Adaptive changes in morphology of Daphnia filter appendages in response to food stress

• Autorzy: Bednarska Anna
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Morphological adaptations of Daphnia filtration apparatus in response to unsuitable food conditions are examined and set against earlier published data. To maximize food gathering under limiting food conditions, Daphnia can respond morphologically by plastic changes in the size and structure of its filter apparatus. Under low food quantity and/or poor quality, the area of Daphnia filter screen increases and the mesh size decreases.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

adaptations; filter appendages morphology; phenotypic plasticity

PL

dafnia; Daphnia; plankton; rozwielitki

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: Vol. 54, nr 4
• Strony: 663--668

Twórcy

autor

Bednarska Anna

• Department of Hydrobiology, Warsaw University, Banacha 2, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland

• Department of Hydrobiology, Warsaw University, Banacha 2, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland,

Bibliografia

• Abrusán G. 2003 – The role of fluid mechanics in the feeding ecology of planktonic cladocerans – PhD thesis, Department of Hydrobiology, Warsaw University.
• Abrusán G. 2004 – Filamentous cyanobacteria, temperature and Daphnia growth: the role of fluid mechanics – Oecologia, 141: 395–401.
• Brendelberger H. 1985 – Filter mesh – size and retention efficiency for small particles: comparative studies with Cladocera – Ergeb. Limnol. 21: 135–146.
• Brendelberger H. 1991 – Filter mesh size of cladocerans predicts retention efficiency for bacteria – Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 884–894.
• Brendelberger H., Geller W. 1985 – Variability of filter structures in eight Daphnia species: mesh sizes and filtering areas – J. Plankton Res. 7: 473–486.
• Brendelberger H., Herbeck M., Lamg H., Lamper t W. 1986 – Daphnia’s filters are not solid walls – Arch. Hydrobiol. 107: 197–202.
• Cannon H.G. 1933 – On the feeding mechanism of the Branchiopoda – Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B, 222: 267–352.
• Egloff D.A., Palmer D.S. 1971 – Size relations of the filtering area of two Daphnia species – Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 900–905.
• Geller W., Müller H. 1981 – The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity – Oecologia, 49: 316–321.
• Gerritsen J., Porter K.G. 1982 – The role of surface chemistry in filter feeding by zooplankton – Science, 216: 1225–1227.
• Gerritsen J., Porter K.G., Strickler J.R. 1988 – Not by sieving alone: Observations of suspension feeding in Daphnia – Bull. Mar. Sci. 43: 366–376.
• Ghadouani A., Pinel-Alloul B. 2002 – Phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia pulicaria as an adaptation to high biomass of colonial and filamentous cyanobacteria: experimental evidence – J. Plankton Res. 24: 1047–1056.
• Gliwicz Z.M. 1969 – The share of algae, bacteria and trypton in the food of the pelagic zooplankton of lake with various trophic characteristics – Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. 17: 159–165.
• Gophen M., Geller W. 1984 – Filter mesh size and food particle uptake by Daphnia – Oecologia, 64: 408–412.
• Koehl M.A.R. 1996 – When does morphology matter? – Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:501–542.
• Koza V., Kořínek V. 1985 – Adaptability of the filtration screen in Daphnia: another answer to the selective pressure of the environment – Ergeb. Limnol. 21: 193–198.
• Lampert W. 1994 – Phenotypic plasticity of the filter screens in Daphnia: adaptation to a lowfood environment – Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 997–1006.
• Lampert W., Brendelberger H. 1996 – Strategies of phenotypic low-food adaptation in Daphnia: filter screens, mesh sizes and appendage beat rates – Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 216–223.
• Pop M. 1991 – Mechanisms of the filtering area adaptation in Daphnia – Hydrobiologia, 225: 169–176.
• Reinikainen M., Repka S. 2003 – Phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits and feeding appendages in two species of Daphnia fed a natural phytoplankton assemblage – Aquatic Ecology, 37: 409–415.
• Repka S., Veen A., Vijverberg J. 1999 – Morphological adaptations in filtering screens of D. galeata to food quantity and food quality – J. Plankton Res. 21: 971–989.
• Rubenstein D.I., Koehl M.A.R. 1977 – The mechanisms of filter feeding: some theoretical considerations – Am. Nat. 111: 981–994.
• Storch O. 1924 – Morphologie und Physiologie des Fangapparates der Daphniden – Ergebn. Fortschr. Zool. 61: 125–234.
• Stuchlík E. 1991 – Feeding behaviour and morphology of filtering combs of Daphnia galeata – Hydrobiologia, 225: 155–167.
• Villalobos L. 2002 – Comparison of the filtration structures in South American Daphnia –Arch. Hydrobiol. 154: 647–663.
• Villalobos L., Geller W. 1997 – Setular bosses: Report of a new ultrafine structure on the filter appendages of Daphnia – Arch. Hydrobiol. 140: 565–575.
• Voigt H., Hülsmann S. 2001 – Do fast increasing food conditions promote the midsummer decline of Daphnia galeata? – Hydrobiologia, 442: 253–259.
• Wildish D., Kristmanson D. 1997 – Benthic suspension feeders and flow – Chapter 5, Cambridge University Press.