Bioinvasions in fresh waters and the Nero dilemma

• Autorzy: Gherardi Francesca
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Human-mediated invasions of organisms are causing great harm to the environment, indigenous species, national economies, and human health. Notwithstanding Elton's (1958) prophecies, only by the mid 1980s did the negative impact of several introduced species become clear, along with the urgency to reduce the pace of bioinvasions. Often conservation biologists are faced with the Nero dilemma. Should they keep "fiddling" with their elegant experiments while biota are burning, or rather act, even before achieving a "strong verification" of their hypotheses? Indeed, we do need a comprehensive scientific understanding of the biological features, ecological effects, and spread potential of invasive species in order to be able to improve our strategies for mitigating their impacts. Abundant data have been collected during the past two decades on a growing number of case studies. The theories on bioinvasions derived from that wealth of knowledge have indeed revealed their predictive power. We should now strive towards a quick transfer of this knowledge from the laboratories to the real world.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biodiversity conservation; biological invasions; fresh waters; management

PL

bioróżnorodność; ekologia; słodka woda

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: Vol. 54, nr 4
• Strony: 549--561

Twórcy

autor

Gherardi Francesca

• Department of Animal Biology and Genetics, University of Florence, Via Romana 17, 50125 Florence, Italy

• Department of Animal Biology and Genetics, University of Florence, Via Romana 17, 50125 Florence, Italy,

Bibliografia

• Beisel J.-N. 2001 – The elusive model of a biological invasion process: time to take differences among aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems into account? – Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 13: 193–195.
• Bright C. 1998 – Life out of bounds. Bioinvasion in a borderless world – Nortin, New York.
• Byers J.E., Reichard S., Randall J.M., Parker I.M., Smith C.S., Lonsdale W.M., Atkinson I.A.E., Seastedt T.R., Williamson M., Chornesky E., Hayes D. 2002 – Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species – Cons. Biol. 16: 630–640.
• Carlton J.T. 1999 – The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans (In: Invasive species and biodiversity management, Eds: O.T. Sandlund, P.J. Schei, Å.Viken) – Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 195–212.
• Carlton J.T. 2001 – Introduced species in U.S. coastal waters: environmental impacts and management priorities – Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, Virginia, 28 pp.
• Carlton J.T. 2002 – Bioinvasion ecology: assessing invasion impact and scale (In: Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Distribution, impacts and management, Eds: E. Leppäkoski, S. Gollasch, S. Olenin) – Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht – Boston – London, pp. 7–17.
• CBD 2001 – Invasive alien species: report on existing international procedures, criteria and capacity for assessing risk from invasive alien species. Convention on Biological Diversity - Subsidiary body on scientific, technical and technological advice, Sixth meeting, Montreal, 12–16 March 2001. UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/6/INF/5.
• Clinton W.J. 1999 – Executive Order 13112. Invasive species – The White House, Washington, D.C.
• Coblentz B.E. 1990 – Exotic organisms: a dilemmafor conservation biology – Cons. Biol. 4: 261–265.
• Colautti R .I., MacIsaac H.J. 2004 – A neutral terminology to define “invasive” species Diver. Distrib. 10: 135–141.
• Copp G.H., Bianco P.G., Bogutskaya N.G., Erós T., Falka I., Ferreira M.T., Fox M.G., Freyhof J., Gozlan R.E., Grabowska J., Kováč V., Moreno-Amich R., Naseka A.M., Peňáz M., Povž M., Przybylski M., Robillard M., Russell I.C., Stakėnas S., Šumer S., Vila-Gispert A., Wiesner C. 2005 - To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish? – J. Appl. Ichthyol. 21: 242–262.
• Courtenay W.R.Jr., Stauffer J.R.Jr. (Eds) 1984 – Distribution, biology, and management of exotic fishes – John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
• Cox G.W. 2004 – Alien species and evolution – Island Press, Washington – Covelo – London.
• Cristescu M.E.A., Hebert P.D.N., Witt J.D.S., MacIsaac H.J., Grigorovich I.A. 2001 – An invasion history for Cercopagis pengoi based on mitochondrial gene sequences Limnol. Oceanogr. 46: 224–229.
• Daehler C.C., Gordon D.R. 1997 – To introduce or not to introduce: trade-offs of nonindigenous organisms – Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 424–425.
• Devine R.S. 1999 – Alien invasion: America’s battle with non-native animals and plants – National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
• Diamond J., Case T.J. 1986 – Overview: introductions, extinctions, exterminations, and invasions (In: Community Ecology, Eds: J. Diamond, T.J. Case) – Harper and Row, New York, NY, pp. 65–79.
• Elton C.S. 1958 – The ecology of invasions by animals and plants – The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, Edition 2000.
• Enserink M. 1999 – Biological invaders sweep in – Science, 285: 1834–1836.
• Ewel J.J., O’Dowd D.J., Bergelson J., Daehler C.C., D’Antonio C.M., Gomez D., Gordon D.R., Hobbs R.J., Holt A., Hopper K.R., Hughes C.E., Lahart M., Leakey R.R.B., Lee W.G., Loope L.L., Lorence D.H., Louda S.M., Lugo A.E., Mcevoy P.B., Richardson D.M., Vitous ek P.M. 1999 – Deliberate introductions of species: research needs – BioScience, 49: 619–630.
• Genovesi P. 2005 – Eradications of invasive alien species in Europe: a review – Biol. Inv. 7: 127–133.
• Gherardi F. 2000 – Are non-indigenous species “ecological malignancies”? – Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 12: 323–325.
• Gollasch S., Leppäkoski E. 1999 – Initial risk assessment of alien species in Nordic coastal waters – Nord 1999: 8. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, 244 pp.
• Gosling M. 1989 – Extinction to order – New Scientist, 121: 44–49.
• Gosling M., Baker S.J. 1989 – The eradication of muskrats and coypus from Britain - Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 38: 39–51.
• Gurevitch J., Padilla D.K. 2004 – Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? - Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 470–474.
• IUCN 2000 – IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species – Species Survival Commission (SSC), Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), Auckland, New Zealand, 14 pp. (www.issg.org)
• Jerscke J.M., Strayer D.L. 2005 – Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America – Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 102: 7198–7202.
• Karatayev A.Y., Burlakova L.E., Padilla D.K. 1997 – The effects of Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) invasion on aquatic communities in eastern Europe – J. Shellfish Res. 16: 187–203.
• Karatayev A.Y., Burlakova L.E., Padilla D.K. 2002 – Impacts of zebra mussels on aquatic communities and their role as ecosystem engineers (In: Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Distribution, impacts and management, Eds: E. Leppäkoski, S. Gollasch, S. Olenin) - Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht - Boston – London, pp. 433–446.
• Kasulo V. 2000 – The impact of invasive species in African lakes (In: The Economics of Biological Invasions, Eds: C. Perrings, M. Williamson, S. Dalmazzone) – Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 183–207.
• Kay S.H., Hoyle S.T. 2001 – Mail order, the Internet, and invasive aquatic weeds – J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 39: 88–91.
• Kolar C.S., Lodge D.M. 2001 – Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders – Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199–204.
• Kuhn T.S. 1970 – The structure of scientific revolutions – University Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Levine J.M., D’Antonio C.M. 1999 – Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invisibility – Oikos, 87: 15–26.
• Lodge D.M. 1993 – Biological invasions: lessons for ecology – Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 133–137.
• Lodge D.M., Hill A.M. 1994 – Factors governing species composition, population size, and productivity of coolwater crayfishes - Nordic J. Freshwat. Res. 69: 111–136.
• Lövei G.L. 1997 – Global change through invasion - Nature, 388: 627–628.
• MacIsaac H.J., Grigorovich I.A., Ricciardi 2001 – Reassessment of species invasions concepts: the Great Lakes basin as a model – Biol. Inv. 3: 405–416.
• Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M., Bazzaz F.A. 2000 – Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control Ecol. Applic. 10: 689–710.
• Manchester S.J., Bullock J. 2000 – The impacts of non-native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control – J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 845–864.
• McKinney M.L., Lockwood J.L. 1999 – Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction - Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 450–453.
• McShane T.O. 2003 – The devil in the detail of biodiversity conservation – Cons. Biol. 17: 1–3.
• Meinesz A. 1999 – Killer algae – University Chicago Press, Chicago, 376 pp.
• Mooney H.A., Cleland E.E. 2001 – The evolutionary impact of invasive species – Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 98: 5446–5451.
• Moyle P.B., Li H.W., Barton B.A. 1986 - The Frankenstein Effect: impact of introduced fishes on native fishes in North America (In: Fish culture in fisheries management, Ed. R.H. Strond) – American Fisheries Societies, Bethesda.
• Nalepa T.F., Hartson D.J., Fanslow D.L., Lang G.A. 2001 – Recent population changes in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) and zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in Lake St. Clair, USA – Am. Malacol. Bull. 16: 141–145.
• Occhipinti-Ambrogi A., Galil B.S. 2004 - A uniform terminology on bioinvasions: a chimera or an operative tool? – Mar. Pollut. Bull. 49: 688–694.
• Parker I.M., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Goodell K., Wonham M., Kareiva P.M., Williamson M.H., Von Holle B., Moyle P.B., Byers J.E., Goldwasser L. 1999 – Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders – Biol. Inv. 1: 3–19.
• Perrings C., Williamson M., Dalmazzone S. (Eds) 2000 – The economics of biological invasions – Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
• Perrings C., Williamson M., Barbier E.B., Delfino D., Dalmazzone S., Shogren J., Simmons P., Watkinson 2002 – Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective – Cons. Ecol. 6: 1–7.
• Perry W.L., Feder J.E., Lodge D.M. 2001 - Implications of hybridization between introduced and resident Orconectes crayfish - Cons. Biol. 15: 1656–1666.
• Perry W.L., Lodge D.M., Feder J.E. 2002 - Importance of hybridization between indigenous and nonindigenous freshwater species: an overlooked threat to North American biodiversity - Syst. Biol. 51: 255–275.
• Pimentel D., McNair S., Janecka J., Wightman J., Simmonds C., O’Connell C., Wong E., Russel L., Zern J., Aquino T., Tsomondo T. 2002 – Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions (In: Biological invasions. Economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species, Ed. D. Pimentel) – CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp. 307–329.
• Pimentel D., Zuniga R., Morrison D. 2005 – Update on the environmental costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States – Ecol. Econ. 52: 273–288.
• Primack R.B. 1998 – Essentials of conservation biology – Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
• Quinn T.P., Kinnison M.T., Unwin M.J. 2001 – Evolution of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: pattern, rate, process – Genetica, 112–113: 493–513.
• Ricciardi A. 2003 – Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions – Freshwat. Biol. 48: 972–981.
• Ricciardi A., Atkinson S.K. 2004 – Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems – Ecol. Letters, 7: 781–784.
• Ricciardi A., Neves R.J., Rasmussen J.B. 1998 – Impending extinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionida) following the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion – J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 613–619.
• Rosenzweig M. 2001 – The four questions: what does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity? – Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 361–367.
• Rouland P. 1985 – Les castors canadiens de la Puisaye – Bulletin Mensuel de l’Office National de la Chasse, 91: 35–40. (in French)
• Scalera R., Zaghi D. 2004 – Alien species and nature conservation in the EU. The role of the LIFE program – LIFE Focus, European Commission, Brussels, 59 pp.
• Schardt J.D. 1997 – Maintenance control (In: Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida, Eds: D. Simberloff, D.C. Schmidt, T.C. Brown) – Island Press, Washington D.C., USA, pp. 229–243.
• Seehausen O., Witte F., Katunzi E.F., Smits J., Bouton N. 1997 – Patterns of the remnant cichlid fauna in southern Lake Victoria – Cons. Biol. 11: 890–904.
• Shea K., Chesson P. 2002 – Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions - Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 170–176.
• Simberloff D. 2003a – Confronting introduced species: a form of xenophobia? – Biol. Inv. 5: 179–192.
• Simberloff D. 2003b – How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? – Cons. Biol. 17: 83–92.
• Simberloff D., Von Holle B. 1999 – Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? – Biol. Inv. 1: 21–32.
• Soulé M.E. 1986 – Conservation biology and the “real world” (In: Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity, Ed. M.E. Soulé) – Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA, pp. 1–12.
• Strayer D.L. 1999 – Effects of alien species on freshwater mollusks in North America – J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 18: 74–98.
• Strayer D.L., Caraco N.F., Cole J.J., Findlay S., Pace M.L. 1999 – Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves BioScience, 49: 19–27.
• Torchin M.E., Lafferty K.D., Dobson A.P., McKenzie V.J., Kuris A.M. 2003 - Introduced species and their missing parasites - Nature, 421: 628–630.
• Vermeij G.J. 1996 – An agenda for invasion biology – Biol. Cons. 78: 3–9.
• Walker B.H., Steffen W. 1997 – An overview of the implications of global change for natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems - Cons. Ecol. 2: 2.
• Walters C.J., Holling C.S. 1990 – Largescale management experiments and learningby-doing – Ecology, 71: 2060–2068.
• Wilcove D.S., Rothstein D., Dubow J., Phillips A., Losos E. 1998 – Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States – BioScience, 48: 607–615.
• Williamson M. 1996 – Biological invasions Chapman and Hall, London.
• Williamson M. 1999 – Invasions – Ecography, 22: 5–12.
• Williamson M., Fitter A. 1996 – The varying success of invaders – Ecology, 77: 1666–1670.