E. 1993 – Sexual dimorphism in relation to swarming and pair formation patterns in leptocerid caddisflies (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) – J. Insect Behav. 6: 563–577.
• Gurnell A.M., Piegay H., Swanson F.J., Gregor y S.V. 2002 – Large wood and fluvial processes – Freshwat. Biol. 47: 601–619.
• Harrison S.S.C., Hildrew A.G. 1998 – Distribution dynamics of epilithic insects in a lake littoral – Arch. Hydrobiol. 143: 275–293.
• Hawkins C.P., Murphy M.L., Anderson N.H. 1982 – Effects of canopy, substrate composition, and gradient on the structure of macroinvertebrate communities in cascade range streams of Oregon – Ecology, 63: 1840–1856.
• Heino J. 2005 – Functional biodiversity of macroinvertebrate assemblages along major ecological gradients of boreal headwater streams – Freshwat. Biol. 50: 1578–1587.
• Hill W.R., Dimick S.M. 2002 – Effects of riparian leaf dynamics on periphyton photosynthesis and light utilisation efficiency – Freshwat. Biol. 47: 1245–1256.
• Hoffmann A., Resh V.H. 2003 – Oviposition in three species of limnephilid caddisflies (Trichoptera): hierarchical influences on site selection – Freshwat. Biol. 48: 1064–1077.
• Hynes H.B.N. 1975 – The stream and its valley – Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 19: 1–15.
• Kishi D., Murakami M., Nakano S., Maekawa K. 2005 – Water temperature determines strength of top-down control in a stream food web – Freshwat. Biol. 50: 1315–1322.
• Kjeldsen K. 1996 – Regulation of algal biomass in a small lowland stream: field experiments on the role of invertebrate grazing, phosphorus and irradiance – Freshwat. Biol. 36: 535–546.
• LaRue P., Belanger L., Huot J. 1995 – Riparian edge effects on boreal balsam fir communities – Can. J. For. Res. 25: 555–566.
• Mosisch T.D., Bunn S.E., Davies P.M. 2001 – The relative importance of shading and nutrients on algal production in subtropical streams – Freshwat. Biol. 46: 1269–1278.
• Necchi O.Jr. 2004 – Light-related photosynthetic characteristics of lotic macroalgae – Hydrobiologia, 525: 139–155.
• Petersen I., Masters Z., Hildrew A.G., Ormerod S.J. 2004 – Dispersal of adult insects in catchments of differing land use – J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 934–950.
• Pretty J.L., Dobson M. 2004 – Leaf transport and retention in a high gradient stream – Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 8: 560–566.
• Quinn J.M., Cooper A.B., Stroud M.J., Burrell G.P. 1997 – Shade effects on stream periphyton and invertebrates: an experiment in streamside channels – N.Z.J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 31: 665–683.
• Richardson J.S. 1991 – Seasonal food limitation of detritivores in a montane stream: An experimental test – Ecology, 72: 873–887.
• Ridge I., Walters J., Street M. 1999 – Algal growth by terrestrial leaf litter: a realistic tool? – Hydrobiologia, 395/396: 173–180.
• Romero N., Gresswell R.E., Li J.L. 2005 – Changing patterns in coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) diet and prey in a gradient of deciduous canopies – Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 1797–1807.
• Sabater F., Butturini A., Marti E., Munoz I., Romani A., Wray J., Sabater S. 2000 – Effects of riparian vegetation on nutrient retention in a Mediterranean stream – J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 609–620.
• Smith B.J., Collier K.J. 2000 – Interactions of adult stoneflies (Plecoptera) with riparian zones. II. Diet – Aquat. Insects, 22: 285–296.
• Swanson F.J., Gregory S.V., Sedell J.R., Campbell A.G. 1982 – Land-water interactions: the riparian zone. Analysis of Coniferous Forest Ecosystems in the Western United States – Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company, Stronsburg, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 267–291.
• Sweeney B.W. 1993 – Effects of streamside vegetation on macroinvertebrate communities of White Clay Creek in Eastern North America – Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 144: 291–340.
• Sweeney B.W., Bott T.L., Jackson J.K., Kaplan L.A., Newbold J.D., Standley L.J., Hession W.C., Horwitz R.J. 2004 – Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services – Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101: 14132–14137.
• Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R., Cushing C.E. 1980 – The river continuum concept – Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.
• Wallace J.B., Eggert J.L., Meyer J.L., Webster J.R. 1999 – Effects of resource limitation on a detrital-based ecosystem – Ecol. Monogr. 69: 409–442.
• Whiles M.R., Wallace J.B. 1997 – Leaf litter decomposition and macroinvertebrate communities in headwater streams draining pine and hardwood catchments – Hydrobiologia, 353: 107–119.
• Wipfli M.S., Musslewhite J. 2004 – Density of red alder (Alnus rubra) in headwaters influences invertebrate and detritus subsidies to downstream fish habitats in Alaska – Hydrobiologia, 520: 153–163.
• Wright M.S., Covich A.P. 2005 – Relative importance of bacteria and fungi in a tropical headwater stream: Leaf decomposition and invertebrate feeding preference – Microb. Ecol. 49: 536–546.